The Worst Part Of It Comment Count

Brian

9/14/2013 – Michigan 28, Akron 24 – 3-0

9754804624_8ff95e854c_c[1]

Bryan Fuller

What was the worst thing about the events that took place in Michigan Stadium on Saturday? There are dozens of candidates vying for the crown. A selection:

That moment when Taylor Lewan was down. Almost picked up the very cute small child in front of me and threw it onto the field. Hey, don't judge me. It could have popped on an Akron helmet and stopped Fitzgerald Toussaint for a one-yard loss. It would have been in no danger of anything except padding its stats.

Small children stopping Fitzgerald Toussaint for one-yard losses. Akron's line consists of a six-year-old, ten-year-old, a guy named Bob who they found walking into the game, and an actual scholarship athlete who chose Akron and is therefore so crazy he insists everyone calls him "Pope Licentiousness III." Fitzgerald Toussaint averaged under four yards a carry against them, and about 80% of his first down runs resulted in second and eleven.

That pick-six. Not digging that M starts every game in an 0-7 hole.

All of it. An obvious contender.

The ruination of an entire Saturday of college football. Don't know about you, but that sapped me so much that I could barely remain awake after it and looked at the other games dully before falling asleep just into the second half of Purdue-Notre Dame. I missed the Wisconsin-Arizona State madness as a result. Never has a win felt so much like a loss.

The severe correction in season expectations. Michigan plays Akron straight up; Notre Dame executes a stirring fourth-quarter comeback to top a team that beat Indiana State thanks to a trick kickoff return on the first play of the day. I liked it better when Michigan had solidly defeated a team obviously headed for ten wins because of its overwhelming talent, and was not the equal of one of the worst teams in college football.

The repudiation of the idea that events follow from other events and can be projected with any certainty. Just because something happened before does not mean it is likely to happen again. Devin Gardner can beat Notre Dame nearly singlehandedly and lose to Akron nearly singlehandedly. Michigan can look like the best team in the Big Ten for two weeks and play a dead-even game with a team that has gone 1-11 the past three seasons and hasn't beaten a I-A opponent since November of 2010. At any moment the laws of physics that bind our component molecules together could catastrophically alter themselves, turning us all into rapidly disintegrating collections of atoms that suddenly hate each other. (IE, how you felt in the fourth quarter.)

My adorable nine-year old niece experiencing her first Michigan game one seat away from me. Sometimes it is nice to take the pressure building inside your head and throw some of it into the atmosphere via colorful expectoration of words. In this manner, you vent dangerous levels of pressure to the atmosphere. When the best you can muster is an under-your-breath "Jesus Christ," your inner control panels look like Chernobyl instead of Fukushima, and you can hear the BEEP BLORP BEEP BLORP as you try not to fall over.

MGoNiece reports that the game was "fun" and "exciting," and not "three hours during which I learned many new words that make my mom cry and that Uncle Brian is possessed by Satan." MGoNiece remains as pure as the driven snow, at all costs.

How familiar it all felt. The first time I thought "this can't be happening" in Michigan Stadium, Michigan was losing to Northwestern. That Northwestern outfit would win en route to their first Rose Bowl in forever, but they walked in overrated pretenders to my 15-year-old self. They were not. Over the course of the game my attitude shifted from  annoyance to disappointment to concern to chest-clenching-panic. Back then I kept thinking "how can this happen?"

Here we are again, following up a Notre Dame win with a severe expectations check that bodes unwell for the season. In 2010, a 42-37 win over UMass was an early indicator that Michigan had the worst defense in the history of the program. This one promises a year of quarterbacks given time to complete PhDs in the pocket and far too many "my bad" blocks.

Now our best hope is that contender a little farther up the page: that causation has failed and we're just coasting along on the universe's sufferance. Michigan will come out against UConn and turn them into gray paste, because that's what the random number generator says next Saturday. That's the ticket.

I don't think "how can this happen" anymore. Not after 10-7 over Utah or 24-21 over SDSU or that Ball State game or The Horror or Toledo. I think "not again." I thought I was done thinking "not again" for a while. Apparently not. I'll be over here, trying to keep all my molecules from fleeing into space.

Highlights

BEWARE

This is Akron's perspective:

At 1:40 you can see that the pick intended for Gallon is just a horrible read; with the corner sinking the crossing route to Funchess is the obvious throw. The deciding play from the first row of the student section.

Parkinggod:

He's going to have to start putting some good things that happen to the other team if he can only get up to seven minutes by including Akron not executing the snap correctly.

[After THE JUMP: a first-ever for Epic Double Point, and a lot of complaining.]

Awards

brady-hoke-epic-double-point_thumb_3_thumb_thumb[2]Brady Hoke Epic Double Point Of The Week. Is not awarded.

Mournful Hoke Double Point points at you and wishes for you to think about what you've done. Did you turn the ball over a lot? Write "Go Blue" over Spartan Stadium? Play to the east side of Michigan Stadium? Refuse to sacrifice a small child to the Michigan Stadium field? Wear the wrong hat? Predict 62-0 pregame in a dismissive game preview? You should feel bad. Don't do that again.

