Tiiiiiiite

Fee Fi Foe Film: Army Defense 2019 Comment Count

Seth September 6th, 2019 at 9:13 AM

Previously: The Offense

Resources: My charting, Army game notes, Army roster, CFBStats, Bill C's preview data, Neck Sharpies on the 404 Tite defense

I was really looking forward to this. I broke down their Oklahoma game to write HTTV last spring and needed to draw up their blitzes and formations just to understand what I was looking at, particularly the 404 Tite, the latest in anti-RPO defensive technology. This also inspired the offseason Neck Sharpies linked above, as well as similar takes from all over the napkin scribbles web, some even specifically about Army.

So of course Army's first game was against Rice, who runs a Stanford beef offense predicated on pitches, Power and running off the fullback, exactly the kind of offense you don't need an ultra-modern, anti-Big XII spread defense against. Also Rice's quarterback is atrocious.

image

Dammit Rice. Where were you in 2017?

The film: Rice, who runs a Stanford beef offense. (sigh)

image (3)

[After THE JUMP: Perhaps too much support for the troops, because I'm a geek]

---------------------------------------

Personnel: My diagram: 

FFFF Army Defense 2019

PDF Version, full-size version (or click on the image)

What you see above is pretty much all you'll get—even the backup nose guard didn't get any run in this one. The whole "burn the clock down with a gazillion tiny plays on offense" strategy means Army doesn't have to find more than 11 or 12 guys they're comfortable putting on the field. Also they're Army guys; there are probably soccer players who would pack it in before these dudes get winded.

The defensive tackles aren't supposed to do much but they got pushed around by Rice's poor man's Stanfordians. The nose guard, Rod Stoddard, was part of last year's rotation and is a poor man's Carlo Kemp: small, low, feisty at times, but no pass rush. They get little from Kwabena Bonsu as well. Jacob Covington is a converted linebacker with active hands who plays an Anchor-like role and gets talked about like a dangerman, but I removed his tentative star about halfway through this film. Edge rusher Jeremiah Lowery has a full-time Uche job that was a bad fit for this game, and SAM Amadadeo West was probably only in there for this game as a more traditional linebacker.

Last year the SAM was Cam Jones, who's been moved to the boundary safety role, permanently from the sound of it. He and field safety Jaylon McClinton are what you have to live with when you're Army: smart and willing to put their bodies in harm's way, but not very athletic. I have no idea who the third safety is but I suspect if they had one they'd move Jones back to the hybrid spaceplayer role.

Their best players are all at middle linebacker and cornerback. We'll get to Cole Christianson, the captain and press darling, and Arik Smith, who had a monster game, in the dangerman section. Boundary CB Elijah Riley is coming off a year of 7.5 TFLs and blew up a couple of plays with blitzes in this one. Field CB Javhari Bourdeau played with Metellus and the Devins at Flanagan for Devin Bush Sr., and you know what Flanagan guys are like.

I was tempted to give him a star, but he's pretty small, and was facing what's probably the worst starting quarterback in FBS this year. They also play off a lot; if Rice's quarterback wasn't winging it 8 yards off target there would have been some 3rd and long conversions.

Base Set: 404 Tite. Take a 3-4, replace your DTs with 4-3 DEs who set up on the OTs' inside shoulders, turn your strongside OLB into third safety, shove your weakside OLB a bit further toward the DE side of the LB/DE spectrum (think Uche), and push your MLB out to where he has to deal with tight ends more often than guards.

image

The "404" refers to how the defensive line sets up, counting shoulders from the ball (1. center's shoulder, 2. guard's inside shoulder, etc.). The fours are the inside shoulders of the offensive tackles. Zero is head up on the center. That gives them some protection against off-tackle runs like Inside Zone that modern spread offenses, used to dealing with 4-2-5 and 2-4-5 nickels, leave in the hands of exploitable WLBs.

The MIKE has to take on some of the role that the Viper plays in Michigan's defense, reacting to the fullback, or when there isn't one, pulling out to relate to the tight end like Khaleke Hudson does for us. This often leaves them with just five guys in the box. As such the WLB is more like your old fashioned middle linebacker: a plugger who can slip off blocks and blitz a ton.

It was cool to see, but Rice is such MANBALL outfit most of this game was spent in a traditional 3-4.

2019 Army vs Rice D Shift   Safeties   Rushers
Situation Even Tite Under Over 1-high 2-high 3 4 5 6+
Normal Downs 12 5 6 4 6 21 - 9 13 5
Passing Downs 6 5 2 4 2 15 - 9 8 -
Total 39% 22% 17% 17% 18% 82% - 41% 48% 11%

What shall we call the hybrid today?: SAM.

Man or zone coverage: Base Cover 2 with some Quarters.

Pressure: GERG or GREG: GREG and interesting. You'll note they don't rush more than six nor less than four, ever.

image

The pressures they use are fascinating though because they will get everyone involved in it. CBS Sports also gave us some All-22's to play with.

They also sometimes get way too cute.

