The Insane Second Half Schedule

Submitted by drz1111 on October 10th, 2021 at 7:50 PM

I know this is sort of obvious, but I haven't seen it discussed in its own thread, so here goes.

If Michigan were to win out, it would have to beat the teams with the following rankings:

#1, #2, one of #3-#5, #6, #7, #10

If you assume each of those games is a toss-up (probably charitable), the odds of winning out are <2%.

It's gonna be a fun year, but this schedule is just too hard to win a championship from. 

 

Bill in Birmingham

October 10th, 2021 at 8:12 PM ^

Absolutely this. If this team can win four of its last six games, this will have been an excellent year. This is far from the most talented Michigan team. But it is tough and wins games that earlier more talented teams might have lost. It could have a legacy of turning around the program and helping develop a culture where the players expect to win, even when they may not have the most talent. That would be a huge achievement.

TrueBlue2003

October 10th, 2021 at 11:17 PM ^

That's the game I care least about.

Obviously want to win at MSU.  And want to beat OSU at home sooooooo badly.

But if those two things happen, and we take care of business against the other three (NW, IU, Maryland), then the PSU game is irrelevant (assuming they lose again which they will).

maquih

October 10th, 2021 at 10:11 PM ^

I mean ohio might not be playoff worthy - beating Rutgers and Maryland by a gazillion points doesn't make you a cfp contender and the one good team they played so far they lost to.(Oregon lost to unranked Stanford BTW)

Could easily imagine us losing to Iowa in the conference championship or getting stomped in a semifinal against Georgia

TrueBlue2003

October 10th, 2021 at 11:32 PM ^

I'm shocked at how many upvotes this loser mentality is getting.  Agree that we should enjoy the winning, but declaring for certain that we're not gonna win a title? ESPN gives us a 28% chance of winning the division and an 18% chance of winning the conference CHAMPIONSHIP.

That's the championship we all want anyway.  So gtfo with this we're not gonna win a championship stuff.  This is a great team.  Enjoy the wins by appreciating the quality and effort of team and keeping the same confidence they players have that they can do some special which they totally can.

Midukman

October 11th, 2021 at 7:45 AM ^

Remember when Tressel won his first natty against Miami? Lots of ugly wins that barely qualified with great special teams and a D that got better as the year went along. When the liar beat Bama I gave them a 1% chance of doing so. This team seems immune to accept the fact that they could lose which a refreshing change of pace. OSU is making it look easy against teams they should blow out. We steamroll Rutgers like we should have and the same could be said for us. Nebraska played Oklahoma much tougher than Texas did.  I actually have Nebraska beating Wiscy and possibly catching Iowa by surprise. 

WorldwideTJRob

October 10th, 2021 at 7:55 PM ^

Nobody is going to shed a tear for us. All of the top teams in our division(MSU, PSU, OSU) will have to do the same. Just go out there and ball every week, everything else will take care of itself.

greymarch

October 10th, 2021 at 8:11 PM ^

Obviously, I dearly hope UM wins all 3 of their remaining brutal games (@MSU, @PSU, home vs The Great Evil.)  

 

The pragmatist in me says UM will lose at MSU, win at PSU (UM is gonna expose PSU) and lose to The Great Evil, thus finishing the regular season 10-2.

 

If UM finishes 10-2, I will be happy.  A 10-2 Michigan team makes one of the six major bowl games.  I can live with that, especially considering we weren't even ranked at the beginning of the season.

 

#GoBlue

NittanyFan

October 10th, 2021 at 8:13 PM ^

A 11-1 Michigan that gets to Indianapolis and wins likely makes the playoff. 

(admittedly, if that loss is to anyone besides NU, IU or Maryland, it means U-M needs help to get to Indy).

So there is a theoretical alternate path beyond "win them all."

NittanyFan

October 10th, 2021 at 8:59 PM ^

5-1 but losing to PSU: U-M wins the East (what I presume you meant) if PSU loses another game.  U-M wins any tie-breaker at 8-1 (over either OSU or MSU) due to a head-to-head win.  PSU would be 7-2 or worse.

5-1 but losing to OSU: if OSU loses twice otherwise, U-M wins.  U-M would also win a 8-1 3-way tie with OSU and MSU due to overall record and head-to-head win over MSU.  

Path 1 is considerably more likely than Path 2 (in terms of additional needed results).  But there is a path.

FB Dive

October 11th, 2021 at 1:38 AM ^

A three-way tie between Michigan, MSU, and OSU is highly unlikely, but if it were to happen, I don't think that Michigan would necessarily win.

Overall record is the 7th tiebreaker, and the last tiebreaker before random draw. The 5th tiebreaker (and the only one likely to be decisive) is the combined conference record of cross-divisional opponents. So you'd combine the conference records of NW, Wisco, and Nebraska (for Michigan), NW, Nebraska, and Purdue (for MSU), and Nebraska, Minnesota, and Purdue (for Ohio State), and whichever one is highest is the rep. Coincidentally, there's a lot of overlap, but you'd have like Ohio State's odds since both Michigan and MSU would be dragged down by Northwestern.

Of course, this assumes all three teams are 8-1 in conference play, with the one loss being to each other. If one team beats the other two but picks up a random loss, they would obviously have the combined head-to-head tiebreaker. 

Tiebreaker formulas for anyone who's interested - https://bigten.org/news/2011/8/10/Big_Ten_Conference_Football_Divisional_Tiebreaker.aspx

LSAClassOf2000

October 10th, 2021 at 8:18 PM ^

While it hasn't had it's own thread (there is a reason for for this - keep reading), it has been discussed at length in numerous threads that, statistically speaking, the odds of winning out and therefore having a potential stake in the CFP and thus the NC Game are, in a word, remote. Not zero, of course, but quite low indeed. That brings me to the point - this was implicitly deemed unworthy of a separate thread by virtue of those discussions.