Aren't We Where We Should Be?

Submitted by Commie_High96 on
Like, this Sucks... No question. But before the season we thought we'd be 8-4 to 10-2. That's were we all thought we'd be. In his 3rd year at Stanford, JH was 8-4. We have shit freshman receivers, a second string qb, but, did we really think we would be better than this?

bamf16

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:56 AM ^

Meh.

 

When people can't respond to logic and reason they try to discredit it as an "excuse." 

 

I've read your stuff; I tend to think I forgot more football while taking a shit a few minutes ago than you know. Frankly, I think you'd be better off reading with an open mind and maybe learning something, but maybe when you're done with your temper tantrum tonight you'll be in a better frame of mind to give it a whirl.

 

Cheers.

 

 

bamf16

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:59 AM ^

I rationalize it pretty simply.

 

Michigan lost to a better team tonight. The only chance they had was the defense, and they went in with a flawed game plan and couldn't recover.

 

Offensively, UM's playing with a backup QB whose skills don't translate real well to the offensive philosophy the coaching staff wishes to develop. There's no threat of a downfield passing attack and that's severely limiting what the offense can do, and the play-caller (Drevno) hasn't yet proven that he's good enough to compensate for the personnel shortcomings with timely play-calls that set up and then exploit the defense.

 

Agreed on Drevno. 100%. I've been kicking him all year and he's without his starting QB because of an injury on a play that happened in large part due to his stubbornness with zone blocking schemes and predictable and unimaginative play-calling, especially on 1st down. Get him back coaching the OL and leave the play-calling to someone who knows what the hell he's doing.

 

 

Maynard

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:56 AM ^

You can talk about logical fallacies all you want but it's not indicative that JH can't beat his rivals. It is factual that Michigan is 1-4 against the two major rivals. So maybe take the pompous down a notch and stop being a blowhard. Your argument is not a good one and you're not so smart that your logical argument would go over anyone's head.

bamf16

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:18 AM ^

Stating a simplistic fact that's true doesn't make all corresponding claims true.

 

Yes, it is a fact that under Harbaugh, UM is 1-4 against MSU and OSU.

 

But I'm not sold on your claim that it's Harbaugh's fault.

 

Personally, I don't think Blake O'Neil's dropped punt gifting the 2015 game against State was Harbaugh's fault. Heck, MSU was coming off an 11-2 season, UM a 7 loss season, MSU was an undefeated top 10 team that eventually won the B1G Championship, and Harbaugh's team had them beat until a punter did something we'll probably never see again. And ingrates like you pin the loss on the head coach and then use MSU's 3-9 record last season to further your claim while ignoring this at the same time. But yeah, I'm delusional and this is proof that Harbaugh just can't beat his rival.

 

At OSU, Michigan's QB fumbled the ball at the 1 yard line, threw a pick 6, and then another INT deep in his own territory, and still took the game to 2 OT's. But yeah, head coach's fault and proof he can't beat his rival.

 

Ty Isaac's fumble, Sean McKeon's fumble, and Karan Higdon's hold in the monsoon also show that Harbaugh can't beat his rival.

 

I'm as pissed as everyone else about this, and if tonight's game were a fight, they'd have called it early. But forgive me for not jumping on board with your whiny, emotional tantrums.

 

I guess I'll just stick with my "delusional excuses."

bronxblue

October 21st, 2017 at 11:34 PM ^

Michigan has won 10 games in back-to-back years for the first time since the early 00s.  I mean, I'm sure the coaches wished they hadn't lost, what was it, 3 games last year by 5 total points.  But it happens.  I doubt they care any more or less about winning than OSU does.  

They are trying to compete for a title.  It won't happen this year.  That's a reality, and no amount of complaining about it or demanding someone gets skewered for that changes it.

MGlobules

October 21st, 2017 at 11:16 PM ^

you don't get to choose. You're just some guy watching the game, pissed off that a team you're backing lost. Half of the teams in the United States lose every Saturday. Ours is the youngest team in the country and just got beaten by the number two team. 

It's always ironic when the whiners show up afterward to weep bitter tears about how their team should be tougher. 

But yeah--that play-action call sucked. 

glewe

October 21st, 2017 at 11:40 PM ^

I fucking hate facile comparisons like this.

OSU runs spread and shred. Bama has been paying players since 2006. I don't pay attention to Clemson tbh.

Jim Harbaugh is trying to do something much finer than all that. I mean, fuck him for not succeeding 100% of the time, I guess, but at least it's not a gimmick that is not precisely replicable at the professional level.

DHughes5218

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:46 AM ^

This is the problem. When you have elite coaching and elite recruiting the young players should dominate. OSU was the youngest team in the country last year, we were the oldest and we all remember how that ended. You can complain about the spot or whatever you want but those young players dominated us in the 4th quarter and made the plays that counted. Call me irrational but with this staff and our level of recruiting it shouldn't be too much to ask for our young team to be competitive with anyone they face. We should be right there with OSU, Clemson, and Bama. If those aren't the expectations then why go get a coach that demands $9 million a year. Keep a coach like Brady Hoke, accept mediocrity, and make a run at a Big Ten title every four or five years.

