OT: Feds indict PokerStars, Full Tilt, Absolute Poker; US online cash players locked out
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/poker/news/story?id=6362238
Kind of sucks. I put a little money in yesterday and will likely have to leave the money there (for now). Maybe this is just a step in legalizing online poker.
As with any other war against demand, an alternative will be up and running within the hour.
Well, maybe not hour, but very soon.
My question is why now? I haven't played in some time, but these sites have been around for a long time. Why crack down on them now?
I really don't want this to turn ugly, but this is probably a decision that either Holder or Obama made based on political pressures or perceived pressures/future pressures.
There's a chance this was initiated at a lower level, in which case it could be a political pressure, or it could be someone at Justice wanting to take this case on for whatever reason.
OTOH it could be that they're going after a bank or something and this was incidental. I still would believe that prosecuting this was a pretty high-level decision based on more than the law that was violated.
I doubt political pressure had anything to do with this. The feds move very slowly on all fronts in order to make sure that the have dotted all the i's and crossed all the t's. With the money at play here and the large scale of it, this had to have taken years to gather all the evidence. I would be really worried if I was them and currently in our country (which they probably aren't).
I think it was political pressure brought on by proposals in states to tax online gambling (CA and apparently DC have both tried moving towards this). I think the Feds want to stay out in front of states bringing in that revenue.
That's my best guess. Those proposals have been around for a while, it wouldn't exclude them dotting i's and crossing t's.
April 16th, 2011 at 10:50 AM ^
Yes because the feds have NEVER rushed anything or botched any investigations.
April 16th, 2011 at 11:08 AM ^
until they are all made of robots, there will be as you said
Or until the feds thoroughly investigate and build a case properly instead of trying to rush a conviction.
This shouldn't be too big of a surprise. I'd say any delay was acquiring evidence sufficient to prosecute.
An online company dealing with gambling. You have to admit, the likelihood of some form of illegality is pretty high.
I think this has more to do with legalizing online gambling than this has to do with tax evasion or money laundering. I'm kind of wondering why they picked now too.
OTOH it could be incidental, looking at banks for other dealings. Or it could just be that Holder thinks this is a big case, where Mukasey didn't.
Seizing domains is scary stuff. A violation of due process.
More than anything, I think they just want to get their hands on the tax revenue. Apparently D.C. is going to have online gaming soon.
I was thinking about California when I said something about political pressure. I didn't know DC was looking in that direction too.
In that case they'll end up paying fines and being the poster children for taxed online poker, and prosecution was most definitely decided at the highest level.
you can blame us for USC and UCLA but don't pin this on us. Knowing our government they wouldn't want to kill this, just tax it.
I'm not blaming you. In fact, I said I think the feds want to copy your (as a state) proposal.
CA wanted to tax internet gambling, going back years, the Feds just now seem to be looking in that direction. They don't want to be scooped by CA or another state, and that's why I think they're moving now.
One of my good friends who loves his online poker is freaking out, withdrawing money. The news says this might be the end. :(
(addressed to the government)
Just allow it to be legal you assholes. You don't stop people from betting on the ponies and shit, why should you care if people want to lose money to each other beyond Wall Street? Fuckers.
I love me some online poker and am discouraged by this news. But if it eventually leads to legalized online poker and an easier time receiving cash outs without the worry of when the next crack down will be, I'll take it. It just needs to start happening quickly.
Don't you just love it when the guys who gambled with trillions and lost get bailouts while people playing for chump change are hauled in?
So, if you're Phil Ivey, do you stay in the US and give up something like a $17 million income, or do you move overseas until the US stops being assholes about online poker?
I'd move to a fancy Caribbean Island and set up shop. I think Phil Ivey is even more unique than the standard famous pro, I think one of the vegas casinos sponsors him, named part of the poker room after him, and pays him an obscene amount of money to play in their poker room.
I wouldn't ever want to buy in at a table with Phil Ivey playing.
