STUDENTS: BRANDON IS NOT MICHIGAN, WE ARE. BOYCOTT PENN STATE KICKOFF.

Submitted by kakusei on

MICHIGAN STUDENTS:

BOYCOTT PENN STATE KICKOFF.

DO NOT GO TO YOUR SEATS UNTIL AFTER KICKOFF.  

WAIT OUTSIDE SECTION GATES, AND TOGETHER WE CAN:

DESTROY BRANDON'S UTL BABY WHILE STILL SUPPORTING THE TEAM.

DEMONSTRATE OUR 'OUTSTANDING' RELATIONSHIP WITH THE AD

DISPATCH BRANDON BEFORE HE DESTROYS THE PRIDE OF OUR UNIVERSITY

IMAGINE:

AN EMPTY STUDENT SECTION FROM THE BLIMP CAM ON NATIONAL TV

AN EMBARASSED BRANDON ON THE SIDELINE

A SCHOOL UNITED IN ITS RESOLVE

SUPPORT THE TEAM &

END BRANDON SATURDAY

HE IS NOT MICHIGAN. WE ARE.

#kickOUTbrandon (instead of kickoff. heh. get it?)

GET THE WORD OUT. 

details / logistical discussion below.

kakusei

October 5th, 2014 at 3:17 PM ^

it sounds like people are concerned that no one will notice if we are not in our seats just before kickoff.  if we are succesful and the student section is empty, it will be MUCH more noticable than some of the poor student showings earlier this year.

But more important than that, is the publicity.  If the campus and media, etc. are AWARE of this protest prior to the game, the story will write itself.  That's why to make this work we have publicize this as best we can and get as many students on board.  If it gets as much attention as say the rally did, media outlets will be talking about it well before the game, and - if the broadcasters are aware - may even mention it beforehand.  

I'm up for extending this to regular ticket holders, but that's probably going to be difficult to organize effectively.  The student section is small(ish) and manageable in that regard.  But if you want to protest with the rest of us then by all means join us!

And finally, I understand that this can be construed as disrespectful to the players.  But if we are serious about change in the AD we need to make a statement and I believe this is the best possible option.  Everyone is going to filter back to their seats after kickoff (there will likely be a TV timeout anyway, giving more time for the student section to fill back up).  We can also help mitigate this perception if we publicize this and get our message and intentions across before the demonstration itself, and emphasize that this is not a slight to the players, but is aimed squarely at the AD.

If this is managed right, it will work.

Huma

October 5th, 2014 at 3:21 PM ^

Wrong. This does not accomplish the goal you are seeking to achieve. You are confused about the concern being voiced. It is not that is will not be noticed -- it is that it will be noticed and will just be an embarrassment to the entire university and the football team and it will have NO EFFECT on whether or not DB keeps his job. This is not the best or most efficient way to voice your concern about the AD.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

kakusei

October 5th, 2014 at 3:34 PM ^

fair point, but i really don't think the football team can be embarassed any further.  we keep talking about how disgruntled the students are about ticket prices, lackluster home schedules, etc., but all i hear are complaints and no action.  A rally will get quick notice from fans and the media, but we need something more than 500 students milling around the diag.  brandon has to go, and he's been clever to craft these protests as abberations and deflect public outrage at the handling of concussion gate by countering that it not an indicative baromoter by which to gauge support for him and his policies.  and even if you think this may 'embarass the team', we should not embarass ourselves by reinforcing brandon's own discordant beliefs about his relationship with students, and his piss poor treatment of a very VERY serious health issue.  instead of taking the lead (promoting research at the university, testing concussion sensors, etc.) on this concussion issue, brandon has decided that giving the trainers walkie talkies (why didn't they have them before?!) is going to prevent further miscommunications.  something needs to be done to effect change around here, and signs and rallys aren't going to cut it.  i strongly believe that if the message of this protest is molded correctly and publicized pervasively, it will NOT be construed by anyone - fans, players, announcers, etc - as a slight against the players and the team itself.  this is about brandon's mismanagement and stupefying rationalizations for his despicable behavior.

maizenbluenc

October 5th, 2014 at 4:46 PM ^

the boos, the losing, the incompetence shown on the field (the concussion issue, 10 players on the field, delay of game after a timeout, etc.), the mishandled and condescending crisis PR management, and the alienation of the student body are all embarrassments to the University.