Epic Double Point Standings.

1.0: Devin Gardner (ND), Jeremy Gallon (ND)
0.5: Cam Gordon (CMU), Brennen Beyer (CMU)

Brady Hoke Epic Double Fist-Pump Of The Week. I guess we have to go with the last play of the game, as Thomas Gordon did jump inside the WR's route, forcing Akron's QB to try to throw a looper to the back of the endzone.

Live it looked dangerous and possibly interference, but when you see it on the video it's Gordon jumping the route and the Akron WR desperately trying to get open, tripping over either himself or Gordon's feet.

This looked like an option route for Akron with the receiver automatically releasing to the back of the endzone if the route gets jumped; Gordon took away the easy throw and made them execute the much more difficult one as the QB got leveled.

Honorable mention: Jehu Chesson is gently escorted to the endzone by Akron defenders; Devin Gardner doesn't turn the ball over that one time.

Epic Double Fist-Pumps Past.

8/31/2013: Dymonte Thomas introduces himself by blocking a punt.
9/7/2013: Jeremy Gallon spins through four Notre Dame defenders for a 61-yard touchdown.
9/14/2013: Michigan does not lose to Akron. Thanks, Thomas Gordon.

Offense

large[1]

A MOMENT TO REMEMBER (that the people running Michigan's social media are not permitted to deviate from the plan no matter how dumb the plan becomes)

Well WTF. How are you supposed to figure out anything if Devin Gardner is going to do that against Notre Dame and that against Akron? I guess the performances aren't that different statistically. Gardner approached 10 YPA, as per usual, and ran for over 100 yards on just ten carries. He still picks up yards at an incredible rate. But four turnovers almost entirely his fault speak for themselves. Gardner's bad decision rate has been relatively low for a new starter; in this one he looked freshly hatched.

The turnovers:

  1. Michigan runs speed option to the boundary, Gardner should pitch, Gardner tries to fake a Zip linebacker, ends up fumbling. Pitch is a large gain, possibly a touchdown.
  2. Gardner throws to a Gallon in-out-in goal line slant, ball is undercut, intercepted; had Funchess on easy high-low read on the corner.
  3. 20-yard pass momentarily complete to Jake Butt before Butt is blown up by a safety; ball pops up and is picked off.
  4. Toussaint is undercut on a screen pass and it's returned for a touchdown.

1 and 2 are very bad and on Gardner; 3 was not included on the BTN highlight reel but I remember it as a good play by that safety more than anything else, and it was less damaging as Michigan only had a few seconds left in the first half. 4… I actually don't know how much I blame Gardner for that. It's a screen, and he's not really looking at Toussaint until the last second so that he doesn't give it away. Akron blitzes a linebacker, he reads it and makes a great play. I think that's more on Miller, who went to momentarily double a DT and never touched the blitzer. Even a brush there knocks him off enough so that he can't intercept.

Well WTF II. Gardner was put in bad positions he often rescued Michigan from by the offensive line and Fitz Toussaint, who collectively saw Michigan's tailback running game acquire 74 yards on 20 carries. That's under four yards a pop. That is terrrrrrrible against Akron. Michigan did pop Toussaint free for a number of ten to twenty yard runs; when they weren't doing that they were getting Toussaint buried in the backfield by multiple dudes.

I have no idea why this happened yet. I try not to get down on particular OL before a thorough review. A Space Coyote tweet from the game emphasized that for me: live I thought a particular stretch play was a WTF moment from Miller; SC pointed out that Akron lined up two DTs in the A gaps, so he couldn't help on both.

I can say it's bad. Michigan doesn't appear to do anything well. They can't block the stretch or inside zone or power with any consistency, and don't seem to check into the right run when a defense overplays. Their best play right now is iso.

Try it again. Toussaint was not covered leaking out of the backfield all day. Very frustrating that they went to him once early in the second quarter and not again.

Hey: Chesson. Chesson is apparently such a nice guy that opposing defenses prefer to shove him towards the touchdown he deserves than tackle him. We should use this in our favor, throwing him more balls.

9741779685_010c6783a4_z[1]

Upchurch

Throw it to Dileo—play Dileo. Problematic moments late when Funchess went out and Michigan went with a one-handed Jordan Paskorz in his first meaningful snaps instead of Drew Dileo. If Paksorz isn't playing at all when AJ Williams is out, he's probably not as good as Dileo. You can cover for the fact that Dileo isn't a tight end by forcing someone to check him on run plays by threatening—yes—bubble screens. This site's enduring obsession with that play has never been about the few (or several) yards you grab with it but the fact that it turns a slot receiver into a guaranteed block if they actually cover it.

Instead, Michigan tries to execute blocks with tight ends. This is not going as well as you'd hope. Run plays get blown up by single points of failure, and Michigan is not consistent at all on the OL right now. Fewer points of failure == more successful runs, as long as you've got a guy like Gardner who can balance out the numbers with his legs. This is clearly not Borges's philosophy, and it gets frustrating when Michigan can't run for four yards a carry against Akron.

