Wednesday Presser 9-10-14: Brady Hoke Comment Count

Adam Schnepp

Hoke presser 2

file

News bullets and other items

  • We’re not going to talk about injuries.
  • Kalis and Glasgow are taking snaps at right guard, and Glasgow is also taking snaps at center.
  • Kenny Allen and Matt Wile are competing at kicker.
  • The average number of explosive plays [Ed: defined by Doug Nussmeier as a twelve-yard run or sixteen-yard pass] per game should be nine to ten. Michigan had five against Notre Dame.

Opening remarks:

"As a team I think everybody really came back to work Tuesday. We had a really good practice. Very high tempo. I think the leadership throughout the team is a big part of that, how competitive and hard-working everybody is. We are correcting things that we need to do better. Talked a lot about fundamentals and techniques. Talked a lot about and worked on a lot of things that you have to do when you talk about ball security and all those things to be successful, and the guys went at it and we had a very competitive, very good practice, like I said. We’re looking forward to Saturday. Number one, we get to play at home. We get to play at the greatest stadium in this country in front of our fans and that’s something we always look forward to. We have the next three weeks to do that. The energy and support is something that we really embrace."


Brady, you said you made corrections. Were they small corrections or were they glaring things?
"Yeah, there's a lot of things that were small but in the big picture those small things can add up. We thought pad level-wise we played pretty well but we've got to be more demanding on finishing some things from both sides of the ball."


As far as the offensive line, do you anticipate making any changes? Do you see a need for it?
"I think right now, I think we like the group we have. I think you asked the other day, [and] it's still highly competitive. Kyle's playing right guard and so is Graham [Ed: MGoD'ohThereGoesMyQuestion]. Graham's taking some snaps at center so the rest of it's been pretty much how it is but it's been really competitive."


Is it important at this point to keep those guys together and let them grow even if they are making mistakes?
"Well, they're not making many mistakes. That's number one. When you look at the tape, those guys up front did a pretty good job. So to answer your question, yeah, to have them together would be awesome. Now, you still got to have some contingencies if somebody goes down, somebody gets hurt. Mags [Ed: Erik Magnuson, but I’m guessing you knew that] is playing a little bit of left tackle at times so all those things are still part of it."

[After THE JUMP: Miami (NTM) scouting report, countering three-step drops, and Hoke’s opinions on the criticism of players]


So are there holes that the running backs missed?
"I'm not going to blame it on the running backs. Believe me, the guys up front, they weren't perfect but you can't put it all on them."


In terms of the frustration level with your team, once the second field goal was missed it seemed like there were a lot more glaring issues from there, especially in the second half compared to earlier in the game. Is there a mental component there?
"I think there's always a mental side of a football game and how you go about it. The thing I will tell you, and this is from the players, they felt like they were together in it the whole time."


Do you anticipate maybe a change in kicker? You said that Kenny [Allen] and Matt [Wile]…
"They’re competing like heck this week."


The press coverage issues: is part of it just getting hands on a guy at the line of scrimmage?
"Yeah, being more physical there. Sliding your feet a little bit more. Again, fundamentally I think some guys reacted real well, some guys didn't react as well as you'd like them to but you’ve seen them do it so you've got confidence in them."


Not asking specific injury questions, but Peppers, Taylor, Funchess: do you expect they'll play?
"We’re not talking about injuries."


Did Jabrill and Raymon practice this week?
"They were here… on the practice field. We're not talking about injuries."


How would you evaluate the safety play after two games?
"I think from that standpoint Wilson's been very solid, very good. Jeremy [Clark] has shown very good signs in there. Delano getting back, again, kind of puts a little more competition up there and [we] kind of like what Delano's doing."


After a game like Saturday, can you talk about keeping the outside noise on the outside for both the coaching staff and the kids?
"You know, I don't worry about myself or the staff because people are going to have opinions and think what they want. You're going to have opinions, and that's fine but when your quarterback takes some criticism that might be unjust because of things that transpired, I guess that's the way we are in society now but at the same time I don't know if that's called for."

