GVSUofM

October 27th, 2012 at 5:39 PM ^

Our policy with taking visits when committed is so flawed that we have to say good bye to this poor kid before he even decommits?! He could end up not liking either visit, but refuse to come back to Big Blue because 17 & 18 year old kids are not humble enough to say, 'just kidding, I want to come back', even if that's what he feels deep down. So sad. This policy needs to be changed to realistic expectations. These kids should be able to stay committed. That way they have Big Blue on their minds when visiting other campuses and its not 'wide open' because they know they are no longer committed anywhere else. Awful.

BostonWolverine

October 27th, 2012 at 5:45 PM ^

I haven't heard that we're "saying goodbye" to him yet. Have you?

Also, if you make a commitment to something, you should be held accountable for that commitment. It is, and should be, a two-way street between coaches and players. It's not about "refusing to come back." They don't get that opportunity. They broke their commitment, so it's done if they go on a visit.

I don't know how it's unrealistic to expect someone to live up to a commitment they've made. They know the policy going in. It's not like the coaches are pulling the wool over these poor, unsuspecting kids' eyes.

Also, "Big Blue" is Kentucky, the New York Football Giants, or a French film starring Jean-Marc Barr. Thanks.

WMUgoblue

October 27th, 2012 at 5:46 PM ^

If you're unsure then don't commit so early, the coaches tell recruits this policy all the time and kudos to them for sticking to their word. One player won't make our break what the coaches are selling to our kids.

vablue

October 27th, 2012 at 6:43 PM ^

How would you feel when we turn McQuay away because we have no room and then Conley takes his visits and decides to go to OSU two weeks before signing day leaving us no chance to back fill for him? This policy is awesome and the fact that Hoke and company are strong enough recruiters that they can enforce it speaks volumes.

Huma

October 27th, 2012 at 7:52 PM ^

I like the policy. If you give your word you stick to it. Our policy has nothing to do with whether or not Conley wants to explore and it doesn't preclude him from recommitting later, but we shouldn't hold a spot for someone that is on the fence.

MGoStrength

October 27th, 2012 at 5:42 PM ^

I don't want to be negative nancy, but sheesh losing two of our top 3 rated prospects in this class would be extremely frustrating.  If they know Hoke's policy, why are they commiting early, then months later saying...oh I didin't know I'd get more offers and now I want to take visits.  Just wait to make your committment forgodssake.

Lac55

October 27th, 2012 at 5:44 PM ^

Man we knew this was coming for sometime now. Kid is having an incredible year especially on offense. You just hate to lose a tall rangy athletic guy with ball skills and speed like that.

gopoohgo

October 27th, 2012 at 5:46 PM ^

Good luck to him.

Michigan will be fine. The current staff has done a great job in evaluating and recruiting talent, so not worried in the least.

bdsisme

October 27th, 2012 at 5:48 PM ^

 


"Michigan was basically the only school I was looking at," he said. "The coaches always communicate very well, and I just really like these coaches. I don't want them to think that I'm waiting to hold out. I just wanted to get this over with and make my decision." ... "What they do on the field, I just want to play on that type of defense," he said. "I just know this is where I want to go."

 

link

WMU81

October 27th, 2012 at 5:53 PM ^

and another one..Oregon has to run up the score because the computers know that they are overrated..I cant stand Oregon type spread..not many NFL type players

 

Smitdog6767

October 27th, 2012 at 6:42 PM ^

You mean you don't like watching 32 teams run the same 7 or 8 formations?  The NFL is fun to watch because, well it's football.  But it's become such a copycat league that every team's playbook is more or less interchangable.  Except maybe the Patriots because they actually show a shred of ingenutiy. 

As far as Conley is concerned, best of luck kid.  I wish things could have worked here because he could have been a player in this defense but our DB recruiting has been pretty outstanding so I don't think we're going to have to fold the team because of this.  Jourdan Lewis, T. Rich, Blake, Douglas, Stribling, etc. will be just fine with our without Mr. Conley. 

Farnn

October 27th, 2012 at 5:55 PM ^

Any reason a recruit can't simply decommit and let the coaches know? Then he can take his visits while the coaches look for someone else. I'd think being straight with the coaches would be the best way to leave yourself a shot at coming back. I know P. Brown last season tried to be sneaky, and I get the impression Dawson did as well.

Section 1

October 27th, 2012 at 5:56 PM ^

... a kid commits to Michigan, takes another couple of visits and thereby has his scholarship "unreserved" for him, and then recommits.  To Michigan.

Presumably, Michigan coaches might now take the opportunity to now look for other kids at CB.  Okay.  What if nobody else appears who is a superior talent and who is willing to commit, while Conley takes official visits; after which, Conley comes back to Hoke and Mattison and says, "I'd like to commit to Michigan, again.  And I'll be signing my national letter of intent and faxing it back to you on Signing Day..."?

Section 1

October 27th, 2012 at 7:22 PM ^

The policy is, "If you visit elsewhere, your scholarship will be offered to others."

I am not aware of there being a policy that says, "If you visit elsewhere, Michigan is no longer interested in you."

I tried to propose the exact scenario that would not render the policy toothless.

In reply to by Section 1

UMICH1606

October 27th, 2012 at 7:31 PM ^

Yeah, because they went all guns blazing to try to real Pharaoh Brown back in, and according to Dawson's own coach told the kick to essentially kick rocks. What precedent is there for them recruiting a kid who desires to take a visit? I doubt Mr. Conley will be the first.

Section 1

October 27th, 2012 at 9:13 PM ^

...but I presume that the reason that Thomas Wilcher said that the Dawson/Michigan "ship has sailed, sunk, whatever" is because Dawson himself knew that taking a visit was crossing a line, and he didn't care.  Dawson no longer wanted to be a Michigan commit because he no longer wants to go to Michigan.

Mind you, my post was not predicting anything.  And I was not trying to say anything in particular about the cases of Dawson or even Conley.

All I was pointing out is that the nature of the policy, technically, is that the scholarship just gets offered to others.