Defense

9741741875_9f2f3e8f08_z[1]

Grady Brooks'd [Upchurch]

Nope. Three games into the season and Frank Clark has zero sacks, one TFL that Greg Mattison generated for him, and four QB hurries on which two were free runs, one was Clark jumping over a running back cut, and the last was actually a block beaten. This is not due to a lack of opportunity. Opponents have attempted 130 passes already; he's been out there for probably two-thirds of them. And he seems to vacate running lanes with frequency.

While he had a decent* game against Notre Dame, I mean "decent" exactly. +4 for a DE, which is what he got in the UFR, is not very far above Mendoza-line performance, especially when the pass rush gets –2 overall and would have been much worse if Mattison didn't load up at the end of the game. He was adequate, maybe. That's a far cry from the massive preseason hype.

When Jake Ryan gets back, it's Clark's playing time that's under the most threat. Brennen Beyer has been Michigan's most dynamic pass rusher so far and he can play WDE.

Meanwhile, the rest of the defensive line. Black occasionally does something good, and Heitzman is an okay plugger. They've gotten little production from the nose tackles, because they don't play their nose tackles. Any organic pass rush was from Beyer, and that huge completion near the end of the game came about because three of the four DL ended up on the ground as Akron's QB rolled out into infinite space.

image

Guy not on his face: Beyer

Cumong, man.

(While we're talking about the DL: Tom Strobel was not on the dress list. FWIW.)

Play a nose tackle please. Part of the problem on the defensive line is that Michigan's not playing their best player, Quinton Washington. He's probably still hurt somewhat and Michigan's trying to get him healthy; fine. But what is the deal with Ondre Pipkins getting sparing time as Glasgow and Wormley eat up the bulk of the defensive tackle snaps not given to Jibreel Black?

If the idea is to get more pass rush out of that spot, it's not happening, and those two backup three-techs (actually, Wormley is a backup SDE) are getting consistently gashed by doubles. Pipkins has played much better than either in his limited time so far this year and is the only interior lineman to actually get some pass rush up the middle, as he bulled a guy back into Tommy Rees against ND. Pipkins has exactly as much experience as either guy getting PT over him and has played better, so what the hell is going on there?

9741205833_65c6d84f72_b[1]

Wilson has been solid. [Fuller]

Countess at nickel… uh. Akron hit two long fly routes and was close to another couple as they worked on Raymon Taylor and Jourdan Lewis. I get the idea behind having a multipurpose weapon at the nickel spot, but Countess isn't really that—he mistimes his blitzes consistently—and by tucking him inside you're taking your best cover corner away from the most vulnerable area of the field.

Meanwhile, the nickel corner was a different guy for the third straight game. First Stribling, then Hollowell, then Lewis. That doesn't seem good, especially when Lewis is getting beat over the top and barely recovering. I wonder if we'll see Courtney Avery return to his ancestral home as a boring no-blitz nickel when he's ready to come back; it seems like they need a corner more than they need a safety at the moment.

Bend but don't break has a different feel. It was one thing to play soft against Notre Dame, which has a senior quarterback and some excellent receivers and has bombed both of their opponents not named Michigan with big plays. It's entirely another to do so against Akron. Michigan stayed in a basic two deep shell the vast majority of the day; when they did not they frequently tipped their blitzes, saw Akron check, and did not check in response.

That last bit is frustrating. I bet that Michigan doesn't have much of a check game because in practice they're going up against an offense that gets out of the huddle with 15 seconds left and does not have time to totally reset after the defense reveals intentions. They seem ill-prepared to go up against no-huddle offenses that will check to the sideline.

I wasn't expecting to feel that this defense had a massive athleticism deficit three games into the season. It's hard not to see Taylor get beat by yards by an Akron WR and not come to that conclusion.

Miscellaneous

Special teams: ugh. Brendan Gibbons misses for the first time in 17 attempts from 45. Okay. He gets a pass. Matt Wile shanking two punts of 21 and 22 yards after shanking one against Notre Dame: not so much. May be time to try out Kenny Allen. Don't get me started on the punt formation. Setting up in the modern spread punt only to go back to dinosaur punt is setting practice time on fire just to piss people off.

Meanwhile, Akron had a half-roll rugby kicker who averaged 42.6 yards net and made it near impossible to return his punts. Akron.

I could use some restoration of Hokefaith. Here you go:

General admission can't fix the fact we're playing Akron at noon. It actually makes it look worse. FWIW, I'm in an old-blues section of the stadium and it was decidedly roomy.

9752944532_b546546b40_h[1]

I was annoyed more by the game than the student attendance. Plenty of non-students were in the same boat—they're just more spread out. MVictors points out that the announced attendance was under capacity. I heard that Michigan was dumping free tickets on anyone vaguely connected with the athletic department this week, which is no surprise after everyone got that mailing in their inbox trying to sell tickets to groups in blocks of 10+.

