Night Games Open Thread

Submitted by jcgold on

Pretty good day for us, with NU taking out Sparty, Minnesota taking out Iowa, and our win.  Not exactly a great night of matchups, but college football is always better than not college football.  Some fun ones to watch:

Georgia 24 - Florida 20 (5 to go, Florida has ball on G 35)

Ole Miss at Auburn - 7 - ESPNU

South Carolina at Tennessee - 7:15 - ESPN2

Wisconsin at Ohio State - 8 ESPN

Stanford at USC - 8 - ABC/ESPN3

Clemson at GT - 8 - ESPN3/ABC

As usual, the full listings can be found here

Discuss and enjoy a solid day for us.

M-Wolverine

October 30th, 2011 at 12:15 AM ^

And At the other end towards the aisle from me. You were with an Asian couple, right? Wearing a Michigan Alumni cap. I thought about yelling "hey CRex!", but noticed you weren't wearing a wedding ring (couldn't see her hands, she was wearing gloves), and thought "damn, that's a weird thing to do if it's NOT them", and then by the time I thought "I don't wear my ring to games for clapping and stuff" and "how many red heads with pretty petite Asian wife/girlfriends can there be watching the game?", the rows had filled out with a couple of late groups, and then you (wisely) took off early before the icy rains hit. And biffed my chance to say hi. But I at least have faces for the stories.
<br>
<br>So not to be too stalkery, I was to your right and back, with the winged cap, beard, blue jacket, and a radio and fanvision, and mostly unnecessary shades.
<br>
<br>Maybe next time.

OKI'llStart

October 29th, 2011 at 11:39 PM ^

They say that negative emotions are stronger than postive ones.  Which explains why I am going to bed disappointed osu won, rather than happy Michigan beat purdue.

I should watch more food network; even when the wrong side wins the iron chef I am not this annoyed.

FGB

October 29th, 2011 at 11:47 PM ^

but the problem with all these reviews, is that it's not when something happens, it's when an official signals for it.  There's no way that Kiffin got a TO and the ref signaled it all within one second (really, half a second).

UMxWolverines

October 29th, 2011 at 11:41 PM ^

You'd think wisconsin would learn how to play late game defense after they were already shafted by that a week earlier. Wisconsin just handed the game away on a silver platter two weeks in a row.

Yeoman

October 29th, 2011 at 11:41 PM ^

Should have fired that ball at Lee Corso on the sideline. Where's Lawrence Ricks when you need him?

(Or, better, taken a knee, since they still had a timeout.)

aiglick

October 29th, 2011 at 11:44 PM ^

I guess it depends on personal preference but I would prefer to beat a better OSU team than a worse one. Of coure any victory over OSU is great. I'm not going to be picky but as long as we beat them I could care less how OSU does against its other competition. A good Michigan vs. a good OSU team will garner national attention like 2006 also like LSU vs. Alabama next week which is good for Michigan.

 

morepete

October 29th, 2011 at 11:44 PM ^

He was actually arguing that he managed to call a timeout in less than one second. That has literally never happened in the history of football. There is no such thing as a timeout that is pre-triggered so the clock stops when the play does. Complete moron.

Avant's Hands

October 29th, 2011 at 11:45 PM ^

What happened to the rule that the clock doesn't stop until the referee waves his arms over his head? I thought the clock does not stop instantaneously when the player hits the ground. Or are we now going to review every play of the game because that happens every play?

lhglrkwg

October 29th, 2011 at 11:52 PM ^

now stanford plays some MANBALL. It's actually really satisfying to watch. Big strong but mobile QB. Big, quick RB. Lot's of 2 and 3 TE sets. MANBALL

Yeoman

October 30th, 2011 at 12:06 AM ^

...and now it's infected football too.

There's an unavoidable clock delay at the beginning and end of each play--it just isn't physically possible for the timer to start the clock precisely on the snap or stop it precisely on the official's signal. Plus there's a slight delay between end of play and official's signal. As long as we have human officials and timers we're going to have human reaction-time delays.

The replay reviews of the end of the play are doing away with the end-of-play delays but not the delay at the start of the play. It's artificially making plays shorter at the end of the game. Not a lot, but sometimes, like today, it's a material difference--or would have been if they hadn't ruled the runner in bounds.

robmorren2

October 30th, 2011 at 12:02 AM ^

The B1G is very mediocre, which makes it competitive. Wisconsin and MSU drop, so there are no favorites. It reminds me of the NFC East with the Cowboys, Giants, Eagles, Redskins... a very "blah" group of teams that can look like the Packers or the Seahawks on any given week. I'd say MSU gets the nod because of the easy remaining schedule.

BlueCheez

October 30th, 2011 at 9:28 AM ^

Once and for all I hope you all stop drinking the Wisconsin kool-aid.If you have a top 20 defense and a good d-line, you can stop the run and shut them down.With Mattison as DC and the recruits coming in next year, I don't worry 1 bit about these turds in the future.Hell with some luck maybe they'll see us in the Conference title game this year.Stop sweating Wisconsin.They have never been shit and never will be shit.

ak47

October 30th, 2011 at 12:06 AM ^

anyone else think stanford should have gone for 2 right there? complete control of their own destiny. I think I would have done it.

triangle_M

October 30th, 2011 at 12:17 AM ^

So my 10 year old, upon seeing Andrew Luck and the Stanford tree in the endzone after the game, says, "Is that the real mascot, or Lee Corso?"

I'm still laughing.