SB Nation: Coaching Hot Seat Over/Unders

Submitted by jimmyshi03 on

So today, some of SB Nation's CFB writers took a look at the over-unders for a few college football teams with coaches seemingly on the hot seat, essentially to say if a coach would be fired if they were around that number.

While most of the names/comments revovle around guys you might expect: Sumlin, Kingsbury, RichRod, Gus Malzahn, Jim Mora, there was one section that caught my eye, for... reasons. 

Michigan State: 6.5 wins

At 90-42, Mark Dantonio is in the conversation for the best coach in Michigan State history. But there is a sense that the program took advantage of some down years from Michigan and Penn State, and is now on the decline with the big three in the Big Ten East all climbing. Dantonio’s 2016 team was not young, yet went just 1-8 in Big Ten play. Still, is there any chance Dantonio is done if his Spartans barely make a bowl game?

 

Alex: Here’s a question for Michigan State: Could you do better? I don’t really see it. It’s not like MSU is a bad job, but Dantonio has a track record that will have been interrupted for two seasons. If the Spartans think they can convince someone great to come battle with Jim Harbaugh, Urban Meyer, and James Franklin, in a fine but not incredible recruiting area, they might fire Dantonio. I doubt they think that.

Godfrey: Remember John L. Smith? This job can get really difficult really quickly. The problem is that Dantonio failed to turn 10-win seasons into elite recruiting, and now Michigan and Penn State have reorganized and lapped Sparty in talent. MSU seems destined to regress from its Rose Bowl run. How much is to be determined, and this is a difficult job to hire for.

Jasper

May 31st, 2017 at 9:05 PM ^

Dantonio and Fleck are different animals. I'd argue that the former is much more appropriate for the Sparty mentality. Fleck (whose ceiling still appears rather limited to me) is well-suited to places where his enthusiasm, etc., can make a big difference. I don't think he's in the same class as Dantonio (or even close). Minnesota might work in the short term.

Bigku22

May 31st, 2017 at 8:15 PM ^

Agreed MSU isn't going to pull a better hire right now, but Dantonio is trending on the "things have changed but I won't consider any change" stubborness a lot of successful older coaches go through towards the end that leads to their demise. 

They haven't replaced Narduzzi with anybody respectable, he's been reluctant to fire his guys even with poor offensive results, the recruiting never branched out of his comfort zone (Ohio, Pennsylvania, Detroit) even when they were winning B1G titles  and now those areas are being heavily recruited by major programs that were down 3-5 years ago but now are trending heavily up (Michigan, PSU, Pitt, Kentucky). 

Factor in the recent scandals, and the fact they could be looking at b2b seasons missing a bowl game....and after this season the seat might be pretty warm. Depends how determined he is to hang on, and how aggressive Hollis will be (judging by how long it took Hollis to fire the worst college hockey coach of the last 15 years in Anatos, Dantonio probably has the job for life). 

mastodon

June 1st, 2017 at 2:51 AM ^

Disagree.  Yes, of course they can hire some also-ran and meet all the middling predictions.  But they could also sign some up and coming, cocky, extremely confident, charismatic, and talented coach, who finds his ultimate overmatched barroom brawl challenge coaching MSU in the B1G East (I think PSU will be pretty good going forward).  Then they just might exceed expectations.  Depends on whether the AD has some cajones and vision, and such a coach is available.

drjaws

May 31st, 2017 at 7:21 PM ^

are in complete denial.  There are quite a few where I live and they all unanimously agree that Dantonio will only be fired if he has 2 more bad years (sub .500) or if he was involved in institutional coverup of sexual assault. 

They completely fail to see that to most everyone else, this just LOOKS really bad, and that bad image is often enough for a schools to make a big change, especially if there is a negative impact on $$$

The Krusty Kra…

May 31st, 2017 at 8:05 PM ^

Dantonio will quit at MSU if they shit the bed again this year. My reasoning is as such:

1. He doesn't seem to have control over the situations, granted, it is not a football coach's place to handle when 3 players allegedly commited sexual assault, his job is to game plan and move forward without them, but there are many decisions regarding personnel that are being made by those over his head, school president, board of trustees, AD, etc.

2. Remember that press conference he had to give before their Spring Game? That was the most boiler plate, lawyer speak stuff that's ever come out of his mouth. That was him at a low point because for a man who is normally passionate (I'll give him that based on his chippiness early on and through their good run) - he looked defeated because he was sent out as a sacrificial lamb, very uncharacteristic of him.

3. As mentioned in this thread, the 'crootin is becoming difficult for Mark D, the wins didn't translate, and now, assuming the three involved never play for MSU again (which I think they won't for obvious reasons, even without charges) those were 3 good recruits that *poof* gone. Contributors that would've helped. L.J Scott might be one of the last truly formiddable players on that offense and he already teased that he is leaving after his junior year. 

