OT Malik McDowell owes Seattle 800k

Submitted by KalkaskaWolverine on May 30th, 2019 at 7:53 PM

The Seahawks are trying to get money back from former sparty Malik McDowell due to the ATV injury that ended his pro career before it even got started. I don't remember any other team doing this. Am I forgetting anyone? Do you think Seattle is right to go after the money?

https://sports.yahoo.com/seahawks-sue-draft-bust-for-nearly-800-k-reveal-deep-animosity-toward-malik-mc-dowell-223438293.html

Yost Ghost

May 31st, 2019 at 2:04 PM ^

Actually he had already signed with the Seahawks when the accident happened which is why they're going after part of the signing bonus they paid him. He had stipulations in his contract about this exact kind of possibility that he ignored and breached his contract.

https://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/nfl/seattle-seahawks/article230981143.html

mGrowOld

May 30th, 2019 at 7:58 PM ^

Absolutely they are right in doing so.  His contract, which by signing he received the bonus money, specifically spelled out activities that would void it out.  He did one of those things and made himself unable to fulfill the contract so he has no right to the money.

Now....do I think for a second they'll ever see a penny back?  No way on Hell-those dollars are LONG gone.

Rug Dog

May 31st, 2019 at 9:57 AM ^

I believe most pro athletes have these clauses in their contracts due to possible injuries to protect investment in a player.  Driving an ATV seems like it would fall under this clause.  Yep, found it:

Section 3 of standard NFL Player Contracts:

3. OTHER ACTIVITIES.  Without prior written consent of the Club, Player will not play football or engage in activities related to football otherwise than for Club or engage in any activity other than football which may involve a significant risk of personal injury. Player represents that he has special, exceptional and unique knowledge, skill, ability, and experience as a football player, the loss of which cannot be estimated with any certainty and cannot be fairly or adequately compensated by damages. Player therefore agrees that Club will have the right, in addition to any other right which Club may possess, to enjoin Player by appropriate proceedings from playing football or engaging in football-related activities other than for Club or from engaging in any activity other than football which may involve a significant risk of personal injury.

 

I'mTheStig

May 31st, 2019 at 8:28 AM ^

Nah... it was a poke at Staee's packing technology degree.  

It's probably a serious thing... kinda like IKEA has made (or saved depending on perspective) $$$ on logistics/revolutionizing packing.   

But since Staee dropped algebra from their core curriculum a few years ago, a shot across the bow of their academics is always a good time.

Sambojangles

May 30th, 2019 at 8:04 PM ^

Barry Sanders too, if I remember. 

Good for the league for enforcing their contract against an idiot and setting the right precedent. I'm sure it will be negotiated down but you can't just let players do whatever they want and jeopardize their own career and waste the team's investment in them. 

J.

May 30th, 2019 at 8:51 PM ^

If you read the article -- they already did negotiate it down.  His signing bonus was for about $3.2MM, to be delivered in four payments of $800K.  He received three of them before the Seahawks decided he was in breach of contract and withheld the fourth.  (They also adjusted his salary to the league minimum when he went on long-term IR).  They originally wanted the whole signing bonus back, but negotiated to where he could keep the first two payments and return the third.

He made some pretty powerful enemies pretty quickly in Seattle.

J.

May 30th, 2019 at 8:01 PM ^

The Lions made Calvin Johnson pay back a bunch of his signing bonus; this SportsNation blog post lists a couple of other examples.

So, it's not unheard of, but it's still rare.