You'll Have To Kick Harder Than That Comment Count

Brian

6/16/2014 – USA 2, Ghana 1 – 1-0-0

450730672.0_standard_709.0[1]

HOW MANY EAGLES CAN INTIMIDATE ON THE HEAD OF A PIN

Clint Dempsey had just been kicked in the face, hard. He'd jumped to head a ball; the Ghana defender he'd made infamous 30 seconds into the game decided he'd challenge for it by kicking Dempsey really hard in the face.

It was obvious from the first shot that Dempsey's nose was broken, even more obvious in the post-game press conference. Someone asked him about it. He said he couldn't really breathe through the thing anymore.

At the time, though, Jozy Altidore had already done something bad to his hamstring and there was nothing for Dempsey to do but spit blood, shoot murder from his eyes, and carry on.

-----------------------

It turns out yesterday's post was unnecessary. All questions about how American USA soccer is under Klinsmann have been resolved in 90 minutes. The verdict: even when the guys still running when normal folk would be in a heap and pounding in the set piece goal are pretty much German, they are so, so American.

Anyone who's followed the US national team for a while can point to a game like that, a frustrating exercise in soaking pressure and trying to pop up on the counter. The US has a knack for bleeding profusely and winning games they have no business doing so via sheer doggedness. This game shoots to the top of that list, the blood and dogs list.

It'll take some doing to top it. They lost their main relief valve to injury 20 minutes in and were forced into a halftime substitution when Matt Besler tweaked his hamstring; by 70 minutes it seemed like half the roster was grasping a leg muscle when afforded the opportunity. When Ghana finally broke through ten minutes later, it felt like the floodgates were about to open.

Instead the US grinds out a corner by running real hard. I mean… if we are trying to move away from the cliché that national teams are avatars for their countries, trying to move away from the faintly ridiculous notion that a country that grows Michael Phelps in a lab is a plucky underdog… if we are attempting to have a straight-faced tactical conversation amongst serious people… I mean, you just can't. I can't.

I'm dying and Fabian Johnson manages to grit up a corner by being annoyingly effortful like he's the right back version of David Eckstein, and it doesn't matter that Fabian Johnson is pretty much German. I have been here before. I have seen this corner before in this game before; I know we've got some tall guys in there and even the guys who aren't tall, like Carlos Bocanegra, have a tendency to fling their head at the ball even if it's at a level where you could reasonably get kicked in the head.

I have been here before. I muster up every last bit of focus and try not to forget to stand. I have seen this on brutal Central American fields where batteries are flung out of the stands. Zusi stands over the ball. Zusi scored to tie Panama in stoppage time when doing anything but would have put Mexico out of the World Cup. They won that game a minute later, because what the hell, why not.

This is a thing they do. Frankie Hedjuk against El Salvador. Donovan against Algeria. The US played a friendly against Italy they won 1-0 because the ball refused to go in for the Italians and the US parlayed their moment into a goal. I have been here; they do this.

I am hoping against hope and remembering not to fall over; Zusi is kicking the ball, which is low enough and high enough and hard and curving into a dangerous area, and I have seen it before.

Highlights

Bullets

Must improve. The game got out of whack early because of the shocking goal and the Altidore injury, plus whatever the US screwed up to have big chunks of the team doing terrible things to their muscles. But they've got to do better in possession if the Ghana game is going to mean anything. Bradley in particular had a game far below his usual standard, tossing balls out of bounds.

When Bradley's off, the verve goes out of the US attack. Verve was almost beside the point here. I would have given a kidney for some extended spells of possession, but balls just kept getting plowed into the sideline. I don't know why. I do know that if they try to soak that much pressure in the next two games they're unlikely to get out of the group.

The goal. The bad one. It was mostly just one of those things that occasionally happen when you're watching the opponent have the ball most of the game; a good pass into the box and an excellent one-time backheel right into the path of a teammate, followed by an equal finish.

I've seen some people criticize Howard for getting beat at the near post. I'm not going to put any of that out Howard. Given the angle—Ayew was close to dead center—and the distance there was little he could do. Ayew's finish was brilliant as well. He hit it with the outside of his left foot, causing the ball to curl away from Howard from an unexpected starting spot.

Zusi should have tracked Ayew. That's the main problem. He's a sub; he should be tracking that run flat-out.

