NC St goes down to Wake

Submitted by Ajcoss on November 8th, 2018 at 11:04 PM

That top 15 juggernaut team in the ACC, just lost at home to an under 500 Wake Forest Team. Wow, you could see from a mile away this NC St. team is not a top 25 team.

1VaBlue1

November 9th, 2018 at 7:25 AM ^

Well, I don't wish that on anybody.  But that being the case, he should absolutely be home!  We missed out on Lloyd being on the committee because of his health.  He wanted to spend his time with family, not football.  And that's a choice anyone can make with a clear conscience.

bronxblue

November 8th, 2018 at 11:16 PM ^

There's a very real chance that Clemson won't play a top-25 team (as ranked at the end of the year) all season, yet there's just this assumption that they're an elite team.  And I think they are a very good team, but much like the SEC it feels like the very top of the conference is probably hiding just how mediocre the middle and bottom are.

bronxblue

November 9th, 2018 at 1:51 PM ^

Clemson beat a 5-4 A&M team by 2 points on a fluky-ish finish, by 4 to Syracuse (admittedly with their backup QB), and have played the S&P+ 87, 40, 75, and 104th teams the past 4 weeks (though with NCSU losing to Wake my guess is the 87 will go down a bit and the 40 will go up).  

By comparison, Michigan has beaten the 65, 13, 30, and 12 teams.  I'm not someone who believes whole-heartedly in resume alone, but their schedule is 88th in the country for a reason, and there's a fair argument to be made that until we see their offense go against anything approximating a good defense we don't know how they'll hold up. A&M's is the best they've seen at 30, and they couldn't crack 30 points against them.  For comparison, Michigan has faced at least 4 top-40 defenses just off the top of my head and did pretty well against them.

Njia

November 9th, 2018 at 5:23 AM ^

Most of college football sucks ass this season. It’s not just the ACC. In the B1G, we could theoretically have a 5-7 Northwestern team playing for the championship in Indianapolis. That’s ... remarkable? Is that the word?

The SEC and PAC-12 are equally awful. I can count on one finger the number of teams in both of those conferences (combined) who could go head-to-head with Michigan.

JPC

November 9th, 2018 at 8:24 AM ^

Wouldn't the middle and lower level teams by definition be "mediocre":

me·di·o·cre

/ˌmēdēˈōkər/

adjective

  1. of only moderate quality; not very good.

 

The problem with the ACC isn't that the not very good teams aren't very good - it's that there's one good team and a lot of filler. 

Bambam

November 8th, 2018 at 11:37 PM ^

I wish the committee were available for questioning on why they think the ACC is so good. Clemson is the only team that should be ranked from that conference. 

NC State, Syracuse, and BC are all frauds. 

xtramelanin

November 9th, 2018 at 5:28 AM ^

nice marbling of the cut, though it is tending to the fatty side of things.  shows as a grain fed, not grass fed shirt.  oddly enough it appears that you will find them mingling with herds of shirts of hairy fat guys.  unsure if the hair gets on the meat.  

wildbackdunesman

November 9th, 2018 at 5:50 AM ^

Gee this proves how great the ACC (aka SEC Jr.) is.  Even their bottom feeders can go on the road and beat powerhouses.

I'd bump every ACC and SEC team in the rankings after last night.