Brunson turned into a Potato

Submitted by Rdog on

Simpson again crushed a top point guard- this time the NPOY- Brunson.  Here was Brunson's stat line 

26 minutes,   4-13 shooting, 1-5 3PT, 2 AT, 2 TO,  9PTS, 80 ORTG

If DiVincenzo hadn't been on fire or if we would have had an answer for him the game would have been much more winnable.

 

Villanova
STARTERS MIN FG 3PT FT OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS
E. PaschallF 27 2-5 1-3 1-2 1 7 8 0 0 1 2 4 6
O. SpellmanF 29 3-8 0-2 2-2 4 7 11 0 0 0 1 3 8
M. BridgesG 36 7-12 3-7 2-2 2 2 4 1 1 0 2 2 19
J. BrunsonG 28 4-13 1-5 0-0 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 4 9
P. BoothG 23 1-4 0-3 0-0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 4 2
BENCH MIN FG 3PT FT OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS
D. Cosby-RoundtreeF 4 0-0 0-0 0-0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
T. DelaneyF 0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J. SamuelsF 0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C. GillespieG 16 0-0 0-0 4-4 0 5 5 1 1 0 0 0 4
D. DiVincenzoG 37 10-15 5-7 6-10 3 2 5 3 0 2 4 1 31
TEAM   27-57 10-27 15-20 12 26 38 7 5 3 12 18 79
    47.4% 37.0% 75.0%                

 

trueblueintexas

April 4th, 2018 at 10:53 AM ^

I'm not sure there is a better defensive plan for a good team with a guy having a career night. Beilein even addressed it in his presser.  His basic comment was, maybe we could have doubled DeVincizio but that would have left one of their other shooters open or opened up even more slip screens to the hoop which they were also executing on. 

Sometimes the other team (or player) is just better that game. 

LabattsBleu

April 4th, 2018 at 9:54 AM ^

Simpson has been great on the defensive side of the ball...

he will need to work on his shooting however... if he becomes a good shooter from outside, that would really compliment and open up additional opportunity for his driving abilities

Magnus

April 4th, 2018 at 10:06 AM ^

This was the frustrating thing for me. It wasn't that DiVincenzo had a great game, because someone is bound to go off in every national championship game (maybe not 31 points, but still a good game).

My annoyance was the 3/23 shooting from 3 point range. If Michigan makes 33% of their threes, that's an additional 12-15 points. And we lost by 17. Even an average shooting night from deep makes that a very tight game.

stephenrjking

April 4th, 2018 at 12:32 PM ^

It makes more sense for those who spent time in the thread(s) looking at next year's lineup, seeing several people totally dismiss Zavier Simpson as a player because he didn't have a great Final Four.

And he didn't, but his defense was still terrific. And he was a key (maybe THE key) in the 14-win stretch run when PG after PG was annihilated by X antiprotons.

Ghost of Fritz…

April 4th, 2018 at 10:10 AM ^

did his part on D. 

Cold 3 point shooting by Michigan + Divincenzo going off was the difference. 

When Divinvenzo entered the game the tide really turned.  Up until that point M had the edge. 

lhglrkwg

April 4th, 2018 at 10:16 AM ^

I really hadn't seen him play before that, but the dude was flopping right there with the worst of the soccer world. Can't make a basket himself so he had to act like he got shot anytime someone touched him

Also a little sad to see that we really handled Nova fairly well except for DD. Everything was there for us, but we couldn't hit anything and DD was just lights out

In reply to by BlueWon

Indiana Blue

April 4th, 2018 at 10:34 AM ^

he has already graduated.  So whatever ... first time I saw an entire game with him and wasn't impressed - those flops won't work in the NBA ... until you match LeBron or Kobie level.

Go Blue!

In reply to by BlueWon

lhglrkwg

April 4th, 2018 at 11:00 AM ^

Yeah that's what frustrated me too. He was the one initiating the contact most of the time and was actually driving Z back a lot of the time, but anytime someone tried to stop him they got called for a foul. Brunson should've gotten 2-3 charges in the first half

In reply to by BlueWon

vinegar strokes

April 4th, 2018 at 11:26 AM ^

His stock will never be higher. POY and just won a national championship. If he has intentions of playing ball after college he should definitely go now even if it won’t be in the NBA.

BlueWon

April 4th, 2018 at 10:15 AM ^

Brunson abused Z in the post early and UM rotated other players on him such as MAAR and Livers.

And Brunson didn't play a lot in the last ten minutes as the game was well in hand.

BlueWon

April 4th, 2018 at 12:55 PM ^

and he easily backed him into the post and scored.

