Hoops Mailbag: Loyola Matchups, Small Ball Possibility, Z Robbed Again Comment Count

Ace

SPONSOR NOTE. HomeSure Lending is once again sponsoring our NCAA Tournament coverage this year, and once again that is going rather well. I'm not saying Michigan's second run to the FINAL FOUR is due to this great partnership of sports blog and home-financing expert; I'm not saying it isn't, either. I certainly don't want to test this theory. If you're looking at buying a house this spring/summer you should talk to him soon.

ICYMI. It's time for yet another two three-part mailbag. Yesterday's covered Moe Wagner's impact on opponent strategy, the John Beilein inbounding myth, and an interesting hypothetical about Beilein as an NBA coach. If you haven't submitted a question yet, I may have room for one or two more: you can tag them with #mgomailbag on twitter or email me.

To Small Ball Or Not To Small Ball


Could Isaiah Livers hold up at center? [Patrick Barron]

Let's start with some background here. Loyola starts a traditional center—6'9", 260-pound Cameron Krutwig—who plays about half of their minutes; when Krutwig leaves the court, they don't field a player taller than 6'6". Meanwhile, FSU went small for much of the second half against Michigan, and an attempted response by John Beilein with Isaiah Livers at center didn't go well. Livers looked lost and M got outscored 8-3 by FSU in that stretch despite getting an extra possession, failing to make a shot from the field.

There's a chance Duncan Robinson could function much better at center. He's well-versed in the system on both ends to the point that he probably knows the center's assignments better than Livers, he's defended well in the post, and he's been utilized in the offense as a screener with some frequency of late. The worry is a small-ball team would expose his sub-par perimeter defense. I think Robinson could match up well with 6'5", 230-pound forward Aundre Jackson, and in that case Michigan may very well want to go small along with Loyola—a Michigan Lineup of Death with Robinson at center is certainly intriguing in the right circumstances.

That said, Beilein may also choose to flip that mismatch the other way. Loyola's offense hasn't been effective without Krutwig, plummeting from 1.21 points per possession when he's on the court to 0.96 PPP when he's off during the NCAA Tournament, according to Hoop Lens. Their defense has also suffered, allowing 1.08 PPP when he's off versus 0.93 PPP when he's on because they can no longer stop anyone inside the arc—their 2-point percentage allowed balloons from 45.6% to 56.5%.

I have serious questions about Krutwig's ability to handle Michigan's five-out offense; he's not nearly the caliber of athlete as FSU's big men nor is he close to their level as a shot-blocker. Either way, Loyola is going to go small at times. I believe it may be in Michigan's best interest to keep playing their normal rotation unless they discover a true Lineup of Death during practice this week.

[Hit THE JUMP for Teske's potential role and Z getting robbed again.]

What About Doing The Opposite?


Could Teske hold his own against the mites? [Barron]

I think Teske will get his normal allotment of minutes unless Moe Wagner goes off, which is a distinct possibility against Krutwig and people who can't really challenge his shot. Teske wouldn't provide the same level of mismatch, but we could see him work the pick-and-roll like he did against Purdue in the BTT when Krutwig is on the floor, and there's a chance he can flip the Loyola small-ball mismatch by overwhelming them with his size on both ends.

Like Robinson, Teske could possibly match up with Jackson, who's capable of stretching the floor but doesn't attempt many threes (20/54 this year). That might not be an ideal matchup for Michigan's defense; at the same time, I don't know how small-ball Loyola would handle a true seven-footer with good rebounding instincts and finishing ability on the other end.

Beilein has a lot of options here. He'll ride Wagner as long as he's putting opponents in the usual bind; after that, he has a couple viable choices for countering Loyola's undersized group. No matter who sees the floor for Michigan, they may be at a big advantage when the Ramblers go small—that's when they like to get out in transition, and in case we haven't pounded this into your head enough, the Wolverines have the best defense in the country at preventing opportunities and limiting efficiency on the fast break.

You Rob Z, He Robs You Harder


WHERE'S THE LOVE? [Marc-Gregor Campredon]

Hi Ace,

Love your stuff.  Seems to me the critical importance of Simpson, most especially his lock down defense on the opponent’s primary ballhandler, but also his taking direction of the offense, is vastly overlooked – he didn’t even make the all-tournament team from the last weekend, much less the Big1G all-defensive team.  What’s your take?

Thanks,

Bill

Yes, if you missed it, Zavier Simpson got robbed again: the all-tournament team from the West region featured MVP Charles Matthews, Moe Wagner, MAAR, and two Seminoles, one of whom (Terrance Mann) recorded all of four points with two assists, four turnovers, and four fouls in 35 minutes on Saturday.

Mann scored 18 points the game before, however, and the people who vote for these things tend to look at box scores when making their choices. The box score doesn't just undervalue what Simpson did last weekend on defense, it also fails to show his true offensive contributions—he gets to ten assists against FSU instead of the five he recorded if Wagner and Co. can hit anything from beyond the arc. Meanwhile, Simpson turned every point guard he faced into a pile of inefficient goo.

It's not just voters overlooking Z. CBS ranked him 16th of the 20 starters in the Final Four despite acknowledging the stat line doesn't "tell the full story." ESPN's John Gasaway put him 22nd among the top 25 players in the Final Four. Someone forward all of these to Simpson, please.