I heard the band! Please never do it again. The band played to the East for the first time, which meant I could hear them loud and clear. This was enjoyable. Unfortunately, they can clearly never do this again.

I appreciate the effort, though.

Here

We have the pressers from Hoke and the players, photosets from Eric Upchurch and Bryan Fuller, and Ace's recap*. Regular Diarists bronxblue and ST3 persevere as well. Best And Worst:

Worst:  It’s a Win? (as said in the voice of Ron Burgundy)

Yeah, I’m not going to be one of those people who says it would have been a better “learning experience” if they had lost; I’m a results-based grader so a win is always better than a loss.  That said, this is up there with narrowly beating Indiana and Illinois under RR and a turrible 10-7 win against 5-6 Utah in 2002 (a game I attended and apparently blocked from my memory until now).  And unlike those games where you could at least point to one element of the performance being a positive, it isn’t really hyperbole or “ESPN talking head”-ole to say UM was beat in all three phases of the game.

Inside The Boxscore:

* I get it that the D-Line doesn't normally get involved in a lot of tackles, and Akron was throwing the ball quite a bit, but they still ran the ball 30 times. Our D-Line was led by a reserve, Ojemudia, with 4 tackles. The starters ended up like this: Clark 2 assists, QWash 0, Heitzman 0, Black 0. Did they even play? [ED: Qwash barely did, FWIW.]

Also LSAClassof2000 has a look at the league three weeks in if you want to feel better. Actually, not feel better.

*[I was advocating for this guy to be the face of the PANIC and RUN AROUND SCREAMING shirt:

panic

Instead it's me. Merph.]

Elsewhere

Blog types. Concentrate on something brighter: last night's Breaking Bad. Walter White finally figured out he can roll a barrel!

Oh hurray we made Shamepaint.

2013Week 3-1[1]2013Week 3-2[1]

Don't click through unless cartoon genitalia are your bag, man.

Hail.

11. Michigan.

DOMINATED AKRON IN A

terrifying, ramshackle, and completely unanticipated

28-24 VICTORY.

At least we're not Wisconsin.

Maize and Go Blue wins Best Headline:

Glazed and confused: Michigan 28 – Akron 24

Magnus gets the important thing:

A hundred years from now, nobody will remember this day.

Since they won, nobody will remember it as soon as Michigan shows itself to be a contender in the division.

Maize and Blue Nation photos; also MVictors. HSR suggests we never speak of the shortcut again. Maize and Blue Nation says things. Hurrah they threw it to Chesson. Holding the Rope:

The rationalizing calculus was "yes no yes no no yes NO *flatlining resignation.*

Newspaper types. Images from Melanie Maxwell:

-d408ae17c8dce026[1]

I envy you without context.

I thought this was supposed to be over now that Denard was gone?

Devin Gardner giveth, and Devin Gardner taketh away

The redshirt junior quarterback had 83 percent of Michigan’s total yards on Saturday, continuing his role as the backbone of the offense. He’s immensely talented and athletic — the Wolverines’ offense would look a lot different (read: worse) without him.

If most outlets won't tell you how mad Taylor Lewan actually was, the Daily will:

2. The offensive line isn’t quite there

Fifth-year senior offensive tackle Taylor Lewan was furious after the game, to the point where he told reporters, “You all don’t even know. You all just write shit down.”

Some of us almost keel over in terror, as well. I bet the skywriter who wrote Go Blue over Spartan Stadium was the same guy who was doing it over the stadium… probably freelancing. Don't do that again, dude.

Baumgardner on stuff and things. Zach Helfand notes that the brain meld was even off:

Gardner even seemed out of sync with his favorite target, fifth-year senior wide receiver Jeremy Gallon. The two usually seem to share a brain. But at the start of the half, after another incompletion on third down, the pair gestured to each other while running off the field. Somewhere in the play, there was a miscommunication.

Gallon thrust his hand and turned, signaling his route. Gardner did the same, miming his read. The pair discussed as they ran off the field. In all, Gardner threw four incompletions intended for Gallon.

Comments

Space Coyote

September 16th, 2013 at 1:53 PM ^

The twists aren't taking too long. The DTs are not doing their job to get out on the edge. They are trying to get up field too early instead of getting outside and up. No one expects them to make the play directly on the QB from there, it's supposed to collapse the pocket and force the QB into the outside contain. But the outside contain isn't there. That stunt was one of the few ways Michigan got legit front 4 pressure. DL needs to work as a unit, as I've said.

Blocking was inconsistent. Looked like it was great at times and awful other times. That's a position that requires consistency though.

Taylor got caught flat footed. Taylor has very good top-end speed, just was not prepared to have a man go over the top on him. Wonder as well if he was expecting help over the top, but I don't think so.

