Choose: 7-5 & W vs. OSU, 9-3 & L vs. OSU

Submitted by StephenRKass on
So I've seen different discussions on how many wins we get this year. Obviously, we won't know much until after the first game or two. But for me, it isn't just the wins, it is who the wins are against. If we have wins against Directional Michigans, ND, & OSU, plus 3 more, I'll be happy. I would rather have that than 9 wins and losses to ND & OSU. What about you? If you had to choose between 7-5 & a win vs. OSU, or 9-3 & a loss vs. OSU, what would you take?

BaltimoreWolverines

July 9th, 2009 at 9:48 PM ^

I think I'd prefer to beat OSU because then that makes the rivalry hotter and can shut them up for a year while still letting everyone else know that we're going to be back next year. That is unless the 9-3 gave us a share of the Big Ten title or a BCS at large bid.

mblood7

July 9th, 2009 at 9:56 PM ^

seconded by far I'd rather beat O$U and have a slightly worse record. The better question is would you rather go 3-9 again but with wins over MSU, ND, and OSU or 9-3 with loses to MSU, ND ,and OSU? I know the scenario is implausible but would demonstrate the meaning of the games between ND AND OSU.

StephenRKass

July 9th, 2009 at 9:59 PM ^

For the sake of the team, I want at least 6-6. 3-9 just wouldn't be good, even with wins vs. ND/OSU/MSU. Affect on recruiting, morale, etc. Further, the teams I most want to beat are OSU & ND. MSU not far behind, but I care far less, and would live with that. Wins vs. the whale and the vest would bring more pleasure.

Koyote

July 9th, 2009 at 9:57 PM ^

I second the 7-5 and beat osu. No one expects us to beat the world this year with likely a true frosh starting at qb. But it would sure be nice to smack the buckeyes down (esp if it killed their chances at going to a bcs game).

5150

July 9th, 2009 at 9:59 PM ^

7-5 beat OSU. Especially if its a healthy OSU. I'd be on the fence if it was a crippled OSU, but still leaning towards 7-5 beat OSU. No other win is quite as gratifying. Just my epinion.

wingedsig

July 9th, 2009 at 10:01 PM ^

I would much rather prefer a win against OSU and a 7-5 record. It is the Buckeyes, losing 2 extra games would be well worth having that year of following bragging rights. Plus, it's at the Big House. As a student I only get 2 home OSU games and I would give anything just to see one win against them in person.

wolverine71

July 9th, 2009 at 10:10 PM ^

gonna sound rediculus but, I live in Toledo, Ohio and I'd take a 1-11 record if that one win was against OSU. Anything to get those sorry asses off their high horses. None of them remember the 90's, they only remember the last 7 games.

chally

July 9th, 2009 at 10:12 PM ^

I know I'm the minority, but I'd take 9-3 with the loss. 7-5 tells me that we're a mediocre team with a fluke win against OSU. I actually think this is very possible this year, given their team and our homefield advantage. But that means we'll likely go back to losing against them next year. 9-3 tells me that our team has made great strides, that things are clicking on a very young team, and that we will continue to be competitive with OSU for years to come (including in recruiting). In short: I'd be willing to sacrifice the win next year if it means having a meaningfully better shot at sustained dominance.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

July 9th, 2009 at 10:22 PM ^

Me, I have a cousin who lives in Ohio and is an OSU fan. This is the kind of guy who draws me in the Christmas gift draw and gives me a bottle opener that plays the OSU fight song. We've long since been forbidden to speak of Michigan or OSU at the dinner table and have made more than one car ride miserable for the other occupants of the vehicle. Like me, he chose to go out of state for school: he's an Indiana grad. This was all well and good until my brother chose, naturally, Purdue.

ShockFX

July 9th, 2009 at 10:36 PM ^

I know I'm the minority, but I'd take 9-3 with the loss. 7-5 tells me that we're a mediocre team with a fluke win against OSU. I actually think this is very possible this year, given their team and our homefield advantage. But that means we'll likely go back to losing against them next year. 9-3 tells me that our team has made great strides, that things are clicking on a very young team, and that we will continue to be competitive with OSU for years to come (including in recruiting). In short: I'd be willing to sacrifice the win next year if it means having a meaningfully better shot at sustained dominance.
This, one thousand times over. 9-3 with a loss to OSU means we beat at least 1 of PSU, MSU, and ND. I can handle this.

Captain

July 10th, 2009 at 10:23 PM ^

but for slightly different reasons. I should preface this by mentioning that I find the Michigan-Ohio State game so profoundly important that the only decor ornamenting my walls is my law school diploma and a framed photograph of the last time we prevailed over OSU. That said, there is a cloud over Michigan football, particularly in the realm of recruitment, that Michigan is a rebuilding program shrouded in uncertainty (for obvious and often justified reasons). Even without negative recruiting, a stigma finding its way into the minds of impressionable high school athletes is that signing onto a rebuilding program is at best a gamble, particularly for a caliber of athletes drooling to be part of a national-championship-level team. With only 4-5 years to accomplish on-field success, it's easier to join an established contender. For every recruit who looks at the transitioning phase as an opportunity to usher in a new era of Michigan football, there are two or three put off by the uncertainty surrounding the program. While there may not be a drastic difference between 7-5 and 9-3, to me it changes the landscape from "rebuilding" to "rebuilt." Rather than Michigan being a "better than average" Big 10 team working toward a BT Championship at 7-5, Michigan would already be in position to vie for BT Championship coming off a 9-3 season, with focus once again where it belongs - on a national championship. Gone would be the uncertainty, gone would be the "rebuilding" stigma. Incoming would be the recruits that keep me mesmerized between seasons and the return to dominance over OSU. Enough dreaming...back to working too late for a Friday evening.

jmblue

July 9th, 2009 at 10:18 PM ^

I'd be really happy with either one. If we'd beaten OSU in the last couple of years, I'd take 9-3, but since we have that streak to end, I'll take 7-5.

lunchboxthegoat

July 10th, 2009 at 1:25 AM ^

this is ridiculous. More wins....every time. Its nice to beat OSU....but we're not Michigan State here. They would take sub .500 seasons every year if they beat us...we're not that program. we will not be that program. More wins, every time, please.

Don

July 10th, 2009 at 8:31 AM ^

any winning record that includes a victory over OSU will solidify his position in AA far more than would a 9-win season with a loss to them. My fantasy is that OSU smokes USC, gets to #1 before the season gets too far along, and comes into AA undefeated with everyone proclaiming them the best team in the country by far, Pryor being a legit Heisman contender, and absolutely nobody giving us any chance. Our chances of beating them rise dramatically if they come into town smug, arrogant, and overconfident.

MichiganStudent

July 10th, 2009 at 12:22 PM ^

100% 7-5 with a win over OSU. Seriously, what does 9-3 do for Michigan other than a slightly better bowl game and possibly a little more national respect? Beating OSU I think trumps any of the benefits 9-3 gives you over 7-5.