mackbru

December 2nd, 2020 at 11:32 AM ^

Agree with the thesis. Playing a contact sport during a pandemic was a greedy and reckless thing to do and the ragged ending was 100 percent predictable. The players wouldn’t have lost any eligibility by skipping the year. This was an exercise in peer pressure and stupidity that added fuel to a raging fire. 

crg

December 2nd, 2020 at 12:18 PM ^

Are you 100% sure about that?  There haven't been reports of widespread outbreaks or deaths directly resulting from having the season... but we know there has been some spread within programs/teams.  We have no data about if that has induced spread outside the programs and probably will never know.

The point is that it is an increased risk to public health (and any testing done is imperfect at best - just look at what happened to the Baylor team just from one false negative).  None of this risk is necessary - it is to enable an entertainment function and the ancillary industries it supports.

I enjoy football, but I'm not sure if we can say it was "worth it" when all is said and done.

SituationSoap

December 2nd, 2020 at 4:49 PM ^

It's probably stupid to argue with someone posting a take like this, but generally speaking: people are really bad at risk assessment. They're also really bad at a lot of other things too, like economics and self-reflection.

90% of people think they're an above-average driver and that advertising doesn't work on them. I have family members who've told me they're being "extra careful" about Covid while attending in-person church services and eating out at restaurants weekly.

I have an aunt who's in the ICU right now because she thought Covid was a hoax and she went on a mission trip to Kentucky, where she contracted coronavirus. Now everyone in her close family and multiple employee's of her husband's business also have covid because she thought this couldn't affect her. She's 50/50 on whether or not she lives.

"Personal responsibility" flies right out the window when your stupid decisions can get me sick through no fault of my own.

BernardC

December 2nd, 2020 at 6:58 PM ^

COVID is an exotic variation of the flu. 
 

A) I caught it while wearing a mask. Had a fever for two days, and then for about an hour a day for the next week. I had chest tightness for a day or so. Not bad, just felt like when you lift for the first time in a long time and you get that stretch. My sense of taste was off for an evening. For reference I’m 45 year old in average shape. 
 

B). I live with my two sons (18,19) and my girlfriend. Very little social distancing occurred and none of them had any symptoms, and they all tested negative. 
 

C). My ex-Father in law is 67 and in marginal health. He caught it and had a runny nose and body weakness for a few days. He said his was more like having a common cold rather than the flu. His Wife did not catch it. He caught it while wearing a mask. 
 

D) My girlfriend’s aunt is mid 60’s and caught it at the school that she volunteers at. It’s an elementary school. She had a fever like with the flu and was fine a week or so later. She is severely overweight and in poor health. 
 

E) My girlfriend’s Grandma lives with the aunt and got it from her. The Grandma is 88 years old, a 9 time cancer survivor, and has Parkinson’s. She went to the ER one night because her oxygen dropped. They kept her overnight, and also diagnosed her with bronchitis. They sent her home the next afternoon. She’s fine. 
 

So I’ve known more than one old person, or immuno -compromised person, who have had it and they all agree with my experience ~ no worse than the flu. If an 88 year old 9 time cancer survivor with Parkinson’s can shake it off in a week or so, that tells me all that I need to know. I’m not denying that it has been more severe in some, and wish that hadn’t happened to them. But the flu kills people every year too. 

rice4114

December 4th, 2020 at 2:32 PM ^

I know nobody that has had it (close friend or family). But ill be damn if they don't complain about the local government all day every day. Its funny those that are happy with their local government are also the ones with a dozen people they know having it. We are a strange people sometimes.

BeatOSU52

December 2nd, 2020 at 1:36 PM ^

Agree with the thesis. Playing a contact sport during a pandemic was a greedy and reckless thing to do and the ragged ending was 100 percent predictable. 

 

Hasn't the recent(ish) studies that have come out been pretty conclusive that Covid is very rarely transmissible during contact sports  , at least in outdoor sports?  Correct me if I'm wrong though. 

Brian Griese

December 2nd, 2020 at 11:38 AM ^

Don’t agree with the premise of this column at all. The NCAA isn’t counting this against eligibility. No one put a gun to anyone’s head and made them play football this fall. Adults made adult decisions to play knowing what the consequences could be. In fact, you could use that sentence for everything you do in your life. 

It’s no more hypocritical to say adults shouldn’t be able to decide if they want to play football during Covid than it is to say no one should play football at all because it is dangerous. 

xtramelanin

December 2nd, 2020 at 11:49 AM ^

The kids who wanted to play, did.  The kids who didn’t, didnt.  No eligibility lost either way.  Yes, it has been a weird year with rosters and results, but the article is by a non-player clutching his pearls about a bunch of young men who wanted very much to play.  

 

I Like Burgers

December 2nd, 2020 at 11:59 AM ^

Plus, the season as a whole has largely been pretty successful!  There's been outbreaks like people have thought there would be, but it hasn't been as rampant as many would have thought, and the outbreaks have all been contained pretty well all things considered. 

The ACC and SEC are going to finish their regular seasons with around an average of one missed game per team.  That's pretty impressive!  A lot of people when they saw 10 game conference only schedules released laughed and said "if they make it that far."  Well, they've made it.

The only conferences that elicit "what are we doing here??" vibes are the Big Ten and Pac-12 who freaked the fuck out early on and cancelled things when waiting like the ACC and SEC did would have been better.  Now they are in scramble mode trying to finish a season that just started.