Last TD wasn't on Lewis (I believe that's who was out there) who was covering their #1. Akron motioned into a bunch route. If their is motion at the snap heading inside to outside on a bunch, you need an in/out call, otherwise Taylor is completely walled off inside by Akron's other bunch receivers and Michigan's defenders. Taylor should have stuck on the hitch man, Lewis jumped outside as he should. The motion is taking that receiver outside on the bunch, he is the effective #1 receiver and a relatively common in/out situation, especailly in GL and "in short" situations where you need to prevent the short completion. That's a man adjustment that they need to have a better feel for because there wasn't time to communicate it, but I'm about 90% sure that's on Taylor rather than Lewis because that bench route is read #1 for the QB and an easy TD in a GL situation if Lewis and Taylor aren't playing in/out.

Still, it's all blown assignments in the end.

True Blue Grit

September 16th, 2013 at 1:32 PM ^

lines will play a lot better.  But, I'm most worried after this game about Devin and his ability to stop being a turnover machine.  I almost think the coaches need to dial back the downfield passing game, at least for a while to get Devin back into a good, confident rhythm.  We seemed to have a lot of success against Akron when we just threw short to one of our wide-open receivers and let them run with it.  Either way though, we still need to fix the running game at all costs.  That was one of my "musts for Michigan" prior to the season for us to have a shot at the Big Ten title. 

Space Coyote

September 16th, 2013 at 1:34 PM ^

- and this is with the knowledge that Michigan played awful and Akron is awful - but Akron made some plays. The pick 6 on the screen was a very nice play by the LB, recognizing the play and undercutting the route. Some of the passes on the outside were damn near perfect by the QB. They had some nice play calls mixed in, mixed up their pressures, and scouted Michigan well.

They shot themselves in the foot several times, but they also took advantage of Michigan mistakes and executed quite well at times. No excuse for the game to be as close as it was, but it certainly was a case of Michigan playing terrible and Akron maxing out their ability.

Jeff09

September 16th, 2013 at 1:34 PM ^

Yes. Was thinking same thing w/r/t nickel corner. You tuck Countess inside as a luxury iff your backup outside CBs can avoid getting beaten over the top. As soon as Lewis started getting abused out there Countess should have flipped back outside.

Kilgore Trout

September 16th, 2013 at 1:36 PM ^

I can only think of two passes thrown outside of the numbers in the entire game. One was Gardner lobbing up a throwaway in the first half and the other was an attempted wheel route to Funchess in the fourth quarter. Everything seemingly goes to the middle of the field which has to make it easier to defend and increase the amount of interceptions thrown.

The lack of outside receivers is killing this team. D'Orazio was running simple 8 yard in cuts, boxing out our DBs all day. We just don't seem to have anyone who can do that. I know Devin Lucien isn't getting a ton of time at UCLA, but we really could use someone like that.

Jeff09

September 16th, 2013 at 1:38 PM ^

Another gripe. Our blitzes have become more vanilla and predictable. What I saw: 6 guys line up at the LOS, 6 guys blitz exactly where they lined up, and six guys get easily picked up in pass pro and the QB gets an easy pitch and catch. Where are the complex blitzes with stunting where we show six, rush four, and get a free hitter?

Magnus

September 16th, 2013 at 1:45 PM ^

I think perhaps Michigan was expecting short, quick-developing passes, so perhaps they didn't think those stunts would get there in time. I think they probably expected Michigan's defensive linemen to beat the offensive linemen straight up, which obviously didn't work very well. I do think it's a sound defensive strategy, but it wasn't executed very well.

Space Coyote

September 16th, 2013 at 1:48 PM ^

Michigan went to much more man schemes to switch it up for various reasons. I agree that the strategy of sending 4 and playing zone behind is probably the best in theory. They expected front 4 pressure and for the zones to be tight enough that Akron would have to work to string together plays at 5 yards a pop. But it didn't work out that way.

Space Coyote

September 16th, 2013 at 1:44 PM ^

And perhaps, despite his athletic ability, he simply isn't ready to be on the field dependably on defense at this point. He is, after all, playing DB for the first time in his career.

I think if Michigan is playing man they need to bring Avery or another NB in to cover the slot and put Countess outside. If there is help over the top and they want to mix up a zone blitz from Countess or play underneath zone, then Countess is best at taking away the quick slants and hitches from the slot. You may start telegraphing your play calls, but man with no help over top is a big difference from "happy with DBs against ND" and "coverage terror" against Akron.

MCalibur

September 16th, 2013 at 1:49 PM ^

The defense is not great obviously but it's good enough to win a lot of games as long as the offense does most of what it's capable of doing on a consistent basis.The game went from frustrating/annoying to oh-God-no! on Devin's pick 6. Might have won it going away if not for that.

It's hard not to be salty as a mofo after that game but I take comfort in the fact that Michigan still won that game despite how crappy they looked. That counts for something in my book. To be in a coin-flip situation with a team that enjoyed a +2 TOM in the boxscore suggests you're better than them by a fair degree. Having said that, Akron has been pretty bad for a while. Maybe they're better this year but, they aint average.

