CRex

March 28th, 2012 at 8:46 PM ^

There have only been two Ohio coaches that fanbase didn't eat alive, Hayes and Tressel.  Hayes went by Professor Hayes and actually taught.  He also got along well with the faculty due to the fact he paid more than lip service to academics.  Tressel was know as Senator Tressel due to the way he carried himself.  

Lavendar uniforms, drinking from the hose, that kind of persona isn't going to go over well.  At Ohio State you are hired to be the next coming of Professor Hayes, not what Urban is doing.  This kind of persona will be tolerated as long as he is winning, but the minute he loses they'll come for him.  Look at Cooper, won over 80% of his games but lost to Michigan and didn't act the way the fans wanted and they ran his ass out of town on a rail.  

wolverine1987

March 28th, 2012 at 9:32 PM ^

that I don't think anything in that article is contrary to how any or most Ohio fans feel is a good way to coach. Hell if it wasn't him and you replaced Meyer with "Hoke" in the article, I would have no problem whatsoever with it myself.

clarkiefromcanada

March 28th, 2012 at 9:39 PM ^

WTF is it with this whole lavender uniforms and drinking god damned water to demonstrated "softness" with players. How evolved Urb. You treat players with respect and they come to you. That and money (as Pete Carroll, Jim Tressel, Gene Chizik, Nick Saban and a slew of Miami coaches might report). 

M-Dog

March 28th, 2012 at 9:50 PM ^

This is no different than my Jr. High School.  Except we could not even drink from the hose, we had to wait until practice was over.

We only won 1 game, for what it's worth.  So much for the magic "toughness" pill that turns everything into a victory.

 

born1ntheArbor

March 28th, 2012 at 10:04 PM ^

I always thought that Ohio had some really weak players. Them losing all those games because they weren't tough enough was what got their last coach fired. Oh...wait.

On the less taunting side, do remember, we have "winners" and "losers" after each practice. And the losers have a punishment as well.

denardogasm

March 28th, 2012 at 10:34 PM ^

We do have losers with punishments for them, but do we have rewards for the winners, i.e. real food that a football player would need rather than oatmeal?  Seems to me Hoke keeps the punishments on the field, and the reward for winning is pride and playing time.  Obviously I'm biased but I like those rewards a lot better than steak and getting to live off campus.  Intrinsic rewards are always better than extrinsic rewards if you really want to motivate people.  There have been a million and one studies on this.  I actually just watched a TED talk about it that was really interesting and I would recommend if I could remember the guy's name.  I could see guys getting pretty resentful if they're continuously the loser wearing a lavender jersey (although I think that's a pretty weak punishment to begin with), and having crappy meals.  Those things would just be embarrassing and make a guy angry, whereas physical labor has a direct impact on making him better.  Hoke for the win.  We'll see who has it right in November I suppose.

denardogasm

March 29th, 2012 at 4:43 AM ^

Fair enough.  That's why I asked if we did anything like that.  But I do think that doing it for one spring game is different than every practice.  My point about it getting embarrassing to always be eating oatmeal and getting sick of it still stands.  Also I love hot dogs and hamburgers.  Oatmeal makes me sick.

lbpeley

March 29th, 2012 at 8:23 AM ^

We're not considering that because that's a one time thing. Not every day in practice. If you can't see the difference I don't know what to tell you.

Sometimes recognizing that "your" team is doing it better than another team is because of the fact that "your" team is doing it better. Calling a spade a spade is not always blind homerism.

In reply to by lbpeley

born1ntheArbor

March 29th, 2012 at 9:22 AM ^

Well I was replying to someone that was basically asking if Michigan had a tangible reward for winning. Which they do, for the spring game.  Just because it's different from giving out random rewards during practice doesn't take away from the fact that it does exist somewhere.