He did make up for it. Zusi's corner that led to the goal was perfect, driven, high enough to get over the guys he needs to get over, low enough for Brooks to get on top of it.

16f2c6a7-6340-4e30-81a5-e8e0ddd8016c-460x276[1]

What in the flying hell. Pre-match I was thankful that a Swedish guy was the ref instead of someone from nowheresville who'd never taken on a match of that significance; not so much at halftime. Clint Dempsey's nose was broken by a flying boot applied to his face as he was three feet off the ground, an obvious straight red card for dangerous play. Boye, the same defender Dempsey turned into goo in the first minute, didn't even see yellow.

That in and of itself is unacceptable; then Jermaine Jones is hammered from behind mere minutes later and the guy who did it got an accidental boot to the head. That resulted in the same kind of aggressive physical action that saw Pepe sent off just a few hours before. Again, not even yellow.

b892c7ab-db73-4924-82d0-f0d179eb8359-460x276[1]

Both the tackle and the reaction afterward are easily card-worthy. Ghana should have been down to nine men by halftime.

But hey, at least the US got totally boned by the refereeing in a game they won for a change.

Jones: the man. Tireless and active, Jones was the USA's best player on the night. He wasn't particularly helpful going forward, because he's generally not, but he was everywhere. Besler's first half was also excellent; hopefully he can return.

Obvious Ghana plan is obvious. Ghana spent most of the game isolating Christian Atsu on Beasley. For their troubles they got a bunch of crosses that didn't result in much.

image

There was that one terrifying Gyan header that Howard had to save despite the fact it was going wide, and then some shots that would have had to been as brilliant as the Gyan chance. Key passes were more balanced, with the Ghana breakthrough coming from the USA's right flank, at Zusi's expense:

image

please ignore the ones coming from the corners

Beasley coped, and only just. Here are defensive events from the outside backs and outside mids:

image

Tackles are green; Beasley(#7) had none; he had a pile of clearances and "recoveries," which are events when you get the ball after it's popped loose or someone sends it directly to you. He played off, didn't let Atsu by him, and let the crosses in. It was reminiscent of the Spain Confederations Cup game.

Looking ahead

424704_heroa[1]

nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

What now? Altidore's World Cup is almost certainly over, leaving the US in a difficult situation. With Eddie Johnson and Terrence Boyd left off the roster, there is nothing approximating a like-for-like substitute. Johannsson's the closest thing and the Ghana game was a good indication he's not much of a target guy at a World Cup level.

The USA's options:

  • Use Johannsson like Charlie Davies. IE, have him run onto long balls to the side of the field, hopefully outdistancing the centerback he's matched up against. With Pepe out and Germany relying on the enormous but a bit ponderous Per Mertesacker, this is a viable option.
  • Use Dempsey as a target guy. In this situation Dempsey leads the line with Johannsson or Wondolowski playing off of him. I am not enthused about this possibility.
  • False nine time. The "false nine" you hear so much about is a striker who isn't really much of a striker. He often comes back into the midfield and then plays balls at gentlemen running past him. Dempsey is a potential fit in that role; he can maintain the ball if it's played into his feet; then Johannsson and Bedoya can be runners past him. That's yet another tactical departure, though.

I'm guessing they go with the first option, but I'm afraid we're about to find out that Jozy does a bunch of things you don't appreciate until he's not out there doing them. Keeping possession better than they did against Ghana is even more critical.

Portugal situation. They've been whittled down by injuries, which momentarily made US fans giddy until Altidore and Besler went out. Pepe is out after taking a red card; left back Fabio Coentrao and striker Hugo Almeida left with injuries that will hold them out of the remainder of the group stage.

Almeida's replacement will (probably) be Eder, a strapping gentleman who plays in the Portuguese league. He is in the Jozy Altidore vein: a physical guy with flashes of brilliance who is maybe a little lacking on the technical side. Almeida wasn't exactly lighting the world on fire, and Eder has made some impact when he's gotten in recently. That dropoff won't be severe.

On the other hand, Coentrao's replacement is a major step down. Coentrao is a fixture at Real Madrid and has excellent chemistry with Ronaldo; he was replaced by Andre Almeida (not that Andre Almeida). The other Almeida plays for Benfica, mostly in the midfield, and only moonlights at outside back. He's only got six caps.

