ESPN - “What college football coaches are saying about sign stealing”

Submitted by VintageRandy on October 24th, 2023 at 9:22 AM

Interesting article posted this morning on ESPN: https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/38727764/what-college-football-coaches-saying-sign-stealing

A bit more balanced of reporting than what we’ve seen over the weekend, giving more voice to coaches that think this isn’t a big deal. Still quite a bit of grumbling featured in the article but the tone is a departure from the pearl clutching going on from Thamel, Mandel, etc.

Buffalowing Blue

October 24th, 2023 at 10:04 AM ^

Or how about just be friggin simple and send your subs in with plays or however they called plays long before holding up signs.  This shit is a big joke at this point.  We all knew they were after Harbaugh when they made him stop satellite camps and busted Michigan for doing too many jumping jacks after practice.  This has been coming for a long time.  Whatever Harbaugh did to the NCAA they've been attacking him ever since.  You'd figure they'd be fine with Michigan being good again since its a top program that generates tons of money.

dragonchild

October 24th, 2023 at 10:13 AM ^

There's the rub though.  Every offense has a two-minute drill, and some go tempo the whole game.

Even if you have your opponent's signs, it takes extra steps to use them.  You need to read the opponent's call, communicate it to the DC, dial up your answer to it, communicate that to the defense, get the defense set. . . a lot of that is SOP, but the first two steps are exclusive to sign stealing, arguably even the third.  So you're going to increase your operational complexity. . . while the opponent's going tempo??  And what if the opponent switches the play at the line?

This may have been relevant like twenty years ago, but today, how would you even capitalize on the information?

crg

October 24th, 2023 at 10:39 AM ^

I'm not arguing that trying to capture & counter an opponent's sign is any kind of significant benefit in this day and age - far from it, in fact.  There are so many signs - each to a specific skill group within offenses and defenses these days - that it would be nearly impossible to try and counter them in real time... even if their encryption had been successfully broken in advance.

I'm just pointing out people are using them now as opposed to running in the plays as of old.

Any claims about yielding an "advantage" are almost entirely bogus, which is why it is rather sad that this young Conner kid (mid 20s, right?) may have just ended his career in college sports over something so relatively meaningless.

maizedNblued

October 24th, 2023 at 11:33 AM ^

You forget the change in the substitution rule slows down the play which allows the defense to slowly sub personnel, figure out the play-call and adjust accordingly. The up-tempo is not as much "up-tempo" anymore unless the offense keeps the same personnel in the game (very seldom). Knowing a team's signs is a HUGE advantage.

Durham Blue

October 24th, 2023 at 12:49 PM ^

Sounds a little like trying to count cards in blackjack, which I have tried many times to do.  It's not easy because dealers are typically pretty fast and you have to count quickly and accurately.  And your subsequent moves are based on a bunch of scenarios which you need to have memorized.  Counting is glorified in movies as some get rich quick thing but in reality it's a very slow and tedious walk up the mountain with a lot of pitfalls along the way.  Counting is a mental grind and it's not much fun.  Plus, I like to partake in the free drinks while playing and actually, ya know, have some fun.  Don't drink and count.

maizenblue92

October 24th, 2023 at 9:29 AM ^

This story is like catnip for online people because everyone gets to play true crime detective. It is time for people to take a step and breathe. It is likely something occured but the competitive advantage gained was minimal. The only people suggesting punishment this season are Stew Mandel and Buckeyes but that would deviate from the stated NCAA protocol and leave them massively exposed to a lawsuit. If the NCAA follows protocol and punishes Michigan, the AD will likely take it as is. However, if the NCAA violates stated protocol, that is something I could see a beaurcrat like Warde taking offense to and acting on. 

maizedNblued

October 24th, 2023 at 12:09 PM ^

Understood but please remember, the NCAA receives much of their opinion-based information from their membership and more specifically, what AD's and Head Coaches say.....very seldom is it someone objectively "standing on their own two feet" making the call without any input from the athletic programs. The bottom line is someone sending spies to games to film sidelines for an entire game and then bringing it back to a fleet of "analysts" to break down and decipher is shady....anyone with a brain can see that. The question is how many other schools do it....because it ain't just us. And that right there is why the NCAA considers it "minimal". 

Gohokego

October 24th, 2023 at 12:08 PM ^

To decode the signs in real time and get that communicated to your players and have them get lined up and ready to go in 15-20 seconds would be something pretty unbelievable.  Also it's not like they're just holding up 1 sign.  They have a different sign for each position group plus dummy signs. 

If they had minutes between plays that would be pretty amazing still. 

The biggest change since 2020 ended was bringing Mike Mcdonald and Jesse Minter. Nfl level coaching vs not good coaching. 

bdneely4

October 24th, 2023 at 9:37 AM ^

Well, we know what Ryan Day says about it.  His team lost because we were stealing signs, it was cold, his team was sick because of our sign stealing, Hassan Haskins ran through their tough defense because we stole their signs, Donovan Edwards ran through their defense because we stole their signs.  They had to bring the house most every play because we stole their signs.  They have only had one bad half because we stole their signs.  Lou Holtz questioned OSUs toughness because we stole their signs.  What did I leave out?