A well planned, targeted, and articulated student protest highlights that they are holding the people in charge are accountable in a visible public way.

I'd rather they do this, than boo an interception.

bj dickey

October 5th, 2014 at 5:23 PM ^

The problem is that to make the point they need to do something different. The students never show up early. Why not make a concerted effort to have everyone show early. Clap and yell for your team. BOOO Brandon when he appears. Wear Brandon tshirts. Bring signs. Not showing up on time is the stasus quo and no one will notice or care other than the few students who organize it. And please do not boo the team.

cGOBLUEm

October 5th, 2014 at 3:22 PM ^

The entire state of Michigan football breaks my heart for the sake of the players. They are only 18-22 and do not deserve to go through all of this. I want DB gone as badly as the next guy, but imagine being s player and looking up to see an empty student section. Please find a different way to voice you displeasure.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BeatOSU52

October 5th, 2014 at 4:55 PM ^

And maybe this the problem. Our players are are being treated as invincible before they even get to campus during their recruitment and perhaps they are still being coddled while they are here. Tough luck if these players think they are the ones Being booed. Part of college is realizing the world isn't always that kind and you must overcome adversity. As someone said, these are big boys and it shouldn't be the end of their lives if not everyone is in their seat at kickoff.

bj dickey

October 5th, 2014 at 5:29 PM ^

You have missed the point entirely. It is not student body vs student athletes. Unless I've missed something. Te way to make a point about Brandon is to show support for the tradition that preceded him while showing the regents and the administration you disapprove of his stewardship of that tradition. In my opinion you're not going to accomplish that with a boycott of a few thousand empty seats, especially when most are empty at kickoff anyway. If anything you will give credence to Brandon's complaints the students never showed up,on time.

Jon06

October 5th, 2014 at 3:25 PM ^

But the message needs to be as clear as possible. If the students are chanting "Fire Brandon" in the concourse while they're boycotting kickoff, chanting "Fire Brandon" while they file in to their seats, and chanting "Fire Brandon" during every TV timeout, then I think this will be a great and effective protest. I also agree with the calls above for signs and other visual symbols of displeasure. The message needs to be clear enough and loud enough to reach Schlissel and the regents in no uncertain terms.

MMBSaxMan

October 5th, 2014 at 3:38 PM ^

Please scrap this idea. As a former MMB member, performing for a empty Big House is one of the most deflating experiences a Michigan student can have. Show up, support you band, cheerleaders, dance team, and the rest of the students and staff who put in countless hours of work in order to cheer on this team. 

mackbru

October 5th, 2014 at 3:40 PM ^

Think about it. You're an M player who's heard nothing but criticism and noise all year. And you come out, in need of support, and see your student section empty. Yeah, very helpful idea.

Go Blue Rosie

October 5th, 2014 at 3:47 PM ^

I like your passion and I get where you are coming from but is an empty student section at kickoff what you want the country (and recruits) to see? Do you really think it will have any bearing on whether or not Brandon is retained? It's already well documented how students feel- there is a petition with 10k+ signatures and there was a Fire Brandon rally. I agree that he should go but coaches and ADs rarely lose their jobs because students are unhappy with them. Donors and high level people connected to the school make things like that happen.

If you stage your delayed entrance, the risk is that you won't be able to control the message the media reports. An empty student section at kick off could very well (and will most likely) be spun into a variation on students have turned against the team, students are apathetic, students are fair weather fans. And more than likely, the images of the empty student section will hit social media without the message you want leaving everyone free to comment on how much Michigan sucks.

If I were a student I would go early and cheer on the band and the team as loudly as possible. Show Penn State, OSU, MSU, the media and all the rest that we love our school and our teams no matter what. No one is going to mistake that for an endorsement of either Brandon or Hoke.