Pepe's replacement is likely to be 33-year-old Ricardo Costa of Valencia. Costa drew into the lineup during Portugal's pre-WC friendlies when Pepe was held out as a precaution. Costa played about half of his club's games as Valencia finished 8th in La Liga. He's no pushover, but neither is he first choice at Real Madrid.

Group situation. The US is in good shape as long as they don't lose to Portugal. Win and they are obviously all but in. A draw is still looking pretty good. If the US and Portugal tie, then the situation based on the result of Ghana-Germany:

  • Germany win. Ghana is eliminated; US advances if they either get a point from Germany (who knows they are through) or they lose and Portugal does not make up the goal difference against Ghana. That would require making up five goals.
  • Tie. US and Germany enter final game knowing a draw gets both through, and Germany knows they are top of group. Desultory 0-0 draw beckons.
  • Ghana win. The US would be at the top of the group but this is the most dangerous situation. Ghana would enter the final game with an opportunity to advance with a win over Portugal, and Germany would have to go all out to beat the US. A US loss then puts them in danger.

So root for the Germans against Ghana.

What if the US loses? Not all is lost but then things are much tougher. A win against Germany would put them through; a tie then puts your fate in the hands of the Ghana-Portugal game.

Comments

Njia

June 17th, 2014 at 12:51 PM ^

In the past, I've always viewed soccer in much the same way that The Onion does. Nevertheless, yesterday's game and your summary above (and your unbridled enthusiasm) are changing my mind. There is real drama in these games and it's infectious. More of this and I'll be watching soccer like this guy:

 

Everyone Murders

June 17th, 2014 at 1:03 PM ^

After the game Klinsmann laughed derisively when someone asked if Dempsey having a broken nose would keep him out of the next game.  Klinsmann said something to the effect of "I have had this happen to me two, three times as a player - it's something you deal with."

I liked the fact he did not pussyfoot around the issue, or go through some b.s. about how they'd have to check with the guy who just played 50 +/- minutes with a broken nose to see if he felt up to Portugal.  Dempsey's a badass, so why dance around that fact?

westwardwolverine

June 17th, 2014 at 1:03 PM ^

Great moment (John Brooks' face was priceless), perfect result, but Jesus, that was as bad as a team could look in victory. 

Heroes: Jones, Beckerman, Cameron, Howard

Adequate: Johnson, Bedoya, Zusi, Besler

Sub-par: Beasley

Horrible: Bradley

Invisible: Johannson

Incomplete: Altidore

Goalscorers who were otherwise below average: Dempsey, Brooks. 

Of the three games we've played against Ghana, this was clearly the worst we've looked in any of them. Thankfully they seemed incredibly impatient with the ball, choosing to rip long shots rather than break down the U.S. defense. Also, whoever was supposed to challenge on Brooks' goal, thank you for staying on your feet and giving him a free look. Dreams do come true!

This game provided a good reason as to why you don't build your front line around a guy whose only consistent ability is to be somewhat competent at holding the ball up. If the U.S. were really in the stages of a revolution, we'd be building around an attacking group of Dempsey, Donovan, Diskerud, Johannson and Bradley, guys who actually have the ability to keep possession of the ball and work off of one another. But hey, if you are going to build your attack around a non-goal scoring forward, you should probably have a substitute ready to fill in for him in case of injury. Or have a plan B that doesn't involve just knocking the ball up to AJ and Dempsey and letting them get pounded by guys who are way bigger than them. 

A bit worrying that our team, supposedly led by a fitness revolutionary, looked like 2/3 of them were cramping up, while the problem seemed to be non-existent for the Ghana team. A trick of the camera? 

I think this is a good example of being more lucky than good. Klinsmann has some serious Hoke 2011 magic going on. 

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

June 17th, 2014 at 1:15 PM ^


A bit worrying that our team, supposedly led by a fitness revolutionary, looked like 2/3 of them were cramping up, while the problem seemed to be non-existent for the Ghana team. A trick of the camera?

Defense is more tiring than offense and we spent a good 75 minutes playing defense.  All the more reason not to do that against Portugal, not that giving Ronaldo that many chances would be a healthy strategy to begin with.


 

L'Carpetron Do…

June 17th, 2014 at 2:51 PM ^

What was up with Bradley?  He looked really out of sorts.  Tired even.  His head was definitely not in thatgame.  He better get it together for Sunday vs Portugal.  It was weird to see him not play aggressive.  