He puts his pants on the same way you do.
he is an alien, and doesn't require pants! Plus, the object of poker is to take advantage of people who are worse at it than you. People who try to prove this wrong, are why his salary is around 17 million, or whatever.
I'm curious as to what a fancy caribbean island is? Which ones would you consider fancy....
April 15th, 2011 at 11:13 PM ^
Is that a lisa frank poster?
To tell you the truth, I have absolutely no idea. I'd guess one of those places movie stars and athletes go on vacation. St. Barths? Wherever that is. Maybe they have their own islands. All they really need is an internet connection. I believe most of these poker sites are still up and running outside of the US.
I went to St. Barths on my honeymoon. It was great but they are used to catering to movie stars so to eat at a regular old restaurant in the middle of the island cost me $140 for lunch without drinks. I fucking hate Paris Hilton for that.
Have you even met Paris Hilton? She is really quite nice. Blame the restaurant owner, but leave Paris out of it.
And here's the best part...Those companies via WTO are pursuing a case against the US government for blocking access. Watch this clip from a CNBC special http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=1359689074
Given what I know about your economics, I thought about you and the couple other posters with a love for things in Auburn, Alabama when I read this thread.
(Not the school for those who don't know what I'm talking about.)
April 15th, 2011 at 10:48 PM ^
It's very very hard not to go to the forbidden zone sometimes. Sometimes you just have to suck it up and shake your head while keeping what you really want to say to yourself or swear at the monitor.
I'm just pleased I have someone here to share that with.
im sure this is great news to all the native casinos
I'm sure this is partially due to the fact there has been fraud and coverup of online gambling from indian reservations and other places outside of the U.S.
Friend of mine was trying to talk me into going into the cash version of one of the sites earlier this week. Thank goodness I didnt decide to go signup.
Unless theres some other legal issue going on, I agree that this is likely the federal governments first step before trying to make the online gambling legal. I'm more surprised it hasnt been brought up more recently since its just another revenue stream for the government if they can tax winnings.
games are still going
Should have been more specific. PokerStars has locked out US-based players, the others haven't done so yet AFAIK. The big one, obviously, is Full Tilt while AP has a much smaller base of players.
But I'm assuming if PokerStars has locked out players, Full Tilt will follow along. Or, which I would like more, is PokerStars opening it back up if Full Tilt continues to allow US players to play.
Everyone will be blocked from all three sites within 48 hours, even countries where online poker isn't banned. That was a tweet from Andrew Feldman a short while ago.
Step 1: Lobbyist powered Nevada lays groundwork for their casino giants to enter online poker market if they get the go ahead from washington.
Step 2: Feds thoroughly destroy existing competition, then give the ok to Nevada
Step 3: Profit
Step 4: PokerStars wishes they had better lobbyists
pretty much
Wynn just walked away from his deal with Stars and the FTP deal is off as well. It's going to be very interesting to see how this all shakes out.
wants part of the rake too. Moving to Canada!
Instead of regulating and taxing it bringing in hundreds of millions in revenues, they pursue criminal charges. I play the cash games here and there, usually the $5 tournaments for fun. It is no different than a home game. I had $120 in my PokerStars account and cashed out tonight as all US cash players are locked out. Since there appears to be no chance this gets resolved I might as well try to get the money back. We'll see if I get the money.
This sucks donkey balls!
April 15th, 2011 at 10:49 PM ^
With gas prices going through the roof and unemployment still over nine percent I am just glad that priorities are in the right place. Get those damn online poker players!
/s
"These defendants, knowing full well that their business with U.S. customers and U.S. banks was illegal, tried to stack the deck," said Janice Fedarcyk, FBI assistant director-in-charge. "They lied to banks about the true nature of their business. Then, some of the defendants found banks willing to flout the law for a fee. The defendants bet the house that they could continue their scheme, and they lost."
Quit trying to be funny and just do your fucking job.
That is all.
Is this going to extend to online sports betting sites as well?
Gotta love our definition of "Freedom"