John O'Neil should be banned from officiating B1G games

Submitted by Diagonal Blue on November 19th, 2018 at 11:00 AM

Re: The John O'Neill crew. This isn't a one-game issue. This isn't a three-game issue. This is years of consistent, game-defining malpractice. This isn't just bad calls; their inability to manage personal fouls is the reason these games get out of control and players get hurt.

— Seth M. Fisher (@Misopogon) November 18, 2018

Off the top of my head

2018 IU
2018 Nebraska
2017 MSU
2016 Iowa
2016 Oregon State
2016 UCF
2014 IU, ND and OSU
2013 Nebraksa
2012 OSU, Illinois
2011 Illinois

And that infamous 2014 OSU-PSU game

— Seth M. Fisher (@Misopogon) November 18, 2018

LeCheezus

November 19th, 2018 at 1:00 PM ^

I think that game is way overblown in the fanbase and amplified because it was The Game, our recent history with OSU and the feeling that we finally had a good enough team to compete.  I watched that video someone posted about the no live ball fouls and I saw 3 legitimate bad missed calls (the late hit and a couple of PI/Defensive holding) and the rest were pretty boarder line.  You can argue the spot all you want but there was no definitive angle and IMO the offense gets the benefit of the doubt in most cases of spotting the ball.  2015 MSU by far the worst game I've seen from officials in a Michigan game and was orders of magnitude worse than 2016 OSU.

JPC

November 19th, 2018 at 11:20 AM ^

The NCAA needs to hire full-time referees who get paid only to ref D1 NCAAFB games. The refs need to be drawn from the entire country, the crews need to be composed of people from dissimilar places, and the crews need to be randomly mixed frequently. 

During the offseason, the refs can do rules training and "virtual reffing" of games that have occurred in the recent past - all being graded. Poor performers need to get fired. 

NCAAFB is a money generating machine. If position coaches can be paid hundreds of thousands of dollars, a ref can be paid $200k a year so they can focus on their craft. 

EGD

November 19th, 2018 at 11:48 AM ^

I don't even think they'd need to pay them anywhere near $200K.  I think you could pay them something comparable to what most state court judges or other high-level public servants make and that would easily be enough--and that's just for the actual referee; the other crew members could be paid less than that DOE. I'm sure there are plenty of people who would sign up to be a field judge or an umpire for $50K or $70K a year, maybe even less.

  

S.G. Rice

November 19th, 2018 at 12:15 PM ^

While I don't disagree with the general sentiment, I don't think that randomly mixing crews frequently is optimal.  The fact of the matter is that being an official is hard.  Each member of the crew has certain responsibilities and they have to be able to work together.  The referee as crew chief has to be able to know the strengths and weaknesses of each.

JPC

November 19th, 2018 at 12:20 PM ^

I'm an academic by profession. The research on group performance as a function of group stability is mixed. One of the highest performing medical systems in the world randomly mixes their surgical support teams weekly.

In this instance, I think any loss of performance would be offset by the increased probability of an honest ref catching/reporting a crooked one. 

Plus, if you standardize and increase the training and kick out the shitty performers, you decrease person to person variance. 

mbrummer

November 19th, 2018 at 11:21 AM ^

I don't even know how to look it up,  if it's possible.  I'd love to see the underdog record vs the spread in his games.  

Every game he refs seems to be closer than it should be.

dragonchild

November 19th, 2018 at 12:30 PM ^

More like Chaotic Incompetent.  Obviously he has no regard for the integrity of the game, but if he was taking dirty money I think he'd be forced to be more brazen.  Also, he doesn't always seem necessarily biased; a lot of his calls are just inexplicable trash.  For example, ejecting Joe Bolden. . . that shell-shocked the defense and MSU took advantage, but FWIW he was one of the worst players on that defense.

He could be placing bets himself, though.  If he was managing his own risks he wouldn't necessarily need to panic if a team outperformed his expectations.

Alton

November 19th, 2018 at 11:32 AM ^

Probably the Capron crew, but obviously they won't announce that until Friday afternoon at the earliest.  Very unlikely to be O'Neil; Big Ten referees almost never get assigned to the same team two weeks in a row.  Hasn't happened in 3 years as far as I can see.

SCS100

November 19th, 2018 at 12:03 PM ^

I'd bet it's a general guideline as opposed to an actual rule. LeMonnier actually did back to back games in 2012 against Notre Dame and Purdue, but that also involved a bye week.

Also just remembered it was the O'Neill crew that was responsible for the Nebraska-Michigan State "receiver forced out of bounds" game in 2015, so we can add that to the list of officiating atrocities.

Leaders And Best

November 19th, 2018 at 12:11 PM ^

I think Capron is a possibility, but he worked The Game the last time it was in Columbus so I don't think it is going to happen twice in a row especially with how much publicity the officiating got in The Game in 2016. I think O'Neill and Kluczynski are out because they did the Michigan and OSU games last week respectively. Ron Snodgrass did The Game last year so I doubt he does it two years in a row. My guess is it is going to be Mike Cannon or Jerry McGinn.

SCS100

November 19th, 2018 at 12:25 PM ^

Kluczynski would have been highly unlikely anyways because he was responsible for the Northwestern phantom hold game this year. I'd add Jeff Servinski to the list of possibilities; he did the Penn State game this year and outside of one botched PI call I can't remember anything too egregious about his crew.

The Mad Hatter

November 19th, 2018 at 11:24 AM ^

They really should double the ref's salaries and make it a full time position.  It has to be hard to find qualified people willing to work part time.

That said, my conclusion is that the Big 10 just doesn't give a fuck about having competent officials.  Because it's not just Michigan that gets screwed on a regular basis by O'Neill crew (among others).

I think it would take the coaches and AD's to make a public stand for anything to change.

Watching From Afar

November 19th, 2018 at 11:25 AM ^

I'm having a hard time remembering anything terrible happening in the 2017 MSU game. Or the 2016 UCF game. Michigan didn't play Oregon State in 2016 either.

The 2014 and earlier ones I'm also having trouble remembering anything stupid happening in regards to officiating.

Care to help a guy out?

MH20

November 19th, 2018 at 12:41 PM ^

Pretty sure that Seth meant he 2015 Oregon State game. That was the game where Michigan wa called for roughing the kicker when the OSU punter had rolled out after bobbling the snap and had become a runner before then punting. You can't rough a runner...because he's a runner!

That call resulted in (I believe) the first sideline meltdown of the Harbaugh era.

Don

November 19th, 2018 at 11:55 AM ^

As long as Comedian/Masturbator Jim Delaney is BIG commish, nothing whatsoever will happen. If anything, he will ensure that this guy works the OSU game.

Referee OSU.jpg

CLord

November 19th, 2018 at 12:01 PM ^

After the game my first thought was how little interest I would ever have again in watching that game again.  It was just excruciating and took 4 hours.  Flags, injuries, cramps, QB escapes, converted IU 3rd downs, just painful,  but nowhere near as painful as watching Maryland miss a wide open pass to a guy  7 yards away to beat OSU...About as tough a weekend as I can imagine where we actually won.

Malum In Se

November 19th, 2018 at 12:01 PM ^

John O'Neill is the only college ref whose name I know.  Most refs aren't consistently bad enough to be memorable.  He and his crew are simply the worst.  

Either fire him or make him only officiate Rutger games.