trump tweets BigTen may play w/o UM & MSU

Submitted by Dorothy_ Mantooth on September 6th, 2020 at 7:23 PM

https://www.freep.com/story/sports/college/2020/09/06/big-ten-football-donald-trump-tweet-michigan-football-michigan-state/5735041002/ 

the man's STFU button doesn't seem to work

Bergs

September 6th, 2020 at 10:11 PM ^

I am by no means interested in disparaging WD or other non-alum fans, as I was a non-alum fan for nearly 30 years of my life. But, outside of the fact that UM is a state university and therefore subsidized in part by state taxes, can you explain to me why it is moronic for someone to believe that the opinions of alumni regarding the direction of their alma mater matters more than the opinions of someone who happens to like the university's sports teams?

Gameboy

September 6th, 2020 at 10:55 PM ^

Because we are part of the greater university family and have vested interested in the welfare of the school? The reputation of the university matters to my career! And how many non-alums have donated (both time and money) to the university like I have (not just so that you can buy football tickets)?

Bergs

September 6th, 2020 at 11:05 PM ^

If the reputation of the university matters to you because of your career, I assume you work for the university? If so, I absolutely agree that you are a major stakeholder in the university and that your opinion matters as much, if not more, than someone whose only relationship to the university is as a former student. That said, it was my interpretation based on OP's comment and WD's relationship to the university that OP was referring to people who are fans, not employees. 

Bergs

September 6th, 2020 at 11:36 PM ^

You misunderstood my post. OP said it is moronic for someone to value the opinions of alums over non-alums regarding the direction of the school. I was questioning why OP thought that was moronic.

TL;DR: you and I are arguing the same point.

BroadneckBlue21

September 7th, 2020 at 12:19 PM ^

Then you’re very dramatic and myopic about how the larger world looks at UM being worried more about safety than optics. No NFL team is going to blame the football team, either, or players, for the season not happening now. 
 

You simply care about your interpretation of Schlissel’s decisions, and you care more about media fodder by sports personalities and smear head fans. 
 

I am sure someone hiding is not going to look at a resume, see top 10 law school grad, and be like: no, your football team is silly so we won’t hire you.

Eleven Year Wo…

September 6th, 2020 at 9:09 PM ^

I am not in favor the "Wal-Mart" wolverine appellation. People should and can be fans of any teams for whatever reasons. Until my loathing of Michael Jordan outweighed my respect for Dean Smith, I was a big UNC basketball fan.

That being said, we are in a weird situation where the stakes for the University are (at least potentially) greater than the importance of football or any other sports.

Not to slam WD, but if Michigan went "full Chicago,." I would still care about and be proud of my alma mater. I would be proud of the Nobel Laureates, the Macarthur Fellows, and other distinguished members of the alumni and faculty of the University. I would be proud of the education and opportunities that the University gave me and would continue to support its mission to give those opportunities and education to graduate and undergraduate students regardless of whether the University has Sports.

If you can't say the same, fine. But don't piss on the opinions of others who value the University for reasons that go beyond sports.

 

 


 

NJWolverine

September 7th, 2020 at 3:30 AM ^

This is both true and untrue at the same time.  Football should never be more important than school, but some people here don't realize that football distinguishes this school from others. 

When I was searching schools 15 years ago, the only thing I knew about Michigan was football.  This is true of most people in the NYC metro area and the Northeast generally.  Pretty much all students from the NYC area were also accepted to NYU/BU/GW, and a lot were also accepted to the low level Ivies Cornell, Brown, and Dartmouth.  What distinguishes Michigan from the above schools is the football and the "college experience" that comes with it.  Take away football, and there's no reason why I or anyone else from the Northeast would choose to attend over say, NYU. 

Notre Dame is even more dependent on attracting students from the Northeast.  Without football and the subway alums scattered along with eastern seaboard, Notre Dame would be a shell of itself, and these students would also attend NYU/BU/GW, low level Ivies, or Georgetown/Villanova/BC (if they insist on a Catholic school).

