Hoke revealed first team OL today (in first padded practice).......

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on

Okay.

EDIT: fixed to not scare people as much

Hoke says first team OL today was Mason Cole LT, Magnuson LG, Miller C, RG Glasgow/Dawson, RT Braden

— Nick Baumgardner (@nickbaumgardner) August 8, 2014

aiglick

August 9th, 2014 at 10:23 AM ^

True Freshman OL = really scary situation. Also having that freshman OL protecting the QB's blindside. It may be good in the future if Cole starts but I'm not sure how he can be physically ready to stand up to mature DLineman and that fact alone should make some of our Redshirt Sophomores better options. If the line performs anywhere near the level of last year this season is probably at risk making next year do-or-die. On the other hand may not make sense to get too worried when this is just the end of the first week of practice. Don't pay twice.

RobM_24

August 8th, 2014 at 7:31 PM ^

The only thing to figure out is which of these guys are actually starters, and which guys are being called starters, strictly to motivate the guys that will be starters. Kalis is obviously one guy he's trying to motivate by not naming. I'm guessing he said Miller at C bc of the whole Glasgow drunk driving punishment. A true frosh LT doesn't seem likely, but I think ND had one in recent history, so who knows.

LordGrantham

August 8th, 2014 at 7:44 PM ^

Even if you're right, which I seriously doubt, 5-star prospects in their third year of college football after two disappointing seasons shouldn't need extra motivation, especially on THE FIRST FUCKING DAY OF PRACTICE.  Kalis was supposed to be ready immediately.  The fact that he's even questionably ready as a junior is a terrible sign.

Reader71

August 9th, 2014 at 12:06 AM ^

It is possible that Kalis is ready and is poised to be the best lineman on the team, but that he had a lackluster summer in the weight room and is being motivated. More to the point, who cares is the 5* underperforms so long as the other guys perform well? Mike Hart meant that Kevin Grady (or whoever the other, more highly touted kid was) didn't really matter.

RobM_24

August 8th, 2014 at 9:59 PM ^

Maybe he showed up too heavy. Maybe he hasn't been as vocal as Hoke would like. It could be anything. Hoke pretended like there was an open competition between Morris and Gardner at one point. Everyone knew Morris wasn't going to start, it was just motivation for DG. That's how Hoke does things. A lot of coaches do. What does he gain by anointing Kalis the starter on Day 1? He's just letting them know they are going to have to earn the right to be called starters.

Boom Goes the …

August 8th, 2014 at 7:42 PM ^

why does anyone (especially on the oline) need "motivated"

They stunk it up last year, and everyone knows it

How about we put our 5 best linemen out there in the positions they are going to play, and practice at those spots

 

We don't have time for motivational ploys, they need reps and cohesion

Reader71

August 9th, 2014 at 12:10 AM ^

That's not how the inside of Schembechler Hall works. You have to motivate every single day. You are trying to turn 18 year old immature lumps of nothing into football playing students athletes and also develop them as people. The minutia of the every day goings on are very important to a team, even if fans don't know anything about it. These kids live and die every day over what would seem to us to be trivial things. There are little tests and teaching opportunities every day.

LSAClassOf2000

August 8th, 2014 at 7:44 PM ^

Like others have said, there are three weeks of practice left and this is subject to change perhaps as early as tomorrow afternoon for all we really know, but more important, it is important to remember that - at any given moment, either in practice or in the season - there is the "depth chart" and then there is the "depth chart", and they are rarely the same thing. One is for public consumption / conversation, the other is not basically. 

JZ

August 8th, 2014 at 7:35 PM ^

It's still early, however if this is a testament to Magnuson's ability (or lack thereof) at the Left Tackle position...that is worrisome . 

evenyoubrutus

August 8th, 2014 at 7:48 PM ^

This makes me feel better. Not sure why, maybe deep down I was worried that things would be so bad they wouldn't find a starting 5 and would just leave one of the spots vacant and play with 4 linemen or something.

TheDirtyD

August 8th, 2014 at 7:39 PM ^

Lots of practice left. No matter how pissed off or happy you get it won't change the staffs mind so you might as well get over it and cheer whoever the starting five are.

theguy49503

August 8th, 2014 at 7:44 PM ^

Guys thats the line up for today I will bet anyone on this forum it wont be the starting oline week 1. Relax, Brady is mixing it up to see what he's got the line up will be different next week. By the end of week 2 start of week 3 we will know who the starters are.

LordGrantham

August 8th, 2014 at 7:47 PM ^

Your hypothesis doesn't provide anymore reassurance.  If Hoke is having to "mix it up" by starting a freshman LT and leaving out a 5-star junior guard, it is a huge indictment on his coaching abilities and his selection of an offensive line coach.  This is ridiculous.

stephenrjking

August 8th, 2014 at 8:09 PM ^

If this were just a Kalis issue, you wouldn't be getting this kind of reaction from fans or movement from coaches. It would be disappointing but hardly unheard of for a highly-touted prospect to not pan out. If that was what was happening and it was just Kalis not making the grade, too bad but okay.

But we wondered that for a bit last year... and none of the other options played well either. Glasgow was the only interior lineman that seemed capable of anything. The whole line was a mess and none of the players could improve it.

And here we have not just Kalis, but Bosch and maybe Magnuson, and something strange happening at center (is it because we have a hole at RG, or did Miller make a jump, or what?). If it was just a matter of one player not making it, fine; but a whole cast of players not cutting it is another issue entirely. 

wresler120

August 8th, 2014 at 7:46 PM ^

I have to believe Mason Cole will start at LT. He was named as a top lineman in the spring and now he comes into fall camp turning heads. I will be shocked if Cole does not line up at LT to start the App State game

stephenrjking

August 8th, 2014 at 7:46 PM ^

Here's why this is a big deal:

Last season, there was a lot of shuffling on the OL in preseason. Players expected to fill spots weren't playing at all, or were playing in different spots. Certain guys expected to be reliable anchors on the interior couldn't seem to win their jobs cleanly.

And we went through some of this. After 2012, where the OL had some serious issues, we were hoping that the new 4 and 5-star guys were going to step in and at least play at the same level. But we knew OL was a questionmark.

So there was bellyaching, but there were also guys professing optimism that things would be ok. That it was just competition, that things would come together, that they were just finding the right combination of guys.

The result? The worst OL in Michigan history. They could not even peform at a level that would be acceptable in the MAC.

So, this year, the benefit of the doubt is gone... and the chances that, after losing two NFL draft picks and otherwise returning most of the same guys on the interior, things will not be drastically better. 

So the heavy disruption, like last year, is a bad sign. There is a 98% chance this means things are really bad.

And if that is so, it is a dramatic, horrible failure that falls squarely on the shoulders of the head coach.

BlueCube

August 8th, 2014 at 7:50 PM ^

Is what I would hope for but so many expected so much from the young guys on the line and ripped on Funk for not developing the guys. Now we have someone stepping up apparently and everyone is in panic mode. That being said, messages are being sent and I have confidence in Nuss to pull this together.