Bill Connelly: "Michigan State was lucky as hell...they were lucky as hell last night"

Submitted by Bambi on October 15th, 2018 at 10:50 AM

The quote is from Bill C's podcast Podcast Ain't Played Nobody about MSU's win Saturday against PSU.

The quote is mostly related to MSU's turnover luck. Michigan State fumbled the ball 4 times and recovered them all. PSU had a potential pick on the game just dropped by a CB. According to Bill, when taking into account the amount of fumbles and batted balls PSU's defense had, MSU was expected to turn the ball over 5.5 times against PSU. They turned it over once. Each turnover is worth around 5 points, so turnover luck gained MSU around 20-21 points.

The following link is a Bill C post detailing a bunch of advanced stats box score numbers on all the games from this weekend (link). Some notables from the link:

  • Another Bill C quote on MSU: "the Spartans enjoyed about a 20- to 21-point boost thanks to turnovers luck... I swear, that happens every single time Sparty plays PSU, Michigan, or Ohio State, doesn’t it..."
  • MSU's post game win expectancy was 26%.
  • OSU's post game win expectancy was 66%.
  • Michigan's post game win expectancy was 86%.
  • Wisconsin had one of the best 5 points per scoring opportunity margins this week. Basically this means advanced numbers say Michigan should have scored more based on the amount of scoring opportunities we had but we didn't because we failed to finish drives. So not only were we not lucky, based on the numbers this game should have been an even bigger blowout.

EGD

October 15th, 2018 at 11:07 AM ^

Fumbling the ball and then recovering it is not "creat[ing] opportunities and then capitalizing on them."  It's fucking up and getting lucky.  Throwing a pass to a defensive back and having him drop it is not creating or capitalizing on opportunities either.  It's also fucking up and getting lucky.

I am not one to deny that MSU has had good teams and earned their success in past seasons.  But this year's MSU is not a good team.  if they are so good at creating and capitalizing on opportunities, whey didn't they do that against Arizona State?  Why didn't they create and capitalize on opportunities against Northwestern?

They got lucky at Penn State.  I don't expect they'll be in a position for luck to matter this coming weekend.

goblue4321

October 15th, 2018 at 11:21 AM ^

Except they r in a position of luck every time they play Michigan, this game will be close, state will throw everything and he kitchen sink to win this game so harbaugh better open his entire playbook because harbaugh CAN NOT Lose this game 

ijohnb

October 15th, 2018 at 11:21 AM ^

I think this misses the point.  Yes, they got a few breaks, but this was a game that people were predicting that they were going to get obliterated.  They were a two touchdown underdog.   Nobody gave them a shot to compete (me excluded, check the posting history for evidence if need be).  But the entire game they were every bit the equal of Penn State.  It was not a situation where they got really short fields because Penn State fumbled or threw pick deep in their zone. (In fact, to counter Connelly, the one time that MSU did force a clear fumble the refs ruled it down and did not review it).  They went head up with PSU, and if there were no rankings by the team names you would not have known who the favorite was, or why.  They punted the ball with 1:50 seconds remaining, down 3.  That is how confident they were that Penn State could not get 10 yards on them.   That is saying something.

It doesn't have anything to do with how this Michigan game will turn out, but I watched the entire MSU v. PSU game and never one time did I say to myself "wow, Michigan State is getting so lucky here I can't believe it."

I think people got carried away with the "MSU sucks" narrative, fueled by their own Mike Valenti.  They lost a bad game to a Northwestern game, that's it.  It happens.  We nearly lost to Northwestern too.  I think Michigan v. Michigan State is a really good BIG matchup against two good BIG teams that I think Michigan will win.  I think any other narrative is hyperbole and/or unsupported.

