Why do they let Lou Holtz on t.v.

Submitted by Ryno2317 on
Espn showed a clip of Holtz at a Notre Dame rally yesterday. In that clip, Holtz said students go to Michigan when they can't get into Notre Dame. Why does Espn think it's appropriate to have this tool on the air? In addition to being totally untrue as UM is a better school, Holtz just comes off as a total jerk.

wolverine1987

September 6th, 2014 at 5:02 PM ^

Honestly I don;t get the hate--OF COURSE Holtz or any ex-coach is gonna be a homer for their school--why wouldn't they? And this isn't meet the Press, it's football--who cares if commentators are openly biased?

Perd Hapley

September 6th, 2014 at 5:03 PM ^

I also don't think many people take Lou Holtz seriously, mostly because he is such a homer. He just makes me laugh. I also like when he makes fun of Mark May. My favorite is when he says, " mark is just mad because ND didn't recruit him" lmfao

slimj091

September 6th, 2014 at 5:06 PM ^

Notre Dame is academically a great school to get in to, and it's usually ranked higher than Michigan. However "student's go to X school when they can't get into the school that i represent" is used quite often as a general diss, usually by people who never took a single course in either school.

Blerg

September 6th, 2014 at 5:18 PM ^

I went to Michigan because we got a flat when I was on my way to check out ND.Took it as an omen. To this day I've yet to step foot on ND's campus. Best flat ever.

 

Edited because my English/grammar is awful.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Mmmm Hmmm

September 6th, 2014 at 5:13 PM ^

This is terrible, and we should all expect every top notch student to choose ND over Michigan because a senile man with a lisp on TV tells then it is a better school...
ND is a fine school. Michigan is a fine school. Lou is on TV so he can throw semi-coherent jabs at Mark May (who himself probably would suffer next to a sharper tongue) and because none of the other on air talent has little enough self respect for segments like Dr. Lou.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Bleedmaizeblue

September 6th, 2014 at 5:32 PM ^

ESPN knows no one in the right mind would listen to a senile old man so out of pity they give him a job. Either that or ESPN is owned by NBC, which clearly isn't biased as we will all hear tonight

grumbler

September 6th, 2014 at 5:35 PM ^

Holtz is a character.  I like characters, even if they pull for the other team.  Too many bland announcers/commentators, and bland+biased (which is pretty common) is the pits.

Holtz is an entertainer, and is very entertaining.  It is those who don't get the open joke about his ND bias (which I think he would acknowledge) that lose out.

Bando Calrissian

September 6th, 2014 at 5:52 PM ^

See, here's the thing: Holtz was entertaining once. The past five years, it's gotten increasingly obvious he's lost it. He can barely talk, and offers little of value when he's coherent. I'm really convinced the guy has had a series of mini-strokes, because that's how he presents himself. And he hasn't recovered the way Corso did.

MGlobules

September 6th, 2014 at 5:43 PM ^

on TV is like asking why they have WWF, or Toddlers in Tiaras, or Keeping Up With the Kardashians. Madison Ave. calls it "hate-watching," and--admit it--we often keep watching when he appears on the screen because we know we're going to enjoy despising him. 

titanfan11

September 6th, 2014 at 5:51 PM ^

they're juth too good!  

 

I used to laugh when ESPN had that segment where Lou gave the pep talk to a certain team for the week...were they supposed to be fired up because of what he said?  Because he was spitting was on them?  Because of the comedy of listening to him?  Tell me which it was ESPN!!!

Mr. Yost

September 6th, 2014 at 6:14 PM ^

@ anyone who takes Lou Holtz seriously.

He could say "Michigan still sucks" and I'd laugh because the 3 s's would've soaked any cameraman who recorded the idiot statement.