The Snowflake Thread: Coaching

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on

This will be this evening's thread to discuss issues with the coaching and any issues you may have with the staff in general. 

Pibby Scott

November 2nd, 2013 at 7:53 PM ^

Which is even more frustrating.

 

MSU is mediocre. 

 

There is no way in hell they may even have the best defense in the country. They've played lousy teams so far. Besides ND (who also are mediocre) who have they played? IU? And they gave up 28 points to IU. Nearly 350 yards of offense. 

 

And that MSU is "this much further along than us" is sad. 

 

 

troublet1969

November 2nd, 2013 at 7:55 PM ^

We have not won a meaningful away game in quite a while now.  This has to be of concern to the current  staff.  I am not ready to scrap everything and start over but the there has to be paradigm shift with the offensive play calling.  Borges is taking a lot the heat after this one and by extension Hoke...this game didn't have to go this way but it did, we can't change it, let's move on...

I didn't believe that St. had a defense that could stop us...they made me a believer out of me today.  Get healthy team....the season is not over.

I don't feel good about the fact that this will be in E. Lansing again next year too....but Devin will stew in this for a year....

 

uminks

November 2nd, 2013 at 7:58 PM ^

Yes, the season is over. What difference does it make if we play in the pizza bowl or cirtus bowl. Are chances will be better to win the pizza bowl. We will get blown out by an SEC team in the citrus bowl

So, we go 8-4 or 7-5. We get blown out by MSU on the road and probably by OSU at home. We have close wins or loses against IA, NW and NE.

We have become a middling B1G team but I guess this is good enough for DB!

Reader71

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:25 PM ^

No its not good enough for DB. He fired a coach that fielded a middling team. Maybe middling is too effusive of praise. He wants a great team. You guys clearly disagree about id this coach can do it, but don't say dumb stuff for no reason.

goblue81

November 2nd, 2013 at 7:55 PM ^

Today, four of our drives ended as:
 
4th & 20
4th & 24
4th & 48
4th & 31
 
Ouch... and double ouch our recent history with MSU:
  • We have a scored a total 32 points in three years (2 TDs, 6 FGs).
  • We have not scored a TD in 129 minutes and 49 seconds.
  • We scored less points than the previous year.  If the trend continues next year, we will either score 0, 2, 3, or 5 pts.  Safety being unlikely, my money is 3 pts.
2011 - 1 TD @ 8:50 Q1, 1 TD @ 9:49 Q4  (14 total points) -  L 14-28
2012 - 60 minutes without a TD (12 total points) -  W 12 -10
2013 - 60 minutes without a TD (6 total points) -  L 6-29
 
So... Fire Funk, Fire Borges...

umichjenks

November 2nd, 2013 at 7:56 PM ^

Game plan and you come up with that crap? Let's play to our weakness and to their strength (our run vs their run def). No adjustments and no one is buying play action in 2nd half with -6 yds rushing. Borges is awful and so is our o line.

Drbogue

November 2nd, 2013 at 7:57 PM ^

College football in the "8-4" 90's: Buy a program, go to the game, read the Free Press. Maybe get some insight watching Brandstatter interview Moehler or Lloyd on Sunday morning. You may read a little article on recruiting in the high school section in the Saturday paper. You rooted for your team, but the analysis stopped by Tuesday at the latest and life went on. The most you knew about these kids was their hometown, major, and number. You supported them because they played for Michigan.

College football now: We follow year round recruiting, post player and future player Twitter feeds, analyze every single play to chart/grade/dissect, and looking for the "underlying message" in the pressers. Each players star ranking from high school determines our willingness to accept failure. If Peppers comes in and gets beat routinely - he's a failure. If Hoke doesn't wear a headset - he doesn't know how to coach. Everything becomes black and white because we've convinced ourselves that we know best. Why shouldn't we? We've studied, charted, dissected, and most importantly devoted our time and effort cheering for this team. Why can't the coaches make the changes we can all see from our computer screens? Fire them! Why can't you make a block as a guard? We don't care if you were at prom 5 months ago! How can Michigan State beat us soundly? We had a week to prepare!

