Iowa Postgame Presser: Jim Harbaugh Comment Count

Adam Schnepp

29782633160_5e92a015cb_z

[Upchurch/MGoBlog]

There are portions of my audio where I couldn’t hear because of the reverberations of Iowa folks celebrating, so I pieced together what I could.

What was happening with the offense tonight? Seemed like it was misfiring.

“Not enough—we didn’t make enough plays to extend drives and get first downs. Missed some deep throws. Close. Just…you know, give Iowa credit. They tackled, they blocked, they played a very good football game. So, congratulate them and move on.”

How about your defense? They stood tall pretty much the whole game, it seemed like. Stribling had a big interception. Talk about what

“Yeah, they—I thought they played well most of the ballgame and it was a low-scoring, hard-fought football game.”

Did you think with the facemask, I didn’t see it, but did you see it from your field position?

“I didn’t see it either.”

Did you get any explanation?

“No.”

What did you tell your team after this game?

“Big things and every little thing isn’t going to go our team’s way or anybody’s way. Every little thing doesn’t always go your way, and we’ll make—to make it a win you’ve got to make it that way. We didn’t do enough to make it that way tonight.”

[After THE JUMP: more words]

Do you still feel like this team’s goal are in front of them?

“Yes.”

Did Wilton’s shoulder affect him late in the game?

“It might have a little bit. I thought he threw a good ball there to Amara, the last one, and then he threw a real good one to Jehu as well, the one that got intercepted—or got taken away. And then the last one, I thought Amara’s hand was getting held down, but every little thing doesn’t go your way. I thought he played well tonight.”

There were two Power 5 teams that went down today at home [Clemson and Washington]. How hard is it in your mind [something about going undefeated]?

“It’s difficult but not insurmountable.”

You don’t know much about this team after a loss, this season in particular. How do you think that they’ll respond?

“We’re all going to do our jobs. I mean, that’s part of my job. I’m not the only one, but a big part of my job is to make sure we respond.”

Did anything they did defensively surprise you today?

“They—there were some wrinkles. They played well. They played hard. They set the edge extremely well. They tackled well. Had good coverage.”

The Devin Bush targeting call: did you think that was targeting?

“I did not, no.”

In the running game, did you guys feel like you’d have a little more success against the running game? Especially on first down, they got some pretty big gains.

“Yeah, we would’ve liked to have more production there.”

When they lose the way they lost last week, [I can’t hear most of the question on my recording but it was about whether Michigan lost focus]?

“We just didn’t get it done tonight. We didn’t do enough to make it go our way.”

Comments

NateVolk

November 13th, 2016 at 1:46 PM ^

I wouldn't want any other coach in charge right now.   

They are going to Columbus in two weeks with everything on the line and they are going to pull through that day.

The people trashing Harbaugh or turning on certain players over one hard fought loss by a measly point, are pathetic excuses for fans.

They'll be the first ones pounding their chests exhalting the greatness of the team after the next big win. It's like they never watched or played sports in their lives.

 

AlbanyBlue

November 13th, 2016 at 1:48 PM ^

Dead-on comment about this happening to (almost) every team once a year. 

A road, night game. Unfamiliar environment. Seemed like a game where Michigan was down a notch in every facet, including play-calling. RS Soph QB, dinged up to boot. And we didn't get breaks, we had turnovers, and there was O'Neill.

A perfect storm, really, but at least we still control our fate.

It is frustrating though, that this team has been ass on the road for a decade or more. 

Also, Brown seems like Durkin in important games. Scheme is off, can't stop the run. I would think Brown would be an upgrade, so it must be the Jimmies and Joes.

With better players, maybe this team doesn't lose road, night games in a couple years.

thethirdcoast

November 13th, 2016 at 1:52 PM ^

I know JH draws a lot of inspiration from Bo, and rightfully so. However, this whole game just has this aura of the 1985 debacle around it, and in some ways it feels like JH is channeling some of Bo's worst tendencies from those days.

I also don't appreciate some of the extra-curriculars JH has indulged in, and I think they may have served as a bit of a distraction during the past few weeks. Being the University's most visible face is cool. Running all over to be a celebrity guest in the midst of football season is pushing it.

robpollard

November 13th, 2016 at 2:12 PM ^

...but that UM-Minn game allowed us to fill our required quota of losing to a running QB at least once per year. It's in the state of Michigan constitution.