UM soon starting throwing different looks at him and, indeed, covered him with MAAR and Livers at times.

You did actually watch the game, didn't you?

Hail-Storm

April 4th, 2018 at 2:45 PM ^

is innaccurate or gives you the impression I did not watch the game.  He backed him down and made a long two.  Not the best shot, and I mentioned they sent help in another post at times.  Z still was the main gaurd on him.  If you thought Z really didn't do a great job on him after "watching" the game and looking at the stats afterwards, then I don't know what to say.  But yea, let's focus on the two early tough baskets he made. 

330blue

April 5th, 2018 at 12:01 AM ^

Those weren’t tough. They were from 3 feet out over a shorter player. Zavier played as expected. Good, solid defense. 4/9 of those misses for Brunson were open or relatively open 3’s. Sound familiar? Shooting slumps happen to everyone.

To use the word “crush” about an opposing player to me means the same as dominate. And I don’t see it. That means leading pretty much every statistical category and drain your opponent mentally and physically. Can’t do that when Brunson played like 8 minutes,if that, in the second half and the rest of the time on the bench cheering on his team and soaking in a national player of the year and national championship with 10 minutes left in the game.

Hail-Storm

April 5th, 2018 at 4:23 AM ^

Not sure why you are bringing up the word “crush” seeing as I didn’t use the word. Also, if your defense of him not really being shut down is because he had two buckets early that you thought were easier, and that less than half of his 9 three attempts were relatively open, you’re not proving what I said was wrong. Z and Michigan’s D did a great job of keeping the national player of the year in check in this game (which it sounds like you agree with in your first part of your post, which makes your comment even more odd).

Space Coyote

April 4th, 2018 at 10:31 AM ^

Simpson in strong, but the first two possession of the game demonstrated that Brunson could get the ball in the post and get it over Simpson due to his lack of height... and then they mostly went away from it.

Yes, Michigan made some adjustments with help side, but the one weakness of Simpson's game defensively is simply the fact that he's short, and guys can shoot over top of him. When Villinova was struggling early, it seemed weird that they rarely went back to Brunson in the post. That was the one area it seemed like they had a very clear advantage they could work with high efficiency. Though they ended up finding another area in long, contested, pull-up 3s that I'm pretty sure never event hit the rim...

Naked Bootlegger

April 4th, 2018 at 11:48 AM ^

Like you, I was surprised that Nova didn't try to keep attacking Simpson down low with Brunson.  After those first few successful post-ups, though, Z played much better defense on Brunson down low (much later in the game).   Z is strong enough to body up on a Brunson-type player.   And even though he's not tall, Z has long arms.   He strongly contested and bothered most of Brunson's shots after those first two easy ones.   

However, Z cannot be expected to bother a 6'5" rise up jump shooter like DiVincenzo.   This happened on switches a few times.

Matte Kudasai

April 4th, 2018 at 10:45 AM ^

Watch the game again and tell me Simpson played great defense. Z has come a long way from last year but I still think his ceiling is lower than what it should be for the starting 1 at Michigan. His play in the tournament especially the Final 4 was not good.

Mongo

April 4th, 2018 at 10:45 AM ^

that U-M would hold Nova's starting 5 players to 48 points in total for the game, I would have said our chances of a win was 99%.  Getting 31 points from your sxth-man (vs his season average of 12) is very fortunate for Nova, othewise it would have been a dog fight at the end. 

Bo4President

April 4th, 2018 at 11:05 AM ^

Funny! I Brunson is the biggest crybaby bitch I have seen in sometime.

Touch that dude and he bobbles his head and falls to the floor.

Pussy.

Sorry in advance for language.

330blue

April 4th, 2018 at 8:13 PM ^

Right, How much of the second half was Brunson even in the game? Taken out for foul trouble and didn’t get back in the game because guess what.... they didn’t need him. He forced things early on. Then his team showed him they didn’t need him to.

Simpson can’t hit a free throw. He is a deer in the headlights when shooting a wide open 3. Simpson had 3 turnovers, 2 assists, 1 steal. Brunson had 2 turnovers, 2 assists, 2 steals. Show me the crushing stat???

Don’t get me wrong, I like Simpson as the point guard on this team. I like his scoop layups and defense. I like his attitude. He just needs to continue to work. I just think it’s hilarious how people on this cult site were fawning over Brunson during his recruitment and now they talk shit about the guy because he chose a different school. It
happens in football all the time.

Congrats Mr. Brunson and Villanova. Wish Michigan won but they didn’t. Talk about the refs all you want but they didn’t kill our chances. It was that kid taking whatever shot he wanted whenever he wanted it.