I believe our obsession with Michigan football prevents many of us from simply enjoying a college football game and the increase in information has turned some of us on a witch hunt whenever our expectations are not met.

College football every year has one or two undefeated teams. Everyone else loses. Michigan is not the best team in the Big Ten. Michigan was outperformed on the field today. Al Borges is not responsible for keeping Bullough out of the backfield. When Kalis misses the blitzing outside linebacker, it is not Borges' fault. Michigan has struggled due to scheme, execution, youth, and a myriad of other issues. These are simple facts. Anyone who thought we'd be 11-0 going into the Ohio game, please raise your hand. If you believe that firing Borges is the solution, or firing Hoke, or cleaning house - are you patient enough to wait 3-5 more years for the next staff? Probably not. We're you of the same mind after the fourth straight 8-4 season of 1996? No staff can succeed without the support of the fan base. I would love to see a rallying post for once rather than a firing squad.

thisisme08

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:03 PM ^

Your right, Michigan football to me is not enjoyable to watch. At. All. 

This is the 3rd time this year that I've left the room and walked out to the garage and tuned the game in on the radio and "busy" worked on some project.  

On the plus side; Unlike our offense I accomplished something today in that I finished building a pair of "doll boxes" that my wifes dance studio will use in their upcoming production of "The Nutcracker".  

uminks

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:06 PM ^

But I thought the team would play better and the young offensive players would improve thought the season. I see no improvement and this is quite concerning. Now I will have to say we will probably go 8-4 again next season. The defense will be better but there has been no improvement in the interior line and we lose bot our NFL caliber tackles. I guess next year will be the reset for the OL and hopefully they will improve but there is now guarantee. I just see our coaches not improving this team. It is very disappointing and we will wait to 2016 to make a change at HC, then it will be time to rebuild for four more seasons.

gustave ferbert

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:48 PM ^

then and now.  In the 90's tickets were affordable.  There were no "seat license donations" it didn't cost $50 to park in the golf course or at pioneer. There wasn't a marketing blitz and "branding".  Certainly, if you're expected to pay for the game day experience and support an athletic program that spends in excess of $100 million a year, you expect a decent product.   If Brandon or the powers-that-be would come out and say "yes, our program isn't worth it, and they would reduce ticket prices and earn the loyalty of the fan base, then yes, you would see a rallying cry.  OSU outspends us, but they are content.  They can go on probation and get a coaching upgrade. . Yes you're right, we need to rally.  But you can't expect people to not be frustrated after what we've experienced especially over the last 6 or 7 years since Bo died. 

Reader71

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:31 PM ^

Why? Did the coaches lock onto a covered Gallon, torpedoing a drive? Did the coaches drop wide-open, well designed PA seam routes, or was that Gallon and Funchess? Did the coaches not tackle late in the game? Come on man, just because your stuff sounds authoritative doesn't mean it's not bullshit. The coaches deserve blame. A lot of it. But look at the tape. We played like shit, even when we had opportunities.

AlwaysBlue

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:50 PM ^

defense for the drives to end and start the halves. Once State got Michigan down 2 scores, they pinned their ears back further and crushed the offense. Unless Borges is responsible for Funk I am tired of seeing him blamed for this game. Who the hell can run an offense behind that line? And I think a ton of that problem is due to the center who should be communicating at the line.

GoBlueRandy

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:00 PM ^

I'm not one to usually bitch, but something's got to change. Funk needs to be fired and in my opinion Borges needs to be as well. How this group gives up negative rush yards is inexcusable. I know MSUs defense is good but that performance is down right uncalled for. Very frustrated but will continue to support the kids.

Maaly

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:00 PM ^

I think the main thing that bothers EVERYONE on this board  is the lack of progress seen on the field every saturday. Even lesser teams get better as the season goes along. There is no way that our entire team (off/def) is this inept.

I want Funk gone, and I would like Borges addressed in the offseason.

BeatOSU52

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:08 PM ^

to fire the head coach at this point, even after this season (and yes I know they did so with RR after year 3).  Recruiting means a lot and he's still accomplished some good things.  Hoke gets at least another 3 years before he gets considered to be in the "hot-seat"

umichjenks

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:02 PM ^

Perfection. But when u run play action when we have negative yds rushing that's on Borges and you know it. We are not a power team, and Borges is play calling like we have our 1997 O line. He knows we can't run block but continues to call power runs. No screen plays, hardly enough quick slants. Put Gardner in shotgun and let him throw. Better than -40 yds rushing.

