Michigan 2 in rankings per ESPN

Submitted by MIFANinMD on November 29th, 2022 at 7:16 PM

NittanyFan

November 29th, 2022 at 8:03 PM ^

UT ahead of PSU is right, IMO.

What's going to be funny, however is when (I'd bet $100 on this) PSU jumps Tennessee next week despite neither team playing.  That will be for political reasons --- it will be "the SEC's turn" to "draw the short straw" of playing a G5 team in the Cotton Bowl after the B1G did it in both 2016 & 2019.  Ranking PSU over UT would put PSU in the Orange Bowl and UT in the Cotton Bowl, versus the reverse.

That would be politics - but it's what you get with committees and bureaucracies.

UMForLife

November 29th, 2022 at 7:26 PM ^

USC wins or loses it should be in top 4. Playing one additional game shouldn't be the reason for them to lose their spot. 

Regardless UM is in. That would s all that matters.

WayOfTheRoad

November 29th, 2022 at 8:22 PM ^

This is it. I hate the idea that you can be punished for being better and playing in your CCG.

Any leeway here has to apply to a team like OSU but only if they barely lost to miss out on the CCG to the team that goes. However, they lost by 22. It just doesn't seem right that it can be a benefit to not make the CCG. It can help you to not play. It turns the CCGs into a danger. If the top-4 all have to play a CCG it's  net negative. At best you better your position in the playoff but you'll still play a really good team. The benefit is so outweighed by the risk because nobody will give a damn if you don't win your Conference Championship but go on to win the National Championship. Not one person will care.

Sneaking in after a blowout and not playing the next week just feels wrong 

Blue@LSU

November 29th, 2022 at 7:30 PM ^

I'm fine with being #2.

I think Tennessee could be set up for a pretty bad bowl loss if they play a good, well-rounded team. I just don't see them as the #7 team in the nation without Hooker. It looks like they're almost a lock to play Clemson right now, so they might luck out. But who knows if Clemson loses to UNC on Saturday.

TBuck97

November 29th, 2022 at 8:09 PM ^

It is interesting. I know they ride our SOS but outside of Notre Dame, we pretty much played the same schedule as OSU. And Notre Dame is respectable but not great. And technically OSU played an easier conference schedule by playing Northwestern and Wisconsin while we played Illinois and Nebraska. Plus they hosted us. It almost seems as if these rankings are based off of recruiting rankings. 

WayOfTheRoad

November 29th, 2022 at 8:26 PM ^

It's awful. Everyone knows that if UM lost by 22pts they'd be out. Done. Rose Bowl incoming.

OSU is 5 because they started the season so high based on the ridiculousness of pre-season polls. ND is .500 with a non-ACC schedule. Their best win is PSU.

But we can say for sure that if UM lost by 22 they would be out. Bama would have jumped them. 100%.

BornInA2

November 29th, 2022 at 7:57 PM ^

Yay, #2 and all, and for sure I'd be happy to play TCU in a first playoff game.

And...I seriously doubt that if we'd been obliterated by 22 points on Saturday, even on an away field, that we'd only have dropped three places.

The homerism of the committee toward 'the regulars' is blatant and gross.

charblue.

November 29th, 2022 at 8:48 PM ^

For the first time since the playoff system began with Michigan in the mix of teams who could be eligible in any football final four, Michigan has no worries about whether it's in no matter what happens Saturday. 

Michigan dropped anchor as the No. 2 team by crushing Ohio State at home and sending the Buckeyes to No. 5, which means Michigan is in. Hallelujah! We are going to the playoffs. 

Still, the CFP Committee in its infinite wisdom, has left 2 loss Alabama at No. 6 giving it faint hope that it might rise to playoff consideration next Sunday if chaos ensues during championship Saturday with TCU and USC losing.

Alabama should not be No. 6. By putting the Tide there, the committee has confirmed its SEC bias in a way that challenges its authority to actually make final playoff choices --of any kind.

Regardless of preseason evaluation of all teams, their relative schedule and conference affiliation strength, the criteria by which all are judged is by overall record no matter who you play. That hasn't been happening during the ranking process. SEC teams are getting the benefit of all doubt. 

The committee has privately determined that Alabama is the crucible of college football, the program by which all others are judged and deserves more consideration as each of its other conference playoff hopefuls fell by the wayside -- other than Georgia.

Turns out, Alabama's best win is over a 4-loss Texas team which it should have lost to without gift-giving officiating. 

Can anyone explain like I'm a third grader why Tennessee is ranked ahead of Penn State at 10-2?  PSU lost to the No. 2 & No. 3 teams in the country, Tennessee lost big to No. 1 Georgia and then unranked South Carolina, sacrificing their Heisman hunting qb in the process. 

Not like either team has a shot at the big game, but Tennessee is ahead because it beat Alabama which gave up 52 points in losing by three on a last second field goal.

The price and quality of victory is not strained. A loss is a loss. And we know this as Michigan fans. I am sort of hoping for controversy to ensue because the committee will then be expose for the fraud that it's good ole boy ranking system really is. 

Amazinblu

November 29th, 2022 at 9:07 PM ^

Explain like to a third grader?   I’ll try.. it’s the equivalent of a most graduate degrees at a certain conference’s institutions.

It’s because it means more in the SEC.  The conference lives for college football .. nothing else matters.  They field two or three very good teams per year, and everyone else rides their coattails.

Bag men helped secure highly regarded prospects, and the NCAA caved into peer pressure when Michigan wanted to participate in summer camps in their part of the country.