OT: Employment/Labor Shortage/Wages question

Submitted by Champeen on December 21st, 2021 at 2:38 PM

This may be more of a question for managers or business owners out there.

Right now businesses are experiencing a labor shortage.  However, unemployment numbers are at a very low 4.2 percent.  So how is their a labor shortage with historically low unemployment rate?

With 'said' labor shortage, businesses are jacking up wages to find workers.  Low end wages are going up.  Common places like McDonalds up to places like Hemlock Semiconductor and others skilled trades are hiring at high premiums.  However, are existing workers seeing their wages go up, or is it just the new/unemployed people?  

Inflation is higher than it has been since late 70's and it seems to me existing workers are not nearly keeping up with it, but if you job hunt, then you can take advantage of much higher wages.  Is this what other people are seeing?

 

Erik_in_Dayton

December 21st, 2021 at 2:41 PM ^

I'm quickly going to get out of my base of knowledge here, but I'm pretty sure that unemployment numbers reflect the people who are looking for jobs and not finding them.  People who have opted out of the labor market do not show up in that statistic.  So, I assume, what we're seeing is a large number of people not looking for jobs.

JonnyHintz

December 21st, 2021 at 2:48 PM ^

To piggy back on that a bit, quite a few people used CoVid to retire early. Those early retirees aren’t going to show up on unemployment numbers but represented a comparatively significant number. 
 

Theres also the fact that we’re still experiencing a pandemic that has resulted in the death of a rather large number of people. While most deaths occurred with people who are above the working age, there’s still a greater than 0 number of people who would otherwise be part of the work force that are dead. 
 

Short answer: there are less people in the workforce and that’s where the worker shortage is showing up, but unemployment numbers won’t reflect that. 

truferblue22

December 21st, 2021 at 3:03 PM ^

 

"There's also the fact that we’re still experiencing a pandemic that has resulted in the death of a rather large number of people. While most deaths occurred with people who are above the working age, there’s still a greater than 0 number of people who would otherwise be part of the work force that are dead."

 

Great point, in addition to the fact that we've experienced negative population growth (ALMOST ZERO IN 2020!!) for long enough now that the kids who would be entering the workforce never existed in the first place. There are also a lot of ways to make money these days that don't involve working at a traditional job for "the man", so as was pointed out, there are a lot of people not actively looking for a job. 

bronxblue

December 21st, 2021 at 2:59 PM ^

I'm not an economist but part of it is lower labor market participation but there are likely more factors involved than pure "I'm not looking for a job anymore".  Like, there has been an increase in retirements and, more notably, people not re-entering the workforce after retiring due to a variety of issues, chiefly health concerns but also just demographics.  We've hit the edge of Baby Boomers hitting retirement age and I assume we'll see lower labor participation from them as a result.

Also, a lot of people who quit moved to other jobs, particularly jobs away from food service/hospitality, and so those sectors are feeling the burden likely more than others at a time when those places also want to re-open more and try to recover.  But at least in November more people came off the sidelines and looked for work; close to 473k did so.

I honestly don't know what's likely to happen going forward but it does seem like wages have risen but the jobs people want to work have changed; it's anecdotal but I know a number of people who moved away from jobs that required more in-person interaction (e.g. retail, healthcare) to lesser ones and that was driven in no small part by competitive wages, fewer risks, and (at least one) a lower chance of dealing with raging assholes in a public space.  I am interested to see how it all looks after the holidays when some of the temporary hiring wears off.

 

TrueBlue2003

December 22nd, 2021 at 3:28 AM ^

Nothing you said is incorrect.  The labor force participation rate is basically how many eligible workers (defined as the civilian non-institutional population over 16 so it excludes military and people in jail, basically) are actually working.  That metric is about 61.3% right now, down about 2% (or about 5 million people) from pre-pandemic levels.

This isn't necessarily the only reason for the shortage though.

I suspect just like there was a major shift in demand for the types of goods and services we buy (and hence have a major shortage of some things like lumber), we have also had a shift in the type of work we need people to do so it will take time and retraining.

So I don't think it's safe to say that if the five million people that haven't gone back to work entered the labor market, everything would be solved.

NittanyFan

December 21st, 2021 at 2:43 PM ^

One thing w/ unemployment metrics --- if I'm not working but don't WANT to be working, I'm not part of the unemployment statistic.