Naked Bootlegger

December 2nd, 2020 at 12:57 PM ^

Your "Big Ten and Pac-12 who freaked the fuck out early on" is my "Big Ten and Pac-12 smartly waited on more scientific data and better testing procedures" before commencing their season.     I don't know how you can argue with that wanting the latest medical guidance regarding a virus that we really didn't know much about can be labeled as freaking out.  

I Like Burgers

December 2nd, 2020 at 5:07 PM ^

But that's not the way it played out.  They cancelled well in advance of when games were scheduled (the freaking the fuck out part) -- a full month before the ACC started play, and 6 weeks before the SEC. The ACC and SEC pushed schedules back and decided to wait for that scientific data to come out and reserve the right to cancel later and closer to the season if it came to that.

New info did come out in those 4-6 weeks, the whole myocarditis thing that freaked the Big Ten out turned out to be faulty info, and increases and advancements in testing happened.  Both of those things happening were what prompted the Big Ten to return to play.  But because they cancelled so early, by the time new shit came to light, it took a while for them to return to play.

BlockM

December 2nd, 2020 at 5:22 PM ^

lol, "Alt-left conspiracy theorist" is an interesting label I don't think I've been given before, and I'd love to hear what you think that word spaghetti even means...

I think the covid body count is enough to indicate that limiting large groups of people gathering during a pandemic is a wise thing to do, but for some reason that fact is still lost on a huge portion of the population.

xtramelanin

December 2nd, 2020 at 7:27 PM ^

Show me studies or proof, not a vague reference to numbers that nobody believes.  Answer the question.

Covid can be serious but it’s still at least a 99.6% survival rate.  unless you are  77 and have multiple comorbidities the numbers are basically 100%. I have had dozens of friends and family members that have had Covid. I do take it seriously, in case you were concerned.


because of you I now know what infowars is.  Now tell me what news sources you accessed today and regularly.  Genuinely curious.

BlockM

December 2nd, 2020 at 7:49 PM ^

Do you think Johns Hopkins and their COVID reporting is some commie liberal fraud machine or something? We're over 275,000 deaths according to them, which is a lot of people.

And you keep making this tired point about at-risk people being the most likely to die, which a) duh and b) is why the rest of us should be extra careful to protect them.

ndekett

December 2nd, 2020 at 12:08 PM ^

I'm not sure it's fair to say that "nobody put a gun to their head". I see what you're saying since they players did have a choice - and that was appropriate. However, there is a penalty to be paid for opting out (e.g. loss of status with coaches and teammates). It's just like how players were clamoring to play this year. I believe it may have been genuine, but they also couldn't say the opposite without inviting criticism that they were soft. People above their heads have to make that decision for them.

It's the same reason there are practice time limits. You can't have coach-led official team activities that are optional because they would be de-facto requirements if you want to see playing time. To protect players from having to make the choice, there have to be rules. *It's not lost on me that players obviously still do athletic work outside of official activities, but I still think it's right to limit official team activities.

Stay.Classy.An…

December 2nd, 2020 at 12:32 PM ^

There is ALWAYS going to be extra societal (this society being the team) pressure to play despite pandemics, injury, etc. That comes with the territory of being involved in major collegiate athletics, shoot, I am sure these kids have been pressured to play on some level since Pop Warner or other youth league sports teams. I agree with your point in respect to the pandemic, I wouldn't want to be put in that situation as a kid. Hell, it's hard enough being put into that position as an adult when it comes to work and family gatherings.

But you missed me with the 2nd part about practice time limits and "unofficially-official" practice. You don't think the trainers, assistant coaches, GAs, etc. know who shows up and who doesn't? I think wording it that way just because schools have to is soft. I have no problem with coaches not playing kids who don't show up to "voluntary" workouts. If any kid thinks that "voluntary" means it's ok if you aren't there, they aren't ready for what it takes. If you are a solid 2nd-3rd string guy and just along for the ride, that's fine. But if you are a kid that is looking to get noticed and wants the coaches to see you put the time in, you show up, period. I'm 1000% rewarding the kid that shows up when they "don't have to". Maybe that's just me though, I was a bench warmer all through high school and still showed up to everything. 

Neg me if you see fit. 

ndekett

December 2nd, 2020 at 2:38 PM ^

Lol, I don't neg for coherent disagreement. I understand the counterpoints to my argument and that's okay. I think rules ought to be in place to mitigate the burden on college students to choose between their health, academics, and social life and their athletic commitments. I don't think it's fair to put that on amateur (in a strict sense) athletes. I understand there may still be incentives for them to participate in unsanctioned activities. I don't think the rules should codify perverse incentives, though.

I suspect our disagreement is in degree rather than kind. There is obviously a logical extreme where it would be inconcienable to ask players to perform. I think covid crosses the line, but I understand if others don't see it that way.

Booted Blue in PA

December 2nd, 2020 at 1:27 PM ^

that's conjuncture..... 

play and risk covid (because not playing someone is less risky?) or don't and coach will be mad at me.......     

all the same rings true with participation in optional workouts.    

its still their choice and their opportunity to make the decision that's best for them.

Stay.Classy.An…

December 2nd, 2020 at 1:53 PM ^

I'm with you Booted, it is what it is. I just can't stand the whole "players shouldn't be "looked at differently" for not coming to "optional" workouts/practice". That is so tired, my playing or not playing you is an OPTION as well....I know this is a different discussion, but the entitlement of players and families without having proven a thing is beyond me.