April 17th, 2011 at 11:21 PM ^
Bravo.
April 17th, 2011 at 11:23 PM ^
Aw c'mon! It'll be way creepier if he was over denard's shoulder.
Turns out I was wrong again... +1
Wow. Just wow. And I thought Neil pert during rush's concert at the palace was awesomesauce last night. You have reached a new level.
April 17th, 2011 at 10:37 PM ^
I opened this post expecting to be irritated because of ANOTHER overreaction but that's funny. Nice.
April 17th, 2011 at 10:47 PM ^
Needs more RichRod.
April 17th, 2011 at 10:50 PM ^
Much better than the "Holy crap the sky is falling and we're generalizing on the basis of very small samples plus we're forgetting the fact that he's another year older regardless of system" stuff that seemed to be all over the board yesterday.
Chunkums is a Great American. I point at thee with pride.
April 17th, 2011 at 11:13 PM ^
we don't approve of blatant nekkedness like those degenerate Euro-trash.
why don't you make it classier, like with a spinning wolverine head covering up DRob's junk?
April 17th, 2011 at 11:43 PM ^
Thank you! I now know what Hoke was referencing when he talked bout "touching kids"
/s: for those whose don't get "/s"
April 18th, 2011 at 12:17 AM ^
credit where credit is due. I lol'ed.
April 18th, 2011 at 12:18 AM ^
Chunkums, dude you're my mothafawking hero.
So fucking radt I can't even comprehend.
+100000000000000000000000000000000000000 cocktails to you.
April 18th, 2011 at 12:28 AM ^
My only qualm here is that the roles are clearly reversed. Denard is God.
April 18th, 2011 at 12:33 AM ^
zomg NWFH!
April 18th, 2011 at 12:35 AM ^
No Weiners For Hoke?
There's clearly a weiner for Hoke. He's pointing right at it.
there are times I think some people on this site would suck Robinson off if he was standing in front of them...this is one of those times.
April 18th, 2011 at 11:42 AM ^
There are times on this site when I think some people here are massive homophobes. This is one of those times.
Can't believe this is still up
I do get that you are very fond of The Nard.
HEY GUYZ I HAVE A GOOD IDEA, I'LL TAKE A COLLEGE STUDENT AND PHOTOSHOP HIM NAKED. Then I'll get annoyed when people point out how 1) creepy and 2) homoerotic this is.
Not every Photoshop job is appropriate, dude.
Awesome. The dude who's name and avatar had to be forcibly changed due to inappropriateness is now commenting on whether or not a photoshop is appropriate.
April 18th, 2011 at 10:05 AM ^
It's not like I took some gay porn and photoshopped Tressel onto it. I put denard's head on one of the most famous pieces of art in the history of the world. Sorry if you're offended by a painted pinga and sorry if you don't realize that my ALL CAPS RAGE OUT was not even remotely serious.
April 18th, 2011 at 10:38 AM ^
Chunkums this is too funny!
I still wouldn't mind a strategically placed helmet sticker for Denard though.
I was so ready to charge into this thread and hand out a heaping scoop of FU......
and then, Chuckums happened. And I laughed. And I re-evaluated my masculinity for staring at things I shouldn't be staring at longer than I should have. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
I'm not sure I want to even consider what Nekked Denard or any football player looks like while waiting for the coach to fan him and feed him grapes.
There really HAS to be better things for photshop to be used for. And I'm still wondering why the OP said he wanted to give Denard a massive ____________.
Dude... feed him grapes? Hve you ever had any exposure to art at all? That's the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. Also, yes I considered photoshopping a massive dick for Denard, but hey, I ain't hiding it.
NOT be lecturing ANYONE about "exposure"
You've gotta get out, man.
The backlash here is hysterical.
.....due to a family commitment. I must ask all the same - were people really that shaken based on one practice, well, scrimmage basically?
MGoBoard is a nevernude.