Kelvin Hopkins vs Rice
Hopkins is an expert at converting Army's confusing blocking angles into cutbacks for six yards. [Army West Point Athletic Communications]

Fee Fi Foe Film: Army Offense 2019 Comment Count

Seth September 5th, 2019 at 9:53 AM

Resources: My charting, Army game notes, Army roster, CFBStats, Bill C's preview data

The first team to ever think to play entire separate offensive and defensive units was Fritz Crisler's Michigan in 1945. Thanks to the War, Crisler was still down to mostly 17-year-olds (because they couldn't be drafted) and due to face Army, which could draft anyone's stars they wanted, offer "you can play football instead of fight a war" to recruits, and had two Heisman winners in their backfield. Michigan's platooners didn't win, but they made a 7-7 tie last deep into the favorite's grumbly hour, the only guys all season to give Army a game.

The Black Knights never forgave us for ending the "let's thump our heads together then sit in mud for 30 minutes" era of football, heralding a future where a guy like Tom Brady can play it. Since then Army's had just one goal in mind: make football so ugly, so cheap, so abysmally unwatchable, that nobody will ever want to play it again. Last year they had 10 wins, took Kyler Murray's Oklahoma to overtime, and crushed Houston in a bowl. Last quarter, they did this:

imageFootball: The Army hates it. Almost as much as they do knees.

The film: Rice, because they've only played one game. Minus about 10 plays that didn't make it into the cuts available.

Personnel: My diagram, which you have to picture a lot more condense because the quarterback actually squats behind the center.

PDF version, full-size version (or click on the image)

This is actually a lot of starters to return for a service academy. The regular fullback, Connor Slomka, is dealing with a pulled something and missed the Rice game; he's questionable for Michigan. He's also a big loss; he's their primary ballcarrier, and the primary blocker when he isn't, and backup fullback Sandon McCoy is just a guy back there.

There isn't a lot of difference between the A-Back Kell Walker, a speedster who's occasionally asked to block cut a knee, and the T-Back Artice Hobbs, who's slightly more likely to be the pitch man, had one wicked run where he shouldered a linebacker out of his way, and often splits out to wideout. Both receivers are just guys, and rotate evenly with tight end Zach Saum or just pretend to be tight ends themselves.

Yes, that's a 6'2/265 senior left tackle and a 6'6/300 center. When asked to pass block this line falls apart. When asked to do anything but cut block, most of this line falls apart. Everyone but the center will start low and as far off the line of scrimmage as they can. Center Peyton Reeder will start lower, jam his head into a DT, and when he's engaged the others will use the running head start to go for guys' knees.

[After THE JUMP: Boy do they hate knees]

--------------------------------------

Spread, Pro-Style, or Hybrid? Service academy Flexbone option. I only caught 53 plays, what with Army shortening the game on purpose and then the recording was missing a dozen plays (two I found in highlights elsewhere). It still paints a picture.

  Formation   Personnel   Playcall
Down Type Flexbone Shotgun Single-Wing Pistol Avg WRs Pass PA Run
Standard 38 - 2 - 1.03 - 3 44
Passing 9 3 - 1 1.75 - 5 10
Total 89% 6% 4% 2% 1.20 - 13% 87%

Football is to be avoided at all costs.

Basketball on Grass or MANBALL? Almost exclusively cut blocking, much of it illegal. A quick refresher: cut blocks are legal if they happen away from the direction of where the ball was snapped, and if the player being cut isn't already engaged (called a chop block). In most Army plays the cuts are going into a mass of bodies, so chops occur on the regular. They're not called, which encourages more of it. Cutting linebackers the way they do is actually more dangerous, though within the rules. I guess this is a kind of zone, but it's more akin to stuff they ran 130 years ago, except with arms outside of bodies. The flying wedge was made illegal because defenses had to counter it by leaping a guy head first into it, and that was causing multiple deaths per season.

Hurry it up or grind it out? This is the organization who invented "Hurry up and wait." They'll get to the line on double-time, then make you sit there, poised, cramping, bored, and offer you a cigarette. Sometimes they'll start a guy in motion, and you'll get all excited but then they stop, and point at things, and get down in those low crouches, again. They were 81st in pace last year, because they were trying to be last, but every so often they would run tempo and catch you with your eyes off the line.

It's strategic. Holding onto the ball shrinks games to handful of possessions, dramatically increasing the randomness factor, and the importance of that one time they pass over your head for a stupid touchdown. Army knows the more plays in a game the greater the likelihood of football occurring, and any football that occurs is likely to be bad for Army.

Quarterback Dilithium Level (Scale: 1 [Navarre] to 10 [Denard]): 10.

Kelvin Hopkins isn't in Denard's class as a runner, but he's the legit Power 5 running back who can't throw worth a damn that people who didn't watch Michigan thought Denard was. Dude can scoot, and has that J.T. Barrett-ness to never go down without spinning to the ground for a few extra yards first.

