September 16th, 2017 at 7:32 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:33 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:42 PM ^
862, I have deep family roots at Mizzou, so I always root for the Tigers unless they're playing Michigan. Are the non-football issues in Columbia (and the rest of Missouri) playing a role, or is it simply lousy coaching?
September 16th, 2017 at 9:08 PM ^
September 17th, 2017 at 8:41 AM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 11:52 PM ^
When they got in an absolute shootout with Missouri State in game 1, I was pretty sure they were horrendous
September 16th, 2017 at 7:33 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:33 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:35 PM ^
Just win.
September 16th, 2017 at 7:34 PM ^
You'd think Purdue will be ranked going in to the game
September 16th, 2017 at 7:39 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:36 PM ^
September 17th, 2017 at 3:26 AM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:37 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 8:00 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 8:40 PM ^
September 17th, 2017 at 3:25 AM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:38 PM ^
Not to discount Purdue, but Missouri was picked to finish last in the SEC.
September 16th, 2017 at 7:39 PM ^
It's stunning that Purdue was a 6-point underdog today. Easiest money I've ever made.
September 16th, 2017 at 8:52 PM ^
Equally as surprising at UCLA being favored at Memphis.
September 16th, 2017 at 10:16 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:39 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:40 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:42 PM ^
To me, any road game is worrisome (except Rutgers), and technically going to West Lafayette is a road game.
And yes, Missouri is terrible, but Purdue's blowout win in Columbia is still impressive.
Fortunately, Purdue's strength seems to be aimed squarely at our strength, and I think ours is considerably stronger.
September 16th, 2017 at 7:43 PM ^
it'll be interesting to see if people doublepost just for old time's sake.
September 16th, 2017 at 7:44 PM ^
The only thing we will learn next week is the strength of the resolve of the Speight haterz.
September 16th, 2017 at 7:56 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 8:14 PM ^
You expected a team with 17 new starters to be 11-0 heading into OSU?
It's not out of the realm of possibility, but I wouldn't expect it.
September 16th, 2017 at 9:19 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 8:59 PM ^
That's pretty irrational to expect to be undefeated going into OSU. And Penn St. is for real. The only people who say they aren't are our fans for whatever reason.
September 16th, 2017 at 11:03 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 9:21 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 11:37 PM ^
I can give you a few reasons:
- They have James Franklin as their coach.
- They have James Franklin as their coach.
- James Franklin was out-coached by Brady Hoke in clock management.
- They lost by 39 points to Michigan last year. The last time Michigan lost by 39 or more points was the 1935 Little Brown Jug game (40-0 Minnesota).
- PSU got outplayed by OSU and got lucky to win. They have up 31 points to non-chaos-team Indiana in a game that was in doubt well into the fourth quarter. They only scored 39 in Piscataway.
- Wisconsin fell asleep in the Big Ten championship game, and the "vaunted" PSU defense gave up 52 points in the Rose Bowl.
- They have James Franklin as their coach.
PSU's supposed talent is a combination of media hype and their irrational, JoePa-worshipping fanbase, plus Saquon Barkley is really, really good -- against everyone except Michigan.
I'm not saying that winning at Happy Valley will be a cakewalk -- it won't. Winning a game on the road is difficult, especially at night. Michigan may very well lose. But that doesn't mean Penn State is for real. It just means that Michigan doesn't seem to play well on the road.
September 16th, 2017 at 7:58 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:56 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 8:54 PM ^
I like to think the Big Ten makes schedules at the business end of Barry Alvarez's gunpoint. We're running on like a decade+ of "hey, Wisconsin has a pretty easy schedule this year."
September 16th, 2017 at 10:35 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 10:44 PM ^
Last year was the alternative to the all cake schedule. They had to play some tough teams (everyone eventually does) but they played all of them but Michigan at home (Ohio St, PSU, Nebraska, and LSU -- which I know was at Lambeau...but c'mon...that's a home game).
They either get a cake schedule or a schedule where all of the tough games are home games. For as long as I can remember. Alvarez da god.
September 16th, 2017 at 10:37 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 7:57 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 8:01 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 8:03 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 8:09 PM ^
He's 3rd on the Depth Chart and some say 4th if you include/want Dylan McCaffrey burning his RS so yeah...
September 16th, 2017 at 8:14 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 8:25 PM ^
The best players play.
September 16th, 2017 at 8:35 PM ^
September 16th, 2017 at 8:55 PM ^
Sure, but these statements are not mutually exclusive:
"Speight is a liability."
"Speight is the best option we have."
Speight now is inferior to pre-Iowa Speight."
In fact, I think it is likely that all of those are true.
September 16th, 2017 at 9:13 PM ^
Almost the entire offense is filled with "he's the best option we have" kinds of guys. Cole is probably the only exception to that rule and even he is playing tackle because "he's the best option we have" at that spot.
They're not starting a bunch of freshman and sophomores for shits and giggles. Its because that's all we've got and they are the best options. It really shouldn't be surprising that the offense has gone backwards a few steps...yet here we are: people arguing for putting a redshirt freshman at QB to lead an offense full of underclassmen because he looked OK (9-17, TD/INT...basically the same as what Speight is doing now) against a split squad defense in a spring game.
September 16th, 2017 at 10:51 PM ^
Perspective...
September 16th, 2017 at 9:02 PM ^
I see you've completely forgotten the Devin Gardner years. Also Jake Ruddock's first three games (which BTW were 59/91 for 582 yds, and 3 TD, 5 INT)