OT: Star Wars: The Force Awakens reaction thread WITH SPOILERS

Submitted by Tim Waymen on

A long time ago, in a thread very, very off-topic:

 

I just got back from seeing The Force Awakens. It was fantastic, absolutely wonderful. JJ Abrams is to Star Wars what Jim Harbaugh is to Michigan. It's entirely possible that Jim Hackett helped assemble the cast and crew for the film.

We're going to discuss the movie, with spoilers. If you haven't seen it, turn away immediately and go watch it so that you can get the full experience.

What did you think? How could George Lucas make such abominable prequels when someone is capable of making something as amazing as The Force Awakens?

May the force be with Blue.

Jeff09

December 18th, 2015 at 6:56 AM ^

I thought it was good, not great. Not sure why everyone is so happy with a retread of the episode IV plot, I thought that was the worst part about the movie. Would've loved a bit more originality here

Reader71

December 18th, 2015 at 7:42 AM ^

That's the only way to protect against fan backlash. The fans have decided that they own the story and have a very specific and narrow reading of it. It's basically a Stick to What I Say is Star Wars argument. The nostalgia makes people resistant to any change. People are generally that way, which is why Hollywood makes derivative blockbusters and more sequels than original IP. Give them the same thing, but different.

Reader71

December 18th, 2015 at 8:33 AM ^

It belonged solely to Lucas, who decided that the prequels were just as Star Wars as the originals. It now belongs to Disney, or more specifically, whoever Disney puts in charge of the creation, like Abrams and the next director. It does not belong to the fans any more than a song or a painting does. What the fans own is their feelings towards the art. But there is no ownership of the art itself. It is not a collaboration. Take it or leave it, but don't think you do or ought to have any say over it.

FreddieMercuryHayes

December 18th, 2015 at 8:42 AM ^

You're talking about legal ownership rights.  I'm talking about something different.  Using your example or art, you can go to the Louvre and see the Mona Lisa.  Someone up has a legal ownership right to that painting.  But it 'belongs' to the world.  Which is why it's on public display for the world to see.  Same with Star Wars at this point.  It's no longer a pet project a film maker is passionate about.  It's a cultural phenomenon unlike anything in entertainment the past half century.  Sure, Disney has ownership rights and can legally do what they want with it, but it still belongs to the fans.  Saying 'fuck you fans, we'll do whatever we want' is not a wise move.  The movie is for the people who want to see it.

Reader71

December 18th, 2015 at 9:17 AM ^

I'm not talking ownership rights though. Lucas owned it by virtue of creation. That's why I said whoever directs the new films will own it. That's why the owner of the Mona Lisa isn't the possessor of the canvas nor is the owner of a song the studio which owns the master copy. In a very real way, the creator of the art is its sole owner. The fans of the art own their perceptions, that's it. They are not entitled to any part of the creation. I agree that pissing off fans is a bad idea. But it isn't from any ownership right, it is because the fans might no longer be fans and the money dries up. George Lucas didn't rape anyone's childhood, he raped his own property. Fans can hate it if they want, and they are free to say they like the originals better. What I don't understand is the people who act like the prequels never happened, or are worried about canon, or feel like any bad thing is an affront to them. I hated Godfather 3. It did not rape my childhood. It did not affect, in any way, my appreciation of the previous films. But it happened.

Reader71

December 18th, 2015 at 12:49 PM ^

Actually, the ending, from the silent scream til Michael's death, alone, with only his dog, is perfect. Gorgeous. Moving. Appropriate. But Sofia was bad, Garcia was bad, Pacino wasn't playing Michael anymore. And you talk about it not feeling like a Godfather movie, wow.

slimj091

December 18th, 2015 at 8:08 AM ^

Sometimes you have to use someone elses words, and idea's as inspiration for your own. This film was the ground work for the next two. As are any first films in a planned trilogy.

More than that JJ wanted the film to feel familiar for fan's. If everything was new and different I don't think many fan's of the films would have recieved it well at all. Episode 8 is where the real divergance will occur. Which is also one of the reasons why JJ is not directing either of the next two films.

The Shredder

December 18th, 2015 at 7:39 AM ^

It was fucking awesome. My only grips was chewy not getting a decent good bye to han and our heros hanging in a lightsaber fight with a trained Jedi. But I thought the effects of the fight was so different from previous saber fights I didn't care cause I was all in. The sabers just seemed to have more weight to them.

Eck Sentrik

December 18th, 2015 at 7:47 AM ^

Yeah, they played it safe incorperating so much of ANH's plot but whatever, I loved it. History repeats itself blah blah.