Zook Frames Janklin Factor: Now that Bill Connelly is at ESPN, his fantastic preseason preview redirects to a Steven Godfrey Banner Society article, but you can still read the title and infer:

image

When the article existed it noted Army went for it 23 times on 4th and 1 and converted 21 of them. Both the success rate and the amplitude are INSAAAAANE. It happens because their entire offense is built around getting three yards with consistency.

Dangerman: Literally, it's center Peyton Reeder, because if he's engaged with you, someone else is about to take out your knees.

Yes, this is highly illegal. Yes, they're coached to do it all the time. Yes, a lot of injuries result from it, both the leave-the-field kind, and the stay-in-but-by-the-4th-quarter-you-won't-dare-to-anchor kind. No, they never have to face justice for it. Are *you* going to flag the troops?

Army had a great center last year who could move some, but what they do with Reeder, who's more Taco Charlton than any mobile center you can think of, does the job. He fires out of an insanely low stance, then his buddies, who line up as far back as a pass-setting tackle, arrive a second later with a head of steam. It's not quite the old flying wedge that got banned in the 1800s because people were dying from it, but it's the closest thing to it in modern football.

The other guy to worry about is Kelvin Hopkins because he's a bona-fide running back in an offense made to provide the cracks he needs to go into spin cycle. He's quick, low, doesn't fumble, makes the correct decision every time on reads (this is a big deal) and won't go down for a simple shoulder:

Can he pass? Haiiiil no.

HenneChart:

Kelvin Hopkins Good   Neutral   Bad   Ovr
Opponent DO CA SCR   PR MA   BA TA IN BR   DSR PFF
Rice - 2 -   1 -   - 2 1* -   40% ?

Eight passes! And I didn't even get to chart two of them (including the third completion) because they were left out of the video. His two "CA"s were lobs to guys with no defenders in a 15-yard radius. I was extremely generous with one of them:

If his receiver doesn't have to stop and spin around with that he probably gets in. Hopkins also has two guys in his face and a third about to nail him from behind. This team cannot, cannot, cannot pass block to save its life.

OVERVIEW:

Today Army is the one looking to change how the game is played to make up a huge talent differential. Their wishbone triple-option offense gets you three yards every play if you don't screw it up. They leave the kids on the bench until they won't screw it up, and stay on schedule by cheating their asses off….a lot…I have more links.

Rice played it by keeping everything inside. This led to me charting at least 10 fullback dives from triple-option calls, each with their own subtle variations of cuts, chops, tackles, and a fullback stumbling toward the next scheduled stop over a mass of prone bodies.

From on high it's going to look like they're running the same few plays: triple option, speed option, QB sweep with a fullback lead, and the occasional pitch sweep until they break out a reverse or the extremely rare non-passing down pass.

Down deep there will be a few tiny things going on that result in runs that your football brain thinks should have ended on a lineman's shoulder a few yards earlier. Watch this variation on their standard triple-option fullback dive where the A-back (guy off the line at the top of the formation) tries to cut block the guy getting read, sort of like a split zone.

The status of their injured fullback could make a huge difference. Connor Slomka was the partner in a two-fullback tandem that kept Army on schedule last year. The next guy up can burl forward nearly as well despite being 25 pounds lighter, but McCoy tends to make mistakes that end in TFLs.

In this offense, a TFL might as well be the end of a drive. Passing downs didn't come around often, but when they did, they either gave up and punted, or gave up instant pressure and Hopkins had to throw it where only patriotism could catch it.

So that's the key: get them to 3rd and long, and the threat is ended. The best way to do this is have a DT make a play. The 3-Tech on the hash here saw he was getting mid-lined, forced the keep, then leapt upfield in time to swallow the quarterback.

Later Army would run a similar thing where they cut this guy with a backside guard and pick up 7 yards. That's a good trade—Army's trying to get to the next 2nd and 6; any 2nd-and-12 means using up a trick or giving up on the drive. Get them off schedule.

Oklahoma game aside, note above that last year's Coach of the Year Jeff Monken has just two wins over a Power Five team in 13 tries since assuming command of West Point in 2014. Those were over [ED-fixed] a 2017 Duke team on a six-game losing streak and a mediocre 2016 Wake Forest. Also Oklahoma was 84th in S&P+ defense last year; Michigan's lowest projections are still top 25. I'm not worried about whether Don Brown will have the guys prepared, or that Michigan can ultimately stop these guys. I am extremely annoyed at how annoyed I'm going to be while they're doing so.

