Poor Cal fans are in full-on meltdown mode

Submitted by FrankMurphy on August 4th, 2023 at 7:37 PM

TL;DR - Cal is in some serious trouble, and their fans are buying up torches and pitchforks. The B1G presidents (who are supposedly pushing for Cal and Stanford to be invited) might be their only hope.

I'm not posting this for schadenfreude because no one really wishes ill upon Cal. If anything, I'm guessing that most of us want to see Cal do well since UC-Berkeley is basically Michigan's West Coast twin (albeit the dirtier, poorer, and more disheveled twin).

https://writeforcalifornia.com/p/oregon-washington-big-ten

The comments give a window into how angry their fans are at the university leadership that has driven their AD completely into the ground over the past 10+ years. They've incurred a massive amount of debt that would have taken them the better part of the next century to pay off even if the Pac-?? were on solid financial footing. Now, with the Pac facing imminent collapse, they may not ever be able to pay it off.

As a Michigan alum in the Bay Area, I definitely want to see Cal get its act together and thrive. But if they can't manage to snag a B1G invite, their athletic department might literally be facing total disintegration. Given that it's Berkeley, there are influential nutjob factions within the university that hate college football and everything it represents. The impending collapse of the Pac could energize those factions and force a shutdown of the program altogether. It seems inconceivable that an FBS football program would go from Power 5 status to defunct seemingly overnight, but here we are.

Relatedly, I'm hearing that the B1G university presidents are pushing hard for Cal and Stanford to be invited, but that Fox Sports and the other media partners are pushing back (I can't find the link where I read that). For mostly selfish reasons, I'm hoping they can find a way to get a deal done.

TheCube

August 4th, 2023 at 7:47 PM ^

Really hoping B10 picks up Cal and Stanford. ND who knows since they always think they're better than the rest of us. 

I feel the most for Wazzu and Oregon State. Their fans are going to be left holding the bag. Today is a dark day for college football. 

oriental andrew

August 5th, 2023 at 10:32 AM ^

Is the ACC really in as bad shape as the Pac? Assuming FSU and Clemson leave, they still have 12 viable schools. They could easily add nd and might stretch for a school like UConn and/or another Florida school (USF, I guess, starting to be slim pickings). Not solid, but they don't seem on the verge of collapse like the Pac. 

SalvatoreQuattro

August 4th, 2023 at 8:49 PM ^

Eh. P5 College football has been operating under the illusion of relative equality for a long time now. It’s time that people face the truth that schools like Cal, Stanford, Oregon State, or Washington State are not going to be challenging for national titles.

Stanford and Cal should drop to Ivy and Oregon State and Wazzu go to Mountain West.

I really would like to see FBS football tiered like English Football because that way less affluent programs can compete for national titles. If they can build toward being able to compete at the highest level there should be a mechanism to allow them in.

CityOfKlompton

August 4th, 2023 at 9:21 PM ^

I don't wish ill will on any program (OK, except probably Ohio), but this idea that there was ever parity in college football is a funny idea some hang on to. Roughly 80% of AP championships have been won by just 13 or 14 programs. That's almost an entire century's worth of championships that have been won by a small subset of teams.

The sport has never been an equal playing field and programs have been cheating and paying players since literally the very beginning. This thought that it used to be more noble and fair is pretty foolish.

Underhill's Gold

August 4th, 2023 at 11:55 PM ^

He means they can compete for second division national titles or third division national titles. 

We do already have that - it's called FCS division football, and there is already a means of relegation or promotion. The only difference is relegation and promotion are self-selected, not enforced by win-loss record. 

BKBlue94

August 5th, 2023 at 2:25 AM ^

I don't like the idea of national tiers, but with the Big Ten getting as big as it is, I think it'd be really fun to have a big ten top division A and a big ten second division B, with say two teams moving up and down each year. This would ensure that the best teams in the conference played every year, give less competitive teams something to play for, and wouldn't be a revenue issue since everyone shares it anyway.

joegeo

August 5th, 2023 at 2:22 AM ^

The B10 is in a cutthroat capitalist fight for survival against the SEC. I agree with the sentiment, but Cal and Stanford have terrible market value, worse than any in the big ten currently, thus watering down tv contract value that will be used to win high value ACC teams to the conference in the future. This is about money. It’s not happening.

Shorty the Bea…

August 4th, 2023 at 8:34 PM ^

I get your idea. But Michigan - Cal or Michigan - Stanford is still a 1000% increase over Michigan - Rutgers or even Maryland. 

Michigan culturally aligns with the Bay area elite institutions.

Ohio aligns with the Rutgers of the world. They are all spray paint, hair gel, and big mouths.

If we could, I'd like to propose a trade. 

outsidethebox

August 5th, 2023 at 7:48 AM ^

I prefer "If you don't like getting beat-get better." The misunderstandings and misplaced blame in athletic competition is quite remarkable. Thank goodness social media was not a thing 50 year ago when my sister's HS basketball team beat a conference opponent 108-0. My sister and her teammates felt very badly... "What were we supposed to do?"

Steve-a-wolverine-o

August 5th, 2023 at 9:53 AM ^

I disagree with you on this point. Have you been to the Bay Area late summer/early fall?  It’s amazing. 
 

The other thing that I don’t see get said enough here is that there are a bunch of Michigan fans that are ready to pounce on Michigan games played on the west coast. I moved to the Bay Area after my undergrad (ended up with a Berkeley degree eventually) and am in Oregon now. The Washington game was canceled due to COVID and the UCLA game was cancelled so this is all very disappointing. Michigan can come out here once every three years or so. It would be very welcomed for those who have a tough time getting to AA for a game. 

Macenblu

August 4th, 2023 at 7:50 PM ^

Interesting, because I’ve been reading for awhile that Cal has no fans and that no one in the Bay Area watches college football.  Seriously though, I’m sure their diehard fans are upset.  This sucks for them.  But, it’s Berkeley, they’re used to protesting

snarling wolverine

August 4th, 2023 at 8:02 PM ^

Their fanbase is a lot smaller than you'd think for the flagship school in a state of 40 million people.  They averaged 38,596 fans per game last year. I feel bad for the fans they do have, but they're really not much of a football school.

As for Stanford, they didn't even average 30K last year.  The job Harbaugh did there is just incredible.