 

The coolest thing for me though is that after what, 32 years, Han Solo was back. Ford stuck the fucking landing. I read a review that I couldnt agree with more. It said that after all the SW/Solo bashing Ford has done over the years, he's likely realized that ultimatly this is the role he'll be remembered for. For the first time in quite a few films, Ford put it all on the line and gave a hell of a performance.

Eck Sentrik

December 18th, 2015 at 7:53 AM ^

There seems to be a lot of assumptions as to how much training Ren as had. Especially with a light saber. Finn and Ray are the only two we see him fight with.

 

For all we know all the training he's had with a saber is reading the quick-start guide.

FreddieMercuryHayes

December 18th, 2015 at 8:02 AM ^

Yeah, exactly.  They don't explain this in the movie, but Ren's lightsaber is an 'ancient' design.  The quillons are energy vents to to keep the blade stable.  That's why it's not a 'clean' blade either.  Constructing a lighsaber is a rite of passage for Jedi, and yet he did not construct a proper modern lightsaber.  We'll find out in the future, but to me, that means Ren hasn't been highly trained.  He found some ancient schematics in empire archives and cobbled together his lightsaber.  He has some major gaps in his education/training.

FreddieMercuryHayes

December 18th, 2015 at 8:07 AM ^

It was great.  I rarely see movies again in the theater (or even go to the movies in theaters), and I'm going to see it again. 

Negatives: Few, but I felt they put too many throw backs from the original trilogy in.  To go along with that, they tried to get the sarcastic witty banter back, and stuffed a little to many jokes into the movie especially when the overall themes seemed to have a lot of gravitas to it.

Positives: Even with the above, it was fantastic to actually have humor and a sense of fun the prequels were missing.  Loved it.  My favorite thing was probably the casting and the charachters they set up.  I think Kylo Ren will be one of the most complex and deep charachters the Star Wars saga has seen.  Reminds me of what I think Lucas was trying to go for with Anakin, but didn't pull it off in the prequels.  The threads for the charachter arcs look great.  Luke looked tortured at the end.  Didn't even have a line, but was probably the best acting Mark Hamill has ever done.  Everyone will love Rey because she's shoruded in mystrey, yet I think most people will be able to identify with her.  Smart writing, fast paced, good action, and seems to set up for a really good plot.  Can't wait until May 2017.

itsbigcat

December 18th, 2015 at 8:18 AM ^

It was excellent. I'd give it an 11/10, but two main points I didn't care for brought it back down to a still excellent 10/10...

One, this is the last Death Star type thing I'm giving them. It's time to get creative for once.

Two, the commander in charge of the fleet, the red headed kid, looked exactly that, like he was 22 at most. Too young to instill any real fear.

Things I loved: Han and Chewie, the scene where the resistance saves them on that forest planet, and the fact that Kylo Ren is a screw up. It gives his character depth.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Toasted Yosties

December 18th, 2015 at 10:29 AM ^

But if it is, I imagine, with it being so close to the same song, Star Wars fanatics will feel misled. Also, I guess it's been mentioned by the Star Wars staff that Snoke is 7', same as Plageius. They also mention that Snoke has a tragic past. Being killed by your apprentice would fit that bill. Anything could change, but I'd love this, even just to connect the prequels to the new trilogy.

Tim Waymen

December 18th, 2015 at 6:09 PM ^

Great catch. I hate it though. Why?

I hate the prequels and refuse to acknowledge their existence. They are just bad cinema. I just thought up this theory: the prequels are really Luke or Leia's dreams because they're so nonsensical (more likely Leia because of the politics and she's a princess). Snoke being Plagueis is interesting, but it undermines my theory/attempt to reconcile the existence of the prequels. One small detail in either's dreams probably wouldn't hint at a character whose existence the dreamer isn't even aware of, but hey, the Force.

legalblue

December 18th, 2015 at 9:34 AM ^

So is this guy force sensitive or what? I loved the whole movie, but this had me scratching my head all night. Is he the only guy in 7 star wars films to use a lightsaber who has no ability with the force or is there something there that just hasn't been trained at all? Seemed like Rey knew exactly what she was doing by the end of the film as far as the force was concerned, but Finn never had one moment where it seemed like he was getting it other than holding his own against Kylo in a lightsaber fight. Thoughts?

FreddieMercuryHayes

December 18th, 2015 at 10:00 AM ^

Well he is a trained soldier who we can presume has had training in some non-blaster type weapons (think that riot stick fight he had with the storm trooper).  But my real thoughts are that this will be explored more in the future films.  I have to think that 'The Force Awakens' would imply the force awakening in more than just Rey.