What was unjust in terms of what they were saying?
"Well, what would you think. He's a kid. He's not a professional athlete."

Are there things that people aren’t seeing that he did well in that game?
"I think there's a lot of things he did well. Like I said the other day, he made some great throws in there. He checked us to the right plays. Was he perfect? No. He wasn't 100%. Do we want to be perfect? Yes."
Did he make any progress from the Appalachian State game to that game that you can see?
"Well yeah, I think so. Yeah. I mean, he’s our quarterback. Now, he’s going to prove it every week. He’s proved it [with] how he’s come to practice and how he’s learned.”

You mentioned Devin’s your quarterback and he’s got to continue to prove it. Is Shane [Morris] ready? Is he up to speed with all this?

“Yeah, we’re confident in him. We’re very confident in him.”

So if Devin does slip you’re confident…

“Well, it’s like every other position, right? If Willie Henry doesn’t play great at three [technique] Wormley’s going to be in there or Godin’s going to be in there.”

But you feel like Shane has…

“Progressed?”

Yeah, and grasped this offense?

“Yeah, I think so.”

It was said the other day with Devin why maybe there were some issues was that it was the second game in a new system. How long, generally, do you think it takes for a fifth-year senior to adapt?

“Well, I think the longer you can have a guy within your philosophy, your program, either offensively or defensively I think the more there’s a comfort level. I think there’s more where they feel better and more confident and maybe seeing what he’s seeing on the field.”

Are there things you see with Miami’s [Andrew] Hendrix, and even Notre Dame, [where they] seem to run more and they’re obviously throwing a lot these last couple games?

“They’re certainly throwing the ball a ton and he’s very- I don’t have his percentage in front of me but he’s pretty doggone accurate. You’re going to see a lot of quick throws. They do a good job. It reminds me a little bit more of the offense at Notre Dame with [Tommy] Rees as far as six man protections, trying three man route schemes, getting the ball out of his hands quickly. The running game consists mostly of some zone. He’s not running [all the time]. Will he run it? Yes, but more like Tommy Rees than Everett Golson.”

You talk about him getting it out quick. How are you evaluating the pass rush if you can’t seem to get any off of the drop?

“Well, I think there’s some things that we’ve got to do. When you feel the three-step [drop] you’ve got to be able to get your hands up. We’ve been pretty good, especially in fall camp, of knocking some balls down and that’s one thing you emphasize. You emphasize trying to knock a hole in the line of scrimmage. A lot of slide protection. Obviously when you play man and it’s those third-and-threes and you’re going to play tight man you’ve got to play tight man.”

Some guys are dinged up at corner but elsewhere are looking at other guys this week [and] giving them more of a look after the struggles last week or are you still sticking…

“You talking about every position?

At corner.

“Well, I think with Strib[ling] we’ve always- every week he’s running with the twos sometimes, he’s running with the ones sometimes. I’m talking about practice and what we’re getting done. So if you’ve got Stribling and Terry Richardson, Jourdan Lewis, who played a little more than the other two, I don’t know if that changes what our beliefs are. Again, I’ll go back, it’s competitive at every position.”

Do you give a guy like Terry more of a look this week given that other guys struggled?

“Well, I think he’s played a lot more. He’s had more reps.”

This week?

“I would say so. But look, we’ve only practiced once.”

Doug [Nussmeier] talked a lot about explosive plays. Are there going to be games where you anticipate going downfield a lot more?

“Say that again.”

Are there going to be games where you anticipate more of a longball? Going downfield, taking more shots…

“Well, when we talk about explosive plays that’s part of it. You know, obviously the vertical passing game or a guy making something happen off of a seven yard route but in the running game, too. I think both. I think we had seventeen the first week [and] we had five last week. The number usually you want to average [is] about nine to ten of those, so we’ve got to hit that and again, there’s a lot that goes into it from the passing game: route running, protection, getting off press, getting off bump, the quarterback, the progression, all that. And the same thing in the running game and the receivers down the field and one thing I can tell you is that the receivers that we have here, they enjoy being physical.”

Have you guys emphasized getting off to a fast start this week to kind of put last week behind you?

