OT: Stern to Rome: "Stop beating your wife yet?"
cliffs: Jim Rome asks David Stern if the nba lottery is rigged, Stern's jimmies are good and rustled
http://fauxjohnmadden.lockerdome.com/media/98253998
Good ol' Rome.
He's the second best sports talk show host on Radio, first being Tony Kornheiser. When you look at what Rome had the guts to do to Stern, and then you compare that with something innocuous like "Mike and Mike in the Morning", you will realize Rome isn't that bad.
Was also a good question given rampant speculation about a league-owned team winning the lottery.
Mike and Mike are simply terrible. I can't stand their obsession with the NFL. 90% of their show is NFL this, NFL that. Terrible radio.
your stupid and my opinion carries a lot more weight.. Mike and Mike are excellent so you better watch your whorish mouth
There's a difference between being a good journalist and being an asshole who retreats right after he finds out he's in above his head.
Jim Rome is a horse's ass.. Gave up on his voice screaming like a horn and calling dbag callers clones... Terrible sports radio.. Jim Everett should have whooped his ass
I think Michigan Insider on WTKA is a good show, particularly when the topic is Michigan-related. I also think there are some good shows on WSCR in Chicago, and there's a really good football guy here in Atlanta (Chuck Oliver).
But in general I agree - on balance, sports radio is pretty awful. Then again, I think sports commentary as a whole is pretty awful. Great piece by Spencer Hall today that satirizes a large chunk of sports commentary (link here).
I really enjoy Shep in the morning.
I used to listen to a lot of sports radio but I quit because it got uninteresting. Dan Patrick is a professional and has a pretty good show. Tony Kornheiser is also hilarious.
ESPN Radio is awful though. I hear Van Pelt is alright, but Cowherd and Mike and Mike are two of the most deplorable hosts out there. Cowherd is more of a jackass than Jim Rome (remember, he was the one who plagiarized a Michigan site) and Mike and Mike are extremely uninteresting and annoying. "Heeeeeeey Greeny!"
Sorry, mate. You're wrong. Rome is the best in the business. There is a reason he has a national show on over 300 stations nationwide.
That reason is people are stupid.
I'm ashamed to say that I've called his show frequently. I've been a Rome slappy for years.
What is wrong with being a Jim Rome fan. You should never be ashamed of that. I love Jim Rome.
No, not ashamed that I listen to Jim Rome. Ashamed that I admit to being a sports talk radio caller...
You're still not done jerking him off. We get it. You like ROME and must defend him to the death!
Let it go.....................
I think people forget that its not like the NBA does the lottery by themselves. E&Y oversees them. Do you really think one of the largest accounting firms in the world would risk BILLIONS just to rig a draft. As an accountant, I think this is the biggest hurdle to the only rigging. I could see the NBA doing it but not E&Y agreeing.
Before you say E&Y gets paid a ton from the NBA I gaurentee the NBA isnt even a top 10 client for them.
but money talks. Plain and simple.
I asked Arthur Andersen if they would risk BILLIONS and they said "No. Enron, what's Enron?"...
I hate Rome. Talks to himself for hours. "BEST INTERVIEW EVER! HOW SICK WAS THAT?!? THAT INTERVIEW WAS AN 1000 out of 10.. SO SICK." I can't stand him.. Give me SVP anyday.
How exactly was Stern supposed to answer?
i thought stern came off like a pouty child.
it would have been much easier just to say "no" and end it at that.
instead he had to insult rome because he was so peeved at the thought of corruption. this, btw, from a league that has had proven corruption issues with the referees, you may recall.
I will say that Stern probably could and should have handled that with a little more dignity, but the question that Rome asked - "Is the NBA lottery fixed?" - probably wasn't going to get a much different response other than what it did. I actually chuckled a little at him for being somewhat snarky in kind.
I would argue that it was a bit misleading as a question, and in this case intentionally so, along the lines of a similar example "Does Bill have a cousin in prison?". Bill may not, but the question implies that there is a need to ask it based on some evidence. Rome's question is sort of like that. It might not be the case, but it happens infrequently enough in day-to-day life or has such a controversial presupposition that many assume that there was a reason to ask it.
So, it wasn't too shocking when Stern replied with the classic example of a complex question, because that is sort of where Rome was taking the discussion. If Rome was looking to have meaningful discourse on the subject, that was not the question to ask.
is a complete tool! Good for the commish
I totally thought this was about Howard...
Stern just got himself racked for the Smackoff.
please make football start soon.
Has anyone tried that new non-stick aluminum foil for their hat? It's expensive, but you only have one brain.
Rome is a tool, but I listen to his radio show because I can't stomach Mike Valenti. This is basically him getting fed his own medicine by a guy I also don't exactly respect.
I can't believe all the Rome hating here. Listen, you guys need to give his show two weeks. If after two weeks of listening, you still don't get it, then give it two more weeks...
I will say that Jim may be a dick and probably deserved what he had coming to him, but Stern really didn't do himself any good by letting Jim get under his skin and in turn be a dick back to him. Just makes himself look bad, and, being the commissioner, he should show a bit more professionalism than someone who's job is to be a little unprofessional.
Jim came out looking like a victim here, which he definitely is not. And I will bet on the fact that Jim was loving the reaction he got out of David Stern. It's entertainment, which brings up his ratings and gets people talking about his him/his show (such as this blog).
Jim got what he wanted and more from this interview.
I find it pathetic that people on this forum will now downvote other posters simply because they dont agree with their opinions on the subject matter of what radio show they like to listen to. Act like adults on this site please.
Holy hell are these two perfect for each other. Both of them are borderline incompetent in their respective fields, and absolutely annoying at best.
Stern has proven over and over again to be a toad, who has little control over the league at it's core.
Rome, is the poster child for nails on a chalk board. I stopped listening to him when he started saying the same thing over and over again during a segment, thinking that if I say "poop" 4 times in a row, the 4th time will be the funniest. He obviously hasn't studied the law of diminishing returns.
That was the most uncomfortable interview I've ever heard on Rome's show. Stern and Rome usually joke around like buddies. That was VERY interesting. The fact that the NBA OWNS the Hornets, does in fact create a conflict of interest. The league shouldn't be allowed to own a team. Period.
I will say that I have heard him since 2003, but yeah, I take a few breaks from listening every now and then. I did listen to the first hour but I was out buying groceries, then I saw the Euro 2012 game. He does go on for 5 or 10 minutes about one topic, which is a little annoying sometimes.
I am not familiar with Rome's personal life and wife beating allegations are to say the least a very strong allegation. Does Rome have a record of doing this? If not those are very slanderous comments by the commissioner.
you are an (_I_) hole!
Myopic.