LSAClassOf2000

December 18th, 2015 at 10:08 AM ^

My wife and I were also part of the first night audience, and incidentally, if you were one of the people at the MJR in Westland trying to start a rousing rendition of the main theme about 20 minutes before the 7 PM show, my wife was trying to help you guys out in the back of the theatre but no one would cooperate. 

Anyway, I enjoyed it - I am not nearly the Star Wars fan that my wife is (I am a staunch Star Trek person), but I thought that this was a very nice continuation of the franchise. It kind of reminded me of A New Hope on a lot of levels, and I think that was probably the intent, at least to some extent - to take that same basic story and move it ahead a generation. 

 

Shakespeare

December 18th, 2015 at 10:27 AM ^

Who are Rey's parents?... Feels like the implication or story we're meant to be leaning towards is that she's Luke's daughter who he left on a desert planet for her safety when he became the most hunted man in the galaxy. But if that's so, then who is her mother?

Who is Snoak?... In theory he's probably a character we've either seen or heard of in the past. Possibly the Sith Lord Palpatine tells Anakin about in Episode III. Is there anyone else he could be? He had pretty distinctive facial scars that would imply he was in a battle of some kind and suffered significant wounds at the hands of the Jedi or Rebels.

Where is Lando?

What are your thoughts guys?

Dr. Venture

December 18th, 2015 at 11:22 AM ^

Saw it last night, and I'm still letting it stew a little in this morning. It was better then then the prequels, but then again that's some pretty low hanging fruit. A few observations I had. -When will the "bad" guys stop building giant freaking planet destroying space stations? It didn't work the first time, or second time, and shockingly didn't work the third time either. Would have been refreshing to see the empire not completely drop the ball at the end. -Too many characters. There was four new main characters, combined with Han, Leia, Chewy, a tenth of Luke, and a handful of supporting characters. -I would've liked it if JJ had slowed down and explained what was happening in the universe instead of moving from planet to planet, and fight to fight. How did the first order come to power? What was the difference between the resistance and the republic? I realize a lot of that might be in the new books, but a lot of people don't read those. -Finn was great, and had some great lines. He and "Solo's" chemistry was great. -As a grown man let me say that BB-8 was the cutest thing I've seen. Fantastic design. -Poor Max Van Syndow, I felt like there was a lot more to his story that we'll never see. -The ending had me choked up, but left me hanging, and not in a good way. Does everything have to be a mystery to JJ Abrahams? Seriously, there's like half a dozen story lines that he left hanging throughout the movie. I get that you don't want to spill all the beans and leave nothing for the sequels, but I'm feeling like he's writing some serious checks that he can't cash. Rey's parentage. Who's Snoke? Luke's story. What about the Knight's of Ren? Etc . This better not turn into Lost, where the fan theories proved far superior to the actual plot.

Gr1mlock

December 18th, 2015 at 12:48 PM ^

I loved it, the fact that it was basically a retelling of New Hope aside.  Glad Han died (because storytelling demanded it, not because I hate Han), it would have been kinda lame if they let him escape just to appease fanboys.  I question how Finn was able to wield a lightsaber since, you know, no demonstrable force attunement, but I feel like that'll be answered in next movie(s).  I like the arc for Kylo Ren - they've done hero falling to dark side twice now, I think the idea of a sworn villain trying to resist the light side is an interesting dynamic.  Overall, worlds better than the prequels, and really really good in and of itself.  

Sopwith

December 18th, 2015 at 12:57 PM ^

a film that was much better than any of the prequels, not as good as SW or Empire, but about as good as or a little better than Jedi. It wasn't brilliant, but it was worthy. Some better writing could have pushed it into the category with IV/V.

The derivative nature of the plotting, though, as others have mentioned, was a real downer. Bad guys, please stop building planet-destroying superweapons that can be destroyed by (1) lowering the shields with a crew of scrappy sappers and (2) second team flying through narrow trenches to hit a smallish target with a team of X/Y wings. 

Baddies, please. 

Also, a couple others pointed this out also, but as much as I liked the casting, you still need to follow this rule of moviemaking: WHEN YOU HAVE MAX VON SYDOW IN YOUR MOVIE, RIDE HIM. He is a great, great actor every bit as accomplished as Alec Guinness was by the time Star Wars rolled around. Missed opportunity to make him more integral.

Love the two young leads. Never seen either of them before.