If Devib gets a grip on his turnovers, the team will be fine.

reshp1

September 16th, 2013 at 1:50 PM ^

I'll save you the suspense re: which guy on the OL was most responsible for plays getting blown up in the backfield. I watched every snap in slow-mo, it was Miller and to a lesser extent Glasgow in the first half. Glasgow was consistently beat by guys slanting to his right, usually to the spot where Miller  vacated to go block a LB. We seemed to get that cleaned up in the second half. Miller got manhandled a lot. Not sure what the problem is because he looked better against Nix last week (although they doubled Nix a lot). The Akron NT seemed to get under him pretty consistently and put him yards back on several plays.

Not sure what the plan is going forward. I kinda hope the coaches try something else this week against UConn, maybe Glasgow at C and Bryant at RG. It is probably the last time to play around with something like that before locking things down for B1G play. On the other hand, we already had one scare against a cupcake, it might not be a good idea to introduce another variable into the mix and have two bad showings against inferior competition.

BlueMan80

September 16th, 2013 at 1:57 PM ^

thought this would be a good week to mix things up and try something new with their personnel, such as Countess at nickel.  However, what's going on with Dymonte?  Wasn't he going to be Mr. Nickel?

Once the brown stuff hit the rotating object, they had to scramble with the plans and plays that had installed during the week.  Four turnovers will do that to you.  Gardner left 14 points on the field and gift wrapped another 7 to the Zips.  21 point swing and the difference between getting the Zips down and keeping them down or helping them gain confidence and think they can win at the big house.  Thank god they pulled it together and scraped out a win, because a loss would have been devasting to whatever confidence they have left at this point.  Coaches are going to need to be on the players but rebuilding their confidence at the same time.  Someone in the OL is most likely going to be an example to the rest of being accountable for their play and will win a seat on the bench.

I have a feeling this week's practices will be tough as they should be.

MI Expat NY

September 16th, 2013 at 1:57 PM ^

At what point do we start raising concerns about O-Line coaching?  I get that there was a talent gap left by RR recruiting, but to me that is negated somewhat by the presence of Lewan and Schofield.  We have two highly lauded classes of o-linemen recruits, and while I know they're young, I find it hard to believe that between those two classes and everything else left over from the RR years that we can't find an interior trio that approaches competency.  

Magnus

September 16th, 2013 at 2:20 PM ^

There's nothing left over from the Rich Rodriguez years. Zip. Zilch. The class of 2008 guys are gone, and the 2009 OL class included Lewan and Schofield (both starting) and Washington (now a DT). The 2010 class was Christian Pace, period.

If it's going to get fixed, it has to be with Hoke's guys.

I'm not entirely sold on Funk, but he doesn't have much to work with (experience-wise).

MI Expat NY

September 16th, 2013 at 2:44 PM ^

I was thinking about last year's O-Line with that statement as well.  I also couldn't remember specifically if Bryant and Miller were Hoke or RR commits, turns out it's one of each.  

I get that a lot has gone wrong that has made depth a problem.  Pace getting injured.  Posada flaming out.  And I know expecting young o-linemen to be great is asking too much.  But I'm not asking for a lot.  There were 10 recruits in two highly lauded classes (seriously, people around here made it seem like we would have had two separate lines who could stand toe to toe with the Hogs) plus Miller and Bryant.  It's too much to ask all of that to fill three positions next to an all american and a three year starter and just be not bad?

ca_prophet

September 16th, 2013 at 4:37 PM ^

Not because the expectation is unreasonable, but because we needed to fill it three years ago. The lag time on OL recruits being good is three years. One year for their HS senior season, one for freshman (which is where our 2013 class is - a month or so into college) and one for stopping the first-year starter my-bad blocks. I agree with Magnus - Funk might be a poor coach, but there's no data there so far. He's probably not great or bad - he hasn't screwed up Lewan and Schofield seems to be improved from two years ago; Kalis is flashing talent in between derps - but we won't have any data without observing what he does with the 2012-2013 classes through their graduations ... which is four years away. We're not where we want to be. The biggest reason is that we have not yet repaired the talent gap; once those guys have some experience we will know more about the coaches (both eyes for talent and teaching that talent to succeed).

Sten Carlson

September 16th, 2013 at 4:19 PM ^

"I find it hard to believe that between those two classes and everything else left over from the RR years that we can't find an interior trio that approaches competency."

Well, believe it.  Do you think that if there were better options that they wouldn't be on the field?  Bare cupboards take time an at least as many recruiting cycles to rebuild as it took to deplete. 

El Jeffe

September 16th, 2013 at 2:03 PM ^

I still maintain that this was a very high variance game, like three or four standard deviations from the mean high variance. By that I mean that a number of unlikely events trended toward Akron and away from UM, leading to a much closer game than it might have been.

Another way to say it: if you re-ran that same game with the identical play calls on both sides 100 times, there would be a distribution of final scores. I bet 28-24 UM (or worse) occurs in maybe 5% of those trials.

So while that game did suuuuuuck to watch as a fan, I'm not ready to PANIC!!! quite yet.

