Michigan Daily got spanked, changes Juwan firing headline

Submitted by St Joe Blues on March 20th, 2024 at 11:03 AM

The Michigan Daily posted its front page for Juwan Howard's firing online and was taken to the woodshed. It was quite shameful and disrespectful. No matter how his tenure ended here, he's still a legendary Michigan basketball figure.

https://twitter.com/michigandaily/status/1770287922543202363

Thankfully they announced they're changing it for the print edition, although I haven't seen what the new version is.

superstringer

March 20th, 2024 at 11:16 AM ^

Rule #1 of Posting Anything Online--anything:

If you just say something vanilla and obvious and what everyone else is saying... no one will read your post.

The future is for the bold! (And crypto investors!)

Kapitan Howard

March 20th, 2024 at 11:17 AM ^

I feel like acknowledging the failure of his tenure as a head coach falls pretty low on the "shameful" and "disrespectful" scales. Maybe they could have workshopped "Fab Failure" a little more because it sounds like they settled on the first headline that made it on the board.

jv02

March 20th, 2024 at 11:18 AM ^

Sad to see the Daily back down on a mild rebuke of the job performance of one of the university's highest paid employees. The Daily represents a leigtimate perspective

Maison Bleue

March 20th, 2024 at 11:20 AM ^

He did win the B1G outright (2021) and get to both the sweet sixteen(2022) and elite eight(2021), so, not a complete failure. The "great" Tom Izzo couldn't even accomplish all of that in the last 6 seasons.

trueblueintexas

March 20th, 2024 at 11:21 AM ^

I am definitely not a "things were better back when" person, but this is pretty disrespectful. There has to be an adult somewhere in the room making sure the writers and editors are being professional in their writing about a former student, athlete, and employee of the school and not just trying to push out a click-bate worthy headline. If they want to point out all of the ways in which the team and coach didn't achieve results, fine. Do it in a news reporting manner, not a tabloid headline manner. 

That they chose to rescind the headline indicates a better decision could have been made in the first place. 

Kapitan Howard

March 20th, 2024 at 11:37 AM ^

Do you seriously think that this headline rises to level of clickbait? Attention-grabbing and somewhat provocative, sure, but there's a reason why the quintessential examples of clickbait are things like "a common soft drink has been found to be lethal. Navigate through 12 pages of ads to find out that it isn't."

trueblueintexas

March 20th, 2024 at 12:39 PM ^

There's a difference between reporting the news of someone being fired and the reasons why their performance deserved being fired vs. labeling them or their tenure a failure. There's a good post below by Hensons Mobile which shows the difference between the headlines of previous coaches being fired and this one. I think the difference is pretty clear.

FantasyFootbaugh

March 20th, 2024 at 11:24 AM ^

Good. Being a head coach at Michigan is so much more than wins and losses. Presence on campus, engagement with alumni/fanbase, and developing student athletes. His tenure has only one low point and that's wins and losses of the past couple years. It's not an entire failure and shouldn't be seen as one.

trueblueintexas

March 20th, 2024 at 11:32 AM ^

There were a couple situations I would put in the low point column which had nothing to do with wins and losses. Nookie was always going to be who he was at heart, but he took on a role which required more self control. That will continue to be a journey for him. Hopefully he finds a role where he can develop in those areas without the scrutiny of media. 

Perkis-Size Me

March 20th, 2024 at 11:36 AM ^

Just me, but I really don't see an issue with it. Could it have been a little nicer? Probably, but his tenure here was a failure. Truth hurts. If the Daily takes that fact and makes it into a witty catchphrase, then that's their choice to make, as long as they are willing to live with the consequences. If people want to stop reading the Daily over it, then that is their choice as well. 

This was not a headline saying that Howard should never be allowed to set foot on campus, the Fab Five should be erased from the history books, that Howard has ugly parents, etc. The headline called Howard's tenure here what it is. A failure. He's still a legandary figure at Michigan as a former player, and he always will be. But his coaching career here was nowhere near up to snuff. 

You don't like it? Don't go 8-24. That result is really freaking hard to ignore. 

Its just hard for me to envision being this offended over this kind of a headline. Then again, we live in an era where everyone is offended by everything so maybe I should accept it as par for the course. 

 

Hensons Mobile…

March 20th, 2024 at 11:39 AM ^

Above the fold headlines on TMD from some notable dismissals:

Ellerbe's Out

Amaker Axed

Dave Brandon Resigns

Rich Rod Out

Brady Hoke Fired

I think the expectation and standard would be "Juwan Howard Fired" or if they want a little more color, "Juwan is Gone."

Labeling him a failure in the headline is undeniably harsh (even if "harsh but fair") and going for Fab Failure (or Fab 5 Failure, depending on your reading of it) is, as others noted, quite tabloid-ish. TMD is not a tabloid.

UMfan21

March 20th, 2024 at 11:40 AM ^

It was quite literally the worst basketball season in most of our lifetimes.  If that isn't "failure", I don't know what is.  Especially given the roster Juwan started with.

NittanyFan

March 20th, 2024 at 12:15 PM ^

I'm pretty shocked this is an issue.  Really?

I would have changed the headline to "Fab Five Fail" --- it keeps the FFF alliteration and also keeps all the words 1 syllable, it flows better. 

But other than that: well, Juwan was a Fab Five member and U-M basketball cratered record-wise over the course of his tenure.  Plus he had a couple high-profile issues w/ other coaches, where his behavior could have been better.  Those are just facts - he DID fail at this job.

Besides: failure is an event, it's not a person.  Failing at things happens.  I've failed at jobs too, and at jobs where I didn't have the cushion of a 7-figure annual salary and a nice exit package.  That didn't make ME a failure, it just meant I wasn't successful at one particular thing.

GetBetterDaily

March 20th, 2024 at 12:18 PM ^

This was the most disappointing topic to open.

I was expecting a "chink in the armor" headline. If this upsets you in any way you are softer than Ryan Day on his worst day.

BlueMk1690

March 20th, 2024 at 12:26 PM ^

I like the "yeah he sucked, but he worked his ass off for the university" type response. I mean yeah I'd hope that's what 3 million dollars a year buys you.

bighouseinmate

March 20th, 2024 at 12:35 PM ^

It’s a stupid headline that never should have seen the light of day. Yes, the past couple of seasons have been a lot less than we the fans wished. But, this wasn’t a coach that did anything that shamed the university (even the “slap” was something a lot of us would have considered in the moment and some of us would have done just as he did). Also, the past couple of seasons can’t be laid completely at his feet. If Michigan gets Shannon, and then love from the portal then these past two seasons would have looked a lot different. 
 

The hire didn’t work out long term, for either Howard or Michigan, but there’s absolutely no reason to denigrate the guy on his way out.
 

BlueMk1690

March 20th, 2024 at 12:43 PM ^

If we're honest, his tenure went pretty effing poorly and there were multiple instances of sub-optimal conduct on his part that would have drawn a lot more of a negative response from Michigan fans if he hadn't been a successful player here.

There's no need to ever personally attack a coach because he didn't do a great job. But to be clear, calling his tenure a failure isn't a personal attack. It's a statement of fact.

lilpenny1316

March 20th, 2024 at 12:44 PM ^

They swung for the fences and hit a ground-rule double IMO. Beilein left for the same reason why Howard was fired: These dudes leave (NBA or transfer) so dang quick these days. We can do a postmortem on why these guys transferred out or left just to be a G-League role player, but Beilein and Howard had a similar issue when it comes to player retention. The difference is that JB knew how to recruit developmental guys and actually develop them.