Question of the week

Submitted by theguy49503 on

Soooooo do you give Peters a shot or do you roll with O'Korn again and chalk up Saturdays game as simply a bad game? Obviosuly everything is earned in practice but just curious given the JO that showed up Saturday looked like the one from the Inidana game last year

robpollard

October 9th, 2017 at 1:12 PM ^

In 2015, OSU lost to MSU 17-14 in a game that had bad conditions -- not as bad as last Saturday (mostly drizzle), but pretty awful b/c of the wind.

Urban Meyer, for some reason, tried to continually pass and go deep against the Spartans and it didn't work (sound familiar?)-- and that was with top-notch receivers and a better QB than we have. What he should have done, and what you *need* in the B1G, is ride a very good OL (with numerous NFL players) and world-class back (Elliott) and pound out a 20-10 win. Instead, Elliott got only 11 carries.

UM needs a very good (or at the very least, competent) offensive line. That allows you to play in any weather. And, obviously, we are far from that right now (and have been for most of the last decade).

mrkid

October 9th, 2017 at 1:26 PM ^

I agree that the elements are a part of the Big Ten but let's establish if O'Korn is a competent QB in normal conditions, then we can adjust the game plan for the weather. We know he is terrible in high wind / rain / snow but if he is terrible in rain or shine, then we know we're screwed either way.

Huma

October 9th, 2017 at 10:13 AM ^

QB is not the biggest problem for this offense. Here is my order:
1) Bad OL
2) inexperienced WRs that don't block, run routes, or catch the ball anywhere near well enough - this is probably the biggest drop off from last year
3) RBs that have each fumbled
4) lack of creativity in playcalling
5) at least 2-3x per game a bad decision or bad throw from a QB



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

mrkid

October 9th, 2017 at 10:24 AM ^

I believe we tried one or two HB screens. I vividly remember one where O'Korn had to throw it in the dirt because it was blown up.

Edit: Also want to add that I think the coaches are afraid of throwing slants because our WR can't catch the damn ball. How many slants get tipped and intercepted? We're in a rough spot offensively and it mostly comes down to lack of trust. We don't trust the QB to make throws, we don't trust the WR to catch, we don't trust the OL to protect. It's a hot mess.

A2toGVSU

October 9th, 2017 at 10:24 AM ^

Each one has been snuffed out by opposing LBs and then turfed by the QB. On the slants: the receivers can't get open downfield 2 or 3 seconds after the snap. What makes you think they can get instant separation on a quick developing route? Also, not a single WR has made a single tough catch on a decently defended pass all year.

J.

October 9th, 2017 at 12:42 PM ^

High school teams run it all the time against high school DBs.  In college, unless the DBs have reason to fear a double move (e.g., sluggo), an "all slants" offense goes like this: 3 yards, incomplete, 5 yards, 3 yards, pick 6.  Eventually the defense is going to tell the DB to jump the slant route and rely on the safety to make the tackle if the DB misses.  And if the DB doesn't miss, it's clear sailing to the end zone.

Google suggests there are about 14,000 high school football teams in the USA.  There are 129 Division I-A college football teams.  Even if you assume that the average college team is 2x the size of the average high school team, that still means that even the members of MSU's much-maligned secondary were in the top 2% coming out of high school.

Also, in response to the original point -- Michigan did go 5-wide.  In fact, they used quite a few empty sets.  One of the interceptions was from an empty set on 3rd and 3 in a collapsing pocket in the driving rain.

Michrider41

October 9th, 2017 at 10:26 AM ^

If you know you have weaknesses you call plays to lessen the burden on the OL.  Instead whoever is calling the plays does the opposite.  Recievers running 25 yard routes when the defense shows blitz.  No hot routes, no slants.  The great play by O'Korn against Purdue when he slipped two sacks and hit Perry was a miracle.  The play call at your own 8 was atrocious, every other receiver was running a 20+ yard route and not close to getting open.  

DMill2782

October 9th, 2017 at 10:14 AM ^

there's no point. The o-line is a dumpster fire and the playcalling is terrible. Drevno still thinks it's against the law to involve the RBs in the passing game. 

Let's throw another fade to McDoom instead of one of our giants. That will be awesome.

Michrider41

October 9th, 2017 at 10:22 AM ^

breaks down.  Wouldn't it be great to flip it to Evans or Higdon or Hill and let them do somwething with it instead of getting sacked?  Or how about throwing the the ball out of bounds when you are about to get sacked?  Coaching is horrible.

DMill2782

October 9th, 2017 at 10:30 AM ^

I watched the game with my buddy who played QB at St. Francis. Not D1, but he led his team to multiple national championship games. The entire game on Saturday night he was yelling "why is there never a fucking checkdown option in this offense!". Multiple times he noticed that every WR/TE was 12 yards or more downfield. Never a safety valve for O'Korn.  

It's utterly ridiculous that this simple thing escapes this coaching staff. Piss poor job coaching the offense this year.

mrkid

October 9th, 2017 at 10:33 AM ^

Because the RBs are too busy trying to decide which free man they're going to attempt to block and fail.

It can't hurt to let the RBs go out as a check down. Its not like they're helping in pass protection anyways.

Michigan4Harbaugh

October 9th, 2017 at 10:53 AM ^

Completely agree with ramping up more passes to the RBs. Yesterday, I watched some old games from the 1997 season (NW, Iowa, MSU, PSU) to try and feel better from what we all witnessed the night before. Wouldn't you know, our leading receivers for the year in mid Oct of 97' were RUNNING BACKS! I don't know how the final receiving stats finished up. However, at least DeBord understood getting the backs involved in the passing game. Chris Howard and Clarence Williams made some huge plays for us that season, and it would be great to see Higdon and Evans doing the same.

SteelBrad

October 9th, 2017 at 10:16 AM ^

I don't understand the narrative of "let's lose now to get prepared for next year". This isn't the NFL where you get rewarded with a higher draft pick for tanking.

If Peters was better than JOK (or Speight) he would be starting already. I want to see the team win. If JOK gives them a better shot I'm riding with him.

Josh9676

October 9th, 2017 at 11:09 AM ^

I can't see burning Mccaffrey's redshirt on this turd of a season. We either roll with JOK the rest of the year or risk ruining Peters's confidence by getting him crushed behind this terrible O line. Either option doesn't have the brightest of outlooks but it is what it is at this point.

 

I am in the boat of let JOK go 2 more games (don't want to start a brand new QB in happy valley at night) and if he can't get it done start building towards the future and put Peters in. I REALLY don't want to start next year with once again a brand new QB, would be nice to at least get some game reps for whoever will be starting.

SteelBrad

October 9th, 2017 at 10:52 AM ^

So you think we should start a QB that the coaches clearly think is behind the current starting QB just for the sake of experience?

It's pretty clear the majority of you have never played organized team sports. If my coach pulled that shit I would check out. Give me the best shot to win. If you lose, you lose.