Who's your starting offensive line next week?
To complement the RB thread, I'd like to know what everything thinks about the starting OL next week, now that Glasgow returns to play? I tried to watch the OL from my seats today and I saw some good things, but also saw Miller get pushed into the backfield once or twice. BTN focused on the OL during their highlight show, and to MY surprise, Magnuson had some very nice seal blocks that helped free Smith and Green. (I was critical of him after watching a couple clips from practice).
So, who you got?
LT - Cole
RG - Mags
C - Miller
RG - Kalis
LT - Braden
August 30th, 2014 at 8:07 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:11 PM ^
But it's hard to keep track of the line unless you're trying to, and I wasn't. I just saw that he had some great down field plays (yeah, pointed out by the commentators) and a few times I saw him pancake a guy.
I really only noticed the good stuff, though. That's part of the reason I like the UFRs here.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:11 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:44 PM ^
Yeah, that was his one ugly play. He took a step back into protection to sell pass and his guy just stood straight up instead of rushing in. That separation was enough to catch Kalis off guard when the defender sniffed out the draw play and let him run around Kalis for the TFL.
Otherwise, I thought he looked really good. I think Burzinyski starting was a classic reward the Senior that had a good week in practice move. They pulled him for Kalis pretty quickly.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:13 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:15 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:13 PM ^
Although he didn't start, I think it's clear he was an upgrade to Burzynski. Brian made mention of it in his post-game post as well.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:12 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
August 30th, 2014 at 8:14 PM ^
The running game with Kalis seemed a lot better than the running game with Burzynski.
August 30th, 2014 at 9:02 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 10:17 PM ^
to have jake butt return for the ND game?
August 30th, 2014 at 10:32 PM ^
No, you're not wrong, jtmc33, you're just an asshole.
August 31st, 2014 at 12:11 AM ^
People must have missed the reference.
August 31st, 2014 at 1:13 AM ^
Great movie, and a great line.
But you used it inappropriately...I think that's where the negging comes from.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:08 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:11 PM ^
not sure why, based solely on Saturday performances.
Kalis is talented, but on that "questionable" play call where they went draw on 3rd and long, Kalis got beat inside by his guy.
Miller did some good things today, but I will continue to question his ability to take on talented 300+ pound DTs.
I'd go with Glasgow replacing Miller, but I think Hoke goes Cole-Mags-Miller-Glasgow-Braden.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:13 PM ^
That's why you cannot be critical of someone during a practice clip. I'd put in Cole, Magnuson, Miller, Glasgow, and Braden.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:12 PM ^
LT-Cole
LG-Magnuson
C-Miller
RG-Glasgow
RT-Braden
August 30th, 2014 at 8:16 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 11:43 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:16 PM ^
Like Brian, I am a fan of Glasgow. He is big and strong and is a capable blocker. Initially I would have inserted him in place of Mags, but now I think he goes back to Center.
Then again, I'd hate to futz with chemistry after such a strong rushing performance. Wally Pipp agrees with me.
August 31st, 2014 at 4:37 AM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:16 PM ^
I'm going to go with LT-Cole, LG-Mags, RG-Kalis, RT-Braden. All easy enough for me. But my problem is that I THINK I want Glasgow in the game, so I might put him in at center. To me, that makes more sense than putting him in at LG and Miller at center.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:17 PM ^
LT-Mags
LG-Glasgow
C-Miller
RG-Kalis
RT-Braden
I feel Cole won't have the strength to compete with ND's Stength.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:28 PM ^
I would be very surprised if either starting tackle was replaced for the ND game.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:36 PM ^
Actually ND's DEs are very young players. The big experienced dude is inside. The tackles are going to be mostly playing guys their age or within 1 year thankfully vs ND. Guards and center have their hands full however.
August 30th, 2014 at 9:52 PM ^
I don't think the new DT will be able to fly like Nix, however.
August 31st, 2014 at 1:42 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
August 31st, 2014 at 12:47 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:18 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 11:25 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:18 PM ^
He wasn't bad, but I think Mags-Glasgow-Miller-Kalis-Braden is best, especially for the running game. Either that or bench Miller, I guess, but he held up against the ogre.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:21 PM ^
Because he had one bust?
August 30th, 2014 at 8:23 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
August 30th, 2014 at 8:24 PM ^
I think we're all-in with Cole at this point. Kid started his first game as a Wolverine because he earned it. I think benching him at this point could have long lasting ill-effects.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:29 PM ^
...and we have no one better to play LT.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:39 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
August 30th, 2014 at 8:23 PM ^
All arrows point to it being Cole, Mags, Miller, Kalis, Braden.
Hoke has said repeatedly that Miller is outperforming Glasgow.
The left side is set...so that's Glasgow and Kalis and Glasgow has been spending more time practicing at RT than RG.
It's nice to have a guy who can come off the bench who can play 4 of the 5 positions on the line. IMO, Glasgow is your 6th OL and they'll role with the 5 above to build chemistry.
August 30th, 2014 at 8:24 PM ^
Glasgow will come in at center for Miller. Jack struggled several times to get any push and was pushed into the backfield a few other times.
So I'm going with...
LT- Cole
LG- Mags
C - Glasgow
RG - Kalis
RT - Braden
August 30th, 2014 at 8:34 PM ^
by Smith at the Game ... even better on replay. Blocked his man all the way into the zone ...and keep on going after the TD. Awesome.
August 31st, 2014 at 4:31 AM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:34 PM ^
LT Jim
LG Bob
C Steve
RG Tom
RT Tommy
August 30th, 2014 at 9:22 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 8:51 PM ^
Man, I didn't think it'd be this hard to figure out who Glasgow will replace, or that Glasgow sitting could actually be a possibility, but that's how it's looking.
Cole wasn't very good in run blocking but was adequate. He was pretty solid in pass pro except his one bad play where he got beat with the swim move.
Magnuson was solid. Had a couple nice plays where he was able to take a handoff on the NT from Miller that let Miller release and vice versa. Had a good pull on a POWER play that looked very fluid.
Miller was really very solid. He was pretty instrumental in all three of the long runs.
Kalis was absolutely riding LBs downfield all day long. Seemed move really well. Had one bad play on a TFL on the 3rd and long draw play, but more than made up for it. Probably 2nd most important lineman after Miller on those long runs.
Braden was rock solid in pass pro. Sealed the edge a couple times and consistently got push.
I really don't think you can look at this game and decide who you're going to pull for Glasgow, if anyone, and that's amazing. I think it'll come down to who does best in practice this week, where better competition may cause some separation between guys.
Gun to my head, I'd say Glasgow sits next week and is first off the bench in case someone does poorly with the high pressure, hostile environment.
August 30th, 2014 at 9:05 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 9:14 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 9:15 PM ^
LG Dierdorf
C Everitt
RG Hutchinson
RT Jansen
No need to pass for the entire game.
August 30th, 2014 at 9:16 PM ^
August 30th, 2014 at 9:40 PM ^
Cole, Magnuson, Glasgow, Kalis, Braden. I think this lineup has the best upside and needs to get the necessary time to gel.
August 30th, 2014 at 9:49 PM ^
LT: Matt Wile
LG: Devin Gardner
C: Dennis Norfleet
RG: Terry Richardson
RT: Jim Bandstatter