Notre Dame Postgame Presser: Brady Hoke Comment Count

Adam Schnepp

Hoke presser 2

file

[Note: I wasn’t in South Bend, so this was all transcribed from the video provided by the Athletic Department’s site.]

Opening remarks:

“Obviously Notre Dame played a very good football game and we didn’t. You’ve got to give them a lot of credit. A lot of credit to what they did on third downs, either defending us or their third down opportunities that they converted on.

“We’ve got to go back to work, and we will as a team. You don’t want to have four turnovers in a game. That doesn’t help you. The red zone, we didn’t help ourselves in there. From the penalty side, we put ourselves behind the sticks offensively. And again, you’ve got to give them a lot of the credit too. But we will bounce back because this is a very resilient, hard-working group of young men who know what it takes to win.”

After [Devin] Gardner started fairly quickly, I think six-for-six, and then did they bring more pressure, did your offensive line struggle; what fell apart?

“I think a little bit it’s never one guy, it’s never one piece of the offensive line, or the quarterback, or the routes, or whatever. When those things happen I think they happen as a team. He started six-for-six. I think we’ve got to give them- we crossed the fifty and they were going to bring more pressure. That’s what they did.”

 

Can you talk about Ray Taylor and any update on his status?

“I’m not going to talk about any of those injuries. Number one, I don’t know enough about them.”

 

And then Jabrill [Peppers], he dressed. Could he have played?

“If he could have played we would have played him. We evaluated all those guys before the game.”

And then you dressed him?

“Well, he went out because we were evaluating him before the game.”

 

You said you’re pretty confident this team will bounce back. How do they bounce back from such a- I mean, this was a pretty humbling loss here.

“Yeah, it is but I think they’ve all been humbled sometime in their life. It’s part of the resiliency this group has.”

 

Your guys were pretty adamant about how bad they wanted this because of this possibly being the last game. Were you surprised at how lopsided this ended up being?

“This game? Yeah.”

 

[After THE JUMP: Gardner is still the starter, why Countess was pulled, and bouncing back from adversity]

 

You talked about Devin [Gardner]. Did you ever consider pulling him at any point?

“No. No. I mean, he’s our quarterback. You know, unless he doesn’t come to work every day, doesn’t come to learn, all those things, he’s our quarterback. We wanted to put points on the board.”

 

Do you feel like he’s slipping into some of his habits he had last year? Holding onto the ball too long, or…

“Well, obviously- I don’t think he slipped into all those habits. I think he’s a better quarterback- I know he is. He’s a better quarterback than he demonstrated today.”

 

You talked about how this team will bounce back, but does it need something different? Does it need some changes from you as the head coach, or personnel-wise, or anything like that? I know immediate aftermath it’s hard to know.

“I think that it is hard to know. I think when you evaluate it, and we’ll evaluate it on the bus on the way home; you know, how guys played, who didn’t play well, who played well. You know, because there were some guys who played pretty well. Jake Ryan- I thought he played a pretty good football game. You could feel him out there. You know, Jack Miller did some good things when you watch that.

“The bad part was we got behind the sticks too many times and got out of rhythm offensively, because we were running the ball halfway decent. That was encouraging to see but then obviously, I think at halftime it turned into a game where we needed to throw it a little more”

 

Evertt Golson is a guy who didn’t even make it out of the first half the last time you guys faced him. He was considerably better tonight. What are the biggest differences you’ve seen in him going against him?

“Well, I think they also use him well. I think Brian [Kelly] does a good job. There’s a lot of three-step game in it, a lot of slants. I think he’s matured. I think I said that this week coming in that he’s a much better quarterback than he was two years ago just from watching the Rice game, and I would say the same thing after our game.”

 

You shuffled the secondary a lot.

“Some of that was because of injuries.”

But even taking out Blake [Countess] at one point. What did you see there that you didn’t really like?

“Well, we’ve played a lot of guys back there in the past. Stribling, we wanted to get him some live reps in there. Sometimes you take a guy out and he gets a chance to watch from the sidelines a little bit, and maybe he picks up a few things. We didn’t play well in man coverage. You get called for two interference calls- and we’ve got to play smarter- early and the guys get a little bit worried about playing press.”

 

This is I believe 0-4 against the big three rivals on the road over the last four years. What is this team missing? What does this team need to get over the hump?

“Winning. You win the game. You play. You don’t turn over the ball. You don’t give up big plays.”

Is this a mental thing at this point or what do you guys view this as?

“You talk about it enough into being a mental thing. I don’t think it’s a mental thing.”