EGD

October 15th, 2018 at 11:58 AM ^

MSU and Penn State have pretty comparable talent.  MSU has the better coach, but Penn State was the healthier team and was playing at home.  So it was a pretty even matchup.  When two pretty evenly-matched teams square off, there's usually a handful of key plays that wind up deciding the game.  According to Connelly, MSU recovered four of its own fumbles, plus had Penn State drop an INT.  Lose just one of those five turnover opportunities, and Penn State likely wins.  When the ball is bouncing on the ground or fluttering in the secondary, it's pretty much random chance who comes up with it.  It's fair to say MSU was lucky because they went 5/5 on those occurrences.

I don't see how people's expectations about that game is relevant to the question of whether MSU got lucky.  I realize people were expecting MSU to get obliterated--honestly I hadn't given that game any thought beforehand, and don't know what I would have said if anyone had asked me.  But as badly as State had been playing up to that game, it wasn't because of some gross talent disparity.  They just didn't seem to have their shit together for whatever reason.  Okay, so they got their shit together enough to hold their own against Penn State. Good for them.  But they still needed a bunch of lucky breaks to actually win that game.

ijohnb

October 15th, 2018 at 12:10 PM ^

"But this years MSU team is not a good team."

That is taken directly from your post above. 

And then "MSU and Penn State have pretty comparable talent.  MSU has the better coach."

These really can't be reconciled. 

People are twisting themselves in pretzels right now for taeks about Michigan and Michigan State.  But the reality is that nothing has changed from the beginning of the season.  Both are formidable teams with conference title aspirations.  MSU made it especially tough on themselves by playing really poorly against NW, but also has the most impressive win of either team to date.  This will be a big win for one program and a notable setback for the other.

 

EGD

October 15th, 2018 at 12:17 PM ^

MSU is not a good team this year because we are seven games into the season and they have shown an inability to consistently execute at a sufficiently high level to defeat their opponents.  it doesn't mean they don't have talent on the roster, or that they aren't a dangerous team who can get their shit together for one week.

You are arguing with me over the fact that I think MSU "got lucky" when they recovered four of their own fumbles and had Penn State drop a game-sealing interception, and I'm the one twisting myself into a pretzel?  Whatever.

 

Indy Pete - Go Blue

October 15th, 2018 at 11:02 AM ^

 Regression to the mean is a beautiful thing. 69-36-5 all time  

 Luck can only get you so far.  3-9 = regression to the mean  

 The better team and the historically better team are one and the same. 

 Go blue on Saturday. 

Mr Grainger

October 15th, 2018 at 11:03 AM ^

MSU definitely caught its share of breaks in that game but good Lord, PSU played like crap. So many chances to put that away and they couldn't do it. They looked like they weren't focused at all. Looks like ol' James Franklin has a way to go before turning his "good" program into an "elite" one (ha ha!)

Michigan MUST NOT commit stupid penalties or turn the ball over Saturday. That's how MSU hangs around in so many of these slugfests in which they are underdogs. If the Wolverines play a good, clean game they should be able to put MSU away.

It's Always Marcia

October 15th, 2018 at 1:58 PM ^

Oh but come on, the media is all over Trace McSorely, the Heisman, and a possible 1st round pick.

Anyway, back to reality.

I saw how he played in the Rose Bowl. He sorta epitomizes Penn St under James Franklin---lots of talent and emotion, but bad in the clutch.

Detroit Dan

October 15th, 2018 at 11:15 AM ^

"Michigan MUST NOT commit stupid penalties" [Mr Grainger]

Michigan has committed very few stupid penalties this year.  Most penalties are judgment calls, and we had quite a few go against us (but not many against Wisconsin).  If you are playing hard (you know, blocking or defending Felton Davis), then there will be potential penalty calls.  These will not be stupid penalties but rather the cost of playing on the road.  Have to play through them.

tspoon

October 15th, 2018 at 11:40 AM ^

Totally agree.  Someone needs to slip something into Devin Bush's water bottle to chill him out before he comes out all tweaked up to take someone's head off.  A targeting out of him would be real trouble.  He's been incredible this year, but he has been yapping about the MSU game for months now. 