Reader71

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:34 PM ^

The negative rushing yards come from the sacks. Sacks come on passing plays, not power runs. Gardner was in the shotgun a lot. Didn't help. You are wrong. This game proves that your offensive ideas are wrong. You wanted this game plan. Shotgun, deep passes, short quick passes. We all did. It sucked. Stop pretending you have any answers for a bad offensive line.

MGoBlue96

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:55 PM ^

the equation is token PA fakes that cause your QB to hold the ball longer included. Yes, there were some short passes, but those were far outweighed by the number of long developing plays. I liked the idea of hitting MSU deep early, the issue was that it became apparent that the pass protection wouldn't hold up for those type of plays.

Al didn't call a terrible game, the problem was against this defense they needed his absolute best playcalling.

Reader71

November 2nd, 2013 at 11:08 PM ^

I agree. Some of those were dumb. I mentioned earlier, though, that some of them were certainly called for timing purposes. Some routes and combos take a really long time to develop, longer than 5- or 7-steps. Unfortunately, almost all of them failed. I am not, nor have I ever, defended everything any coach has done. But on the whole, this was not only a pretty good game plan, it was the one mgoblog wanted. Want to argue about a few PA passes, fine. But the question remains: what kind of offense is going to be effective with that line, particularly against that D? No one has an answer. Part of the reason is because our second half game plan was heavy on quick shotgun over the middle stuff that is theoretically PERFECT against this D. It didn't work for us. I've asked all year, what do we do behind this line? No one has a good answer. Not me, not you, not Brian, and unfortunately, not Borges.

Cranky Dave

November 3rd, 2013 at 2:11 PM ^

Come from passing plays. But adjusting for sacks and the 20yd snap by Glasgow I get 21 rushing attempts for 21 yds. sounds eerily similar to a game earlier this season... Having said that I agree that the game plan was fairly sound this game. The first drive was very encouraging for me. However as everyone agrees this o-line is atrocious so it seems like the remaining games will be all about seeing some competence up front rather than gameplan. I continue to be in the camp of definitely firing Funk and reserving judgement on Borges until after the season. Funk hasnt produced any NFL lineman the last time I checked. He's had a few (3 IIRC) drafted butnone made it to an active roster.

BeatOSU52

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:04 PM ^

Can our coaches make sure our players don't say anything dumb next year within the week before the game?  I know Fitz wasn't meaning any harm, but we still look even worse after a blowout loss to them.

Epic-Blue

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:06 PM ^

You think we're obsessed? I lived outside of Knoxville TN. Phil Fulmer had death threats on him and family members! This is PG compared to the fanaticism you'll find in the SEC!!! Hoke said it himself, anything less than a BTen championship is a Failure! Alums...Walmarts...need to let the brass know that a change is needed and very much warranted after this curb stomping that occurred this afternoon in East Lansing, MI!!!!

Sllepy81

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:11 PM ^

you live and die with seniors, well hoke does. You got knocked out, time to try another HB, Fitz did nothing and is mediocre, the other guys looked good but are sitting and watching. Blame the oline, sure but when you can't run and play action they blitz your turnover happy qb. Play the damn freshmen, he wanted to start, you burned his shirt. As someone from Richmond VA I regret telling Derrick he made a good choice, I figured they would play him over fitz but the coaches are letting seniority rule.

anewnoise

November 2nd, 2013 at 8:16 PM ^

Fitz isn't the problem.  He isn't a great RB but I think you are asking a lot of a true freshman to step in and perform any better.  As someone mentioned in the LiveBlog, Adrian Peterson would have trouble doing anything with this Offensive Line and some of the schemes Borges puts these guys in.  

Sllepy81

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:41 PM ^

good running backs find ways. Adrian Peterson would not have this many horribly statistical games in college with this line, hell I think Mike Cox could've done better with this oline. fitz did come off a broken leg, partially they don't give him breaks and he's just not that good.