Blinkin

October 24th, 2023 at 9:37 AM ^

"I'm going to admit to this," said Berry, who was last a head coach at Louisiana Monroe in 2015, "I would have fans that would go to opponents' games and film their sidelines and film just on their phones, their smartphones and then send me that stuff." But, he added, "I didn't look at it because that was wrong."

Oh really, and were you just holding those drugs for a friend?  And those magazines under the mattress, you only read those for the articles, right?  

"It's been a problem for a long time. We need to resolve it."

Has it been around for a long time?  Absolutely.  Is it a problem?  Does it need to be resolved?  That is less clear, I think.  If it was such a "problem," there'd be no shortage of energy and consensus to fix it.  The fact that there ISN'T is telling.  Too many people view sign stealing as part of the game, too many coaches enjoy doing it.

"No one's that good," a Big Ten coordinator said.

MSU had fair public warning and it didn't help them.  OSU admitted to changing their signs specifically for Michigan in 2022 and they lost by more than 2021.  When teams keep failing to get into so much as goal-to-go situations against Michigan, even AFTER being warned, then maybe it's time to admit that yes, someone is that good.  And that someone is Michigan. 

dieseljr32

October 24th, 2023 at 9:40 AM ^

The way all of this has been reported and reacted to seems wayyy overboard. I've never seen anything like it.  Everybody is jumping to some sort of conclusion when honest-to-God, I'm not even trying to play dumb or obtuse, I'm still trying to figure out exactly what the big deal is and why people are losing their minds? Is it just because it's Michigan?

 

njvictor

October 24th, 2023 at 10:07 AM ^

I feel the same way. The amount of people who don't know what is currently legal and what Michigan actually did is making social media unusable right now. The competitive advantage Michigan got from doing this was slim to none and the NCAA Board of Directors literally admitted to it:

The Board of Directors Infractions Process Committee requested that the Legislative Committee Modernization of the Rules Subcommittee focus its rules modernization efforts on identifying rules that no longer serve the needs of the membership and the 21st century student-athlete, and recommending modifications to or the elimination of such rules. Specifically, livestreams of intercollegiate competition and prerecorded game film are readily available in the digital age. The minimal competitive advantage gained by scouting future opponents in-person is outweighed by the monitoring and enforcement burdens of ensuring compliance with the legislation

But people are acting like we somehow telepathically new every play and that we should get the death penalty for it

M-Dog

October 24th, 2023 at 12:20 PM ^

The NCAA itself has acknowledged, sign-stealing affords "minimal competitive advantage."

So, the fair Michigan punishment should be to go back and dock us a field goal from the score of each of our games.

OK, dock us a touchdown just to be safe.

OK, dock us two touchdowns just to be safe.

OK, dock us three touchdowns just to be safe. 

What's that you say?  Still doesn't matter.

Wendyk5

October 24th, 2023 at 10:17 AM ^

It's because the media has learned how to create a frenzy through how they frame and tell stories. Not just sports but politics as well. They're putting on a gladiator show, with heroes and villains, and taking sides is deeply ingrained in us. All for the almighty dollar. We're not immune to it, either. All those Mel Tucker threads had a ton of interest and comments. 

bdneely4

October 24th, 2023 at 10:24 AM ^

This is exactly right.  Reporters know they have two of the largest fanbases in the world completely enthralled in this news and they will get clicks galore no matter what they put out.  Most of what has been reported is pure speculation but is being reported as facts.  This fuels both fanbases.

njvictor

October 24th, 2023 at 12:48 PM ^

I've literally had opposing fanbases get mad at me on social media for saying "if the allegations prove to bet true" as if this investigation isn't brand new and all of the evidence produced so far is just allegations and hearsay. They're treating everything said so far as fact and are cheering for the hammer to come down

Ernis

October 24th, 2023 at 10:25 AM ^

Come on now, the Mel Tugger saga had far more organic drama and intrigue than this. All of the outrage about this is a massive reach due to sensationalism combined with the appalling dearth of media literacy in the US. A college football coach sexually harassing an anti-sexual harassment counselor by cranking his hog on the phone with her, unsolicited, and losing tens of millions of dollars as a result? That's some dark, twisted shit straight out of "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" - no embellishment necessary.

St Joe Blues

October 24th, 2023 at 9:41 AM ^

Some teams push the boundaries more than others, but ultimately coaches say it's not hard to tell when you've been skunked.

A former head coach said it's simple. If a defense blows up your bubble screen three times in a row, chances are they have your number and you better switch things up and hope your players don't get confused.

It sounds to me like every team was stealing Michigan's signs in years past. Otherwise, how do you explain that they stopped all our great RBs when they tried to run into a stacked box over and over again. Stealing signs is the only answer that makes sense.

/s

BlueMk1690

October 24th, 2023 at 9:46 AM ^

If Michigan is 6-2 no-one gives a shit about this. The investigation is typical in-conference vendetta where they throw everything at you because you're at the top of the league and they can't deal with it. If you're a top dog, you gotta expect that they'll pull that crap on you.