Matthews was the team's MVP last weekend, but Simpson was just behind him, and I don't think any other Wolverine came close. I think the team would agree with that assessment, too.

If Only He Could Recruit...

Thanks for writing in, Scott. I know you're a longtime reader/listener.

In my opinion, if Beilein can avoid the upset on Saturday, he's probably earned himself another year.

Comments

SHub'68

March 28th, 2018 at 5:00 PM ^

1)  Z and Wagner get officiated out of relevance during the first 10 minutes - think Burke against Louisville; except in this case, we're playing everybody's darling.  I predict that is going to be worth at least 4 absurd fouls.  Probably two of them on Wagner during the game's opening minutes

2) Michigan can't hit 3s - saying this lightly because jinx

3) Michigan has trouble getting layups to fall - we've seen this before, where the ball inexplicably and repeatedly rolls off the rim in every direction except for the one that makes us happy

4) Michigan needs to hit free throws - some of the guys have shown they can come through at times (Matthews), but it's still not real good

Then the game goes down to the wire and we are still 50/50 to pull it out.

TrueBlue2003

March 28th, 2018 at 6:02 PM ^

the recipe for March upsets is often the underdog being on fire from three.  If their threes are falling at a high rate, we'll be on notice.  And they're a good shooting team so it's more likely they shoot the lights out than A&M or FSU which pretty much needed a miracle to make a bunch of 3s.

I don't think FTs will be very important in the first 37 minutes of this game.  They don't go for blocked shots, and they don't foul.  Maybe they take a different strategy with Z and Matthews but I doubt it.

Whomever said they're like Michigan circa 2011 is just about spot on.  Custer is more of a scorer and less of a distributor than Morris was but other than that, pretty similar teams.

Bambi

March 28th, 2018 at 5:32 PM ^

I agree. I said as much in the comments of the diary I posted this week. Jackson as Loyola's small ball 5 is still more of a traditional post player so I think playing Moe/Teske at the 5 is still a viable option, and probably the best one with the massive size advantage it would give us. Plus we wouldn't have to experiment with Livers/Duncan at the 5 which didn't look great against FSU, granted we have a week to practice that lineup now.

I think Moe at the 5 is good enough to guard the little perimeter game Jackson has and still gives us a huge advantage on O/rebounding. Teske out there means no perimeter shooting advantage but an even larger rebounding one. He was good enough in the P&R with Z against Purdue in the BTT so he can do that on O, or just let him get position under the basket, take a shot and if it doesn't fall he probably has a good shot at a rebound. On D when Jackson's on the perimeter, have him sag off and make himself available as a help side defender/rebounder. If Jackson's trying to post up just stick Teske at the rim and good luck to anyone on Loyola not getting blocked or trying to get an OReb.

If we do need to go small, I also think we can find a workable lineup with DRob/Livers at the 5 after a week of practice.

Gitback

March 28th, 2018 at 4:43 PM ^

Back in 2013, as we were coming off a loss to Wisconsin in the B1G Tornament I clipped and saved some VERY choice takes from some of our illustrious MGoPosters regarding Beilein and his monumental inability to coach.  His lack of recruiting prowess.  His softness.  The way he gets nothing out of his players.  Can't coach defense.  On and on and on. 

Of course, that season ended in the NCAA title game.  

I wonder if I still have those...

blue90

March 28th, 2018 at 4:46 PM ^

I'm sure just like most of the other teams who got Loyola thought it would be a great match-up and they would come out on top...all four teams who thought that were wrong.  Of course Michigan is a WAY better team than these guys but Chicago is still riding the wave.  Take this as a regular season game in the beginning of the season and we win by 20 but march madness is wierd.  We have to go in to this game thinking that this is going to be the best team we've played all season (even though it's not).  I would play Wagner and Teske at the same time and just pummel them with post-ups...when they double, kick it out.  Can't wait to watch.

Eng1980

March 28th, 2018 at 8:35 PM ^

Loyola's regular season indicates competent, methodical scoring offense and great defense in the MVC.

Their tournament victories have been over mostly peers.  They should have been an 8th seed, maybe 7, maybe 9 but 11 is inexplicable to me.  They should have been slight favorites in two games, one mild upset and the Tennessee win was nice but the Volunteers were missing their big man and the 3 seed loses on a last second shot.

I expect Loyola to play slow and drag things out and make the game painful to watch.  

I really hope the referees do not have an agenda.

TrueBlue2003

March 28th, 2018 at 5:42 PM ^

especially the fact that we didn't make a FG with him at the 5.  I don't think we shot many, if any FGs while he was there.  FSU was in foul mode.  The fact we missed two front ends of 1-and-1s (two empty possessions) and missed a few others doesn't reflect much on the offense in general.

I do think we looked very confused as to who was doing what while he was at the 5 and the offense wasn't pretty (the couple of times we actually ran offense).

And on defense, I'm pretty sure 3 of those 8 points were thanks to Duncan making a terrible, terrible foul on a three pointer.  So that was a 3 point gift.

I would imagine we'll work on that this week and I would definitely agree that it should be Duncan at the 5/being the one setting the pick in the pick and roll with Livers in the corner doing his usual job.

There is a chance we go small with them if they're able to take Wagner/Teske off the dribble like FSU did to force us to go small.