What do you think it is?

“Just what I said. You can’t give up big plays. Can’t turn the ball over.”

 

When the game was that far out of reach, Gardner often puts his body in a position where he takes hits. He takes hits in the fourth quarter. Why were you playing him at that point?

“Because he’s our quarterback. He’s our quarterback. You know, we’re going to play some really big games on the road this year, and for him to keep improving he needs to play quarterback.”

Is it a risk, when he takes a hit like that?

“Anything’s a risk. To me, the risk was starting him maybe. I don’t know. We’re trying to develop a team.”

 

You might have touched on this a little bit already, but what specifically was your message to the team?

“After the game? Number one, give Notre Dame credit for how they played. It was a total butt kicking all the way around that we all took. Going back to work tomorrow as a team, like they will. And we’ve got to get a lot better. I think we learned some things that we’ve got to get better at.”

 

It looked like your quarterback was under pressure a lot and their quarterback wasn’t under pressure a lot. Was there a disparity in the trenches or was that scheme?

“I don’t know about that. He had to run enough. He did a good job evading a lot of rush, Everett did. And so I think there was pressure there. And sometimes it’s hard to get pressure on a three-step game.”

You mentioned that you feel like this team will bounce back. Adversity-wise, with a young team do you worry that they may get off track?

“I really don’t. Not with this team.”

Why?

“Because of what we’ve seen every day from them. I mean, from their work ethic, from how they care about each other. All those things.”

Devin [Gardner] took a good shot at the end. Is he okay?

“Like I said, I’ll talk about those injuries when I know more.”

Comments

blueblueblue

September 7th, 2014 at 12:22 PM ^

I seriously questioned Hoke's decision to keep Funk, and his approval of allowing a guy to coach the secondary who has no expereince doing so. This isnt the MAC or high school football. This is the big leagues. That was a dumb move. He just doesnt seem like a good manager. He's a likable guy, but not a manager.

Also, how the team reacted to Gardner getting hit at the end of the game speaks volumes. There are some serious issues on this team.  

It is apparent Hoke has to go, and the new guy has to be a huge name in order to not allow the transition to take this program even lower. This program is in real danger right now. 

 

The Baughz

September 7th, 2014 at 12:23 PM ^

I stopped reading after Hoke basically said Miller had a good game. Maybe he did, but it seemed like he was getting pushed into the backfield every time DG dropped back to pass.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Reader71

September 7th, 2014 at 1:59 PM ^

Yeah, Notre Dame came out in the 2nd half up 21-0. They could afford to gamble a bit, and brought more pressure than they did early. Add to that the fact that they knew we had to pass, and it was kind of easy for them. Our line was unprepared to deal with the pressure (again) and that was all she wrote.

westwardwolverine

September 7th, 2014 at 2:23 PM ^

But there is the real problem: They shouldn't have had to deal with that pressure. We knew they weren't going to be great. The theory was, the defense would be our big strength this year and allow the offense to grow. 

You and I both predicted similar scores for this game and I'm assuming we came to those conclusions based on the idea that the Notre Dame would never have the lead, let alone a 21-0 lead. 

Reader71

September 7th, 2014 at 2:44 PM ^

100% correct. This team will never do well with comebacks. As soon as a team feels free to throw a lot of pressure at us, we're toast. We will have to jump out to leads or keep them close. My predicted score was not really serious. I've been known to place an occasional wager, but I kept my money in my pocket last night. My mouth was running, but I was scared, and I'll admit that. I predicted this as a loss before the season. What last night really did to me was confirm my belief that aggressive man coverage is always a terrible idea at the collegiate level. I am a firm believer in zones and bend-but-don't break defense. Most DBs aren't good in man coverage. Not many NFL teams even run it, and they get to pick from the best of the best. Most college QBs aren't great, so lets not help them by making their reads easier. Lets not make one bad step by a corner into an automatic touchdown. I hate it. Always have. I let the blog's excitement sweep me up. I was wrong. It suck, because there is a tiny percentage of it actually working. Particularly against spread offenses and mobile QBs, who often mitigate your pass rush.

CoverZero

September 7th, 2014 at 6:36 PM ^

No. The CBs got beat in zone as well as in press.   Countess was horrible at both.  College teams can play press, just look at Alabama for example.  Last night, vs. the ND 3 step drops, press is the only way to go.  Too often, Mattisson left a big cushion on 3rd down which lead to a quick and easy 7-10 yds on the quick passes.  Its on the tape man.