The OLBs aren't great in coverage but they're asked to do it a bunch to keep the blitzes varied. This works in tandem with their offensive philosophy: shorten games so the offense never gets to face the same blitz twice, and run a lot of different blitzes. Unfortunately this game doesn't have many examples, which makes me nervous.

Dangerman: You won't open an Army program without hearing about senior captain MLB Cole Christianson so let's discuss him. Remember in this defense the WILL is the inside linebacker who gets all the blocks while the MIKE gets the TFLs. He only had one sack last year, but 12 tackles for loss despite what I said above about the paucity of snaps they face. I was surprised to be more impressed with his coverage.

But this wasn't a great game to show off his skills. What the above shows you is his uncanny acceleration, the same trait Don Brown's army of linebacker recruits in the 2020 class all possess. Against Rice this meant accelerating into being taken out by a fullback. When he got the chance to stick a running back, the back stayed sticked.

This clip wouldn't have been possible without Arik Smith, who's odd indeed for an Army player. For one, Smith played extensively last year as a freshman. Two, rumor has it he had Power 5 offers (his recruiting profiles are still as walk-onny as any Knight). After one game, I get it. Maybe Christianson wasn't built for Power offenses but Smith was in his wheelhouse, poppin' blockers in the mouth, scootin' past others, and generally making himself a nuisance wherever the ball went. He charted +12/-6.5 by my account—remember breaking even is good linebackin'. Most of those negatives were over-aggression from a true sophomore. Also remember this was in about half of a normal game's worth of snaps. This is Wisconsin middle linebackin', where the DL are just trying to keep you clean to do your thing.

The afore mentioned blitzy cornerback, Elijah Riley, is a guy people have known about for a long time. After having a game against Oklahoma this was a walk in the park.

OVERVIEW:

okay but is THIS a chopblock, truthers?

If my take on the Army offense came off disrespectful to the troops, it's partly because I needed to establish I'm not a total Army homer before I get to talking about the Black Knights' defense. Much of its design has to be credited to Jay Bateman, who arrived with Monken in 2014 and left to join Mack Brown's staff last offseason. Structurally they have a lot in common with Michigan State: the 404 Tite trades off better B gap protection for weaker A gaps, so when they blitz they come for those gaps you were expecting to be open:

It's also really hard to get them to screw up. Like the offense, they play mostly upperclassmen, but unlike the offense, the defense really takes advantage of skills that most teams don't have. They're smart guys—smart in the way you have to be to command U.S. ground forces in a tactical setting. Unable to pass, Rice tried to crack them all game. It happened once, on a wholesale breakdown:

That was on both safeties, the only guys on the team I considered cyans for. It's relevant because that's the position the new DC coaches.

What made this team so dangerous to Oklahoma was the blitzes, which take advantage of the brilliant minds available to them at West Point. Few teams can have a playbook this deep and not make mistakes with it all the time. With the offense chewing away clock, their defense has to face less than half of the snaps of an average one. Rice got to snap the ball just 48 times in this one, which was also the difference between the number of snaps Army faced last year and the team that faced the second-fewest. As soon as you think you're in a groove, they'll pull out something that wasn't on film and out comes the 3rd and long team.

At least that's what they were last year. It's too early to tell if 1st year DC John Loose will keep it going. This game was vanilla; the Oklahoma game last year had about 20 things that the Heisman winner didn't see coming. It could be a sign that Loose isn't the mad scientist Bateman was. More likely it means they've been saving it for Michigan.

Comments

Sir Guy

September 6th, 2019 at 9:27 AM ^

I'm feeling much more confident after watching the Army-Rice game and now confirming it with this write-up.

I'm sure there isn't a small amount of people out there who would love to watch an all-22 broadcast, right? I'd love to see a whole game all-22.

Bambi

September 6th, 2019 at 10:13 AM ^

This whole post seems oddly...positive to me. As hard as it can be for S&P+ and the like to properly capture a triple option offense, the defense for Army doesn't have the same pitfalls and can generally be graded like any other defense. And last year Army was 70th in S&P+ in defense.

Against Oklahoma last year they gave up 11 yards per pass and 7 yards per rush. Including the OT drive, Oklahoma had 8 drives. Those drives were:

  • 4 TDs (68, 65, 66 and 25 yards on 6, 6, 4 and 2 plays)
  • 9 play, 78 yard drive that ended on downs at the Army 1
  • 8 play, 46 yard drive that resulted in a missed GW 33 yard FG to end regulation
  • 1 punt
  • 1 INT

Minus the punt and the INT (so 2/8 drives), Army couldn't come close to stopping OU. Army only had 1 sack (by a player who is now graduated). So I don't get the idea that there were "things OU hadn't seen" that tripped them up or that Army's defense and its blitzes were "so dangerous" to OU.

Even against Rice: Army gave up 181 rushing yards on 6 YPC (including 6.5 YPC on 27 carries to the 2 main RBs and one of them going over 100 yards on 11.4 YPC). And this is to the 129th team in S&P+ last year with the 124th offense, 129th offense in success rate and 128th rushing offense.

And not mentioned in all of this is Army has a new DC. I feel like this preview is Seth gushing about Army because he really likes their 404 defense even though nothing else makes them seem even average. 

