I'll be that guy - can we ditch Adidas?

Submitted by karpodiem on

Terrible zippers on their jackets, absolutely terrible.

The Shredder

January 2nd, 2011 at 11:17 PM ^

I miss Nike. Stuff was just better. Not to mention just classic. 

Adidas is also know as bad luck. We are proof of that and so are these teams.

ND
Nebraska until the last few seasons
Tenn
Michigan
UCLA

Also no we can't dump them.... Eight year contract. 

Super J

January 2nd, 2011 at 11:23 PM ^

TCU hated the cleates they were forced to wear in the Rose Bowl.  They were slipping all over in the first half.  Athletic tape helped in the second half by covering the smooth parts under the shoe.

Lets not be subject to that. Or Pro Combat Unis

AMazinBlue

January 2nd, 2011 at 11:34 PM ^

Adidas had to call it something else.  I would like to see us go back to Nike as well.   No team wearing Adidas has ever won the MNC.  That little fact aside,  I liked the general Nike stuff better.

As far as their changing the unis all the time.  I imagine the school has the right to keep things as they want them.  tOSU is just getting on the Oregon/Nike bandwagon.

MGoShtoink

January 3rd, 2011 at 12:04 AM ^

I remember that now, although they didn't copyright Maize itself...

Via Blazefire...

They didn't copyright the term "Maize" being used to describe yellow. That's not possible, and a judge would throw that out in a second.

What they did do is copyright the usage of the term Maize to describe X color value when used on athletic gear sold by competing corporations for the University of Michigan. Rather than just create a different shade of yellow and also call it Maize, which would be somewhat confusing and possibly could be contested in court, Adidas decided it would be simpler to create a new shade and and give it a new name, and trademark THAT. So now, Michigan can have their stuff, call it Maize and everything is fine, but Adidas can't list the color as "Maize" in commercial documents.