Tunneler

November 23rd, 2022 at 6:56 AM ^

The contract is a huge mistake no matter who is paying for it, because he’s a horseshit coach. It is the silver lining in that loss to MSU last year.

UMForLife

November 23rd, 2022 at 6:56 AM ^

So, the source itself debunked the idea that he donated most if not all of the contract. No wonder MSU is fighting to block FOIA. How are their administrators, trustees and fans going to spin this? That is too much money to be funded by the school on their own. 

UMForLife

November 23rd, 2022 at 9:07 AM ^

So they knew all that B1G adding USC and the new contract etc before they signed the contract? 

Regardless, it is still too much money based on the going market rate. They were paying more than top tier coaches were getting for a coach who had a career average of .500

JonnyHintz

November 23rd, 2022 at 8:40 AM ^

That is too much money to be funded by the school on their own. 
 

How do you figure? $9.5 million per year is a pretty insignificant drop in the bucket for a p5 athletic program. With the donor chipping in, it’s now $8.1 million. 
 

Now, it may not be a wise use of that money. But that’s a separate debate altogether. If MSU has trouble generating $8 million dollars per year, they have some major issues to sort out that go beyond the field of play. 

DelhiWolverine

November 23rd, 2022 at 10:34 AM ^

How do you figure? $9.5 million per year is a pretty insignificant drop in the bucket for a p5 athletic program. With the donor chipping in, it’s now $8.1 million. 

Insignificant? That's just plain wrong. You have to look at the entire Athletics Department Spending. Check out MSU's R&E for athletics in 2021 - they are $15MM in the hole.

Looking at things in that context, Tuck's $9.5MM contract is a HUGE deal.

JonnyHintz

November 23rd, 2022 at 12:40 PM ^

Nah, YOU need to look at the entire athletics department spending. A large chunk of their “spending” is simply a write-off to balance the budget for both the Athletics Department and the school itself. 
 

For example, schools are charging athletic departments for the scholarship cost of the athletes. Now obviously, the athletic departments aren’t actually paying the school $30k+ for each full-ride scholarship an athlete gets. But it’s being included in the budgets. 
 

If you think the MSU Athletics Department is ACTUALLY operating at a $15m loss, I don’t know what to tell you. They bring in way more money than they’re actually spending. 
 

Also, the $8.1 million isn’t money that has to be generated on top of their deficit already. Coaching salary is already part of those expenses. So any additional costs to the previous contract are what needs to be generated. So what, $3 million maybe? Yeah, that’s a drop in the bucket in an athletic budget over $100 million. 

SBayBlue

November 23rd, 2022 at 10:56 AM ^

Well, they did cut their swimming program. While not a major sport, most schools have a swim team, even in D3. Granted it was done before Tuck's big contract, but they're now trying to justify reinstatement. His contract makes it that much more difficult to do so.

Assuming they have the same results over the next few years, this can't help the finances of the athletic department as a whole.

jmblue

November 23rd, 2022 at 11:43 AM ^

They can afford to pay his salary, I imagine.  But the problem is if he flops as a coach.  If you fire him, you've got to pay his contract (it's apparently fully guaranteed) and pay a new coach's, too. That's a lot of dead money.  The contract pretty much forces them to stick it out with Tucker for a long time.

JonnyHintz

November 24th, 2022 at 12:56 PM ^

Cutting a program that is dead weight financially doesn’t mean they can’t afford it. Just because you CAN afford to keep propping up a program that is hemorrhaging money, doesn’t mean it’s a good investment to do so. The ROI on a football coach is significantly higher than a swimming and diving team.

1VaBlue1

November 23rd, 2022 at 8:03 AM ^

Doesn't matter...  MeLLLLLL will be rowing that dinghy all on his own for another 5 years, at least.  Nobody - not MSU, not any donors - will spend $85M on a buyout.  So as long as MeLLLLLL has an agent worth a nickel he's not leaving on his own or with any settled buyout that differs from the contract.  They're stuck.  I say 5 years because, at some point, the buyout cost comes down to a more affordable amount.  Is that 5 years?  Four?  Seven?  I dunno, but it will become sustainable at some point.

The question left to be answered is how far a coach like MeLLLLLL can crater a program before he can be reasonably removed?  A few more years like this one...  Would MSU ever be able to recover?