Clarence Boddicker

September 7th, 2020 at 10:39 AM ^

I'm from the Bronx--born and bred in the Boogie Down, kid. I went to BC as an undergrad back in the mid-80s--I selected it over the SUNY schools I also got into because BC had a great football program, and I wanted that experience. It also helped that Doug Flutie's senior year was my freshman year. I wouldn't and still wouldn't go to NYU if you paid me. No one I know who went there liked it, and they're a terrible employer. I went to Michigan for grad school ten years ago and had different considerations--the UM grad school I attended was rated either #2 or #3 of all American programs and high ranking were my priority. But, yeah, the football and basketball programs definitely sweetened the deal, since I've ALWAYS loved college football and was a huge Fab Five fan. Also, I knew people from high school who attended Michigan in the 80s, and they threw me Go Blues on my facebook account, which felt good. They clearly loved the experience back in the day as undergrads.

Wolverine Devotee

September 6th, 2020 at 9:03 PM ^

I don’t care about the school. I’m a fan of the sports teams. Why is that so hard for people like you to understand?

Gusss what? A majority of OUR fans didn’t go to U-M. At least the more passionate ones. Same can be said for every big boy flagship program

Wolverine Devotee

September 6th, 2020 at 9:34 PM ^

I have $0 in student loan debt at 25, a job good enough to let me get whatever Michigan stuff I want (or really any stuff as we just got a gigantic 4K TV) and live close enough now to go to whatever Michigan games I want. 

I guess I’ll just have to settle with my BGSU degree ?

trueblueintexas

September 6th, 2020 at 10:29 PM ^

WD, this is a pretty sad statement. I grew up a Michigan fan and was set to go there. My Dad had other plans for me and I respected his recommendation. It worked out very well for me. 
Now I’m a fan of my alma mater and Michigan. I respect Michigan for it’s academics as much as athletics. I can speak with equal capability about it’s R&D programs as I can the athletic programs. 
I may be old fashioned but I think college fans have some responsibility for caring about the school’s academic endeavors as well as athletic. If not, you really don’t respect the idea of student-athlete. And other than a very small percentage who know they will go pro, they are student athletes. 

Wolverine Devotee

September 7th, 2020 at 5:17 PM ^

I think it's awesome that U-M is a great school. And I love hearing about our athletes doing well with their work.

But U-M could be a Kentucky-level academic institution and it wouldn't change a thing for me. I'm a fan because I grew up watching the Michigan Wolverines play and went to games with my step dad. 

I make it very clear that I don't claim the academic side. That doesn't apply to me because I didn't go there, so I distance myself from it. Was never a dream of mine to even go there as a kid, I just wanted to be a Michigan Football season ticket holder some day. Any path to get there is the one I wanted to travel down. 

Who do you really think likely has a better understanding of Michigan tradition? An out of state student who became a fan of the team just because he got accepted into the school or someone who has been a fan their entire life? 

 

MLD Woody

September 8th, 2020 at 12:42 AM ^

Yes, what would that student ever know about Michigan, Michigan football, and the traditions after having lived on campus for 4+ years, attending years of games in the student section, and interacting with others in the Michigan family on campus for years....

 

Look man, it's great you really, really like Michigan. But diminishing the impact of the student/alumni experience is just as off base as someone calling you a Walmart Wolverine

MLD Woody

September 6th, 2020 at 11:08 PM ^

I think you need to understand there are fans of the sports teams here and fans of the school.

As an alum I want the best decisions made for the school, and not necessarily the football team. And, as a university first, those are the decisions we want to be making.

 

It is great that you're a super fan. There are many great fans that never went there. No one is doubting that. But Michigan is a world class university first and a football team second 

uminks

September 7th, 2020 at 12:54 AM ^

Actually, it was the football team in the 70s that got me interested in attending Michigan, so I did. So my football fandom as a youth allowed me to motivate my lazy self to get into Michigan. I wish I was athletic enough to play football but I was too slow. I'm proud of my Michigan degree but if not for the football team I may have not had the interest and went elsewhere for my college education.

TheVarsity

September 6th, 2020 at 11:52 PM ^

You follow the team and conference closely. Just take a second and think how stupid that tweet is. The Michigan schools alone can't stop the conference from voting to go forward, Whitmer had no say on this topic (and is allowing sports to be played), and there are SEVERAL other schools in the conference that are strongly opposed to fielding a team. There's no reason to single out Michigan and MSU. So why are we having this mindless conversation? Votes. F*cking votes in November. This isn't about Michigan or MSU football. It's a sloppy attempt to anger Michigan voters in a state run by a Democrat. The tweet is so stupid and childish I wouldn't be surprised if it was actually Stephen A. Smith who posted it to start up a moronic sports debate.