Man, I wonder if Jurgen was like 'I sure wish I didnt have a weird hatred for Donovan right about now' when Altidore went down.  Man, the US could use him to attack.  I thought they looked so lackadaisical in the midfield and too nonchalant on D.  They had plenty of opportunities to push it upfield but they ended making the wrong pass, kicking it out of bounds or straight up losing it to Ghana.  Did anyone else think the whole team looked tired?  Maybe we can chalk that up to the humidity and it won't be a problem for the next game.  

The goals were nice, but man they didn't play well.  Thank God Ghana played horribly too.  

aplatypus

June 17th, 2014 at 3:00 PM ^

he made several good plays getting in the way of shots and making pretty good clearance when needed. He whiffed one, recovered and drew a foul right away to get possession back. He did nothing below average that I saw at all, and I think most people feel the same. 

Dempsey wasn't too involved after the goal, but he played an hour or so with a broken nose. Most people couldn't keep up with that exhaustion with a good nose, let alone ability to breathe decently. His effectiveness is also hampered by the fact that it was impossible for anyone behind him to make a decent pass forward without just booting it. Bradley returning to form Sunday would help Dempsey a ton. 

Also not fair to call Bradley horrible, he was on offense, but he was solid defensively when needed. He was sub-par by his standards for sure, but not horrible by objective ones. 

westwardwolverine

June 17th, 2014 at 3:11 PM ^

With Dempsey, I'm holding him to a higher level based on him being a great player. The goal was magical, but he pretty much disappeared afterwards. 

Bradley is supposed to be our offensive engine, that's why he's playing further up field. He was terrible. 

Brooks scored a goal and therefore his performance is not going to be judged accurately. He was out of position on several occasions, had a couple of braindead decisions and wasn't as strong in the air as Cameron and Besler. 

FreddieMercuryHayes

June 17th, 2014 at 1:10 PM ^

I was thrilled by the result, but man, I don't know how to feel about the team going forward.  Was the inability to keep or maintain any possestion just a blip, or is it going to continue?  Is Bradley going to rebound, as we'll need him even more without Altidore?  Or is the US back to World Cup underperformance.  I feel like Kevin Bacon in Animal House trying to convince myself everything is going to be OK.  That's not usually a good sign.

KBLOW

June 17th, 2014 at 1:21 PM ^

"He couldn't even had dreamt that."'   EXCEPT THAT HE DID!

From:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/us-soccer-beats-ghana-in-world-cup-thriller-on-john-brooks-goal/2014/06/16/6c91a81c-f5b2-11e3-930d-ca5db8eb8323_story.html

Two days earlier, “I had a dream. I told some teammates I dreamed I scored in the 80th minute and we win the game,” he said. “Now it was the 86th minute, and we won.”

In the dream, he said, “I also scored on a header. . . . It was my first dream [about scoring]. Hopefully not the last.”

PAproudtoGoBlue

June 17th, 2014 at 1:19 PM ^

Great game, considering it was a slop-fest on our part.  For eighty-five minutes I waited for them to get the equalizer because we just looked rather sloppy. Then they did, saw that coming. Then, on a set piece which is odd for us, the go ahead. Did not see that coming. With Portugal down their center piece on defense I hope we can get some decent runs put together. Bradley has to play better which isn't asking much because IMHO he had as rough an outing as you can have. Great to get the 3 points and position ourselves to advance.

 

4godkingandwol…

June 17th, 2014 at 1:25 PM ^

... Question for those who know soccer tactics.  Given that it was clear what Ghana was trying to do by attacking on their right wing, shouldn't our left midfielder have been tracking back harder in support of Beasley?

 

It just felt like there was always so much space for Ghana to simply enter a pretty dangerous area for crosses into the box without even a challenge and with only one defender (Beasley) left on an island.  

Needs

June 17th, 2014 at 2:19 PM ^

For what it's worth, I can't really remember any dangerous crosses coming in from that side. The play that Howard made to tip the header behind came from an otherworldly play by the forward (ie the cross wasn't dangerous, it was just an amazing header). Beasley rarely if ever got beat to the endline and therefore the crosses coming in were early balls that are much easier for the central defense to deal with because the CDs can sight both the ball and the attacker (versus crosses from the endline where they have runners coming from unsighted positions). If teams are going to fire crosses in from positions even with the top of the box, that's a win for Beasley.

aiglick

June 17th, 2014 at 1:30 PM ^

The announcers made it seem like it was a strained hamstring so maybe Jozy could be back after the group stage (if we advance)?

