doggdetroit

November 29th, 2015 at 10:43 PM ^

That's cold of Clayes. But, I can't fault him.

It was clear that Kill got Minnesota as far as they could go with that staff. Nebraska is at a historical low and despite finishing 9-3, this was a down year for Wisconsin. Minnesota couldn't beat either at home. You figure both will improve next year. Meanwhile, you have a resurgent Iowa to deal with. If you are Claeys and you want to give yourself a chance to succeed in the West in the next few years (he only has a three year contract), you probably needed to make this change. 

Ty Butterfield

November 29th, 2015 at 10:46 PM ^

Well, they did move the ball against Michigan, but when it came time to win the game they looked like an total shit show.

aflapan

November 29th, 2015 at 10:47 PM ^

Minnesota's offense has been, frankly, horrible for a while. Their defense kept them in most of their games. There is no need to hold the program hostage to underpreforming coaches out of some loyalty to Kill. Claeys is the head coach now, and he needs to run the program as he knows best regardless of what Kill would do. 

Doctor Wolverine

November 29th, 2015 at 10:48 PM ^

When you take over for someone like that, sometimes it is hard for the old staff to respect their new boss, not because he is better or worse, but because he is different. If there was insubordination, then they had to go (no idea if that was the case or not).

CTSgoblue

November 29th, 2015 at 11:07 PM ^

Who knows--he may have been told, "the job is yours on the condition that you do something to address the offense." This decision may have been predetermined by those in charge.

stephenrjking

November 30th, 2015 at 12:00 AM ^

I'm legit shocked here. No idea what to make of this--is Claeys boldly making hard choices to win games? Is he under pressure to make changes already? Was he being undermined from beneath? The whole selling point with Claeys was continuity and the existing progress of the Kill regime. He pushed for a contract in season for recruiting purposes. Now, the staff is getting slashed. Honestly I think this could be a bold move by Claeys both to chart his own path and to correct known shortcomings with Kill's philosophy. It's possible. It's also possible that Minnesota is about to disintegrate in chaos. I really don't know.

Optimism Attache

November 30th, 2015 at 6:37 AM ^

Yes, one reason they hired Claeys was for continuity, but he's not Jerry Kill. Claeys would know better than most what the weaknesses of Kill's staff were. After that many years, there very likely was some dead weight. If Claeys were just interested in coasting through, I'd expect no changes at all. This could turn out to be a smart move or the beginning signs of regression, but at least he's showing he's going to try.

JOHNNAVARREISMYHERO

November 30th, 2015 at 1:53 AM ^

Claeys is a fat ass joke of a coach.  The fact that he was given the job midseason is a complete cop out.

Predictably, he was horrible the rest of the way.  

Instead of actually going out and getting someone innovative or fresh, Minnesota is content to be a joke for eternity.

wayneandgarth

November 30th, 2015 at 8:36 AM ^

You don't know what you are talking about.  Minnesota's last five games (those coached by Claey's) would be a challenge for most teams:

Michigan - could have won

Ohio State - played them a lot better than Michigan did

Iowa - played them close

IL - won

Wisky - lost - not so great of a loss but not blown out

Claeys did well two years ago when Kill was out a few game (pulled a couple upsets).  Claeys is a football guy through and through.  He simply made a necessary, tough decision.

SC Wolverine

November 30th, 2015 at 3:12 AM ^

This often happens among subordinates.  I once had a protege follow me in a position and within six months he had run off all my other proteges.  But I found them jobs.  Jerry will find these guys jobs too.

NJWolverine

November 30th, 2015 at 6:48 AM ^

This happens all the time in the work world. It's a classic case of attrition, and the reason why so much of the working world nowadays follows the "up or out" principle.  Here, you had two guys, Claeys and Limegrover, who had nearly identical credentials, but with only one spot.  It's easy to see how Limegrover would feel slighted, even if the entire staff are close.  Another example of this is Orgeron, who refused to accept a position that would essentially make him a co-coach with Sark because Sark was hired over him even though he did well as an interim coach.  "Up or out" may sound harsh but it does reduce the internal strife that happens when people are chosen over others (and it's fine if the people who aren't selected are well qualified because they can simply find other jobs easily).

wayneandgarth

November 30th, 2015 at 8:30 AM ^

This is a gutsy and necessary move by Claeys.  Gutsy because everyone spoke of the staff consistency with Kill's staff; which is fine if it is producing results.  But, the offense in Minnesota was its problem.  Turning over the offensive staff was needed to at least try to improve itself.