Comments

MGoCadet-Vicar…

September 5th, 2019 at 10:14 AM ^

Power 5 stat is wrong Seth. Off the top of my head we beat Wake Forest my senior year, 2016. Surprised you didn’t star Walker, he’s the biggest home run threat in the run game and pass game. For the record, this is the first time in my life I’m rooting against Michigan - going to be a strange sensation on Saturday. That being said, Go Army, Beat Michigan!

m_go_T

September 5th, 2019 at 10:47 AM ^

Part of me wonders whether Army didn't spend any time last week prepping for Rice.  The game was much closer than many people thought it would be.  Last season, the big game on the schedule was Oklahoma.  The week before they barely beat Hawaii, which was just an OK team last year.  My guess is they believe they can get away with spending the majority of their time prepping for Michigan and beat Rice without much prep.  I hope I am wrong. 

DoubleB

September 5th, 2019 at 11:57 AM ^

It's flexbone football man. It's hard to blow a team out with only 8 possessions. It's also hard to get blown out. It happens. Michigan can certainly do it. But looking at comparative scores is a complete waste of time. 

Can Michigan truly contain the option is the big question with 3 and outs / short Army drives? If so, they will be fine (barring a meltdown on offense with turnovers). If not, the game probably will look more like MTSU in terms of feel. Comfortably ahead at most times, but a real bad play a way from getting dicey. Three Army drives totalling 40+ plays leading to TDs--it's a ballgame.

Blues the ONE

September 5th, 2019 at 11:18 AM ^

Funny that you brought up George Patton and it made a personal connection to this game I had not thought about .  Patton was class of 1909 from West Point along with my great uncle.  My great uncle's brother, my grandfather, was a Michigan Grad. 

They are both long passed but I can imagine them watching the game from above and rooting for their respective schools!! 

SC Wolverine

September 5th, 2019 at 3:42 PM ^

Both my father and grandfather were West Pointers and I was raised cheering, "On Brave Old Army Team," on the way to the Army-Navy game in Philadelphia.  I also taught at USMA for three of the greatest years of my life.  But, for all that, I have nothing in my heart but a desire for the Wolverines to blow out the Black Knights and escape without injury.  Although I had an appointment to West Point, I had the good sense to attend Michigan on an ROTC scholarship.  One of the best decisions I ever made.  Go Blue.

Mongo

September 5th, 2019 at 10:33 AM ^

The back-side knee chips are dirty ... total unnecessary other than to try to take a guy out and not get called for it as the refs are occupied following the play-side bodies.  I guess sportsmanship integrity isn't something they teach in the service academies.  But you know, I don't want my cadets being taught how to "play nice" at anything ... so I guess we just have to deal with it.  Ugh

MotownGoBlue

September 5th, 2019 at 10:33 AM ^

Borderline? All those OGs do is dive at knees. It’s bullshit.

The first clip shows a clear view of the RG (#75) spearheading that poor Rice kid directly in the knees, only to be completely taken out at the knees 2 seconds later by the Army tailback (#3). That shit ought to be flagged every play until Army learns how to man up and block a man head on. 

IIRC, it was a similar cut block that took Jabrill Peppers out by an AFA WR/RB that derailed his frosh season.

Stop scheduling the academies. 

reshp1

September 5th, 2019 at 11:15 AM ^

It's not directly at the knees, upper thigh at best and mostly at the waist. I'm not arguing it's a shitty and dangerous thing to do, but "below the waist" is the letter of the rule and they're close enough to not get called.

Peppers was cut from his blindside downfield running after the ball, which is completely different than a chop block where someone is engaged and then another player goes below the waist.

MotownGoBlue

September 5th, 2019 at 1:06 PM ^

 First clip, #75 (OG) and #3 (TB) both hit that Rice SDE in the knees, with their helmets about 18” off the ground. The end managed to back out of the first cut block only to be upended, at the knees, by the running back. 

Slow it down, blow it up, pause it...both Army cadets hit that guy in the knees...they ducked and drove through, right at the knees to cut the defensive end down. There was no “waist high” about it. 

pescadero

September 5th, 2019 at 1:29 PM ^

" First clip, #75 (OG) and #3 (TB) both hit that Rice SDE in the knees, with their helmets about 18” off the ground. "

 

Yes.

...and perfectly legal.

 

Cut blocking is not against the rules.

 

Chop blocking is against the rules. Cut blocking more than 5 yards past the line of scrimmage is against the rules. Cut blocking by folks outside the tackle box that doesn't hit between 10 and 2 is against the rules.

 

#75 is inside the tackle box. He dives at the dudes knees within 5 yards, while the ball is still inside the box. Completely legal cut block.

 

#3 is not inside the tackle box. He dives at the dudes knees within 5 yards, while the ball is still inside the box, and makes initial contact from the front. Completely legal cut block.

reshp1

September 5th, 2019 at 1:54 PM ^

both Army cadets hit that guy in the knees

I don't think that's actually illegal. A chop block has to have the defender engaged with a offensive player while another goes after him below the waist. The idea is if you're engaged you're anchoring an enormous amount of force through your legs into the ground and a sideways impact to the knee could buckle it. 

