Sam Webb "All-American Gut Feeling" on Sean Parker

Submitted by umhero on
I just listened to the WTKA Recruiting Roundup and a caller asked Sam who the "All-American" Sam was having one of his famous gut feelings about? Sam said based on conversations he had with Sean and other players (read Cullen?) at the Army All-American Game, he has a strong feeling that Parker will be a Wolverine. He did remind listeners that he had a "gut feeling" in the past about Grimes too, but he pointed out circumstances changed with Grimes. He is hopeful we will be able to keep Parker for the final three week of recruiting. http://www.wtka.com/index.php?fuseaction=home.podcasts_sel&id=3074

The Other Brian

January 14th, 2010 at 11:52 AM ^

Should be interesting to see how the next 20 days play out. USC is up to their eyeballs in elite corners and safeties, and they're still probably going to reel in Dietrich Riley. Even if they put the press on Parker (which they may, who knows how the new staff will evaluate), one thing that hasn't changed is the depth chart, which is still in Michigan's favor, and was one of the main factors in Michigan surging to the top of Parker's list.

Erik_in_Dayton

January 14th, 2010 at 12:20 PM ^

while brushing his teeth he questioned whether there could be meaning in a godless universe. He decided that while he might be Sisyphus, he could imagine Sisyphus as happy, and so, yes, there could be meaning.

funkywolve

January 14th, 2010 at 12:28 PM ^

Would the coaches start Woolfolk and Kovacs and get Parker on the bench even if he could do a better job then Kovacs? If Parker comes in and is solid and it looks like both Woolfolk and Parker can play as well as if not better then Kovacs, why wouldn't you start both?

mstier

January 14th, 2010 at 12:32 PM ^

Being good at one position doesn't necessarily mean you'd be good at another, even among more closely related things like safeties. The point is, a deep safety usually has to be better in pass coverage than a shallow safety, who conversely is typically better at run support, blitzes, etc. Its a different skill set, and personally I think Parker's strong suit is his abilities in coverage, hence the projection at strong (deep) safety.

caveman.lawyer

January 14th, 2010 at 2:17 PM ^

Magnus -- do you think that it is a foregone conclusion that Woolfolk will play safety? If we have a viable option at strong safety, doesn't Warren's departure make Woolfolk playing corner a little more likely? I guess it boils down to whether the coaches will be more comfortable starting a true freshman (or freshmen) at corner or safety. Of all the new guys coming or potentially coming, who do you think are the most ready to see the field?

Magnus

January 14th, 2010 at 12:16 PM ^

If you ask about Baxter on every recruiting thread, you will be negged on every recruiting thread (and not just by me). People don't withhold information. If there's news, you will hear it.

Magnus

January 14th, 2010 at 12:36 PM ^

They started Kovacs over Emilien and Williams last year. I don't see why they wouldn't continue to do that if Kovacs is a better option. Regardless, neither Parker or Woolfolk is a free safety in this defense. Free safety will be played by Kovacs, Emilien, Williams, or Marvin Robinson.

Magnus

January 14th, 2010 at 12:49 PM ^

Yes, I think we will continue to pursue Parker. Not only can he play both positions, but we need depth at strong safety, which would be his most likely destination. I think that's especially true because other guys seem to be going off the board (Grimes, Murphy, Taylor, Wilson, Beachum, Hankins, etc.) that we thought we had a good shot at. That being said, I don't have a good feeling about Knight anymore. I think he'll go elsewhere, whether we continue to pursue him or not.

AC1997

January 14th, 2010 at 1:33 PM ^

I am equally excited about the chances of having two highly ranked safety prospects (Parker, Robinson) in this class. But I'm even more excited about having FOUR safety prospects in one class (Vinopal and Johnson included). In my opinion, recruiting success is as much based on quality as quantity. If you recruit two guys to play two positions and one of them falls short of expectations for any number of reasons (injury, grades, homesick, etc.) you're left scrambling. That's been the problem with our secondary the past three years more than anything. Having four guys competing for two spots means that you could be successful even if something doesn't pan out. For all we know, Carvin Johnson could be the best of the bunch and underrated for other reasons. Or maybe Robinson will bulk up to play LB and we'll need to shuffle things around. Depth is as exciting as talent - especially when you play multiple players at that position throughout a game.

Clarence Beeks

January 14th, 2010 at 2:16 PM ^

"I am equally excited about the chances of having two highly ranked safety prospects (Parker, Robinson) in this class. But I'm even more excited about having FOUR safety prospects in one class (Vinopal and Johnson included)." Don't forget about Conelius Jones.

Magnus

January 14th, 2010 at 2:39 PM ^

I think Woolfolk will be a safety next year. Our defense played better this year when he was at safety. It's better to have experienced guys in the deep secondary rather than experienced guys at the corners. That's one reason that you see veteran NFL cornerbacks often move to free safety - they can diagnose players quicker and don't get fooled by play action (the other reason being that they lose a step). The guys that I think will come in ready to contribute are Marvin Robinson, Cullen Christian, Drew Dileo, Austin White, and Ken Wilkins. (EDIT: You could add Parker and Baxter if they come, although the latter probably won't.) Miller and Jackson will probably play, but I don't think they'll contribute much. The vast majority of this class is going to redshirt, IMO.

BiaBiakabutuka21

January 14th, 2010 at 2:45 PM ^

on special teams? Or do you think he will contribute right away at slot? I'm assuming you mean Special teams due to the depth chart at slot. Where do you see Wilkins playing early on? Seems like he could grow into a pretty good DE but I'm not sure he is big enough yet. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Magnus

January 14th, 2010 at 5:19 PM ^

Yeah, I think Dileo might be our punt returner next year. Hemingway can't do it, Mathews is gone, Warren is gone, Odoms' hands are questionable. That basically leaves it up to guys like Robinson (see Odoms), Gallon, and Dileo, all unknown quantities. But this is what Dileo's being brought in to do - return kicks.

Magnus

January 14th, 2010 at 5:22 PM ^

Oh yeah, I think Wilkins could get some playing time at DE/Quick next year. He's a young'n but we don't have much depth, and I think we'll have to play one young DL (at least). Wilkins is the most physically ready. I expect him to end up at DE eventually, but it could be one of those things where he starts out at Quick and eventually has his hand down 100% of the time.