QB Job "Wide Open"

Submitted by The Mad Hatter on

Not much new information in the article, more of a summary of things we already know.

I really like that Drevno plans to organize the offense around the strengths of the QB, instead of putting a square peg into a round hole like we've been doing since 2008.

 

http://www.mlive.com/wolverines/index.ssf/2015/03/michigan_qb_job_wide_open_offe.html

Gulogulo37

March 4th, 2015 at 10:29 AM ^

Gutierrez went on to play at the University of Michigan, where he was slated to be the starter in 2004 before he suffered a shoulder injury (a torn labrum) before the season opener during pregame warm-ups. Backup quarterback freshman Chad Henne played well during the games Gutierrez was unable to play and was thus awarded the starting job.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Gutierrez

Auerbach

March 4th, 2015 at 11:02 AM ^

You might not have been around back then, but it was a common suspicion that the "injured shoulder" line was  a "save face" story floated by Lloyd's staff so Guitierrez wouldn't lose pro interest. He was, after all, an NFL-caliber player, but it doesn't do him any favors when people hear that he was beat out by a true freshman. Note that Gutierrez never won the starting job back after that even though he played some garabage time and also releived a shaken up Henne during a game (I don't remember which) in Henne's 2nd year. 

Gulogulo37

March 4th, 2015 at 8:39 PM ^

I was around. I went to that game. I remember hearing on the radio in the parking lot structure that Gutierrez was hurt and Henne would be the starter. Your conspiracy theory made me laugh, so thanks for that.

4EverBlueGirl

March 4th, 2015 at 11:21 AM ^

Can and will he?   We shall see.

I'm not following the Henne comparison tho.

Henne's surprising start came about after expected starter Matt Gutierrez was declared unable to play because of soreness in his throwing arm.  Carr didn't even announce the decision until right before the opener. Henne then earned and kept his job and Matt went to Idaho State.
 

umumum

March 4th, 2015 at 2:10 PM ^

Morris was essentially just as successful, playing in the exact same conference.  Plus he was higher rated.  And that hasn't worked out to date.  So let's quit annointing 6 foot QBs before they have ever played a game.  Not realistic and not fair to Malzone.

CoachBP6

March 4th, 2015 at 2:44 PM ^

Wilton Speight had better high school numbers and is very much a Harbaugh type QB, and more importantly, a winner. I broke them both down side by side and I gotta say I like Malzones confidence and work ethic, but I think Wilton is better and will win the job. If Malzone wins the job he will have earned it every day. I think Wilton's size / mobility in the pocket make him the better option, but I'll wait til the spring game before I name a front runner.

Qmatic

March 4th, 2015 at 10:26 AM ^

Malzone is a comfortable notch below Henne when he came in (and Ryan Mallett too) I'm pretty opposed to true fresh starting at QB, unless they are head above shoulders the competition. I don't see that being the case come fall. I think Malzone likely will end up the best out of the trio, but I'm not sure he will be better off than Speight or Morris from the start.

blueblueblue

March 4th, 2015 at 10:27 AM ^

I don't think I've ever read a Baumgardner article with anything new in it. He does what he can with information that has made its way around the twitters and blogs.

MGoATC

March 4th, 2015 at 10:29 AM ^

Harbaugh Factor
Kaepernick replaced Alex Smith, who was 19-5-1 as a starter under Harbaugh. Coach will have no problem keeping this, or any other position an open competition



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

LSAClassOf2000

March 4th, 2015 at 10:46 AM ^

And, while we're at it, things probably won't be ironed out in spring period. Jim Harbaugh will put his quarterbacks through a true competition, and right now, everything's running even.

I personally am fine with that, if there isn't a definitive #1 at the close of spring practice, but it would be interesting to know if at that point there is at least some discernable separation between QBs. To what the OP mentioned, I actually like that the plan seems to be to build the offense from a central point rather than having a preconceived scheme and trying to fit people inside that. It rather ensures (or attempts to ensure anyway) you don't have the problem of "square peg, round hole" altogether. 

funkywolve

March 4th, 2015 at 4:08 PM ^

I'm guessing there will to some extent be some separation between the QB's after Spring practice.  Will it be enough to say there is a clear #1?  Who knows. 

I'm guessing what the QB's do in the off-season might play as a big of a role as Spring practice in determining who starts.  There's an entire new playbook to learn and after only 15 Spring practices I'm guessing there will still be a large portion of the playbook to learn.  Will any of the QB's come back with a broader knowledge and understanding of the playbook after the summer?  Did any of the QB's seem to develop better chemistry with wr's during the course of the off season workouts?

Blau

March 4th, 2015 at 10:55 AM ^

Yeah because Denard and Tate were such sqaure pegs for RR's round hole spread offense. Hell, even in 2011, Denard did pretty well in Borges's offense even though he wasn't "suited" for it. Fact is, ever year the OC gameplans for the QB's strength. I'd like our O Line to finally be a strength or even our RBs to take the leap. 

 

allintime23

March 4th, 2015 at 10:58 AM ^

Denard basically just ran for his life and created scores out of broken plays all of hokes first year. Anytime he actually took snaps under center and tried to run any power stuff the offense was awful. You saw more spread elements in year two because they came to the realization that they couldn't run the pro set they were pushing. It actually cost us a few games.

