LA Times: How Harbaugh is upending CFB

Submitted by UMProud on


"Among recruits, Michigan has “become kind of the cool, hip school,” said Brandon Huffman, national director of recruiting for Scout.com. “And that’s almost 100% attributed to Harbaugh.”

Harbaugh is considered among the best football minds in college or the NFL — Michigan had a record of 10-3 in his first season, up from 5-7 the year before — but his approach to coaching tends to the conservative.

His rebellious side comes out in recruiting, and he has changed the way college programs operate. Harbaugh’s innovations come at a rapid speed, and some explore the boundaries of NCAA rules, but they all share the same aim: to stay in the news and, therefore, in the consciousness of top recruits.

That approach, Huffman said, has made Michigan a recruiting powerhouse."

Source:  Zach Helfand, 8/25/2016, LA Times

http://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-michigan-harbaugh-20160824-snap-htmlstory.html

Doctor J

August 25th, 2016 at 11:22 AM ^

It is critical we remain front and center. I don't think there's such a thing as overexposure when the appetite for Football is so huge. Personally, I like when my team is on Sportscenter - with highlights from a huge win. (Which will happen a lot this fall). 

PopeLando

August 25th, 2016 at 1:14 PM ^

Disagree. The "Oakland in play" thing was us mocking how hilariously wrong the NFL beat writers were. When the "Harbaugh to NFL" speculation starts up again - probably every offseason from now until forever - then it will be relevant again. The "can't _____ until we beat MSU and OSU" thing is us mocking a section of our own fanbase (including many on this blog) who admonished everyone on every thread/discussion that we couldn't be considered "good" until we beat MSU and OSU, and that we shouldn't even get excited for Michigan football until MSU and OSU are beaten. We need to continue to point out how ridiculous that stance is.

SAMgO

August 25th, 2016 at 8:23 AM ^

I really, really hate the "Donald Trump of college football" lazy moniker that seems to have caught on among lazy writers looking to make comparisons.

Harbaugh is out there being himself trying to do whatever he can to improve the Michigan program. Trump is out there putting on a show trying to incite controversy to gain media attention, to put it delicately.

pfholland

August 25th, 2016 at 9:20 AM ^

As a huge fan of the no politics rule I honestly don't see the Donald Trump reference as political, but as a reference to Trump's self promotional ways. And that's something that long predates Trumps entry into the political arena.

BlueKoj

August 25th, 2016 at 11:17 AM ^

I've always thought the comparison missed the mark by quite a bit (even without politics). Harbaugh's motivation is not self promotion or the Harbaugh brand.

JH is motivated by promoting the pursuit of excellence (especially when it comes to UM's FB program). He defaults to "yes" when asked to do something especially when it involves athletes and teams striving for excellence (and winning). He's motivated by UM-promotion (FB and university alike). He's motivated by spreading the gospel of FB in general.

mgobleu

August 25th, 2016 at 9:52 AM ^

The whole discussion is a farce anyway, because football coaches are loved by their team's fans and hated by their team's rivals. Of course he's polarizing; just like any coach is if they show up in media. I can't stand Mork whenever I see his face, not (only) because of what he says or does, but because of the team he represents. The more I see him, the more he annoys me. Jim just happens to be super eccentric and cameras love him. Nothing he does can be compared Donald Trump.

DairyQueen

August 25th, 2016 at 9:56 AM ^

The "Donald Trump" analogy starts and ends with the fact that both of them choose to speak publicly with more candor--and, most importantly, the media's choice to run stories and create headline's on it--and with a frequency and tone previously unheard of coming from positions of such power and representation.

After that, there is literally zero comparison or similarity. Zero.

One is an innovative, fun-loving, and kinetic football coach.

The other is the canary in the coal-mine for the state of the American media-system.

Rabbit21

August 25th, 2016 at 10:02 AM ^

I hate it as well, because of the general negative connotations, but the point if you put politics aside is that Trump has a showman side and a weird ability to suck all the oxygen out of the room. In that way, I can definitely see how a neutral fan would read it that way.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

FreddieMercuryHayes

August 25th, 2016 at 10:09 AM ^

I'll try to avoid the politics stuff as best as possible:

It is an apt comparison in that both Harbaugh and Trump are genuinely and publicly authetic; they are who they are and don't try and be someone else.  In Harbaugh's case, he's someone who is so engrossed in his craft (coaching football) that he maybe loses touch with the mainstream 'outside' world.  He's the eccentric artist so to speak.  But it's an authetic eccentricity. 

Trump is authentically himself too and is unapologic about it.  But for the sake of the board, I won't say exactly what Trump's 'authetically himself' actually entails.

RHammer - SNRE 98

August 25th, 2016 at 1:18 PM ^

was applied here by Paul Finebaum, who I think most would agree, is a "get off my lawn" type of old esseesseee-loving curmudgeon.  

liked the piece overall, and am glad it put us in a positive light in the major SoCal paper (likely doesn't hurt that Helfand is a UM alum)...

MinorRage

August 25th, 2016 at 8:33 AM ^

“This is where Harbaugh has rankled some folks because he’s making people work, and not just his own coaches,” Huffman said.

 

I can almost hear Hugh Freeze complaining from here.

BeatIt

August 25th, 2016 at 8:35 AM ^

Not just because I'm a buckeye. He definately turned your program 180 from where hoke had it heading.the msu loss really hurt your momentum. To me that loss was just as much on the coaching staff as it was on your punter.in that situation, near midfield with 10 seconds left with your opponent needing a td, the punter should know to just fall on the ball. He actually did the worst thing in that situation. No one is infallible. Meyer blew the opportunity for a repeat last year because he took his eye off the offense. Its going to be tough for harbaugh to catch up to meyer and the buckeye's because of all the talent TOSU continues to pile up. Hypothetical, if saban was availible, would um have hired him over habaugh?

MGoGrendel

August 25th, 2016 at 10:55 AM ^

Saban is available for the right price.  Texas couldn't come up with it recently.  There is no way Michigan was going to make a run at Saban, expecially when Harbaugh was available.  For those at tOSU, you should know that our AD only went after one guy for our head coach.  We got him and we're going to catch up to (and pass) Meyer.  You may want to watch Meyer's health (again) should the L's pile up like at Florida. 

father fisch

August 25th, 2016 at 10:54 AM ^

When you think about how tough a game that was and how hard it was going to be on either team to lose it, that's tough enough.  But to have the game in hand at home and lose it on a million-to-one play?  Gut-wrenching.

However, I couldn't be any prouder of how the team came back and finished the year.  No quit.  No crying.  That's the kind of game that haunts you and the fact the team was able to move on?  Pretty incredible.

1VaBlue1

August 25th, 2016 at 8:53 AM ^

Wow!  What an analysis of the end of that game!  I don't think we ever realized any of that, thanks for sharing your superlative knowledge!

And no, there is no chance in hell that Michigan would have picked Saban (a UM bitch when he was at MSU, and an NFL loser) over Jim Harbaugh (a UM football legend, creator of Stanford football, and Super Bowl coach with the best first 4-yrs NFL coaching record in history).  But nice try trolling...