Jack Harbaugh

March 5th, 2018 at 4:50 PM ^

Or is it just you being a fan? And if it’s you being a fan, why did this warrant it’s own thread instead of just posting in one of the other 6 bracketology threads we’ve had in the last 24 hours?

Joined: 10/31/2014

MGoPoints: 2216

Gulogulo37

March 5th, 2018 at 7:37 PM ^

Well, if you actually wanna be taken seriously, don't be too much of a homer.

I have no idea how realistic your bracket is. But if you want to show you have your own ideas about this stuff and that you're serious about it, maybe write something more than the bracket. Like, what changed compared to the last bracket? When you have outliers compared to most other brackets (like Michigan as a 2), why do you think they will be a 2 other than saying you love Michigan?

Joined: 03/16/2010

MGoPoints: 28315

sportzfan81

March 5th, 2018 at 4:53 PM ^

You have Texas and UCLA both playing in the "First Four" games. I am under the impression that in order for Michigan to move all the way up to a 2-seed (or likely hold on to a 3-seed) that UCLA and Texas have to win some games in their conference tournament...which if they did do would more than likely play them off of those play-in game lines. Just my opinion though. Everything else seems like just as good of a guess as anybody else's.

Joined: 05/20/2011

MGoPoints: 1072

M2GoBlue

March 5th, 2018 at 5:02 PM ^

Not to be a dick, but it looks like you went to ESPN, ripped Lunardi's bracket, and then just moved some things around to make it unrealistically favorable for UM.

Joined: 11/14/2010

MGoPoints: 513

San Diego Mick

March 5th, 2018 at 11:36 PM ^

so pay the man.

 

But no seriously, as I perused all the teams in that bracket, no one scares me, any game can be tough of course but I like our chances to win it all this year.

Make no mistake about it folks, we are a match-up nightmare for anyone, just ask MSU and Purdue.

Joined: 05/11/2011

MGoPoints: 50644

corundum

March 5th, 2018 at 5:44 PM ^

So people are just upvoting this content because it's wet dream level homerism? If WD made a more realistic bracket and posted it to the board, it would probably be a 3/-53 vote split.

Joined: 05/10/2012

MGoPoints: 47323

Boner Stabone

March 5th, 2018 at 9:50 PM ^

Looking at your bracket, it is almost identical to Lunardi.  I have 3 differences in my brackt to Lunardi's.  I have Penn St, Louisville, and Syracuse in and he has them out while Lunardi has Kansas St, Providence, and Alabama in while I have them out.

My number 1 seeds are different too, as I have Virginia, Villanova, Duke, and Kansas, where I think he has Xavier instead of Duke.

Joined: 01/06/2015

MGoPoints: 24051