OT: Dave Brandon gets a $2.4M Bonus

Submitted by Da Fino on

Judge rules that Toys R Us execs get to keep bonuses after the company filed for bankruptcy. That includes a $2.4 million bump for our least favorite former AD. Barf. Proposed: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/nation-now/2017/11/29/toys-r-us-ba… Approved: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/12/07/bankrupt-…

 

EDIT: Changed title from DB to Dave Brandon

UM Fan from Sydney

December 7th, 2017 at 7:34 AM ^

Why is this man still discussed on this blog? The guy was greatly responsible for wrecking our football program. He was rightfully fired. Move on.

Everyone Murders

December 7th, 2017 at 7:46 AM ^

Because he was greatly responsible for wrecking our football program.  And he was rightfully fired.

Plus he seems to have not suffered one whit for his egregious missteps, has remained an arrogant prick, and that still grates.  So we applaud when bad things happen to Brandon, and are chagrined when good things happen to him.

tl;dr?  You move on if you like (it's a healthy attitude).  I look forward to eventually pissing on his grave.

Autostocks

December 7th, 2017 at 8:20 AM ^

Bill Martin was at least equally responsible for wrecking our football program, and yet nobody seems to want to blame him. If Martin had known one whit about football, we would not have ended up with RichRod, and the dumpster fire that Brandon threw gas on would never have started. To be clear, I'm not defending Brandon in any way, I'm just pointing out the co-conspirator and how we seem to ignore him.

Autostocks

December 7th, 2017 at 10:01 AM ^

I agree with this. But Carr is a great, humble guy who did a lot for the program and I will not begrudge him this error. Nobody is perfect. On the other hand, and in response to the person who thinks I should read up on this topic, I have read everything, don't agree with some of it, and actually was fairly close to the Martin situation personally. Bill Martin chose to conduct a haphazard search without the help of almost anyone who could have helped him. His boss negligently allowed him to do this. And he wound up with the wrong guy and a lot of angst among the people closest to the program. Sorry folks, you can blame the douchebag Brandon all you want (and I blame him plenty), but this in fact was the beginning of the fall.

Da Fino

December 7th, 2017 at 10:08 AM ^

I don't disagree with you that Bill Martin made bad decisions.  Clearly he did.  What I disagree with is the equivalency you're drawing between Martin and Brandon. The quantity and quality of Brandon's bad decisions negatively impacted our football program more than Martin's.  That's all I'm saying.

Boner Stabone

December 7th, 2017 at 7:43 AM ^

If he was a man of integrity, he would turn around and give that bonus money to his employees.  This guy is an absolute disgrace and has to rank up there as one of the mosted disliked alumni of Michigan.

PapabearBlue

December 7th, 2017 at 8:12 AM ^

So, what exactly are they getting out of the bankruptcy? I'm not familiar with the bankruptcies that businesses get. Someone earlier suggested they wouldn't have to pay as much to vendors. If that's true, how can they justify not paying a vendor when they've got all this money to give to execs, legally speaking?

 

Another serious question, from someone who has never sniffed this level of aristocracy. How the hell do people end up in positions where you get bonuses this large for this level of incompetence? Does this have anything to do with merit? Has someone like Dave Brandon actually done anything positive to earn their position or are they just well connected people?

mgoblue0970

December 7th, 2017 at 9:36 AM ^

If you read between the lines, Dave Brandon is acknowledging that TRU is a shitstorm -- what the C-levels are spinning when they do stuff like this is say, "look judge, we're a mess, but if you want us to get out of bankruptcy court, you need to pay us a premium... rats don't jump On a sinking ship, they jump off -- and if you don't offer the c-suite an incentive to take on a task such is this, you'll get nobody."

Don

December 7th, 2017 at 8:12 AM ^

"Attorneys for the company argued in court papers that the bonuses would help encourage executives to focus on driving up sales as the holidays approach." These executives already make huge salaries that dwarf not only what average ToysRUs workers get, but also exceed what the large majority of Americans make in any sector of the economy by several orders of magnitude. But that amount is apparently still not enough to secure their "focus."

Brodie

December 7th, 2017 at 9:37 AM ^

Who gives a shit? Are we going to follow everything this guy does for the rest of his life? I care about athletic directors who currently work for Michigan

LSAClassOf2000

December 7th, 2017 at 10:58 AM ^

As I see it, the Dave Brandon threads - and let me preface this by saying I tend to agree with you on this - are kind of like the Rich Rod threads here and the result of a nasty divorce which leaves one detesting the other person involved. As seems to be the case sometimes though, you can't help but be curious as to what that person is doing because try as you might, you cannot completely ditch the feelings - however negative - attached to them. 

lhglrkwg

December 7th, 2017 at 9:42 AM ^

It's easy to get rabble roused about this, but I've read elsewhere that this money would be paid by major investors anyway and that keeping the continuity at the executive leadership levels is likely critical to turning Toys R Us around instead of just seeing it fold entirely. No one likes Dave Brandon, but I do believe this is pretty standard practice for trying to get a company out of bankruptcy

His Dudeness

December 7th, 2017 at 12:06 PM ^

Letting shit go is what got us here to begin with. When will "normal" people start acting in their own self-interest? I swear I'm going to ask myself this same question as I lay dying of every type of cancer (due to EPA shutdown) in a sweltering (due to global warming) over crowded (due to rising healthcare costs) understaffed (due to profit driven corporate structures) retirement home someday 50 years from now. God damn, you people.

Perkis-Size Me

December 7th, 2017 at 10:25 AM ^

I don’t mind execs making the bonuses they do when the company is performing. Or if someone is coming in to fix a tanking company and he’s actually fixing things. You get paid the big bucks to make the big decisions, and your bonus compensation should reflect your ability to do that.

But when you’re directly contributing to driving your company further into the red, laying off countless employees, and you still get to go home with a fat Christmas bonus while many of your front line employees are wondering how long they’ll still have a job, that’s just wrong.

I’m not a socialist, but in a situation like this DB should have the decency to distribute his bonus directly to his in-store employees. I don’t see why he gets to walk home with an extra, cool $2.4 million when he’s driving his own company into the ground.

Perkis-Size Me

December 7th, 2017 at 11:23 AM ^

Right, I understand how it works. From my far too idealistic point of view, that shouldn't be the way things are when fucking up for the common worker means, in the words of Judge Smails, "you get nothing and like it."

But the world often does not work the way it should. Arrogant dicks like Dave Brandon can drive companies into the ground and get rewarded for it, while his underlings sit there and wonder if their next paycheck is their last one. 

Bigly yuge

December 7th, 2017 at 1:10 PM ^

Dave Brandon would cause bitcoin to plummet, apple to go bankrupt, and Microsoft to go belly up. If this prick gets another ceo position the implant that hires him deserves to fail.

UM Griff

December 7th, 2017 at 8:23 PM ^

(The current one and the last) this guy is making far more money than he deserves. Ironically, the thing he stated he cared about the most, his reputation, is in tatters. Hahahahahaha!