El Jeffe

September 16th, 2013 at 3:10 PM ^

It's obviously a silly, purely academic exercise, but what I mean is that the game remained close on the basis of a number of plays that I don't think would all go against M very frequently in repeated trials--the horrible interceptions and fumble, and two long passes Akron completed near the end.

I have no doubt that in repeated trials the mean of the distribution wouldn't be nearly as comfortable as we'd like, given the lacklusterness of M's play and the general, historical horribleness of Akron. But, as others have said, M basically gave away 13 to 21 points. Now, you could argue that the tipped Countess interception and the escorting of Jehu to the end zone and the complete lack of tackling on Funchess's TD balanced that out to some degree.

But in terms of highly repeatable issues, I would predict that the mean of this imaginary repeated trials game would be something like 38-17 M. Not an epic blowout, suggesting all of the things Lewan was pissed about, but not a nail-biter either.

Again, silly hypothetical exercise caveats apply. 

GoBlueInNYC

September 16th, 2013 at 3:22 PM ^

I guess I could see the game turning on some big, improbable plays (e.g., screen pass INT for the TD). But I guess I personally see those improbable plays as simply the outcome of very poor execution up front and some pretty consistent poor decision making by Gardner. The outcomes of the plays may be improbable, but Michigan's plays was so subpar that if they didn't happen when they did, they probably would have just happened at another point.

But I get your point; the game was as close as it was because of unusual circumstance and some bad breaks on some weird plays.

CompleteLunacy

September 16th, 2013 at 3:27 PM ^

Mindset...coaching...execution all come to mind (I'm sure more can be found). If each team has a "bell curve" associated with these three "variables", Akron was easily in the far right  tail of their distributions, and Michigan was easily in the far left tail of theirs, which would be the only way that the teams overlap and come out with a close score.

Kind of different and maybe wonky way to look at it, but I get the statistical analogy he made.

Bodogblog

September 16th, 2013 at 2:23 PM ^

DL will be brutal

I think the OL will be better than totally desperate. There were plays where lots of good work was done, only to be undone by one bad block (though this is often the case w/ running games).  I think it will be a mix of 1) bad blocks, 2) poor reads by the RB or QB, 3) running into stacked fronts, 4) Miller doesn't intimidate anyone, 5) general bad mojo in the stadium that day.

imafreak1

September 16th, 2013 at 2:15 PM ^

There is emotional over reacting, which is part of this blog's ouvre and fine, and then there is this;

I bet that Michigan doesn't have much of a check game because in practice they're going up against an offense that gets out of the huddle with 15 seconds left and does not have time to totally reset after the defense reveals intentions. They seem ill-prepared to go up against no-huddle offenses that will check to the sideline.

Which is another thing that is consistently found in this blog, the suggestion that running anything but hurry up offense is death, but in this case is totally ridiculous.

Greg Mattison was an NFL defensive coordinator. He is not flumoxed by aubibles because Brady Hoke runs a dinosaur offense.

I understand that is a huge narrative around these parts but in this case it is completely ridiculous. As is often the case with the Brandon is evil and stupid narrative, this one is being forced into use well past anything that is reasonable.

There explanations for things that go beyond PUNTASAUR  OFFENSE and Dave Brandon is Satan.

 

EnoughAlready

September 16th, 2013 at 2:25 PM ^

Narratives, even when they're tendentious and question-begging and droll, rule the day here. (Bubble Screen Borges no one-was-recruited-for-that no MANBALL please -- for example.)  Funny that Akron actually slowed their offense down for this game.  Slowing their offense down was part of the game plan.

Oops, didn't mean to disrupt the foregone conclusion of the kool kidz on this blog.

EnoughAlready

September 16th, 2013 at 2:27 PM ^

Someone on this blog suggested a few weeks ago that Neon Chip Kelly with the Neon Spread would change the NFL.  He will Change the Way the Game Is Played.  Funny.  Yesterday I heard an interview with a Philly sportscaster.  He was actually laughing at Kelly; said he didn't understand the NFL and wouldn't last 3 years as an NFL coach.

Naturally he's wrong...because -- spread!  Bubble screen!  No huddle!

Bodogblog

September 16th, 2013 at 2:16 PM ^

  • Caught with too many LB's on WR's
  • Unfortunately those LB's aren't dynamic playmakers right now, especially vs. a spread  
  • Those LB's not getting deep enough drops, combined with zero pass-rush, hurt
  • Gallon is still open on that pick (though I agree Funchess is the right read), but Gardner throws late and behind him

This is a great game for them.  They may have been a little too happy.  Desperately need some anger in their game and hopefully we see that next week.

Space Coyote

September 16th, 2013 at 2:33 PM ^

That's an awesome completion to Gallon. But it needs to be right at the end of his drop, no hitch step. But he did hitch, then climbed, and climbed, and threw. If the CB doesn't undercut it Gallon gets his body blown off by the FS because of the timing. I talked about this a few weeks ago, but footwork dictates timing. DG's footwork was for the TE cross to come open, which it was. He needed to throw it there if he didn't already release the ball the Gallon. Also, the CB is playing hang coverage technique. Ball has to be out immediately at Gallon's break otherwise the DB will be able to undercut it fairly easily because of his technique at the snap. Gallon should also flatten his route a little more to take the undercut away with his body verse that coverage technique.