The labor force participation rate is arguably a better metric.  And that has generally been dropping for 2 decades now.  From 67% in 2000 to 63% in 2019.  The pandemic led to another step-change decline in that metric: it's now in the 61%-62% range.

Net net, though, worker shortage is still a headwind for our economy.  As an anecdote, I was laid off in early October and found a new role about as easily as possible.  Very pro-candidate environment right now.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART

NittanyFan

December 21st, 2021 at 3:44 PM ^

Right.  There was an Atlantic article on this recently.

200K is a big absolute number, but in relative comparison to the number of people who have voluntarily dropped out of the labor force, particularly in the 45-65 year old cohort, it is an order of magnitude smaller.

7,000,000 (!) less people are in the workforce today versus February 2020.  To be fair, 200K isn't quite a rounding error in comparison, but you're right that neither is it overly significant.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/10/how-do-you-make-7-million-workers-disappear/620475/

JonnyHintz

December 22nd, 2021 at 5:46 AM ^

While not a huge portion of the actual labor force, it does represent a more significant portion of infilled jobs. Say for example there are 8 million infilled positions in the country (no idea on the actual number) 200k is 2.5% of those unfilled positions. It isn’t going to completely fix the issue on its own but those are still 200k jobs that are unfilled in a market that is suffering from a worker shortage in multiple industries. It’s at least a mentionable factor. 

Darker Blue

December 21st, 2021 at 2:44 PM ^

I thought the unemployment rate was simply the number of people drawing unemployment benefits at that moment. 

Not to be a doomer but I truly believe we are watching the fall of Rome part 2 

Darker Blue

December 21st, 2021 at 2:57 PM ^

I've never claimed to be smart 

EDIT: For anone else that didn't know,  Google says: In general, the unemployment rate in the United States is obtained by dividing the number of unemployed persons by the number of persons in the labor force (employed or unemployed) and multiplying that figure by 100.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

December 21st, 2021 at 2:48 PM ^

I don't understand the question.  Low unemployment and labor shortage go hand in hand.  If there's low unemployment, very few people (who want to be employed) are out of a job, thus it's hard for businesses to find workers.  This is like asking "if there aren't any Turbo Man figures on the shelves, why is it so hard to find one?"

GoBlue96

December 21st, 2021 at 2:49 PM ^

It's easier to increase your wages by job jumping.  You are basically selling yourself to the highest bidder.  A lot of people use that leverage to ask for a raise or promotion.  That's always been true and now more so than ever.

schreibee

December 21st, 2021 at 3:05 PM ^

I have never "job jumped" in my 30 year career - in fact before the pandemic I feared I was nearing the age where I settle in & ride it out, as any "better" job would go to a younger person.

But after being furloughed & now seeing the labor market shortage, I'm actively seeking to job jump now. I love the company I landed with after my furlough, but as our industry was very hard hit by social distancing/quarantine rules etc, people had to take less or wait at home for unemployment checks or stimulus that may not come for weeks or months. 

Now we can get fairly substantial raises jumping jobs (I've been offered positions for more than my pre-pandemic salary). Yet as always, the place that hired you at the hardship rate doesn't want everyone coming for raises at once, so they're slow playing it.

Upshot is, I'd stay if they matched what I'm being offered, but I can't if they won't. Great people or more $?! There's the conundrum...

carolina blue

December 21st, 2021 at 5:48 PM ^

Co-sign this. I increased my salary by 50% in 2.5 yrs mostly by job hopping and a little bit by promotion. Left a job 2.5 yrs ago (after 8 yrs) and got 30% bump (in a lateral positional move). 1 yr later moved to another job, got 10-12% more (a level 2 to a level 3 jump in position). 1.5 yrs into that I earned a promotion for another 10%.  
can’t keep that going for too long because it risks getting that reputation. But…one or two moves in quick succession can get you a lot. Then you probably need to stay for at least 3 years to make sure you’re not labeled as a job hopper that won’t stick around.  But that’s the way it is now. If a company can keep you for more than 2 years it’s often considered a success. 

schreibee

December 21st, 2021 at 3:11 PM ^

I didn't neg you HAIL, because we probably agree on the issues. 

But I didn't understand your point either! I've been an economy expert since before Biden, before Obama, since back to Clinton. 

I agree blaming Biden for any part of this economy is not just willfully stupid, but also wish fulfillment for Cult45 members. But when did people ever not freely venture opinions on shit they don't understand in the least?!