Reader71

September 7th, 2014 at 7:11 PM ^

Yeah zone isn't the answer to everything. But I'd prefer if our identity was zone and we went to man as a changeup. Look at that tape, there are guys being beaten in man every snap. Stribling plays right up on the line, doesn't use his hands at all, and is burnt up the seam. Countess is right on the line and gets beaten 3-4 times for 5 yard passes on third and short. It's a hard technique, and our guys aren't up to the task. Most college DBs aren't.

Bando Calrissian

September 7th, 2014 at 12:24 PM ^

My biggest question is should Gardner still be your quarterback when you're down 31 and you need him to be your quarterback when, you know, you're playing games later in the season and you're not down 31.

It was foolish to have key starters in on those last couple of drives, even if none of them got hurt. Unfortunately, Funchess got dinged up and Gardner took a dangerous shot that probably shook him up, too. 

Coaching is about planning ahead and being responsible, knowing when the game is out of reach and taking into account this is week two of a long season. If we weren't making it into the red zone the rest of the game, what was going to change in the waning moments of the fourth quarter?

Shop Smart Sho…

September 7th, 2014 at 12:50 PM ^

A bigger concern to me than having Gardner still out there was letting Funchess back onto the field after that hit.  The next time we saw him on camera after that he was limping after trying to make a cut.  There seemed to be absolutely no reason to let him go back out there.  They did it with Peppers last week, and who knows how long he is going to be out now.  Why not just err on the side of caution?

maize-blue

September 7th, 2014 at 12:30 PM ^

This biggest think I take from the game is now I am not confident about the games with Utah, Penn State, Maryland. 2013 has come crashing back. The MSU and OSU games now seem to be very steep up hill climbs.

BornInA2

September 7th, 2014 at 12:30 PM ^

1. Miller sucked. Over and over I saw hem bent over backwards being pushed into the pocket. He might be a great kid, but I don't see him being even a decent center. I'd much rather see Glasgow at center and Kalis at guard, though I read this AM that his back is acting up again.

2. I thought the play calling on offense changed after the first couple series. It looked snappy and diverse and effective at the beginning, then it became very predictable and ineffective. If they bring pressure, where are our quick slants?

3. Still seeing Green miss holes and run right into crowds at the line. Not every time, but too many times.

4. No deep plays. Until we show that we can punish defenses for cramming the box and bringing the house on blitzes, we're hosed. This has been a problem since Denard's first year and it's probably the thing I'm most frustrated about right now.

5. The officiating STUNK. No, it didn't cost us the game, but it repeatedly cost us momentum. That officially reviewed 'reception' by ND where his foot was clearly on the line was just one of many bad calls. And not a single holding call on ND all game? Does anyone remember ever seeing an entire game without a holding on an offense? I do not. Meanwhile, we get PI calls for incidental contact on their first drive that takes us right out of our press coverage.

6. Gack, injuries. Peppers, Morgan, Taylor, Funchess, and maybe Gardner? Those aren't just five starters, they are five of our best.

I'm still hopeful that we'll look back at this game as an anomaly this season. But we're going to have to play a very different kind of football once the conference games start for that to be true.

johnthesavage

September 7th, 2014 at 12:40 PM ^

That endzone PI was hogwash. Both guys looked at the ball, both guys went for the ball, both guys made incidental contact -- that's a no-call everywhere, and especially in the endzone. Worse then after you watch it is you have to listen to homer ND announcers (doing a national game, mind you) immediately praising the call. That did make me angry at the time, but there are no refs that could have saved us from the rest of the game.

BlueSpiceIn SEC.hell

September 7th, 2014 at 12:48 PM ^

....by the way it was A crummy game - not a season - STILL I am not happy...  #3 -Smith was so much more effective ... one time in the second half Green actually hit the correct hole hard and it was a successful play .. I thought he was getting it...then the very next one he went right when there was a 10 ft hole to the left ... I would also like to give Drake and Justice some more opportunities.

Reader71

September 7th, 2014 at 12:52 PM ^

Miller was our best lineman last night. He did and does give ground too easily, bug Magnuson and Cole were simply letting guys run free. Braden is incapable of maintaining a block. Didn't watch Glasgow much. Miller didn't stink, especially considering who he was tasked with blocking for a lot of the game.

SHub'68

September 7th, 2014 at 1:23 PM ^

Had a whiff so bad early in the game that I started to lose interest almost immediately.  It looked intentional, like he was expecting someone else to make the block.  But who exactly?  Everyone else was engaged.  It was pretty obvious right there that our OL wasn't improved enough from last year.  That said, I do think there /was/ evidence of improvement, but I'm not sure exactly what it is.