But this was Gardner's problem all day. He started off hot, had a few things go against him, and suddenly lost confidence in his reads. Then his reads started taking longer, the timing got way off, and suddenly Michigan couldn't throw over the middle of the field anymore, where Akron was it's weakest.

So Borges tried to adjust. He tried to get the run game going and tried to boot and roll to give DG easy passes. Run the ball and get DG's confidence back up. Nice concept in theory. But OL was completely inconsistent, Akron was well schooled on the naked boot, and then Michigan couldn't get that going.

So then Borges tried adjusting again, went to pistol and ran some read option with Gardner. Worked well several times. Then Akron adjusted and said to just cover Gardner because Michigan's OL can't maintain their blocks. Well crap, now that's been taken away.

So then Michigan tried to run straight power and jumbo-type formations, 22 personnel, but they couldn't really get that going.

Because the offense never got in a rhythm, never developed any synch, Borges was forced to keep diving into the playbook to reach for other things. But at each point they lacked execution. It all stemmed from a few bad throws from DG and a poor OL performance.

FWIW, the same thing happened to Mattison as well. Had a sound game plan coming in, defense wasn't executing. Went overload blitzes. Worked. Anticipated Akron would try to adjust to that, did, Mattison backed off, stopped them. Then Akron scored and adjusted back. So Mattison went to more man coverage. Akron adjusted by attacking the outside.

Give some credit, Akron adjusted to each thing Michigan threw at them. But the fact that both coordinators felt the need to keep switching up because their side of the ball couldn't execute at some point comes down to the players and pregame prep from the coaches. I don't think it's necessarily a skill level, or a huge coordinator deficiency. It's something Michigan has to learn to overcome and become more rounded though. Need to be prepared better and continue to improve.

alum96

September 16th, 2013 at 2:17 PM ^

Any thoughts on a DL that includes on obvious passing yards a nickel formation with James Ross + Cam Gordon at LBs, and Jake Ryan and Beyer as the 2 DEs?  i.e. 3rd and 7s in November?  #DesperateForQBPressure

markusr2007

September 16th, 2013 at 2:26 PM ^

Michigan played Akron.

Guys, this was the worst colllege football team in the nation for three years running.  It still is one of the worst, least-talented football teams in the country.

Lay down the confusion and shame for a moment and just let that idea detonate in your brain for a minute.

 

TenThousandThings

September 16th, 2013 at 3:12 PM ^

It is correct to say Michigan should have won easily. No question. Anyone with half a brain who watched the game could see that.

But Akron has a chance at winning a few games this year. You've got to just wait and see where they end up. Transfers who sat out last year now on the field. An experienced coaching staff in their second year. These are huge changes at Akron. It's too soon to be certain where they are in relation to the rest of the MAC. This week's game against ULL should say a lot.

trueblueintexas

September 16th, 2013 at 2:52 PM ^

I watched the game again on Sunday and know this will not jive with what everyone saw on Saturday, but I actually felt "less bad" about the game. Outside of the many execution issues Space Coyote and Magnus have pointed out, it really was the turnovers that hurt.

The fumble and the "force it to Gallon" pick were both in the red zone after Michigan had moved down the field with relative ease. Obviously the pick six was six. Two red zone chances turned into TD's and the pick six (which was well read and executed by the Akron LB) is a total of 21 points. If Michigan finishes the game 42 - 17, everyone would have been a little peaved, but it would not have been the "win of sadness".

With the DVR I specifically watched the D-Line and O-Line play. I won't get into indivdual performance, but here are a few general trends. For the most part the Akron QB had released the ball by the end of a two count. That just isn't a lot of time for a 4 man rush to get to the QB. In looking at the "who won the line of scrimmage" battle, Michigan reapetedly created better push.

Akron doing good things: On the third quarter pass and catch up the middle the WR slipped passed Joe Bolden. On the critical 4th and 1 in the fourth quarter when the RB picked up 7 yards, it was Joe Bolden who did not maintain his gap responsibility. The RB made a nice cut-back and got the yards. Bolden will be a good player, but he is still just a true sophmore. These "little things" will happen. They will also get better.

There are plenty of things to be disgruntled about, but it probably is not as bad as it felt Saturday.

GoBlueInNYC

September 16th, 2013 at 2:59 PM ^

I applaud your bravery for rewatching that game. I don't think I have the stones to do it.

Regarding the turnovers, I think that's very concerning. It's been a problem for Gardner going back to last year. Michigan has had a huge problem with turnovers of the past few years, and that's not just on Denard. The fact that it caused a 21 point swing in this game just speaks to how bad it is that the offense (and Gardner, particular) gives it away so much.