TheTeam16

October 21st, 2017 at 11:41 PM ^

We are complacent with mediocrity. We are not even is the same universe as OSU, Bama, or even MSU...coaching and mostly talent wise. If you don't think this season is going to take a toll on recruiting, get your head scanned.

I didn't see it take Urban 3 years to install and offense at OSU, no they were winning a NC. Our programs are apples and oranges, not even comparable from a coaching standpoint. It is extremely depressing. But just keep making excuses, and be another second tier power 5 team for the next decade too. 

I love this University, and I love this football program, but I am not renewing my seat license. It isn't worth my time, my money, or my emothional investment at this time, and frankly hasn't been for more than a decade.

enlightenedbum

October 21st, 2017 at 11:51 PM ^

Urban took over a program that was two years from a 12-1 record and a Sugar Bowl win with one shitty intervening season when they had an overmatched rube at coach and a bunch of off field distractions.  Harbaugh was taking over a program that had basically sucked for 7 years (with an incredibly flukey run of luck in 2011) and had just had back to back dud recruiting classes.

We are starting what, four guys (Cole, Hill, Hurst, McCray) who are fourth or fifth year players and were originally recruited to be here.

DHughes5218

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:07 AM ^

If the cupboard was so bare for Harbaugh, how did we have the most players drafted in the NFL last year? Harbaugh is a great coach and I hope he's our coach for the next 20 years but we shouldn't have lost to a less talented msu team, shouldn't have needed overtime against a middle of the pack Indiana team, and we shouldn't be getting blown out by anybody. I don't know if it's scheme, personnel, play calling, or anything else, but I know it's unacceptable. When you have one of the best head coaches in football the response shouldn't be "lower your expectations...we are young." Especially when we watched OSU with an even younger team make the playoffs last year.

bronxblue

October 21st, 2017 at 11:52 PM ^

So last year Michigan ran over MSU and nearly beat OSU on the road in one of the more crazy finishes to the year.  But yes, because Michigan is very young and lost to what I will 100% admit is a really good PSU team on the road, they are now no longer in the same universe.  

Give up your seats if you want (I mean, I doubt anyone here ever actually does, but it makes for righteous indignation), but stop looking for some high ground to justify it.

bamf16

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:11 AM ^

You're a fucking child. Close the laptop and go cry in the corner.

 

And you're what people envision when they rag on the stereotype of the Michigan fan base.

TheTeam16

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:40 AM ^

YOU are the stereotype. I am realistic this program is/has been mediocre for more than a decade. I choose not to make excuses for it, and point out the reality of the situation.

You on the other hand, and people like you live in fantasy world where people still care that we lead the all time series with OSU, or have the best winning percentage in history.

Who the fuck cares.

bamf16

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:23 AM ^

Strawman alert!

 

I never made any of those claims.

 

I'm pissed that UM got its ass handed to it tonight. I'm pissed that UM still hasn't played in Indianapolis for the championship. I'm pissed that UM lost again to MSU. I'm pissed that again, OSU seems to have the superior team.

 

But most of us can look at the team rationally and understand where the team is, how it got here, and why things are the way they are. It's not about excuses, it's about seeking a better understanding of the entirety of the situation.

LeCheezus

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:25 AM ^

Lol, did you start watching Michigan football in 2015? I'm baffled why people seem to think we're entitled to championships every year. What part of recent Michigan history is devoid of 4 loss seasons? We've been this way since scholarship limits came into play. I mean, this is the internet so I'm sure all of you are rich, successful, married to models and have never settled for anything less than the best in your life, so carry on.

SpikeFan2016

October 21st, 2017 at 11:03 PM ^

Should we be better than a 29 point loss to James Franklin and a second consecutive home loss to an MSU team that has barely beaten Minnesota and Indiana and had 45 players kicked off the team in the offseason? 

 

Yeah, I think so. 

SpikeFan2016

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:44 AM ^

I think your knee jerk "anyone who has a critique is irrational right now" mentality is disappointing and unfair. 

 

My take was very rational. I'm happy with Harbaugh. The future is still pretty bright. That said, we are not where we should be. After an overachieving 2015 season, 2016 was a severe underachievement and 2017 is looking like at least a moderate underachievement. 

I don't have patience for people like you who think that any criticism, no matter how rational it is, is a #OUTRAGE. Our coaching staff is literally paid millions of dollars, we don't have to be happy with them no matter what.

 

I'm upset about tonight, but 2016 especially, and 2017 MSU, are the real problems for me.

That was Urban's worst Ohio State team, by a pretty decent margin, out of his first 5 years. They lost 31-0 to Clemson; they were exceedingly young. That Iowa team lost to Jim McElwain's Florida by 27 points, PSU by 27 points and at home to both Northwestern and North Dakota State. We had hoardes of NFL talent, more than any team in football, with a supposed "top 3 coach in football", a pretty manageable schedule and we squandered it. 

Losing to Penn State is fine. They're likely a playoff team. The margin is a bit embarassing and shouldn't be that way. But the real kicker is losing to MSU at home in a game where we were THOROUGLY outcoached. MSU is YOUNGER than we are.