Wolfman

April 4th, 2018 at 9:04 PM ^

because you are right about Dechenzio or whatever the spelling, and us just having no answer. However, it should be known the young man averages 11 pts per game and it wasn't lack of defense - see your stats above on Brunson, but the young man just had an absolute great game exactly when great players have them. He may be the greatest player on their team. I don't know his academic standing as to grade or eligibility. He was the best player on the floor that evening. 

Now I'm going to take a little away as well due to "they didn't kill our chances."  We don't know that. We can look at everything around it, rebounds, the 6th man, foul shots, etc., and damn we're still pretty much tied with them if the youngster stays in his lane.  Those early fouls could surely have given Nova an attitude they could do anything and get away with it and M better lay low because they aren't giving us a thing. i say this because that's exactly what happened and who knows how much that influenced the early part of the game where we were actually out playing them. Calls aren't made, or made one-sided as they were and we might have been up by 20 instead of what we were and the result could have been different. Seldom do I even suggest such a thing or play Devil's advocate but you said that as if it had absolutely no bearing on the outcome and I'm just not as sure as you seem to be. No big thing. Thank you. 

330blue

April 4th, 2018 at 11:40 PM ^

Fair points. When I say it didn’t kill our chances I mean we were down 4 or 5 with like 3 minutes left in the first half. If I remember correctly, at that point in the game it could be summarized as a great start, some bad calls, a Nova run (with a couple more bad calls), and then it balanced out more. That lead swelled to 9 at halftime. And then the second half happened. I think they had more fouls than Michigan in the second half, but that doesn’t matter.

I don’t think the game was officiated well. Duncan getting autobenched really hurt. I like Livers potential and I know why he’s getting time but he has yet to show much on offense. He’s a good enough shooter they just haven’t gone in for him.

This was a defensive team but in this offense guys need to knock down the open threes. With Livers and Simpson on the floor together for that period of time things just looked more stagnant than usual because neither wanted to shoot. Basically it was up to Wagner, MAAR, and Matthews.

Great season, great team, just didn’t happen for us in a game 90% of people they’re really being honest did not think they would make it to.I look forward to next season though. It’s hard to dwell on a game when the score differential ended up being 17.


DetroitBlue

April 5th, 2018 at 12:53 PM ^

your post reads like an adhd kid went off his meds; what the fuck are you taking about? 1) it doesn’t matter how much he played in the second half - he was absolutely ineffective in that game and x was the guy guarding him most of the time. 2) i never said that x was a better player than brunson. i just gave you his stats from the game. 3) i never mentioned the refs. they were bad but not even in the top 5 reasons of why we lost.

Catchafire

April 4th, 2018 at 11:23 AM ^

That is the power of Villanova.  All of their guys can carry the team if something isn't working; that's a luxury and that was their answer for Michigan.

 

Michigan got to the championship with a stellar defense and an average offense.  We have nothing to be ashamed of.

 

Go Blue!

megaswami

April 4th, 2018 at 11:28 AM ^

Did some of you even watch the game? PG doesn’t always mean defended by the other team’s PG. Brunson was guarded by Simpson only a fraction of the time. To say Simpson shut down Brunson is a far stretch. Simpson may be the best on ball defender in the country, but they had to make a switch when Brunson took Simpson down in the post.

jmblue

April 4th, 2018 at 11:34 AM ^

That's what's tough about Villanova.  We held five of their seven rotation guys to subpar games but the other two went for 50 points.  

HailObeans

April 4th, 2018 at 11:38 AM ^

To say he shut Brunsen down. Brunsen was not hitting some fairly easy shots in the post. Simpson is an amazing bulldog defender, but we couldn’t seem to slow DiVincenzo down, so one would wonder why Simpson could not switch to Donte to slow his on fire shooting. We defended well all around, but Villanova Villanova’ed us like they have every decent defense.

I dont mean to take anything away from Simpson, but if you can’t shut down a hot shooting guard (Donte), then what’s the point?

Perkis-Size Me

April 4th, 2018 at 11:48 AM ^

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts we'd all have a merry christmas. 

Brunson didn't have a big night because he didn't have to. DiVincenzo or whatever his name is lit us up for 30 points. You absolutely go with the hot hand in a game like this. Like when Spike put up 17 in the first half of the title game. Trey was silent for the first half because he didn't have to do anything. 

If it wasn't DiVincenzo, it would've been Brunson. Or Bridges. Or quite literally anyone else on their team. That entire team is lethal from downtown.