For instance, at least our running game doesn't consist of going backwards most of the time - or at best, running straight into into a brick wall and going nowhere.  But it's also no where near a state where we can afford to run Alabama's offense and win against solid competition.

Alabama could run that offense because it requires you to be able to road-grade over ANY team you play, and Alabama could do that.  With our offensive line, running this gameplan just makes it easier to defend us.

SWFLWolverine

September 7th, 2014 at 11:02 PM ^

I am thinking of, Cole picked up an outside rusher (stepping out) and Mags stepped down to give inside help to Miller but didn't really engage. I haven't gone back and watched the play and don't know what the line call was, but my guess is that is not on Cole but  either Mags was to step out and a RB pick up the inside or vice versa.

johnthesavage

September 7th, 2014 at 12:32 PM ^

Some of this is nonsense. We were getting pressure like they were? What game was he watching? Jack Miller played well? Not to mention that I guess the Peppers stuff last week was just deceit. I know this isn't a fun press conference to do but spending breath praising your center and DL play after that game is bewildering.

slappy09

September 7th, 2014 at 3:15 PM ^

I was thinking the same thing yesterday. I also don't understand the big cushions we played with on defense after all that hyperbole on in your face man coverage.

A loss yesterday, competitive loss, would have been okay - but this was one of your pride stealing moments. There is only so much before you just stop caring... Only so much before you don't want to drop crazy money to go, park, and attend a game to see the school you have so much pride for play scared, unprepared, flat...

markusr2007

September 7th, 2014 at 12:36 PM ^

But his words do not inspire confidence that errors will be corrected. Michigan is in for a long season for like the 3rd year in a row. Notre dame destroyed Michigan last night. How many more embarrassing losses are fans expected to sit through?

M-Dog

September 7th, 2014 at 12:46 PM ^

All we hear are broad platitudes:  "You can't give up turnovers . . . .You can't give up big plays . . . You have to elimiante errors . . . Etc."
 
OK, no shit.  What's the actual plan to not give up turnovers, not give up big plays, elimiante the errors?  How are you going to do this, if you even can?  Do you even have a plan?  Cause I'm not seeing any plan. 
 
If there's a coherent plan, I'm patient.  It can take time, ala Beilein.  Hell, even ala Brain Kelly.  But what's the plan?
 

Reader71

September 7th, 2014 at 12:57 PM ^

How would telling the press help? One could argue that it would actually hurt, since the next opponent would know what the upcoming wrinkles would be. It might serve to calm our nerves, but I don't think we should care about words anyway. He could say all the right things and lay an egg next week. Or he could say nothing and be better next week. I'd rather have the latter.

M-Dog

September 7th, 2014 at 3:07 PM ^

I agree with your point about the press.  Under normal circumstances.  

But coaches don't live in a vacuum.  He is losing support from the fanbase.  You can say that he can ignore the fanbase and just keep his buddy the AD happy, but it eventually reaches a tipping point in any program where even the AD can't ignore it.

 After 4 years and a loss that should not even happen in the first year, it is time for some damage control.  He needs to give the fanbase something to hang their hat on.  The press is never just simply the press, it's also the conduit for info that the fans pick up.

If he can bypass the press and have an internet fireside chat with just us fans, then cool, but he is quickly reaching a level where he further alienates the fanbase at his own risk.

If he hates the press then it's time to find a way to dismiss the press without dismissing the fanbase.

 

 

Reader71

September 7th, 2014 at 3:51 PM ^

Nothing he can say will sway anyone either way. Guys who like him aren't dissuaded by words. Guys that don't like him will take any words he says and twist them to fit their narrative. If he gives a precise textbook definition of how to help the OL protect by, say, spreading the field to bring some defenders out of the box, people will say, "What took so long?" And when that doesn't work, as it hasn't despite us averaging 3 WR last night, they will say, "Have more max protect, dummy!" Than when we go max protect and it doesn't work, like it didn't work last year for Borges, people will say, "Spread it out, dummy." Or even more broadly. When he says he had to coach better, people say, "Duh, you suck!" But if he says we had a good game plan but we couldn't execute it, people say, "Blame the players, how dare you." I'm not speaking in hypothetical, this stuff has been said already. And this isn't a defense of Hoke, its a defense of all coaches against the media and the fans. We want results. We think we want words, but we want results. These same exact answers were lauded in 2011. Results or you're fired. Fuck the quotes.