Wolverine 73

September 5th, 2019 at 11:43 AM ^

Why did Oklahoma?  Why does any decent team?  If Army is using dubious blocking techniques that have a high tendency to injure players, teams should collectively just stop playing them.  It is more than a little disturbing when teams are coached this way.  I get shortening the game.  I get ball control.  I don’t get “borderline” illegal blocking.

Reggie Dunlop

September 5th, 2019 at 10:25 AM ^

Good overview. Curious about the chop block. Under the Dangerman: Peyton Reeder section, the embedded clip is followed by "Yes, this is highly illegal".

The Center is engaged with the defensive player, then the Guard comes up and hits the guy in the mid-section, above the waist. He spins and falls awkwardly, but you're saying that's a penalty? I thought second guy had to be below the waist for a chop block. Don't care really. Just curious.

Also, I feel dirty for saying this, but I wonder if this is why they crash-coursed Ben Mason so hard last week. Smaller DT who can shoot upfield and gum up the option works while also being the least valuable at the position moving forward? I'm sorry. I feel terrible for this thought.

reshp1

September 5th, 2019 at 10:29 AM ^

The problem is Mason wasn't really a gap shooting guy last week, he was a plugger despite his size and wasn't really getting much penetration. Getting his weight up so fast looks to have cost him some burst and athleticism. Maybe with the Army OL lining up a bit farther off the line he'll have a little better time trying to dodge them and shoot upfield, but I kinda doubt it.

Reggie Dunlop

September 5th, 2019 at 10:35 AM ^

I think I could find a few clips of him penetrating vs. MTSU, but whatever. My bigger point is I wonder if his move and sudden ascent up the depth chart (for a guy who really doesn't strike me as a viable DT in any way) didn't have at least a little bit to do with this game. And then during the off week they re-focus on Smith and Hinton and developing them for the long haul.

I usually neg people who throw out half-baked conspiracy theories like this, so I realize it's a reach.

Mongo

September 5th, 2019 at 10:46 AM ^

He is only one guy, so there is no way to protect the entire DL by Mason taking all the chop blocks.  But I think he starts the game and screams a lot ... we are going to see some skull shots.  Ben will be just as low and make them pay ... his job is to murderface that center.  I think he relishes the opportunity to play Army. 

After the game, the Army brass will offer him a grad transfer job on the spot.  Can you imagine Ben Mason in the FB role at Army ? 

Jota09

September 5th, 2019 at 10:53 AM ^

I thought the same thing last week when MTSU was cut blocking.  Our 2 biggest DT's are both injured.  Mobile d-lineman would seem more adept at taking a cut block and surviving.  Save Jeter and Dwumfour for Wisconsin and beyond.  And as your said, Mason isn't needed much going forward.  We are hoping that one of the freshman will enter the 2 deep, so Mason will be 3rd string at that point.  His knees aren't as valuable going forward.  It's a shitty thing to think, but also has logic behind it.  

1VaBlue1

September 6th, 2019 at 9:26 AM ^

Don't feel too dirty, I had this same thought independently while reading through this...  It feels bad to think of a valuable player - especially a fan favorite like Bench Mason - as a sacrificial lamb to protect others against cheap shot artists.  Funny thing about Mason, though, is that he would accept that mission with gung-ho abandon, and probably scare the shit out of every Army OL that cuts by screaming in the guys face about murderwolving!

gbdub

September 5th, 2019 at 10:30 AM ^

I think I’m missing something in the clip you show of Reeder - yes, the guy he engages with gets taken out from the side by a lineman with a head of steam, but the second hit is (barely) above the waist, and therefore legal... right? 

 

EDIT: your clip of Kelvin Hopkins is a better example I think - there the left guard dives for what would be a definitely illegal chop block on the guy the center is engaged with, except that he mostly whiffs. Basically it seems like their interior linemen do just kind of throw themselves recklessly at the sides of DTs, which isn’t inherently illegal but ought to be flagged more strictly because something in between the legal hit in the first clip and the whiff in the second would be a pretty dangerous shot to the knee. 

EDIT EDIT: also not seeing the obvious cheating in your clip hyperlinked from “cheating”... all I see there is a (poor) cut block attempt by the right guard on a linebacker (completely legal) and the center hitting the man engaged by the left guard above the waist and then sliding down his leg (also legal, it’s the initial contact point that matters). 

Seth

September 5th, 2019 at 10:58 AM ^

The brunt of his force goes into the thigh, and no part of it goes above the waist. When your leg is extended like that in a force struggle with another player it's liable to be snapped backwards. You have no leverage to take the hit. If you don't mind looking like an insane person at the office for a second, go push against a wall using your leg to anchor yourself and then imagine a hit to your thigh like #52 received.