BTW, while quickly Googling Rickey Foggie, I came across this. Be careful with the "Like" button on Twitter, everyone!

http://www.twincities.com/2016/05/26/rickey-foggie-eagan-coaching-job-l…

Gulo Gulo Luscus

November 13th, 2016 at 2:17 PM ^

RPS numbers won't be good. Iowa offense was actually moving it with good old rock and hit us with a few timely scissors. Defensively they positioned to contain the edge well and stuffed a couple head-scratching runs we sent outside the tackle anyway.

It is beyond my pay grade to say if we got outcoached. I just know we have the better one and still lost. Harbaugh has proven brilliant and this is what he means that every game is a championship game. Every opponent is to be respected. Even Ferentz, target of much mockery here (and for good reason), can rise to the occasion against a superior opponent.

On the fuield the Jimmys and Joes followed suit. Iowa couldn't pass but was solid in the trenches against our monster DL and Wadley was fantastic. Their defense was fine but we had chances. The game was lost on Wilton missing a couple likely TD deep balls and receivers failing to bring in a couple challenging but critical catches.

Positive takeaway: Kenny Allen hits a clutch 51yd FG on the road. At the time I thought he'd miss and was bitching about four down territory and the previous play call.

Sten Carlson

November 13th, 2016 at 2:19 PM ^

^^^ x1000!

Yes Uncle Fred, PERSPECTIVE!!!

It's like many on this board never watch CFB, or have a selective set of criteria when comparing Michigan to the every other team in the nation.  That unstoppable juggernaut, OSU, the one so many are terrfied of, JUST DID THE SAME THING in a night game against PSU -- at team that we destroyed!  Many mocked their ignorant fanbase for being up in arms, and yet here are many Michigan fans wringing their hands and looking for answers.

Did  you guys happen to catch that Clemson team lose to Pitt, at home?  Its happens to almost everyone.

The answer is simple: Michigan had a chance to stamp out the hope and will of an overmatched team, on the road, at night, and the didn't do it.  It was a team effort, and dispite some iffy play calling, Michigan STILL had a very good chance to win -- needing only a first down to seal the deal (sound familiar?). 

Does a 5th year senior Wilton Speight make those throws?  I see no reason to doubt that given his current trajectory.  But, this isn't 5th year senior Wilton Speight, it's RS Soph Wilton Speight making his 10th start, on the road, at night, against a fired up (and at least resonably talented and well-coached team) with nothing to lose.

Michigan failed to convert 3-4 plays that change the entire complextion of the game.  If all of our losses are like this, where it comes down to needing to make one stop, or convert one 1st down to win, I'll take that.  Under Hoke this is a 21 point decimation.

UMgradMSUdad

November 13th, 2016 at 2:36 PM ^

The defense played well enough to win (allowing only 12 points). It just seemed like a confluence of elements that are easier to see in hindsight:

 A night away game against a team that has the coaching and players to be a good team but who is coming off an embarrassing loss the week before and are 0-3 in their previous 3 home games .  

Playing a team who is fighting for bowl eligibility and probably more importantly pride and  respectability

18-23 year old players listening to the hype and looking ahead to "The Game"

A QB whose only similar experience was last year as a backup brought in in the 4th quarter

I also question the wisdom of trying to cover everything up in the locker room; it seems it would be more productive to laugh at the locker room decor or ignore it than draw even more attention to it and act like the color pink will somehow influence the play of the team. 

Fezzik

November 13th, 2016 at 3:07 PM ^

Speight's game has really came along but his home run throws have just been bad. Darboh was routinely beating guys deep. If only we connected on just one of them...

Beat Rutgerland

November 13th, 2016 at 3:38 PM ^

Out game-planned by Iowa combined with what Harbaugh said, a sort of critical mass of little things going wrong. It sucks but it's football. I don't know if we're going to beat OSU, because OSU might be the best team in the country. I still absolutely believe that we have a credible chance of beating that team, and also of eventually proving ourselves to be the best team in the country, and at the very least this team will show up prepared and ready to compete in Columbus. And having everything to play for in November is such a ridiculous improvement over where this program has been over the past decade, that even after a loss we still need to be counting our blessings.

MGoStrength

November 13th, 2016 at 5:24 PM ^

I think it's really hard to go undefeated.  Don't get me wrong, I'd love to go undefeated, and once you lose one game you now have the chance to lose more than one game.  But, that being said, being undefeated can cause a build up of pressure.  For a team that is not accostumed to being under pressure of being undefeated, this may actually feel like a weight lifted off their shoulders.  If this helps us to re-focus, be hungry, and play loose against OSU, than I'm all for this one loss.  

 

This one loss won't lose the season.  The only problem is if this loss is a sign of things to come.  But, that is still to be decided and it's too early to tell.  Here's to hoping we make a positive out of this loss.