While he wouldn't want to leave in poor circumstances, the world seems to be falling down around him at MSU, and at age 61, with prior health issues, I can see him walking away rather than go through a full rebuild.

alum96

May 31st, 2017 at 8:26 PM ^

Should have took the South Carolina when he was at peak luck - i.e. Cook throwing 20 INTs that were dropped, Oregon QB hurting hand, Purdue almost beating them at home, the "play" in Ann Arbor, Meyer coaching like Lloyd Carr in conservatism without a viable MSU QB etc.

Guy sold so many souls - he ran out. 

That said MSU wont be firing this guy - his 10 yr run is statue level for them especially for a program that only cares about one game a year.   He'd have to have 4-5 years of bad results for it to even come up.  MSU won't find a better coach - Saban couldn't win there fergodsakes.  And who of value outside of Narduzzi is going to come and want to play for 3rd or 4th place every year as long as Meyer and Harbaugh are here. 

And missing another bowl is nearly impossible; 5-7 teams with appropriate APR (I think thats the acronym) are making bowls.  They got Western in a down year, they have Rutgers which is still an auto win and Bowling Green coming off a 4 win season and they can find 2 other trash programs to get lucky against to go 5-7.  I do think their 2018 squad will be pretty solid even without the 3 players.

Ironically their recruiting DID go up in the 2016 class - it was his best ever.  But apparently full of alleged convicts and Auston Robertson types.

jabberwock

May 31st, 2017 at 8:44 PM ^

Dantonio is a full-fledged-ASSbag, but he's had an incredible run and buildings will be named after him.  
Barring some major scandal he's involved with it would take a few down years before he's let go.  If it trends that way he'll just retire.

No matter how much I hate him, you have to give  him & Narduzzi credit for striking while Michigan was down.  They beat Michigan over & over again and even had OSU's number a couple times. That's nothing no recent (or current) Michigan coach can say.

It pleases me greatly that Sparty hasn't been able to capitalize more on thier success, they roided-up, played dirty and turned a blind eye to get results but now have discovered that it's unsustainable.

Boo-fucking-hoo.

Everyone Murders

June 1st, 2017 at 7:31 AM ^

Jabberwock says

They beat Michigan over & over again and even had OSU's number a couple times. That's nothing no recent (or current) Michigan coach can say.

I think it's pretty plain that both Brady Hoke and Rich Rodriguez beat Michigan over and over again.  And Hoke even had OSU's number.  Once.

/sobs into coffee/

WhoopinStick

May 31st, 2017 at 8:34 PM ^

 

This is an idiotic prediction.  No way Dantonio gets fired next year unless he gets caught cheating or breaks the law.  He has built up a lot of good will at MSU, he could go winless next year and not get fired.   I think if he had a really bad year in 2017 he might be on the hot seat the following year, but way too soon to put him on the hot seat now.

Danwillhor

May 31st, 2017 at 8:47 PM ^

better stick with MD or go to a really wild hire wrt system. Nobidy else is coming in, lining the ball up like 90s football and winning at MSU. MD is the best they'll get at that. Could be different if they grabbed a young passing spread guru or something. I dunno, just a strange way of saying they're likely better off with him.

LSAClassOf2000

May 31st, 2017 at 8:52 PM ^

The summary of a Butch Jones team was fairly accurate, I thought:

"A Jones program thrives on turning non-accomplishment into accomplishment. This is how you get the Championship of Life, or Music City Bowl rings, or the commemorative flag he’ll commission for beating UMass 16-10 this year. It’s entirely possible Tennessee goes 8-4 and wins the SEC East."

DMack

May 31st, 2017 at 9:05 PM ^

Sparty would be stupid as hell to fire him. Best coach they have had in the modern era. Sure the program is going through a rough patch with all the off field issues and the terrible last season. And yeah the re-emergence of Michigan and Penn State (even though I think James Franklin is a motivator not a great coach), doesn't help the future outlook. Dantonio is the 3rd best coach in a lopsided Big Ten, unfortunately for him, the east is loaded with all the talent. All programs go through rough patches. Bama, OSU, Notre Dame, even Michigan. Sparty would be well advised to ride it out and stick with him because no great football coach wants to come to a great basketball school and live in the shadow of Izzo?

AA Forever

June 1st, 2017 at 10:28 AM ^

But there will be low level rumblings. How many years will you be happy winning 10 games if we never beat OSU, never win even the division, let alone the conference, and never make the playoff? 4? 5? 6? If Harbaugh loses to OSU and finishes out of the money for anything but a third tier bowl game this year, he won't get fired, but his seat will be warm next year.

Ali G Bomaye

June 2nd, 2017 at 12:10 PM ^

No. No, it won't.

He's already taken us to parity with OSU (losing by 3, on the road, in OT). Are you going to fire a guy because Delano Hill didn't tackle JT Barrett six inches before where he did?  Do you remember the last couple times we tried to hire head coaches before Harbaugh?

This opinion is so dumb that it makes my head hurt.