I prefer burgers to steaks at BBQs, so it's not much of a punishment to me. 

denardogasm

March 28th, 2012 at 10:34 PM ^

We do have losers with punishments for them, but do we have rewards for the winners, i.e. real food that a football player would need rather than oatmeal?  Seems to me Hoke keeps the punishments on the field, and the reward for winning is pride and playing time.  Obviously I'm biased but I like those rewards a lot better than steak and getting to live off campus.  Intrinsic rewards are always better than extrinsic rewards if you really want to motivate people.  There have been a million and one studies on this.  I actually just watched a TED talk about it that was really interesting and I would recommend if I could remember the guy's name.  I could see guys getting pretty resentful if they're continuously the loser wearing a lavender jersey (although I think that's a pretty weak punishment to begin with), and having crappy meals.  Those things would just be embarrassing and make a guy angry, whereas physical labor has a direct impact on making him better.  Hoke for the win.  We'll see who has it right in November I suppose.

denardogasm

March 28th, 2012 at 10:34 PM ^

We do have losers with punishments for them, but do we have rewards for the winners, i.e. real food that a football player would need rather than oatmeal?  Seems to me Hoke keeps the punishments on the field, and the reward for winning is pride and playing time.  Obviously I'm biased but I like those rewards a lot better than steak and getting to live off campus.  Intrinsic rewards are always better than extrinsic rewards if you really want to motivate people.  There have been a million and one studies on this.  I actually just watched a TED talk about it that was really interesting and I would recommend if I could remember the guy's name.  I could see guys getting pretty resentful if they're continuously the loser wearing a lavender jersey (although I think that's a pretty weak punishment to begin with), and having crappy meals.  Those things would just be embarrassing and make a guy angry, whereas physical labor has a direct impact on making him better.  Hoke for the win.  We'll see who has it right in November I suppose.

TheGhostofYost

March 28th, 2012 at 10:51 PM ^

I'm so tired of reading about Meyer as if he is some revolutionary.  Do people really think that all Big Ten coaches don't push their players to the brink?  Is toughness some patented Meyer idea?  Were his mentors the only ones to teach hard work?  Give me a break.  Meyer just talks louder than the rest, and idiotic journalists listen.

UofM626

March 29th, 2012 at 2:33 AM ^

Crap about Meyer and how ESPN and Rivals always cover this guy like he invented football and he made the SEC a power house. Enough already, Hoke is a way better coach and he will prove it in years to come. Everyone just hold on as the "NEW GOLDEN YEARS FOR MICH" is coming. Like Hoke said " I would have walked here" that's the guy that every University wishes they had, to be honest I'm so fricken excited about Hoke and the future of our Wolverines!

GO BLUE!!!!

HarBooYa

March 29th, 2012 at 9:44 AM ^

Way urban's incentive program was described was a little close to the line From anNCAA pay to play perspective. Per the espn story they Sid they were running things like "the business world" where top performers are rewarded and seemed to infer this was thevurban way if you are incenting players with things of value for performance (eg better food, better digs etc) and punishing others for poor performance (not as bad as Texas tech, but giving them scraps to eat etc) That seems more tan merely ethically problematic to me. Is it problematic to to you?

Mr. Yost

March 29th, 2012 at 10:56 AM ^

Anyone want to be a prick?

Do some digging a find out if they're drinking water from a filtered water spicket.

Also, the garden hose? It MUST be clear per NCAA Sports Medicine code. If it's green, it's a violation. Can't see particles floating through a green hose.

I'm absolutely not lying...I work in college athletics, Facilities & Operations and literally just bought 10 clear garden hoses for our Sports Medicine department last month.

His silly little story/motivation tactics could be over if someone really cared enough. #justsayin

Son of THE PAR…

March 29th, 2012 at 4:32 PM ^

I don't think there's anything wrong with giving players incentives to work harder.  He's not depriving them of food, water, etc.

If people would take off their "I hate OSU and Urban Meyer" blinders off, this really is not an issue.  

He's trying to motivate his players.  Everyone has a different approach - we'll find out in a few months how successful it is.

beeg75

March 29th, 2012 at 6:25 PM ^

If everything at OSU is incentive-based now, what will the players get after a win? and better yet can we get Mark Hollis to tweet this article to the NCAA people?