Rawls if he can hang onto it, I'd guesss
ikestoys
History
- Member for
- 2 years 34 weeks
- Blog
- View recent blog entries
Karma
- Current value
- 1
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 24 weeks 5 days ago | Men can't win arguments, |
Men can't win arguments, because even when we are right, we still end up losing overall. |
| 25 weeks 4 days ago | Screenshot here (obv trolling inside) |
The angle right down the line is indisputable. |
| 25 weeks 4 days ago | SC Has a great screenshot |
Notice how the angle showing him short is much closer to a direct shot down the goal line. Clearly short.
|
| 25 weeks 4 days ago | Right, so there's this chip |
Right, so there's this chip in every ball, when it crosses a 55 yard plane, lights up a camera, then we go to review if it's close isn't convoluted? I never said it was possible, just unnecessary. Goal line cameras are plenty enough. Nevermind that none of this solves the problem presented by this play. |
| 25 weeks 4 days ago | Eventually someone will come |
Eventually someone will come up with a screenshot. It was obviously short. The ball may have been obscured, but unless fitz was carrying it outside his arm invisibly he wasn't in.
And the shot I'm refering to was as goal line as you get. |
| 25 weeks 4 days ago | How are you going to sync the |
How are you going to sync the chip to the cameras? You're about to build one convoluted system to attempt to solve something that really isn't a major problem.
Chip in the ball stuff is much better for stuff like soccer, where all that matters is if the ball crossed.
This is really ridiculous. The video got this right. Even with a chip in the ball this is getting called back. |
| 25 weeks 4 days ago | So here's the only thing |
So here's the only thing image I can find atm: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSGwIq0sQXA
The video is frozen a bit late, so the ball is a bit further back than it appears. It's also important to remember the plane of the goaline is running diagonal slightly shifting to the left as you go up. That means the goal line directly behind toussaint isn't actually where toussaint is. You need to translate fitz in the same way the goal line is distorted.
This angle doesn't overturn the angle that clearly showed him short. |
| 25 weeks 4 days ago | How is a chip going to |
How is a chip in the football going to determine when the football player is down?
This is just a silly idea. |
| 25 weeks 4 days ago | The side that showed he was |
The side that showed he was in was not on the goal line. This created the illusion that he was in. The side that showed him out was facing straight down the goal line and showed that he definitely not in. This was enough evidence imo to overturn. The fact that one side showed him in doesn't overturn the obviously superior angle. If someone could get some screenshots of each one that'd be great. |
| 33 weeks 1 day ago | Pretty hilarious that he |
Pretty hilarious that he describes our offense as a 'jump-ball offense'
LOL sorry dude, we'll be running just a bit more. |