If he plays under control, he could very well dominate this game.  Their OLs aren't nearly good enough to keep him off their playmakers.

 

 

 

unWavering

October 15th, 2018 at 11:06 AM ^

I'm convinced Dantonio has sold his soul to some nefarious entity.  MSU has barely been playing above their historical mean of 'mediocre' for the majority of his tenure and he still somehow winds up winning 10 games every other year.

maize-blue

October 15th, 2018 at 11:07 AM ^

The team will have to be prepared for some unlucky penalty on a crucial 3rd down, or crazy tip/near interception that falls right into one of MSU's receivers hands, or any other possible scenario that Sparty will somehow fall ass-backward into and to not let those plays be the difference in the game.

Durham Blue

October 15th, 2018 at 11:56 AM ^

A huge key to victory for Michigan is to come out guns blazing on both sides of the ball and get an early 10 to 14 point lead.  MSU will probably win the toss because of aforementioned luck.  They will probably kick off to start the game.  We need to turn that first drive into points, preferably 7 points.  As others have stated we cannot let them hang around within one score.

MichiganTeacher

October 15th, 2018 at 11:07 AM ^

They really are damn lucky against PSU, OSU, and us. Weather, turnovers, dropped non-turnovers, scheduling,  etc. Also they are tremendously lucky not to have suffered worse from the Nassar situation. I guess that's partly not so much luck as it is people/media just not caring about their fleabag university.

Durham Blue

October 15th, 2018 at 11:41 AM ^

MSU always seems to be underwhelming on paper, from player talent level to their statistics.  They're probably the most unremarkable successful program of the past 10 years.  They play boring Tressel ball.  They rarely crush inferior opponents.  And they rarely lose by more than a score or two.  Opposing teams not named Michigan probably find it difficult to get up for the game.  But they're well coached.  Combine these things and you have recipes for upsets.

Don

October 15th, 2018 at 1:55 PM ^

"MSU always seems to be underwhelming on paper, from player talent level to their statistics. They're probably the most unremarkable successful program of the past 10 years."

Dantonio has used that lack of "respect" compared to sexier or bluer-blooded programs like UM, OSU, and PSU to his advantage in big games year after year. He basically rope-a-dopes teams into playing his style of ball, which is to slow the game down into a grinding defensive game if he can.If  the score is close in the 4th, he's pretty good at game management to preserve his chances, but isn't afraid to gamble in key situations, either.

dieseljr32

October 15th, 2018 at 11:28 AM ^

Not to mention Lewerke was 24/52 and averaged 5.0 ypc. Oh well, now they put three trick plays out there on tape that they couldn't save for UM. Rather have them fluke it out against the team a week  before they play Michigan. Just gotta trust the staff will have them prepared. 

evenyoubrutus

October 15th, 2018 at 11:29 AM ^

I really hope Patterson gets it together for MSU. It seems like he held onto the ball too long and missed a lot of passes against a bad secondary. MSU's secondary is worse, but their defensive line is very good. They're gonna need to throw effectively. 

Of course we all said that heading into Wisconsin so who knows anything?

TSimpson77

October 15th, 2018 at 11:35 AM ^

MSU is a very respektabal football team, not just lucky, they knew they were going to win that game because they've been disrespekted and depleted before and came out on top. Like I said very respekted and reputable football team and coaches, not lucky. Ever. See 2015 Michigan game as proof of not lucky. 

UMProud

October 15th, 2018 at 11:36 AM ^

He's right Sharty was lucky as hell.

On a separate note I was listening to secfans podcast on the M-W game and their computer model (published before the game), predicted something like 40-13 score or w/e...I was pretty stunned when I saw that.  Much of what they covered in their podcast came about...definitely going to be paying more attention to these guys.

GoWings2008

October 15th, 2018 at 11:36 AM ^

As a side note, look at the advertisement that popped up on MY MGOBLOG feed this morning as I was perusing the Board for articles.  What the ever loving hell is going on with our advertising dollars????  

State download.png