“I don’t know that we’ve emphasized that. I think what we’ve emphasized is going back to- this has been, and I’m going to say it one more time and I’ll probably say it more, but it’s been an unbelievably hard working group of guys. Coming out to a fast start? Yeah, we’d love to do it. We have an opponent who’s going to have something to say about that, too.”

Comments

reshp1

September 10th, 2014 at 5:17 PM ^

Before the ZOMG Hoke doesn't see a problem with the OL comments....

I honestly think the UFR tomorrow will vindicate the OL. They were decent, not good, but decent, especially prior to about middle of the 3rd quarter. When they did get beat, it was more of a physical or leverage thing, not making mental mistakes about assignments. That side of it was, in fact, pretty encouraging.

Windy City Blue

September 11th, 2014 at 12:56 PM ^

If you think about pass blocking, the only objective is to prevent the guy from getting around you or pushing you into the QB. They're taught to cede ground, as long as the defender stays in front of them. Miller got worked a few times there, but the nose never got around him. Sure, they ran a bunch of stunts and we were beat a couple of times but overall, I thought the line played well in pass pro. To me, the problem is with Devin. He took a painfully-long time to get rid of the ball on Saturday. 

SC Wolverine

September 10th, 2014 at 8:10 PM ^

I think you are right about Devin.  I love the guy, but the difference between him and Golston was striking.  The decisiveness and execution just weren't there, however much potential he oozes.  Maybe it is working through a new system, etc.  But I thought the biggest issue was indeed Devin.

Rufus X

September 11th, 2014 at 11:36 AM ^

In truth, neither one ever progressed AS A PASSER* while at Michigan, and that is 95% a Borges problem.  It's really quite sad.  I am sure Nuss will be better at QB development, but Denard was the same AS A PASSER the day he left as he was the day he arrived - strong arm, mediocre feet, mediocre decisions.  Gardner is the same AS A PASSER today as he was the day he arrived - strong arm, mediocre feet, mediocre decisions (and yes I realize that he had a whole season as a reciever).  I think/hope he will get better by the end of the year, but just imagine if we had kept him on the outside as a wideout, with Funchess and Norfleet, and now had a fully operational southpaw Shane Morris slinging it from sideline to sideline.  Damn. 

*capitalized for emphasis so that it is clear to myopic blog readers that I am only talking about Denard and Devin as a passer.  Not as a runner, not even as as a QB, not as a beloved leader and face of our program whom we all love dearly, author included.  

B-Nut-GoBlue

September 10th, 2014 at 6:26 PM ^

I think it'll grade well but I'm still thinking, personally, that it wasn't all that good.  Rushing, there were some good holes opened up that some were hit and some weren't, so a pretty good positive number for that aspect.  But the protection I don't think was up to task.  That combined with Devin's, uhmm, poor play, was not a recipe for success.  Humble opinion...and that's based off of 1 viewing and a few replays on a number of plays.

I Like Burgers

September 10th, 2014 at 6:06 PM ^

Peppers played in the first game, so no redshirt.

How do people not understand this yet?  If you play a single snap in any season, it counts as one of your four seasons to play college sports.  There are no exceptions to this rule.

Sideline

September 11th, 2014 at 11:25 AM ^

Even if he played the first 2-3 games, he can redshirt. How long have you been a college football fan? You do realize Coaches have up until the first 1/3 or 1/4 of the season to decide on Redshirting, right? This isn't NCAA 2014 where you have to decide before you play a game.

"A special case involves the eligibility of a player who loses the majority of a season to injury. Popularly known as a medical redshirt, a hardship waiver may be granted to athletes who appear in fewer than 30% of team competitions (none after the midpoint of the season) then suffers a season-ending injury. Players granted such a waiver are treated for the purposes of eligibility as though they did not compete in that season.

True Blue Grit

September 10th, 2014 at 6:25 PM ^

First of all, Pepper is WAY, WAY too good to redshirt.  Second, Hoke has said nothing to indicate the severity of Pepper's injury situation one way or the other, right?  So, only 2 games into the season, isn't it a little premature to even suggest Peppers may redshirt?  Third, Peppers played in the first game quite a bit.  On what basis would he be able to get a redshirt?  

