Tennessee (2-seed) loses to Mercer (7-seed) in first round of NIT

Submitted by a2_electricboogaloo on

Normally,  I don't think this would be board worthy.  But after Tennessee Coach Cuonzo Martin complained yesterday about how the SEC was treated like a mid major in the NCAA tournament selection, I can't resist.

For those who missed Martin's comments, here are the ones from yesterday:

Tennessee coach Cuonzo Martin predicted two weeks ago that the SEC would earn six bids.

Martin said the SEC's three bids were an ''embarrassment'' after the brackets were revealed, and he didn't back down from those comments Monday. He said Tennessee, Kentucky and Alabama are ''NCAA tournament teams'' that landed in the NIT.

''It's almost like a mid-major mentality in this league, when you've got your second-place team that doesn't get in the NCAA tournament,'' Martin said. ''This is a BCS league. It's one of the best leagues in America. That shouldn't happen.''

The SEC's non-conference performance indicates it actually wasn't one of the best leagues in the nation this season.

And then Tennessee and Kentucky went on to lose in the first round of the NIT, to Mercer and Robert Morris respectively.  That's a true power conference right there.

TRUEwolverine

March 21st, 2013 at 9:28 AM ^

I was aware that the original story wasn't knew, however I thought the update would allow some of us to have a laugh at states expense. The story seemed to be showing up on many news sources as well.

Thanks for checking it out anyways.

State Street

March 21st, 2013 at 5:51 AM ^

Has there been a major program in the past decade that's had two worse consecutive hires than Derek Dooley and Cuonzo Martin?

I mean that's as bad as it gets.  Tennessee used to be a powerhouse.

Lumpy_wolverine

March 21st, 2013 at 11:42 AM ^

I am a UM alum living in Knoxville, and something of a UT basketball fan (distant second to Michigan, although my house was divided when they played in the tournament 2 years ago).  A lot of UT fans here compare the Dooley and Martin hires, but I think that there is a big distinction - Martin's teams have improved over the course of the season, while Dooley's never did.

On the football situation - it's worth noting that Lane Kiffin left the football program in total disarray - leaving after one year, but still managing to bring NCAA sanctions on the school.  Dooley was not a BCS level head coach, but they couldn't get someone at that level on short notice and under a cloud.

One more note on Cuonzo Martin's comments about the SEC - they might be boneheaded, but he has to come out defending the SEC a little too loudly.  There's some suspicion of him here because of his BIG pedigree.

Don't feel too sorry for the Volunteers - there's always women's basketball!

LSAClassOf2000

March 21st, 2013 at 8:22 AM ^

The funny story in the numbers is that Mercer won despite Tennessee maintaining an offensive rebound percentage that was over two times what Mercer was achieving (51.4% to 24%). The SEC was simply outshot by a significant margin (effective FG% for Mercer was 56.7%, nearly 13% better than Tennessee). 

It seems, at this point, that if the SEC adopted a mid-major mentality and approach that Martin derided, they might actually improve their basketball outlook. 

Canadian

March 21st, 2013 at 11:54 AM ^

"Well our kids were still upset about Sunday and came out a little flatter than normal and then we played good Tennessee basketball but it was too late. And give mercer a lot of credit. That's a damn good basketball team that should've been in the NCAA tournament." Right coach??

jmblue

March 21st, 2013 at 3:03 PM ^

It's funny, but we've got to start winning national championships before we can talk trash.  The SEC has won three in basketball since we won our last one (2000). 

panicvol

March 21st, 2013 at 4:32 PM ^

Won't be the same story next year. Hard to be the best conference in every sport all the time. Mark it down, the SEC will be better than the B10 in basketball next year.