so much for that
- Member for
- 4 years 37 weeks
- View recent blog entries
- Current value
|11 hours 23 min ago||"Plus, he looked like Santa||
"Plus, he looked like Santa Clause"
|11 hours 36 min ago||I figured, but I don't know||
I figured, but I don't know how his comments were remotely political. I don't think many people, regardless of party, would argue that she wasn't an awful governor. That isn't politics; it's a fact.
|11 hours 56 min ago||Strong contender right here.||
Strong contender right here.
|11 hours 57 min ago||Mentioning a political figure||
Mentioning a political figure is not necessarily astray of the "no politics" rule.
|13 hours 11 min ago||"It's just interesting that||
"It's just interesting that it wasn't actually written by southerners."
|1 week 2 days ago||"There is no reason for these||
"There is no reason for these salaries to wildly outpace growth in just about every other field in the country."
|1 week 2 days ago||New Hampshire has it right.||
New Hampshire has it right.
|1 week 3 days ago||I'm sure we will see that||
I'm sure we will see that from the Mathlete (and I look forward to it), but frankly we don't need it to know that it's true. There were very few freshmen that ever saw significant (if any) playing time before the mid-2000s, and really, probably more accurately 2009. The question I'm more curious about isn't if, it's when it happened. I suspect it wasn't really until 2009, which masked some of why what happened in the next few years happened, and only seems like it happened sooner because we were blessed with several of those exceptions (Henne, Hart, Manningham) in basically the same short span.
|1 week 6 days ago||I wish I could lend some||
I wish I could lend some insight, but this will largely depend upon some particularities of New York common law. So you will need to have some of the New York admitted lawyers who post here contribute to get the most accurate answer. From a very general perspective, though, I tend to side with Singh on this one (but that certainly isn't based upon the state law that will actually control in this cass).
|2 weeks 2 days ago||I see what you mean. I find||
I see what you mean. I find that, generally, when people can an answer its beyond obvious that they have something memorized and it sounds absolutely inauthentic. We far prefer that they have a situation or experience that they can pull answers from when they get a question, rather than having a precise answer. We do a lot with behavioral interviewing, though, so if you don't that may be where our perspectives differ.
|2 weeks 2 days ago||I didn't say unprepared.||
I didn't say unprepared. There is a big difference between being prepared and having obviously canned answers.
|2 weeks 2 days ago||"I don’t doubt that on the||
"I don’t doubt that on the whole, hiring managers choose the candidates who dress up, stay off their phones, and have canned answers ready to go."
|2 weeks 2 days ago||"The other thing that I've||
"The other thing that I've noticed is that folks just don't put a lot of effort into their resumes."
|2 weeks 2 days ago||Unfortunately, it does.||
Unfortunately, it does.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Exactly. When they show the||
Exactly. When they show the angle that looks straight at the end line it's absolutely clear that initial contact was to the body (front of left shoulder) and then carried through to the head.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||No. He didn't. If you watch||
No. He didn't. If you watch it frame by frame, he is not in the air with both feet when contact is made.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||We'll have to agree to||
We'll have to agree to disagree.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||You're absolutely right, on||
You're absolutely right, on all accounts.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||On his feet until contact and||
On his feet until contact and initial contact was to the shoulder. Terrible.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||The national folks are||
The national folks are idiots.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Disagree completely. That||
Disagree completely. That was not a penalty.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||You mean the same idiots that||
You mean the same idiots that decided not to call a blatant over the glass penalty at the end of regulation against the Capitals? No way...
|2 weeks 3 days ago||This. It's called a DVR.||
This. It's called a DVR. Use it before you say something dumb.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Because: 1) He didn't leave||
|2 weeks 3 days ago||My sentiment exactly. There||
My sentiment exactly. There was absolutely nothing wrong with that hit.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Or better yet, to get the CBC||
Or better yet, to get the CBC teams throughout.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||I agree. I would also pay||
I agree. I would also pay decent money to be able to watch the regional broadcasts throughout the entire playoffs (especially living out of market).
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Absolutely. That was just||
Absolutely. That was just awful.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Can anyone explain why NBC||
Can anyone explain why NBC insists on using jokers like McGuire, Emerick, Olczyk, etc. when there are other options that are so much better? So happy to have Rick Peckham on this game tonight. Boston-Toronto has CBC's simulcast. Night and day difference from the AWFUL combination that they had for the Caps-Rangers game (Emerick, Olczyk, McGuire). Just call the damn game, stop the theatrics (it's a driiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive!), and the stupid personal interest stories during the game (no one gives a crap that two of the Islanders played for the Penguins last year, let alone that you need to tell us about it 8 times in two games). I don't know why, but the TSN and CBC crews just call the game, while the NBC crews try to make it a show. So annoying. Personally, I hate these "national" crews because they don't know crap about the teams (aside from the basic stuff that anyone knows) and repeat the same stuff game after game after game as if no one watched the previous games. It's such an uneducated broadcast and so annoying for fans that closely follow the teams. That said, Rick Peckham is the clear exception and I wish they would use him more, instead of continuing to put their awful trio on every "important" game. /rant. Sorry... Had to get that off of my chest, and I can't be the only one who this pisses off.
|2 weeks 6 days ago||Yes! Wings & More, that's||
Yes! Wings & More, that's it! That place was unexpectedly amazing.