UMForLife

September 10th, 2014 at 7:22 PM ^

Peppers is not redshirting. Hoke said the other day that he will tell the reporters if someone is out for the season. He will not talk about injured players if they are coming back this season. That is what I remember.

ifis

September 11th, 2014 at 6:31 AM ^

and this week is Miami (NTM).  Cornerback depth is pretty good.  If Peppers is borderline, he should sit and get healthy.  There are still plenty of games to get him ready for the B1G season.  He is not redshirting though. 

StephenRKass

September 10th, 2014 at 5:35 PM ^

There's at least two things involved.

  1. Not tipping your hand for what you're going to do. Does it really make sense to spell out what you're going to do? Look at how VT used the element of surprise to ambush JT and OSU last Saturday. Urban Meyer and his OC had no idea what hit them. The element of surprise is a good thing.
  2. Not knowing whether or not someone will be ready by Saturday. I can easily imagine that Hoke would love to have Peppers and Taylor play. Maybe they aren't 100% today, or tomorrow. But if they're close on Friday, and ready on Saturday, well, then they'll play. Come on, everyone who has been sick or injured knows that there isn't an "exact" timetable for being ready.

BloomingtonBlue

September 10th, 2014 at 5:47 PM ^

Not tipping your hand to who? You think any team really carries what players we put out there, it really doesn't seem to matter. When I look at the scoreboard, I don't see any schematic advantage we are gaining.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BloomingtonBlue

September 10th, 2014 at 6:04 PM ^

We don't have any game changing players that other coaches have to scheme around. Maybe, Funchess, maybe Gardner. There is no one else on that field coaches are worrying about. VT hid an entire defensive scheme from OSU. That makes sense. But, I'm sorry there is no one in our defensive backfield or our offensive that teams are spending too much time discussing.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Reader71

September 10th, 2014 at 6:37 PM ^

This is just wrong. What happens in the meeting room when Michigan plays Miami? You think just because they don't have great athletes that there is no scouting report? If Miami's coaches don't scout our corners and say that they should throw at Countess if we are in man instead of Taylor and Lewis, they will have done their team a disservice. "Michigan's DBs are no good, we won't have any wrinkles or anything specific, just go out there and play." That's stupid. That doesn't happen.

BloomingtonBlue

September 10th, 2014 at 7:28 PM ^

My argument is we don't have any DB's coaches spend hours game planning against. They're all basically the same skill and interchangeable. Our own coaches even say that. So for Hoke to not say hey Taylor and Countess are hurt they might not play Saturday. It's next man up, the expectation is for the position. This doesn't affect opposing coaches at all because they spent the same amount of time discussing Taylor as they do Lewis.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Reader71

September 10th, 2014 at 7:34 PM ^

I see. Well I did put up a concrete example upthread about Countess being worse in man than our other guys. But I don't think Countess is a worse corner; he was our beat guy last year when we spent most time in zone. So its not even really about quality. We don't have a Deion Sanders, but there ain't many of them out there. But the coaches will still have some type of plan for whoever we run out there.

BloomingtonBlue

September 10th, 2014 at 7:41 PM ^

Nick Baumgarnder just tweeted out a quote from Hoke saying he didn't know Golson threw that well. If that doesn't tell you all you need to know about Hoke and scouting reports. My god, that's disconcerting for a head coach to say. Embarrassing.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Space Coyote

September 10th, 2014 at 9:32 PM ^

To a full season sample. Sometimes QBs have games where they're on. And Golson was on against Michigan, more than he was against Rice. Golson was mostly a downfield thrower against Rice, against coverage that was pretty badly beat itself downfield. Michigan didn't know if that was competition level, scheme, ND throwing safer throws, whatever.

Sometimes a you see a guy in person, going against you, and he's simply better than he looked on film or whatever. Sometimes you hear about guys being great, they look good on film, and it turns out they're just a guy too. It cuts both ways.