JTrain

May 31st, 2017 at 9:16 PM ^

MSU would look desperate and pathetic if they fired Dantonio. Let the guy recover to mediocrity over the next couple years. Throw him a party. And do what it takes to get their next legacy guy....Narduzzi. See if he can get the whole Defense on enough "juice" to put a dent in the big ten east. I highly doubt it..but it's about their only shot.

McSomething

May 31st, 2017 at 9:22 PM ^

Unless he is tied to some nasty shit, he isn't getting fired. Not unless he has a string of terrible seasons in a row. If Michigan comes anywhere close to evening out the record against him, my guess is he'll retire before that can happen.

Ty Butterfield

May 31st, 2017 at 10:55 PM ^

I think Staee would have to miss a bowl game this coming season and then Mork could possibly be on the hot seat. Still, I think Mork retires before he gets canned and it sucks that he will go out with a winning record against Michigan.

bacon

May 31st, 2017 at 11:57 PM ^

MSU won't fire Dantoni. It's not like there's going to be some sort of groundswell movement where people complain and put pressure on the Athletic Director to fire him. The national media doesn't care if MSU isn't winning, and their fans will snap back to not caring about the season. They will focus on how they kept it close against Michigan in the first quarter as a sign of hope, and reminisce about the old ole days. Before the dark times. Before the Empire.

saveferris

June 1st, 2017 at 9:33 AM ^

History is not on Dantonio's side with regard to his future prospects.  Dantonio's tenure is pretty much following the arc of MSU success in comparison to Michigan.  When Michigan is down, MSU is up.  MSU has only ever risen to the ranks of the elite when Michigan is a mess, but they've never been able to sustain top tier performance when Michigan is going great guns.  Dantonio is facing a unique prospect of having his coaching tenure broach two phases of Michigan performance, which will ultimately put a tarnish on his accomplishments for the previous 8 years.  I for one will enjoy seeing him go out on a low note.

AA Forever

June 1st, 2017 at 10:35 AM ^

all kinds of pressure on Harbaugh to not go 0-4 against OSU? Can you name the last Michigan coach to do that badly against our biggest rival? Harbaugh was brought in to win championships and beat Ohio State, not just to go a comfy 9-3/10-2 every year. How long do you think he should get to accomplish that?

aflapan

June 1st, 2017 at 2:51 PM ^

we going to get? Harbaugh was our grand-slam hire. He is seemingly carved out of marble to be Michigan's head coach. Yes, it sucks that Urban Meyer and Ohio State are so dominant. But literally no other coach with this Michigan roster would do much better. Also, we were playing with a senior-laden offensive line that was regularly blowing assignments and a quarterback who only thrived against weak competition. Very few of Harbaugh's recruits have seen the field yet.

AA Forever

June 1st, 2017 at 3:30 PM ^

in his third year, and he did it with a roster of mainly 3 star recruits. He had a true sophomore QB playing at an all-American level. His team will start the season in the Top 10 again. If Harbaugh doesn't do as well in his third year, with far superior talent, what does that say? The notion that there can't possibly be a better coach out there for Michigan than Harbaugh, even if he's a perennial 9-3/10-2 coach, is just silly.

Ty Butterfield

June 1st, 2017 at 3:49 PM ^

Good points but I think the QB for Washington was better than Speight or a redshirt freshman Peters. Not having a solid QB and O-line is still holding Michigan back. Harbaugh is obviously a good coach but I don't think he is elite yet. Harbaugh has a very good chance of starting 0-3 vs OSU. I am no fan of PSU or James Franklin but at the end of year 3 they beat OSU and won a conference title.

BleedBlue4U

June 2nd, 2017 at 10:08 AM ^

Some good points AA. We can't have blind faith forever, the sweatervested tattoo shark had immediate results. Meyer had immediate results.

 

Bottome line:

 

There is REAL and IMMEDIATE pressure on Harbaugh to beat OSU this year. He cannot go into his 4th year 0-3 against our rival.

 

Meyer is 5-0 vs UM, IF he wins this year he will be at a level that will be difficult to catch up to. Meaning he will never have a losing record against us...

jimmyshi03

June 2nd, 2017 at 12:44 PM ^

Peterson got to Washington at a particularly good moment: Oregon, which had seized its traditional status as the top non-California football school, was headed downward, even if that was apparent in Helfrich's first year, and Stanford has taken something of a small step back.

At the same time, USC was in turmoil, first with Sark's weird behavior, then the firing, then the hire of Helton. And it should be noted that in the two games in which U-Dub faced superior or equal talent, they got crushed, at home against SC and then Alabama, they got crushed. Hell, Browning was aful against Colorado, they needed an avalanche of turnovers to turn that game into a blowout.

Harbaugh, on the other hand, stepped into a situation with a fully weaponized Ohio State beginning to really flex its recruiting muscles nationally. He was behind OSU from the start, and to pretend otherwise is just silly.