Esterhaus

November 13th, 2016 at 6:32 PM ^

 

Iowa adjusted effectively, we did not. Those here quasi-joking this game reminded them of DeBord running the same damn ineffective alignments and plays are not so far off the mark. We failed to adjust given what was so obvious to those of us watching on TV.

Hello Indiana. And in two weeks OSU. Not a lot of time to prepare for contingencies but in this staff I trust.

Goggles Paisano

November 14th, 2016 at 6:02 AM ^

Why did we get out coached?  You need to back that statement up with something.  Iowa played with a bit more fire after the punt was downed on the 1.  We then missed some plays (Hill fumble of the kickoff, Chesson ball taken away, Darboh drop on last drive) that cost us the game.  That is player focus and execution, not coaching.  

charblue.

November 13th, 2016 at 7:47 PM ^

on dwelling on negativity and holding onto it except as it serves as a lesson that you learn and fix the problems that your poor play created, if that's possible. There was not one thing you could point to and say that was a direct cause.

However, there were omens in that game that were reminiscent of last year's loss to MSU, another final play loss. That was the fact the game was officiated by John O'Nieil's crew; so Michigan lost a linebacker to a targeting calll, Joe Bolden against MSU, Devin Bush last night.

Punting issues impacted Michigan with both poor field position all night just as a dropped snap ended the loss to MSU.

By the way, the targeting call was made from the booth, not on the field and then allowed to stand. The booth couldn't correct a poor judgment on a phantom facemask call that essentially allowed Iowa to kick a game-winning field goal without movint the ball at all on its final possession. Because Michigan never flipped the field in its contest against MSU and never did against Iowa, it was vulnerable to final play losses in both. The game was really lost on failure to force Iowa to play on a long field in order to do any of its scoring.

You can blame the defense, but Iowa never had to far in order to score any of its points.

Clock management will be debated as Michigan had a chance to run out the clock if it could have simply run out the final 1:54 with a single first down.

Bertello NC

November 13th, 2016 at 9:13 PM ^

Going into this game you have to know this is going to be just like the stae game. The fans, players, and coaches are going to be juiced. Iowas record is a bit deceiving. A year ago the program played in the BIG championship. A play away from going to the playoff. So they're not totally chopped liver. I watched the game again and there may have been a few stretches in the game where we didn't match Iowa's intensity or grit. Outside of a handful of play-calls I don't think they out-coached us. The Karan toss is one. Second, if I'm partridge or Jay and we get flagged for running into the punter, the next damn snap I'm going total return.

Chesson needs to work on coming back to the ball. And just needs to be tougher in those 70/30 balls.

all in all it's tough to go 12-0. I have all the faith in the world that this staff will look at what went wrong and work like heck to get better. This game was a pressure cooker for us. A lot on the line and a lot of guys especially Wilton who haven't been in situations like that. As much as it sucks, this loss could be a blessing in disguise.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Wolfman

November 14th, 2016 at 12:01 AM ^

Think rules have to be looked at on Rugby style punting. Those first three steps draw players instinctively toward preparing for an open field tackle. If you noticed, the team did exactly as you stated after those two back-to-back. If IA thought they could get another flag by having him do a Rugby style punt, it was a damn good coaching move on their part. 

Jonesy

November 13th, 2016 at 11:12 PM ^

We lost because our an went 0-a ton on wide open deep throws and we only needed one. Even a less than mediocre game from speight and we win. He was terrible. I've no explanation for our run defense.

Wolfman

November 13th, 2016 at 11:58 PM ^

I think Darboh lost awareness of where he was in the end zone. Lots of room between him and the sideline. Chesson let a ball be taken away from him. Think his arm is hurting him. He actually made enough good throws imo but the team lost focus tonight,. Little things like Smith making a poor lateral back to him on the flea flicker, the aforementioned steal of the ball, Khalid fumbling the ball on the kickoff, etc. There are nights things don't go your way, as Coach said, but to lay it on Wilton would be wrong. He made the throws that would have sealed the game. They have to be caught. 

NJMichigan

November 14th, 2016 at 11:48 AM ^

of the outcome, win or lose, the season all-in-all comes down to The Game. It would have with or without a loss to Iowa. I'm disappointed of the outcome and I wish to have gone undefeated, but a win or loss against OSU would have made the seaon with or without a loss to Iowa. I'm most concerned about our o-line, who looked very mortal against Iowa. Our defense, I am still happy with as we only gave 13 points, however, I have been dissapointed on how McCray has looked in the open field.