Blau

March 4th, 2015 at 11:20 AM ^

Agree to a point. It was obvious the longer that staff stayed around, the more west coast, pro-style O they were going to install once Denard left. The more he installed, the more heat he took for taking away what made Denard awesome. He didn't last long anyhow.

 

My point is that Denard's offense WAS him running around in space for his life. So what if it isn't a designed play? Borges knew that and RR definitely knew it. The whole "controlled chaos" that was his offense was based on getting the fastest guy on the field the ball every down and trying not to get a holding penalty while he sprinted past eveyone. I believe the OP is trying to state that now we will have 4-5 pro style QBs and a coach who runs a smashmouth style offense better suited to these players.

The Uke

March 4th, 2015 at 10:57 AM ^

I feel really good having a former Michigan and NFL quarterback being the guy to make the final choice. All the qbs bring something different to the table and I believe Harbough will get it right about who gives us the best chance of winning.

CoachBP6

March 4th, 2015 at 11:14 AM ^

Of course the QB race is wide open. The team has practiced only a small number of times. Even if someone has separated themselves, do you really expect the coaches to say?

Yooper

March 4th, 2015 at 11:19 AM ^

Yards, TD passes, interceptions.  Averages for first year, full-time QB's under Harbaugh.  If we get this type of production out of one of these guys, we will have a great year.

Perkis-Size Me

March 4th, 2015 at 11:24 AM ^

It's going to be wide open for a while. The only guy on the roster that has any in-game experience has performed poorly (putting it mildly), and everyone else is either a true freshman, a RS freshman, or a walk-on.

I'm operating under the assumption that we won't know who our starter will be until maybe a week or so before Utah.

Ryanonymous

March 4th, 2015 at 12:36 PM ^

I also had a back and forth with Steve Lorenz or another analyst about the same thing.
From the film I watched and games I saw Alex has a great arm and throws with more zip than I've seen from anyone on our roster except Shane. Shane can wing it but has poor decision making.
Speight didn't seem to compare when watching the two of them, Shane and him, during warm ups last year.
Also, many of the recruiting sites and articles talked about Malzone's arm strength and accuracy as being assets with the only real knock on him being his height.
At 6'1 - 6'2 or better he's not exactly too short for the position either.
What gives?

JonnyHintz

March 4th, 2015 at 3:01 PM ^

He could start. But he's not on campus yet, so he isn't a part of the competition. Adding to that, he is extremely unlikely to start. He is incredibly raw, has poor mechanics, poor pocket presence and has played poor competition in New Mexico, which shows he will have to adapt to the college level as far as talent and speed. That doesn't mention him being the last QB on campus. Meaning the last QB to receive a playbook, last to be in the film room, last to participate in conditioning, last to participate in weight room, last to take a snap, and last to receive any collegiate coaching. All of which, is going to put him way behind the rest of the QBs. EXTREMELY unlikely that he will be the starting QB this season. He would benefit from a redshirt. We all know how detrimental a wasted redshirt season can be for these kids based on the Hoke years. I think Gentry is just going to be too far behind developmentally to challenge for starts this season.

AA2Denver

March 4th, 2015 at 12:44 PM ^

Wow. I think we are going to be okay.

"The average statistical output for first-year, full-time college starting quarterbacks under Jim Harbaugh: 2,584 yards, 21 touchdowns and 8 interceptions."

jabberwock

March 4th, 2015 at 2:20 PM ^

but i don't think he'll start, and i think Harbaugh is going to keep inviting/recruiting a lot of QB's to Ann Arbor, and its for a pretty simple reason.

He's looking for the next Jim Harbaugh.

How many of you watched his QB coaching clinic video?  He's the most insane competitior I've ever seen or heard, and he absolutely wants, hungers, DEMANDS that same competitiveness from his quarterback.  
No matter how many stars they have, games they've played or how pretty they can throw a spiral; if theyre aren't practically alienating their teammates with their over-the-top competitiveness than Jim Harbaugh doesn't want them.

I think he's waiting, searching, evaluating (like any coach) but believes that given the right attitude, all the other QB skills can be coached up later with the right guy.

That "right guy" is who he sees in the mirror, and I'm not sure I could argue with that.

 

jabberwock

March 4th, 2015 at 3:15 PM ^

I just think think that Harbaugh believes there are coachable skills and then there are innate personality traits that more equate to "being a winner".

He's not going to hand the QB job to some clumsy, never-say-die idiot.

But if for example Malzone is breathing competitive fire but isn't quite as experinced as Morris, or have the physical prowess of Speight, etc. then he's going to give Malzone EVERY opportunity to devolpe until he's close, may even just close enough.

Maybe I put too much stock in his QB clinic video?, but he stated numerous times in that video that the #1 job of the QB is to protect the football, but that the number one QB trait is the "will to win!"  he seems quite obsessed by it.

 

JonnyHintz

March 4th, 2015 at 3:50 PM ^

Personally, I don't think that it is limited to just the QB. I believe the #1 trait of any athlete is the will to win. The guy who is going to stick his neck out for the guy next to him is the guy I want on my team. The size and speed and everything is fine. But the will to do whatever it takes to win the game, is something coaches covet.