Charles Woodson. Some people still think Peyton should have won the Heisman.
Those people would be bitter Tennessee fans. Big players step up big in big time games. Woodson almost single-handedly won Michigan a national title, as a defensive player no less. Manning never won a game that was even as remotely significant as that. Couldn't even beat Florida.
Tom Brady, especially when you consider his post U of M accomplishments, and he isn't done yet, maybe Super Bowl win #5 might happen.
Brady is awesome, but the vast majority of his accomplishments were post Wolverine playing time.
You must be remembering things different than I do. Michigan's problems those first two losses weren't the QB's fault. It was all on the defense that lost a ton of talent from the 97 team. The defense (and fumbling RBs) blew it against Notre Dame, and they just had no answers for McNabb. The Brady/Henson platoon had nothing to do with the losses in those first two games.
And Brady threw for 31/56, 375 yds, but only one TD vs Ohio State. Was that Henson's (who didn't play) fault too?
I swear...everyone remembers Brady's time at Michigan so different than it actually was.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
IIRC both losses in '98 were blowing huge leads. While a couple of wins were sizable comebacks. Because that was a passing team without a great defense and didn't really mesh with Carr's philosophy.
Somehow I typoed trying to type the same key twice. Meant to say '99.
is how many open 3rd down drive-sustaining throws Brady missed that day.
If Brady was really on that day, that could've been a very competitive game.
Well that explains it.
In the 1999 game at MSU Brady was the far better QB, but Lloyd split the time. I can't put the Illinois game on the QB situation. We just couldn't protect a 20 point lead.
Brady got the nod in the second half of the MSU game because the offense didn't look great with either guy at the helm, but Henson did nail a long td pass late in the second quarter. Based on Lloyd's criteria of playing whomever was the hotter hand, Henson was a defensible choice.
I don't think Lloyd should have handled it that way, but I highly suspect he wanted to keep Henson as involved as possible to keep from losing him to baseball. And he did get a terrific year out of Henson in 2000, so it was partly successful. Unfortunately, in the '99 MSU game, Brady would have been better suited to win the game, and given the comeback that he almost led (in two years with Brady as a starter Michigan lost five games and Brady managed to rally the team late in each one of them) it's possible they would have won.
The Illinois game was extremely flukey. Michigan was playing a typical conservative Lloyd-ball game and it was working just fine, hence the 20-point lead. Anthony Thomas was playing well but got dinged (groin tweak, maybe? I don't recall) and Lloyd sent him to the locker room. There's no question in my mind that Thomas could have continued to play well, but Lloyd had a huge lead and didn't want to risk further injury, an understandable caution.
Then the wheels came off and Michigan's key RB had already hit the showers. Michigan wins if Thomas doesn't leave the game early, and the killer is that he really didn't have to.
I don't think that Brady re-entered until the 4th Quarter, when he threw for over 200 yards. I remember trying to defend him to people in New England who didn't think he was that great in college.
That game and loss finally showed the separation between the two QBs that year. Too bad that Michigan had no answer for Burress on defense and didn't put Brady in until too late.
Henson had probably had a better season in 2000 than Brady did, and was probably the better college QB, just not when he was a Sophmore/ Freshman and Brady was a Senior/ Junior.
to start the 2nd half, given the rest of his first paragraph.
Illinois in 1999 was my first game at the Big House. I still can't believe we blew that lead. :(
was during mybirthday dinner with my parents. I still have no idea how that ball was dropped.
And Brady threw for 31/56, 375 yds, but only one TD vs Ohio State. Was that Henson's (who didn't play) fault too?
I swear...everyone remembers Brady's time at Michigan so different than it actually was.
You should make sure you're talking about the same year as everyone else before you get all uppity.
Under or improperly utilized is different than underrated. I don't think anyone is underrating Brady. Dude is an all-timer.
Yea you have to say Brady. Woodson is one of the best defensive players of all time and has the hardware to prove it but Manning is one of the best QB's of this and many other generations.
I remember thinking why in the hell is Carr splitting time between Brady and Henson after 2-3 games. I remember the season going something Brady QB's the team to a lead (7-0, 10-0) and Henson comes in to lose the lead so Brady comes back out and wins the game in the 4th. Their stats that year wheren't even close, Henson should have never played but, it's possibly what pushed Brady to be so good. Nobody appreciated Brady when he was here (besides a few) and everyone wanted Henson but now everyone is a Brady fan.
While the vast majority of the accomplishments he's known for have happened in the pros, he went 20-5 as a starter at UM, won a Big Ten title and was 2-0 in bowl games with one of them being an Orange Bowl victory.
Why folks be tryin' to let the air out of Tom Brady's reputation?
Oops! Perhaps I should rephrase that.
But is he a Michigan man?
Ray Jackson was underrated...with more opportunity he could have really developed...played strong...could dribble and drive
when I need a quick pick me up
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Garrett Rivas always seemed to catch a lot of flack for being a really solid kicker
of Braylon vs. MSU. Clutch kicks the whole game. . .
So I was biased against him for the rest of his time here, until one day when I realized he'd actually been pretty good for a while.
Not unlike Brendan Gibbons.
Jason Avant. Never had the big play threat or hype of Mario, but was equally important to the offense.
Jason Avant. Never had the big play threat or hype of Braylon, but was equally important to the offense.
Your version is much better, because I'm an idiot who couldn't remember who played when...I was thinking Arrington played with Braylon and Avant with Manningham, it's obviously the other way around. Someone slap me.
Avant was one of my favorite players...great hands, good route runner, nice size on the ball. Braylon was obviously a massive talent but the offense wouldn't work if the secondaries only had to respect Navarre and then Henne (his senior year, as a freshman) throwing to him. He went on to probably have the better NFL career as well.
Arrington was solid as well... good possession compelement to Mario.
Since you said all-time, Harry Newman.
He was a QB that played at Michigan from 1930-1932, went 24-1-2 with three Western Conference Championships and the 1932 National Championship.
Won the Douglas Fairbanks Trophy which was the Heisman before the Heisman.
If that wasn't enough, he played both ways as QBs did back in those days. He was what is called a defensive back in today's football. Here he is picking off a pass in 1932
But wait, there's more. He played all three ways. He also kicked field goals for Michigan's 1932 National Championship team. He kicked the game-winning and championship-winning FG in the 2nd quarter of the 1932 game with Minnesota to give Michigan the 3-0 win.
And yet, he is never mentioned on all-time team lists. He is the closest Michigan has to a Heisman trophy winning QB......for now....
All I have to say is that I knew Mr. Newman and he was a great and humble guy!
-2? WD could post that he likes Michigan's helmets and some people would still neg him.
Maybe the people who negged WD have a good reason. After all, the pictures aren't in color.
Oh wait...
Then again, maybe they're just idiots.