Seth

September 6th, 2019 at 11:07 AM ^

It's FFFF tradition to give a team its due, pointing out only the glaring weaknesses and crediting the best players and ideas. I try to leave bread crumbs to my suspicions in the process, like "if they had a third safety..." and "against Rice" while letting the tape speak for itself.

The preview should then capture this in context of what we think will happen against Michigan. I want FFFF readers to get a better sense of who the opponent is, what's their intent, and who they're going to try to build the game around.

I just don't see the point in writing this post if it's just going to be reasons Michigan should crush this team by 40. I try to write about what interests me most as a fan, and when it comes to opponents what interests me is which guys of theirs to watch and what are some things they intend to do that I'll be able to catch from the stands. If Michigan is blowing them out, there's nothing to see anyway.

Reggie Dunlop

September 6th, 2019 at 11:50 AM ^

Good theory, but when you say things like:

"The Oklahoma game last year had about 20 things that the Heisman winner didn't see coming."

...I think you're making Bambi's point.

Murray was 11/15 passing at 11 yards/attempt (really fucking good) and carried 7 times at over 10 yards per carry. Oklahoma only ran 39 offensive plays in the entire game. He was sacked once. He threw 3 incompletions in the game. "20 things"?

That seems like nonsense that doesn't need to be in there. It does none of the things you're saying your FFFFs are trying to do.

LeCheezus

September 6th, 2019 at 10:54 AM ^

I dunno man, I’m just not quite buying it.  I watched a good chunk of this game and that Army D looked sloooow, particularly sideline to sideline.  And this was against Rice, who ain’t exactly speed in space personified.  What did they rank last year in S&P+?  Guessing not great.

reshp1

September 6th, 2019 at 11:14 AM ^

Both sides of the ball are built for upsets by creating variance and increasing the effect of it. They're not scary in the sense they're good at football in the traditional sense, but that it only takes a couple mistakes and bad bounces to set you up for a clencher you really shouldn't be in on paper.

reshp1

September 6th, 2019 at 11:48 AM ^

The defense seems to be built on variance. Get the disruptive play to set up 3rd and long and get off the field, even if you risk getting gashed or thrown over the top of. The offense squeezing the clock out makes any variance the defense generates count double because they cut your possessions. Also, triple option is the most boring consistent style, right up to the play where they throw a pass for all the yards because you fell asleep. 

Reggie Dunlop

September 6th, 2019 at 12:06 PM ^

Oh, so they're one of those defenses that are trying to get the offense in 3rd and long and get off the field. Bold strategy, Cotton.

S&P+ measure success rate and explosiveness. They don't really say much for Army either way, but their success rate is worse than their overall ranking and their explosiveness measures better. That means they're bad at getting people off schedule and don't give up many big plays relative to their ranking.  Basically, according to S&P+, what you said is completely made up.

Army's defense is crap, relatively. They ranked 70th in FBS a year ago, right behind Central Michigan, Middle Tennessee and Rutgers. By all indications, it had nothing to do with "variance".

1VaBlue1

September 6th, 2019 at 11:27 AM ^

I don't really care who the coordinators are, this is still the same Army team coached by Monken that last year was.  The new DC is going to run the same scheme as the last DC, and he'll have 100 different blitzes ready for Michigan, that simply were not needed for Rice.

If Monken changed OC's, it wouldn't matter one bit - Army would still run the triple option.  Same with the DC...

Mongo

September 6th, 2019 at 11:28 AM ^

John Loose ran this defense at Lafayette College as the DC for 14 years.  He developed it to attack triple option teams and then adapted it with complex blitz schemes to attack spread option football. 

I met John when he was the DC for Lafayette College - great person.  His players really liked his coaching style and he is a military trained coach (Coast Guard Academy and West Point), so he is a great fit to be back to "the Banks of the Hudson" as its defensive leader. 

He and Don Brown were competitors for Northeast recruits for most of their coaching careers.  Don's stop at BC was the stronger draw, but many guys who just miss out at the Ivies or BC end up going to the Patriot League (Lehigh, Lafayette, Holy Cross, Fordam, etc).  In most sports other than football, both Navy and Army are members of the Patriot League.

Edit - Seth, you would really like John as he is a bit like a professor of defensive football. 

Forsakenprole

September 6th, 2019 at 11:39 AM ^

I’m thinking in the 31-16 range. A comfortable-ish win that it never really in question, but also kinda close enough due to their style and overall high floor. I think a TFL is worth point in this one; more than 8 and it could inflate the score even more.

GoArmy

September 6th, 2019 at 11:19 PM ^

Hello, MGo, Y'all -

Stoked to be in The Big House tomorrow for a great game and great atmosphere. Excellent analysis. Army's offense takes 3-4 games into the season at times to get dialed-in. Was at the OU game in Norman last year and they had their shot to win it.

Just got into AA and have a tailgate on the Golf Course with some Army folks. Any suggestions for downtown Ann arbor? Wish we had more time. I have a 6:00 am flight back Sunday morning, so I might as well stay up for 36 hours to see it all.

What suggestions do any of you have to maximize the time here in AA? Thanks.