He's getting the MRI today so we may know more later.

UM Fan in Nashville

June 17th, 2014 at 1:50 PM ^

Tough situation to be in for the US.  Both of their first 2 games are MUST WIN games.  

But, I don't think we could have asked for a better situation (minus the Altidore injury), considering we're in the 'Group of Death.'  That POR loss helped us out a lot.

alum96

June 18th, 2014 at 5:59 AM ^

This is assuming the U.S. does not lose 3-0 etc to Germany which is not out of reality.   Othern than the Dutch there was not a more impressive first rounder than the Germans.  That said Ghana could give them a game - I dont think the U.S. matches up well against Ghana or Germany but they could match up in an interesting manner with each other.  In that game Ghana would play the U.S. role in the US Ghana game but with far more proficient midfield play and ability to have some possession

Bradly was the worse I've seen him since I don't know when - 5 years?  I hope it was a 1 day funk, we need him to be the engine.  The total inability to hold possession was shocking to me - as Brian said, they played far better in previous 2 Ghana games and lost... just weird how it works out.

Space Coyote

June 17th, 2014 at 2:00 PM ^

The US looked like the better team when they were willing to actually push forward with some consistency. Unfortunately, they were content with generally packing it in with their "Christmas tree" formation, the wings never got pushed up, they were flat with the center mids, and the US couldn't work the ball on diagonals up the field from the center to the wing and around. By being content to pack it in, they struggled to keep possession at all because they didn't have diagonals to work it up field.

In that way, the US was very lucky. Ghana should have had plenty of more good scoring chances off some through balls and runs to the corner of the 18, yet they continued to get bad touches or bad passes to the top of the box or whatever else. Ghana played really poorly up front outside of their goal, and that saved the US a bit, though I wonder how the US would have faired had they not scored as early and attacked more often throughout. Think it would have helped their offense actually build a bit more (instead of relying almost entirely on transition) and would have helped them keep possession while also getting into a better alignment (rather than just giving the ball right back while out of position) to help the defense.

As for the Ghana goal and Howard, the "don't get beat front post" is such a simplistic way of looking at things for keepers. You look at the Ghana's players hips and step foot and it tells you a shot to the far post. You do that in a split second. He kicks it with the outside of his left foot and you're not in a position to do anything but immediately react. I don't see how you can put any blame on Howard outside of maybe getting off the line earlier (but even then the ball was near the end line on the back heal, you can't really expect him to come off the line when the ball was just recently in that position). 

Needs

June 17th, 2014 at 2:27 PM ^

Yep. Ghana was really poor in the attacking third. Just didn't have a lot of ideas and was willing to try to beat Howard, for most of the night, on volley attempts and long headers off crosses and shots from outside the box. They had a ton of possession but, aside from tiring the US out because we had to chase so much, didn't really do much with it. Aside from the goal, they didn't really have another clear cut scoring chances, just a lot of half-chances where it takes a world class strike to produce anything. Now, the other teams in the group will probably produce 2-3 of those strikes, but Ghana wasn't creating consistently dangerous chances (which doesn't mean that that wasn't 80 minutes of misery, I joked with a friend that this game showed the American viewing public a new sense of just how miserable it can be to watch soccer).

If Bradley hadn't had the worst game in his recent career for the US, I think we would have gotten at least another goal on the counter. Players were getting into the right places in attack when we'd counter, but Bradley just couldn't complete a pass to save his life. Given his past record, I expect that game to be an anomoly from him.

AnthonyThomas

June 17th, 2014 at 10:40 PM ^

Totally agree that the early goal was jarring to the US. No one expected that and you could tell the players were timid and unsure of what exactly to do. Goals really do completely change the nature of the game. I think if Altidore and Dempsey hadn't gotten injured, the US would have looked exponentially more dangerous around the hour mark forward. I suspect they were willing to sit back until Ghana was tired, but when your attacking options both get injured, it's hard to counter punch on the break.

That being said, there was no excuse for Bradley, who was awful by his standards. A better/typical performance and the US is more efficient and effective in possession. 