Willie Heston

October 5th, 2014 at 3:48 PM ^

I support this effort in principle.

However, examine this document below from 2011-2012 concerning the revenues generated by events at Michigan Stadium. 

http://www.regents.umich.edu/meetings/06-11/2011-06-X-13.pdf

Unless you are making a dent in the admissions number (~38% of revenue) then I am not sure how a delayed admission into the stadium affects DB other than being an embarrasing blip on his radar.

I was erroneously under the impression that a concession boycott could have some effect for those that are already committed to going to the stadium--but they are only about 2.5% of the revenue.

Anyway, I do like the idea proposed by the students, I just think it is important to think in terms of broader effects on the bottom line as detailed in the document attached as the only real way to get the administration's  attention.

slimj091

October 5th, 2014 at 3:49 PM ^

What exactly do alumni have to do to be labeled as "not Michigan"? I mean I get that you are upset with a few of his policies, but how to current students to get to decide which Michigan Graduates get to represent the university?

State Street

October 5th, 2014 at 3:52 PM ^

To be honest it sounds like most of the people dissenting are old farts/Wal-Mart types who are still hiding behind the much maligned "Support the Troops" defense.

As a youngish alum, I can pretty safely say this protest will be welcomed by ~95% of the student section, if not more.

Go Blue Rosie

October 5th, 2014 at 4:12 PM ^

First of all, I'm a youngish alum and I think this is a bad idea for the reasons I stated. I'm not sure you can use age to generalize the differences of opinion here. Second, I'm not trying to be rude by calling you put but I don't think we need to insult Michigan fans who didn't go to the school by adopting the MSU 'Wal-Mart Wolverine' tag. Can we please leave insults like that to our rivals? A fan is a fan.

Sports

October 5th, 2014 at 3:54 PM ^

So...you're suggesting that we, as students, pretend not to be apathetic about the team by acting apathetic to send a message?

They've already lost the majority of the student body. Even die hards that have watched the team their entire lives are beginning to give up. 

Besides, do you honestly think the student section will be full anyway? The idiots scheduled this game for fall break. Most students are going home. Between the shitty performance of the team, the general apathy regarding the schedule, and the direct hatred of the AD and coach, less than 67% of the student section will even attempt to attend. Guaranteed. 

Save the protest for Maryland, which people will actually probably show up to, given that it's senior day and is the last game of the season, aka the last chance for students to have a football saturday. 

wbpbrian

October 5th, 2014 at 3:54 PM ^

Have like 500 students hold up one poster so it looks like one sign that says fire Brandon. Just get alot of students to hold up one part of the sign.

chatster

October 5th, 2014 at 4:03 PM ^

Create three long banners or arrange card signs so that (a) The top banner has  “LET’S” written on the front and “WE’RE” written on the back. (b) The middle banner has “UPSET” written on it.  (c) The bottom banner has “PENN STATE” written on the front and “FIRE BRANDON” written on the back.
 
When the team enters the stadium through the tunnel, as the students sing The Victors, to support the players, the banners would read:
 
LET’S
UPSET
PENN STATE
 
When the music ends and all the players have reached the Michigan sideline, the top and bottom banners would be flipped to read:
 
WE’RE
UPSET
FIRE BRANDON
 
And then the "Fire Brandon" chants could begin

UMForLife

October 5th, 2014 at 3:57 PM ^

I see a lot of messages about how the proposed boycott will not support the players.

Hey, How about the whole plan of AD did not support the students -- You know the other students who actually pay out of their pocket to watch the game? Who is speaking for those students? Football players? I don't see them having a sign that says, "Do not raise the ticket price for students DB. We need them." (I actually believe that if there is a choice for those football players, they will probably have a board...)

I know some of the people on this board are not students and some are. The idea was for the students to protest. So, let the students do what they want. If you don't want to protest, don't. There is no need to tell others not to.

DB has a lot of power. The only power students have is the right to protest.