I have no idea what the US will do in replacing Altidore. People are somehow connecting this to why Klinsmann should have brought Donovan which doesn't really make sense. Donovan doesn't replace Altidore any better than Johannson did. Whether it's him or Wondo starting, they should be sharper. Coming into a match so abruptly, especially one that has been turned on its head, is really difficult. 

bronxblue

June 17th, 2014 at 2:03 PM ^

I really think that early goal kind of screwed up the US's gameplan.  I'm not a consistent follower of USMNT, but it seems like this team is better equiped to chase, and once they had the 1-goal lead so early, they seemed to be far more passive than you'd like.  It's not that they can't hold a lead, but there were few counters and, especially without Altidore, little in the way of "push" offensively until Ghana tied it up.

That said, it's a win.  Portugal was rocked by Germany and looks to have some weaknesses, and who knows if this was a blip by Ghana or if they might be a step worse than people thought.  Win or tie against Portugal and the US most likely moves on.

momo

June 17th, 2014 at 2:21 PM ^

I don't think the US really changed their game plan - I just think they didn't pass the ball well. Giving away possession was more caused by misplaced passing and general lack of vision than by going into some kind of conservative mode, from what I saw.

taistreetsmyhero

June 17th, 2014 at 2:27 PM ^

to jones certainly seemed more malicious than what pepe did. that deserved a yellow for sure. the high kick is never going to get a red card, even if it deserves one. should have been a yellow though.

gwkrlghl

June 17th, 2014 at 2:31 PM ^

No reason at all to have your foot up there. Someone nearby said 'Well he got bumped', to which I say it was obviously a deliberate kick to the face. Unless he's attempting a backflip there's no reason he should have his leg that high. Dirty play. Suck it Ghana.

gwkrlghl

June 18th, 2014 at 12:14 PM ^

Nobody kicks that high when going for a header in fact you usually never see guys kick at all because that doesn't make any sense when you're trying to jump as high as you can to head it. The fact that he brought his foot that high is an obvious indication he was hoping to kick Dempsey in some way

Needs

June 17th, 2014 at 2:42 PM ^

For an intelligent discussion of the myriad issues with World Cup referreeing, bigsoccer's WC referree forum is pretty great. There seem to be a number of high level referrees there. Their general consensus (though not universal) on the various incidents:

1. Boye's kick to Dempsey: These are professionals, their bodies don't get in unusual positions accidentally. That said, very difficult to go to red on what could be construed as an accidental kick. Yellow for Serious Foul Play (SFP) rather than red for Violent Conduct (VC).

2. The Muntari-Jones incident. Definite yellow on the tackle. Some thought (on the logic of 'these guys know what they're doing with their bodies) that Jones intentionally kicked Muntari in the head while down, and that if Muntari was sent off, Jones probably would have to be as well. Dispute about whether Muntari's hands went to Jones's throat (VC) or just pushed him in the chest. 

3. Those on the forum who know that refs past work suggest that he likes to try to manage the game with as few cards as possible (which probably hurt the US last night but might help in the long run).

Game discussion here: http://forums.bigsoccer.com/threads/match-14-gha-usa-eriksson-swe.20065…

General WC refereeing forum here: http://forums.bigsoccer.com/forums/world-cup-2014-refereeing.1612/

Yeoman

June 17th, 2014 at 2:42 PM ^

I wouldn't expect Germany to ease up because they "know they are through." The German goal is to win the group, not just get through. They don't want a quarterfinal against Argentina, they want the other side of the bracket.

Unless Argentina somehow finishes second in that group, but that's unlikely now.

Farnn

June 17th, 2014 at 2:58 PM ^

But if Germany beats Ghana soundly as they should, they would have 6 points and a big lead in goal advantage.  Then, the only way that Germany would be at risk of not winning the group would be if the US lost to Portugal by a lot of goals and at that point we need to actually beat Germany to have any shot, so they would be happy with a tie.  Even a loss by 1 goal would still mean they likely win the group.

BursleysFinest

June 17th, 2014 at 2:56 PM ^

 But Germany winning the group could be decided by the time we play them.  If they get 2 wins against Portugal and Ghana, and we're at a Win (Ghana) and a Draw (Portugal).... they may be content to play a Draw with no injuries, and the US go through on Goal differential.

Yeoman

June 17th, 2014 at 3:13 PM ^

I'm having trouble seeing Germany playing for a draw. They score a ton of goals; they haven't been held to less than two in a competitive match in almost two years and two only happened once. Nobody goes into a match playing for 3:3, do they? I don't think they have 0:0 in them.